Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Das Thema chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen wird im Live-Webinar am 7. Mai von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr aus internistischer, gynäkologischer und psychologisch-neurowissenschaftlicher Perspektive beleuchtet. Besprochen werden krankheitsbedingte Ursachen, Mechanismen der kognitiven Schmerzmodulation sowie mögliche Therapieoptionen. Die Fortbildung ist mit 2 CME-Punkten zertifiziert. Melden Sie sich jetzt an!
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Abdominal Radiology
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 3/2005

01.06.2005 | Invited Review

Malignant biliary obstruction: value of imaging findings

verfasst von: C. Stroszczynski, M. Hunerbein

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2005

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This review focuses on the clinical impact of different modalities to image primary and secondary malignant biliary obstruction. The detection and staging of cancers of the pancreatic and biliary tract are best accomplished with endoscopic ultrasound, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Three-dimensional ultrasound is a new noninvasive method that may be used increasingly as an initial test to select patients who require further diagnostic evaluation by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. All-in-one computed tomography including three-dimensional reconstructions of the biliary tree may be competitive against all-in-one magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and staging of pancreatic tumors. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is excellent for identifying the presence and the level of biliary obstruction. With newer diagnostic imaging technologies emerging, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is evolving into a predominantly therapeutic procedure.
Literatur
1.
Cooperberg, PL, Burhenne, HJ 1980Real-time ultrasonography diagnostic technique of choice in gall-bladder diseaseN Engl J Med.30212771279PubMed
2.
Blackbourne, L, Earnhardt, RC, Sistrom, CL,  et al. 1994The sensitivity and role of ultrasound in the evaluation of biliary obstructionAm Surg.60685690
3.
Rickes, S, Unkrodt, K, Neye, H,  et al. 2002Differentiation of pancreatic tumors by conventional ultrasound. unenhanced and echo-enhanced power Doppler sonographyScand J Gastroenterol3713131320CrossRefPubMed
4.
Kaneko, T, Kimata, H, Sugimoto, H,  et al. 2002Power Doppler ultrasonography for the assessment of vascular invasion by pancreatic cancerPancreatology26168CrossRefPubMed
5.
Songur, Y, Temucin, G, Sahin, B 2001Endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of dilated common bile ductJ Clin Gastroenterol33302305CrossRefPubMed
6.
Linghu, EO, Cheng, LF, Wang, XD,  et al. 2004Intraductal ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct stones: a comparative studyHepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int.3129132PubMed
7.
Catanzaro, A, Pfau, P, Isenberg, GA,  et al. 2003Clinical utility of intraductal US for evaluation of choledocholithiasisGastrointest Endosc.57648652CrossRefPubMed
8.
Tamada, K, Yasuda, Y, Nagai, H,  et al. 2000Limitations of three-dimensional intraductal ultrasonography in the assessment of longitudinal spread of extrahepatic bile duct carcinomaJ Gastroenterol35919923CrossRefPubMed
9.
Hunerbein, M, Stroszczynski, C, Felix, R,  et al. 2002Three-dimensional ultrasound cholangiography: a new noninvasive technique for evaluation of biliary obstructionAm J Gastroenterol97500501CrossRefPubMed
10.
Hunerbein, M, Stroszczynski, C, Ulmer, C,  et al. 2003Prospective comparison of transcutaneous 3-dimensional US cholangiography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and direct cholangiography in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstructionGastrointest Endosc.58853858CrossRefPubMed
11.
Yeh, BM, Breiman, RS, Taouli, B,  et al. 2004Biliary tract depiction in living potential liver donors: comparison of conventional MR, mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced excretory MR, and multi-detector row CT cholangiography-initial experienceRadiology230645651PubMed
12.
Maniatis, P, Triantopoulou, C, Sofianou, E,  et al. 2003Virtual CT cholangiography in patients with choledocholithiasisAbdom Imaging28536544CrossRefPubMed
13.
Caoili, EM, Paulson, EK, Heyneman, LE,  et al. 2000Helical CT cholangiography with three-dimensional volume rendering using an oral biliary contrast agent: feasibility of a novel techniqueAJR174487492PubMed
14.
Takamatsu, S, Goseki, N, Nakajima, K,  et al. 2004Distributing pattern of the bile duct of the caudate lobe on computed tomography with drip infusion cholangiography and its surgical significanceHepatogastroenterology512932PubMed
15.
Schroeder, T, Nadalin, S, Stattaus, J,  et al. 2002Potential living liver donors: evaluation with an all-in-one protocol with multi-detector row CTRadiology224586591PubMed
16.
Koito, K, Namieno, T, Hirokawa, N,  et al. 2001Virtual CT cholangioscopy: comparison with fiberoptic cholangioscopyEndoscopy33676681CrossRefPubMed
17.
Park, SJ, Han, JK, Kim, TK,  et al. 2001Three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography with minimum intensity projection in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: comparison with percutaneous transhepatic cholangiographyAbdom Imaging26281286CrossRefPubMed
18.
David, V, Reinhold, C, Hochman, M,  et al. 1998Pitfalls in the interpretation of MR cholangiopancreatographyAJR17010551059PubMed
19.
Romagnuolo, J, Bardou, M, Rahme, E,  et al. 2003Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary diseaseAnn Intern Med139547557PubMed
20.
Irie, H, Honda, H, Kuroiwa, T,  et al. 2001Pitfalls in MR cholangiopancreatographic interpretationRadiographics212337PubMed
21.
Yamashita, Y, Abe, Y, Tang, Y,  et al. 1997In vitro and clinical studies of image acquisition in breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography: single-shot projection technique versus multislice techniqueAJR16814491454PubMed
22.
Lopera, JE, Soto, JA, Munera, F 2001Malignant hilar and perihilar biliary obstruction: use of MR cholangiography to define the extent of biliary ductal involvement and plan percutaneous interventionsRadiology2209096PubMed
23.
Boraschi, P, Braccini, G, Gigoni, R,  et al. 1999MR cholangiopancreatography: value of axial and coronal fast spin-Echo fat-suppressed T2-weighted sequencesEur J Radiol.32171181CrossRefPubMed
24.
Kondo, H, Kanematsu, M, Shiratori, Y,  et al. 1999Potential pitfalls of MR cholangiopancreatography: right hepatic arterial impression of the common hepatic ductJ Comput Assist Tomogr236062CrossRefPubMed
25.
Papanikolaou, N, Prassopoulos, P, Eracleous, E,  et al. 2001 Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography versus heavily T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiographyInvest Radiol.36682686CrossRefPubMed
26.
Yoshikawa, K, Inoue, Y, Akahane, M,  et al. 2003Phantom and animal studies of a new hepatobiliary agent for MR imaging: comparison of Gd-DTPA-DeA with Gd-EOB-DTPAJ Magn Reson Imaging18204209CrossRefPubMed
27.
Schima, W, Fugger, R, Schober, E,  et al. 2002Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer: comparison of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR imaging and contrast-enhanced helical hydro-CTAJR179717724PubMed
28.
Farrell, RJ, Noonan, N, Mahmud, N,  et al. 2001Potential impact of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography workload and complication rate in patients referred because of abdominal painEndoscopy33688675CrossRef
29.
NIH 2002state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreato-graphy (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapyNIH Consens State Sci Statement19126
30.
Lee, MG, Lee, HJ, Kim, MH,  et al. 1997Extrahepatic biliary diseases: 3D MR cholangiopancreatography compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyRadiology202663669PubMed
31.
Semelka, RC, Shoenut, JP, Kroeker, MA,  et al. 1992Bile duct disease: prospective comparison of ERCP, CT, and fat suppression MRIGastrointest Radiol.17347352PubMed
32.
Geier, A, Nguyen, HN, Gartung, C,  et al. 2000MRCP and ERCP to detect small ampullary carcinomaLancet35616071608CrossRefPubMed
33.
Irie, H, Honda, H, Shinozaki, K,  et al. 2002MR imaging of ampullary carcinomasJ Comput Assist Tomogr26711717CrossRefPubMed
34.
35.
Adamek, HE, Albert, J, Breer, H,  et al. 2000Pancreatic cancer detection with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective controlled studyLancet356190193CrossRefPubMed
36.
Lim, JH, Kim, MH, Kim, TK,  et al. 2003Papiliary neoplasms of the bile duct that mimic biliary stone diseaseRadiographics23447455PubMed
37.
Huang, JF, Wang, LY, Lin, ZY,  et al. 2002Incidence and clinical outcome of icteric type hepatocellular carcinomaJ Gastroenterol Hepatol17190195CrossRefPubMed
38.
Fletcher, JG, Wiersema, MJ, Farrell, MA,  et al. 2003Pancreatic malignancy: value of arterial, pancreatic, and hepatic phase imaging with multi-detector row CTRadiology2298190PubMed
39.
Schwartz, LH, Black, J, Fong, Y,  et al. 2002Gallbladder carcinoma: findings at MR imaging with MR cholangiopancreatographyJ Comput Assist Tomogr26405410CrossRefPubMed
40.
Yeh, TS, Jan, YY, Tseng, JH,  et al. 2000Malignant perihilar biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance Cholangiopancreatographic findingsAm J Gastroenterol95432440CrossRefPubMed
41.
Catalano, C, Pavone, P, Laghi, A,  et al. 1998Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: combination of MR imaging, MR angiography and MR cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis and assessment of resectabilityEur Radiol.8428434CrossRefPubMed
42.
Gehl, HB, Urhahn, R, Bohndorf, K,  et al. 1993Mn-DPDP in MR imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: initial clinical experienceRadiology186795798PubMed
43.
Lopez Hanninen, E, Amthauer, H, Hosten, N,  et al. 2002Prospective evaluation of pancreatic tumors: accuracy of MR imaging with MR cholangiopancreatography and MR angiographyRadiology2243441PubMed
44.
Stroszczynski, C, Gaffke, G, Gretschel, S,  et al. 2003[Use of SPIO-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted images for the differentiation of liver lesions: an ROC analysis]Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr17513681375CrossRefPubMed
45.
Reimer, P, Jahnke, N, Fiebich, M,  et al. 2000Hepatic lesion detection and characterization: value of nonenhanced MR imaging, superparamagnetic iron oxide–enhanced MR imaging, and spiral CT-ROC analysisRadiology217152158PubMed
46.
Takahama, K, Amano, Y, Hayashi, H,  et al. 2003Detection and characterization of focal liver lesions using superparamagnetic iron oxide–enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between ferumoxides-enhanced T1-weighted imaging and delayed-phase gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imagingAbdom Imaging28525530CrossRefPubMed
47.
Yoshimitsu, K, Honda, H, Jimi, M,  et al. 1999MR diagnosis of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder and differentiation from gallbladder carcinoma: importance of showing Rokitansky-Aschoff sinusesAJR17215351540PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Malignant biliary obstruction: value of imaging findings
verfasst von
C. Stroszczynski
M. Hunerbein
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2005
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2005
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0251-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2005

Abdominal Radiology 3/2005 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Hepatosplenic brucelloma: clinical presentation and imaging features in six cases

OriginalPaper

MR peritoneography in complications of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

OriginalPaper

Primary hepatic carcinoid tumor: dynamic CT findings

OriginalPaper

Comparison of contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasound (Levovist) and computed tomography in alveolar echinococcosis

OriginalPaper

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: endovascular treatment

OriginalPaper

Successful treatment of a ruptured infected aneurysm of the lumbar artery with transcatheter embolization

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärzte und Psychotherapeuten.

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise