Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology 6/2015

01.06.2015 | Scientific Article

Using cone-beam CT as a low-dose 3D imaging technique for the extremities: initial experience in 50 subjects

verfasst von: Ambrose J. Huang, Connie Y. Chang, Bijoy J. Thomas, Peter J. MacMahon, William E. Palmer

Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology | Ausgabe 6/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To prospectively evaluate a dedicated extremity cone-beam CT (CBCT) scanner in cases with and without orthopedic hardware by (1) comparing its imaging duration and image quality to those of radiography and multidetector CT (MDCT) and (2) comparing its radiation dose to that of MDCT.

Materials and methods

Written informed consent was obtained for all subjects for this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant study. Fifty subjects with (1) fracture of small bones, (2) suspected intraarticular fracture, (3) fracture at the site of complex anatomy, or (4) a surgical site difficult to assess with radiography alone were recruited and scanned on an extremity CBCT scanner prior to FDA approval. Same-day radiographs were performed in all subjects. Some subjects also underwent MDCT within 1 month of CBCT. Imaging duration and image quality were compared between CBCT and radiographs. Imaging duration, effective radiation dose, and image quality were compared between CBCT and MDCT.

Results

Fifty-one CBCT scans were performed in 50 subjects. Average imaging duration was shorter for CBCT than radiographs (4.5 min vs. 6.6 min, P = 0.001, n = 51) and MDCT (7.6 min vs. 10.9 min, P = 0.01, n = 7). Average estimated effective radiation dose was less for CBCT than MDCT (0.04 mSv vs. 0.13 mSv, P = 0.02, n = 7). CBCT images yielded more diagnostic information than radiographs in 23/51 cases and more diagnostic information than MDCT in 1/7 cases, although radiographs were superior for detecting hardware complications.

Conclusion

CBCT performs high-resolution imaging of the extremities using less imaging time than radiographs and MDCT and lower radiation dose than MDCT.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:1558–64.CrossRefPubMed Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:1558–64.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat De Cock J, Mermuys K, Goubau J, Van Petegem S, Houthoofd B, Casselman JW. Cone-beam computed tomography: a new low dose, high resolution imaging technique of the wrist, presentation of three cases with technique. Skeletal Radiol. 2012;41:93–6.CrossRefPubMed De Cock J, Mermuys K, Goubau J, Van Petegem S, Houthoofd B, Casselman JW. Cone-beam computed tomography: a new low dose, high resolution imaging technique of the wrist, presentation of three cases with technique. Skeletal Radiol. 2012;41:93–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kapila S, Conley RS, Harrell Jr WE. The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40:24–34.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Kapila S, Conley RS, Harrell Jr WE. The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40:24–34.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Jung Y-H, Cho B-H. Assessment of the relationship between the maxillary molars and adjacent structures using cone beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2012;42:219–24.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Jung Y-H, Cho B-H. Assessment of the relationship between the maxillary molars and adjacent structures using cone beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2012;42:219–24.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 2: clinical applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1285–92.CrossRefPubMed Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 2: clinical applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1285–92.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GRJ. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38:609–25.CrossRefPubMed De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GRJ. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38:609–25.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, Schutyser F, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Investig. 2006;10:1–7.CrossRefPubMed Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, Schutyser F, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Investig. 2006;10:1–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Okano T, Harata Y, Sugihara Y, Sakaino R, Tsuchida R, Iwai K, et al. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning. Dento-Maxillo-Facial Radiol. 2009;38:79–85.CrossRef Okano T, Harata Y, Sugihara Y, Sakaino R, Tsuchida R, Iwai K, et al. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning. Dento-Maxillo-Facial Radiol. 2009;38:79–85.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gracco A, Incerti Parenti S, Ioele C, Alessandri Bonetti G, Stellini E. Prevalence of incidental maxillary sinus findings in Italian orthodontic patients: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study. Korean J Orthod. 2012;42:329–34.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Gracco A, Incerti Parenti S, Ioele C, Alessandri Bonetti G, Stellini E. Prevalence of incidental maxillary sinus findings in Italian orthodontic patients: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study. Korean J Orthod. 2012;42:329–34.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruivo J, Mermuys K, Bacher K, Kuhweide R, Offeciers E, Casselman JW. Cone beam computed tomography, a low-dose imaging technique in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2009;30:299–303.CrossRefPubMed Ruivo J, Mermuys K, Bacher K, Kuhweide R, Offeciers E, Casselman JW. Cone beam computed tomography, a low-dose imaging technique in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2009;30:299–303.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Faccioli N, Barillari M, Guariglia S, Zivelonghi E, Rizzotti A, Cerini R, et al. Radiation dose saving through the use of cone-beam CT in hearing-impaired patients. Radiol Med. 2009;114:1308–18.CrossRefPubMed Faccioli N, Barillari M, Guariglia S, Zivelonghi E, Rizzotti A, Cerini R, et al. Radiation dose saving through the use of cone-beam CT in hearing-impaired patients. Radiol Med. 2009;114:1308–18.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Vu T, Bayome M, Kook Y-A, Han SH. Evaluation of the palatal soft tissue thickness by cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod. 2012;42:291–6.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Vu T, Bayome M, Kook Y-A, Han SH. Evaluation of the palatal soft tissue thickness by cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod. 2012;42:291–6.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat de Souza KRS, Oltramari-Navarro PVP, de Lima Navarro R, de Castro Ferreira Conti AC, de Almeida MR. Reliability of a method to conduct upper airway analysis in cone-beam computed tomography. Braz Oral Res. 2013;27:48–54.CrossRefPubMed de Souza KRS, Oltramari-Navarro PVP, de Lima Navarro R, de Castro Ferreira Conti AC, de Almeida MR. Reliability of a method to conduct upper airway analysis in cone-beam computed tomography. Braz Oral Res. 2013;27:48–54.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Faccioli N, Foti G, Barillari M, Atzei A, Mucelli RP. Finger fractures imaging: accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol. 2010;39:1087–95.CrossRefPubMed Faccioli N, Foti G, Barillari M, Atzei A, Mucelli RP. Finger fractures imaging: accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol. 2010;39:1087–95.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Koskinen SK, Haapamäki VV, Salo J, Lindfors NC, Kortesniemi M, Seppälä L, et al. CT arthrography of the wrist using a novel, mobile, dedicated extremity cone-beam CT (CBCT). Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42:649–57.CrossRefPubMed Koskinen SK, Haapamäki VV, Salo J, Lindfors NC, Kortesniemi M, Seppälä L, et al. CT arthrography of the wrist using a novel, mobile, dedicated extremity cone-beam CT (CBCT). Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42:649–57.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kröpil P, Hakimi AR, Jungbluth P, Riegger C, Rubbert C, Miese F, et al. Cone beam CT in assessment of tibial bone defect healing: an animal study. Acad Radiol. 2012;19:320–5.CrossRefPubMed Kröpil P, Hakimi AR, Jungbluth P, Riegger C, Rubbert C, Miese F, et al. Cone beam CT in assessment of tibial bone defect healing: an animal study. Acad Radiol. 2012;19:320–5.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tuominen EKJ, Kankare J, Koskinen SK, Mattila KT. Weight-bearing CT imaging of the lower extremity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:146–8.CrossRefPubMed Tuominen EKJ, Kankare J, Koskinen SK, Mattila KT. Weight-bearing CT imaging of the lower extremity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:146–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirschmann A, Pfirrmann CWA, Klammer G, Espinosa N, Buck FM. Upright Cone CT of the hindfoot: Comparison of the non-weight-bearing with the upright weight-bearing position. Eur Radiol. 2013. Hirschmann A, Pfirrmann CWA, Klammer G, Espinosa N, Buck FM. Upright Cone CT of the hindfoot: Comparison of the non-weight-bearing with the upright weight-bearing position. Eur Radiol. 2013.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Carrino JA, Al Muhit A, Zbijewski W, Thawait GK, Stayman JW, Packard N, et al. Dedicated cone-beam CT system for extremity imaging. Radiology. 2014;270:816–24.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Carrino JA, Al Muhit A, Zbijewski W, Thawait GK, Stayman JW, Packard N, et al. Dedicated cone-beam CT system for extremity imaging. Radiology. 2014;270:816–24.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Joemai RMS, Zweers D, Obermann WR, Geleijns J. Assessment of patient and occupational dose in established and new applications of MDCT fluoroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:881–6.CrossRefPubMed Joemai RMS, Zweers D, Obermann WR, Geleijns J. Assessment of patient and occupational dose in established and new applications of MDCT fluoroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:881–6.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Finkenstaedt T, Morsbach F, Calcagni M, Vich M, Pfirrmann CWA, Alkadhi H, et al. Metallic artifacts from internal scaphoid fracture fixation screws: comparison between C-arm flat-panel, cone-beam, and multidetector computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2014;49:532–9.CrossRefPubMed Finkenstaedt T, Morsbach F, Calcagni M, Vich M, Pfirrmann CWA, Alkadhi H, et al. Metallic artifacts from internal scaphoid fracture fixation screws: comparison between C-arm flat-panel, cone-beam, and multidetector computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2014;49:532–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Blokhuis TJ, de Bruine JH, Bramer JA, den Boer FC, Bakker FC, Patka P, et al. The reliability of plain radiography in experimental fracture healing. Skeletal Radiol. 2001;30:151–6.CrossRefPubMed Blokhuis TJ, de Bruine JH, Bramer JA, den Boer FC, Bakker FC, Patka P, et al. The reliability of plain radiography in experimental fracture healing. Skeletal Radiol. 2001;30:151–6.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Panjabi MM, Lindsey RW, Walter SD, White AA. The clinician’s ability to evaluate the strength of healing fractures from plain radiographs. J Orthop Trauma. 1989;3:29–32.CrossRefPubMed Panjabi MM, Lindsey RW, Walter SD, White AA. The clinician’s ability to evaluate the strength of healing fractures from plain radiographs. J Orthop Trauma. 1989;3:29–32.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnarkowski P, Rédei J, Peterfy CG, Weidenmaier W, Mutschler W, Arand M, et al. Tibial shaft fractures: assessment of fracture healing with computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1995;19:777–81.CrossRefPubMed Schnarkowski P, Rédei J, Peterfy CG, Weidenmaier W, Mutschler W, Arand M, et al. Tibial shaft fractures: assessment of fracture healing with computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1995;19:777–81.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Holberg C, Steinhäuser S, Geis P, Rudzki-Janson I. Cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics: benefits and limitations. J Orofac Orthop. 2005;66:434–44.CrossRefPubMed Holberg C, Steinhäuser S, Geis P, Rudzki-Janson I. Cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics: benefits and limitations. J Orofac Orthop. 2005;66:434–44.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Huda W, Gkanatsios N. Radiation dosimetry for extremity radiographs. Health Phys. 1998;75:492–9.CrossRefPubMed Huda W, Gkanatsios N. Radiation dosimetry for extremity radiographs. Health Phys. 1998;75:492–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Koivisto J, Kiljunen T, Wolff J, Kortesniemi M. Assessment of effective radiation dose of an extremity CBCT, MSCT and conventional X ray for knee area using MOSFET dosemeters. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013;157:515–24.CrossRefPubMed Koivisto J, Kiljunen T, Wolff J, Kortesniemi M. Assessment of effective radiation dose of an extremity CBCT, MSCT and conventional X ray for knee area using MOSFET dosemeters. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013;157:515–24.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Vol. 1: Sources, vol. 1. New York: United Nations Publishing; 2000. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Vol. 1: Sources, vol. 1. New York: United Nations Publishing; 2000.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Coppenrath E, Draenert F, Lechel U, Veit R, Meindl T, Reiser M. et al [Cross-sectional imaging in dentomaxillofacial diagnostics: dose comparison of dental MSCT and NewTom 9000 DVT]. Röfo. 2008;180:396–401.PubMed Coppenrath E, Draenert F, Lechel U, Veit R, Meindl T, Reiser M. et al [Cross-sectional imaging in dentomaxillofacial diagnostics: dose comparison of dental MSCT and NewTom 9000 DVT]. Röfo. 2008;180:396–401.PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts JA, Drage NA, Davies J, Thomas DW. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol. 2009;82:35–40.CrossRefPubMed Roberts JA, Drage NA, Davies J, Thomas DW. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol. 2009;82:35–40.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Koong B. Cone beam imaging: is this the ultimate imaging modality? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:1201–8.CrossRefPubMed Koong B. Cone beam imaging: is this the ultimate imaging modality? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:1201–8.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, Karayianni K, Kamenopoulou V, Hourdakis CJ. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT. Eur J Radiol. 2005;56:413–7.CrossRefPubMed Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, Karayianni K, Kamenopoulou V, Hourdakis CJ. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT. Eur J Radiol. 2005;56:413–7.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Li T, Li X, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Heron DE, Huq MS. Simultaneous reduction of radiation dose and scatter for CBCT by using collimators. Med Phys. 2013;40:121913.CrossRefPubMed Li T, Li X, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Heron DE, Huq MS. Simultaneous reduction of radiation dose and scatter for CBCT by using collimators. Med Phys. 2013;40:121913.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Boas FE, Fleischmann D. CT artifacts: causes and reduction techniques. Imag Med. 2012;4:229–40.CrossRef Boas FE, Fleischmann D. CT artifacts: causes and reduction techniques. Imag Med. 2012;4:229–40.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Alsufyani NA, Noga ML, Finlay WH, Major PW. Topical contrast agents to improve soft-tissue contrast in the upper airway using cone beam CT: a pilot study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42:20130022.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Alsufyani NA, Noga ML, Finlay WH, Major PW. Topical contrast agents to improve soft-tissue contrast in the upper airway using cone beam CT: a pilot study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42:20130022.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Endo M, Tsunoo T, Nakamori N, Yoshida K. Effect of scattered radiation on image noise in cone beam CT. Med Phys. 2001;28:469.CrossRefPubMed Endo M, Tsunoo T, Nakamori N, Yoshida K. Effect of scattered radiation on image noise in cone beam CT. Med Phys. 2001;28:469.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40:265–73.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40:265–73.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Meilinger M, Schmidgunst C, Schütz O, Lang EW. Metal artifact reduction in cone beam computed tomography using forward projected reconstruction information. Z Med Phys. 2011;21:174–82.CrossRefPubMed Meilinger M, Schmidgunst C, Schütz O, Lang EW. Metal artifact reduction in cone beam computed tomography using forward projected reconstruction information. Z Med Phys. 2011;21:174–82.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Q, Li L, Zhang L, Chen Z, Kang K. A novel metal artifact reducing method for cone-beam CT based on three approximately orthogonal projections. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58:1–17.CrossRefPubMed Wang Q, Li L, Zhang L, Chen Z, Kang K. A novel metal artifact reducing method for cone-beam CT based on three approximately orthogonal projections. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58:1–17.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Li X, Li T, Yang Y, Heron DE, Huq MS. A novel image-domain-based cone-beam computed tomography enhancement algorithm. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:2755–66.CrossRefPubMed Li X, Li T, Yang Y, Heron DE, Huq MS. A novel image-domain-based cone-beam computed tomography enhancement algorithm. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:2755–66.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Stuehmer C, Essig H, Bormann K-H, Majdani O, Gellrich N-C, Rücker M. Cone beam CT imaging of airgun injuries to the craniomaxillofacial region. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37:903–6.CrossRefPubMed Stuehmer C, Essig H, Bormann K-H, Majdani O, Gellrich N-C, Rücker M. Cone beam CT imaging of airgun injuries to the craniomaxillofacial region. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37:903–6.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Luckow M, Deyhle H, Beckmann F, Dagassan-Berndt D, Müller B. Tilting the jaw to improve the image quality or to reduce the dose in cone-beam computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80:e389–93.CrossRefPubMed Luckow M, Deyhle H, Beckmann F, Dagassan-Berndt D, Müller B. Tilting the jaw to improve the image quality or to reduce the dose in cone-beam computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80:e389–93.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Kataoka ML, Hochman MG, Rodriguez EK, Lin P-JP, Kubo S, Raptopolous VD. A review of factors that affect artifact from metallic hardware on multi-row detector computed tomography. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2010;39:125–36.CrossRefPubMed Kataoka ML, Hochman MG, Rodriguez EK, Lin P-JP, Kubo S, Raptopolous VD. A review of factors that affect artifact from metallic hardware on multi-row detector computed tomography. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2010;39:125–36.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta R, Cheung AC, Bartling SH, Lisauskas J, Grasruck M, Leidecker C, et al. Flat-panel volume CT: fundamental principles, technology, and applications. Radiographics. 2008;28:2009–22.CrossRefPubMed Gupta R, Cheung AC, Bartling SH, Lisauskas J, Grasruck M, Leidecker C, et al. Flat-panel volume CT: fundamental principles, technology, and applications. Radiographics. 2008;28:2009–22.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Dixon RL, Boone JM. Stationary table CT dosimetry and anomalous scanner-reported values of CTDIvol. Med Phys. 2014;41:011907.CrossRefPubMed Dixon RL, Boone JM. Stationary table CT dosimetry and anomalous scanner-reported values of CTDIvol. Med Phys. 2014;41:011907.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Report of AAPM Task Group 111: The Future of CT Dosimetry. Comprehensive Methodology for the Evaluation of Radiation Dose in X-Ray Computed Tomography. AAPM; 2010. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Report of AAPM Task Group 111: The Future of CT Dosimetry. Comprehensive Methodology for the Evaluation of Radiation Dose in X-Ray Computed Tomography. AAPM; 2010.
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Zbijewski W, De Jean P, Prakash P, Ding Y, Stayman JW, Packard N, et al. A dedicated cone-beam CT system for musculoskeletal extremities imaging: design, optimization, and initial performance characterization. Med Phys. 2011;38:4700–13.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Zbijewski W, De Jean P, Prakash P, Ding Y, Stayman JW, Packard N, et al. A dedicated cone-beam CT system for musculoskeletal extremities imaging: design, optimization, and initial performance characterization. Med Phys. 2011;38:4700–13.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, Adam G. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33:83–6.CrossRefPubMed Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, Adam G. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33:83–6.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Braak SJ, van Strijen MJL, van Es HW, Nievelstein RAJ, van Heesewijk JPM. Effective dose during needle interventions: cone-beam CT guidance compared with conventional CT guidance. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22:455–61.CrossRefPubMed Braak SJ, van Strijen MJL, van Es HW, Nievelstein RAJ, van Heesewijk JPM. Effective dose during needle interventions: cone-beam CT guidance compared with conventional CT guidance. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22:455–61.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Using cone-beam CT as a low-dose 3D imaging technique for the extremities: initial experience in 50 subjects
verfasst von
Ambrose J. Huang
Connie Y. Chang
Bijoy J. Thomas
Peter J. MacMahon
William E. Palmer
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Skeletal Radiology / Ausgabe 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2105-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2015

Skeletal Radiology 6/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Browser's Notes

Browser's Notes

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.