Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 1/2008

01.01.2008

The relative roles of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasound in diagnosis of common bile duct calculi: a critically appraised topic

verfasst von: Colm J. McMahon

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

The relative roles of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the investigation of common bile duct (CD) calculi were evaluated using “evidence-based practice” (EBP) methods.

Methods

A focused clinical question was constructed. A structured search of primary and secondary evidence was performed. Retrieved studies were appraised for validity, strength and level of evidence (Oxford/CEBM scale: 1–5). Retrieved literature was divided into group A; MRCP slice thickness ≥5 mm, group B; MRCP slice thickness = 3 mm or 3D-MRCP sequences.

Results

Six studies were eligible for inclusion (3 = level 1b, 3 = level 3b). Group A: sensitivity and specificity of MRCP and EUS were (40%, 96%) and (80%, 95%), respectively. Group B: sensitivity and specificity of MRCP and EUS were (87%, 95%) and (90%, 99%), respectively.

Conclusion

MRCP should be the first-line investigation for CD calculi and EUS should be performed when MRCP is negative in patients with moderate or high pre-test probability.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Staunton M (2007) Evidence-based radiology: steps 1 and 2-asking answerable questions and searching for evidence. Radiology 242:23–31PubMed Staunton M (2007) Evidence-based radiology: steps 1 and 2-asking answerable questions and searching for evidence. Radiology 242:23–31PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Haynes RB (2001) Of studies, summaries, synopses, and systems: the “4S” evolution of services for finding current best evidence. Evid Based Ment Health 4:37–39PubMedCrossRef Haynes RB (2001) Of studies, summaries, synopses, and systems: the “4S” evolution of services for finding current best evidence. Evid Based Ment Health 4:37–39PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Dodd JD, MacEneaney PM, Malone DE (2004) Evidence-based radiology: how to quickly assess the validity and strength of publications in the diagnostic radiology literature. Eur Radiol 14:915–922PubMedCrossRef Dodd JD, MacEneaney PM, Malone DE (2004) Evidence-based radiology: how to quickly assess the validity and strength of publications in the diagnostic radiology literature. Eur Radiol 14:915–922PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheiman JM, Carlos RC, Barnett JL, Elta GH, Nostrant TT, Chey WD, Francis IR, Nandi PS (2001) Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 96:2900–2904PubMedCrossRef Scheiman JM, Carlos RC, Barnett JL, Elta GH, Nostrant TT, Chey WD, Francis IR, Nandi PS (2001) Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 96:2900–2904PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat de Ledinghen V, Lecesne R, Raymond JM, Gense V, Amouretti M, Drouillard J, Couzigou P, Silvain C (1999) Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? A prospective controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 49:26–31PubMedCrossRef de Ledinghen V, Lecesne R, Raymond JM, Gense V, Amouretti M, Drouillard J, Couzigou P, Silvain C (1999) Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? A prospective controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 49:26–31PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ainsworth AP, Rafaelsen SR, Wamberg PA, Durup J, Pless TK, Mortensen MB (2003) Is there a difference in diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact between endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography? Endoscopy 35:1029–1032PubMedCrossRef Ainsworth AP, Rafaelsen SR, Wamberg PA, Durup J, Pless TK, Mortensen MB (2003) Is there a difference in diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact between endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography? Endoscopy 35:1029–1032PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Materne R, Van Beers BE, Gigot JF, Jamart J, Geubel A, Pringot J, Deprez P (2000) Extrahepatic biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance imaging compared with endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 32:3–9PubMedCrossRef Materne R, Van Beers BE, Gigot JF, Jamart J, Geubel A, Pringot J, Deprez P (2000) Extrahepatic biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance imaging compared with endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 32:3–9PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Aube C, Delorme B, Yzet T, Burtin P, Lebigot J, Pessaux P, Gondry-Jouet C, Boyer J, Caron C (2005) MR cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: a prospective, comparative study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:55–62PubMed Aube C, Delorme B, Yzet T, Burtin P, Lebigot J, Pessaux P, Gondry-Jouet C, Boyer J, Caron C (2005) MR cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: a prospective, comparative study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:55–62PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kondo S, Isayama H, Akahane M, Toda N, Sasahira N, Nakai Y, Yamamoto N, Hirano K, Komatsu Y, Tada M, Yoshida H, Kawabe T, Ohtomo K, Omata M (2005) Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography. Eur J Radiol 54:271–275PubMedCrossRef Kondo S, Isayama H, Akahane M, Toda N, Sasahira N, Nakai Y, Yamamoto N, Hirano K, Komatsu Y, Tada M, Yoshida H, Kawabe T, Ohtomo K, Omata M (2005) Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography. Eur J Radiol 54:271–275PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt S, Chevallier P, Novellas S, Gelsi E, Vanbiervliet G, Tran A, Schnyder P, Bruneton JN (2007) Choledocholithiasis: repetitive thick-slab single-shot projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography versus endoscopic ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 17:241–250PubMedCrossRef Schmidt S, Chevallier P, Novellas S, Gelsi E, Vanbiervliet G, Tran A, Schnyder P, Bruneton JN (2007) Choledocholithiasis: repetitive thick-slab single-shot projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography versus endoscopic ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 17:241–250PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Dodd JD (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: steps 3 and 4-appraise and apply diagnostic radiology literature. Radiology 242:342–354PubMed Dodd JD (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: steps 3 and 4-appraise and apply diagnostic radiology literature. Radiology 242:342–354PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat MacEneaney PM, Malone DE (2000) The meaning of diagnostic test results: a spreadsheet for swift data analysis. Clin Radiol 55:227–235PubMedCrossRef MacEneaney PM, Malone DE (2000) The meaning of diagnostic test results: a spreadsheet for swift data analysis. Clin Radiol 55:227–235PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Verma D, Kapadia A, Eisen GM, Adler DG. (2006) EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 64:248–254PubMedCrossRef Verma D, Kapadia A, Eisen GM, Adler DG. (2006) EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 64:248–254PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The relative roles of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasound in diagnosis of common bile duct calculi: a critically appraised topic
verfasst von
Colm J. McMahon
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2008
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9304-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2008

Abdominal Radiology 1/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.