Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 4/2015

01.04.2015

Magnetic resonance elastography and acoustic radiation force impulse for staging hepatic fibrosis: a meta-analysis

verfasst von: Yang Guo, Sudharshan Parthasarathy, Preeya Goyal, Robert J. McCarthy, Andrew C. Larson, Frank H. Miller

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Elastography is a non-invasive method to quantify fibrosis based on tissue mechanical properties. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of two such techniques: Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging (ARFI) or Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE) for staging hepatic fibrosis.

Materials and Methods

Literature databases were searched until June 2013. Inclusion criteria were evaluation of MRE or ARFI, liver biopsy, and reported sensitivity and specificity. A random effects model was used to combine sensitivity and specificity, from which positive (LR+) and negative (LR−) likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratios, and area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) were derived. Differences between MRE and ARFI were compared with t tests (P < 0.05 considered significant).

Results

Eleven MRE studies including 982 patients and fifteen ARFI studies including 2,128 patients were selected. AUROC for MRE staging fibrosis were 0.94, 0.97, 0.96, and 0.97 for F1–F4, respectively, whereas AUROC for ARFI staging were 0.82, 0.85, 0.94, and 0.94 for F1–F4, respectively. Significance was found in AUROC between MRE and ARFI for the diagnosis of stage 1 and 2 fibrosis.

Conclusion

MRE is more accurate than ARFI with a higher combination of sensitivity, specificity, LR, and AUROC particularly in diagnosing early stages of hepatic fibrosis.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruguera M, Bordas JM, Mas P, Rodes J (1974) A comparison of the accuracy of peritoneoscopy and liver biopsy in the diagnosis of cirrhosis. Gut 15(10):799–800CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Bruguera M, Bordas JM, Mas P, Rodes J (1974) A comparison of the accuracy of peritoneoscopy and liver biopsy in the diagnosis of cirrhosis. Gut 15(10):799–800CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Poniachik J, Bernstein DE, Reddy KR, et al. (1996) The role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of cirrhosis. Gastrointest Endosc 43(6):568–571CrossRefPubMed Poniachik J, Bernstein DE, Reddy KR, et al. (1996) The role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of cirrhosis. Gastrointest Endosc 43(6):568–571CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Maharaj B, Maharaj RJ, Leary WP, et al. (1986) Sampling variability and its influence on the diagnostic yield of percutaneous needle biopsy of the liver. Lancet 1(8480):523–525CrossRefPubMed Maharaj B, Maharaj RJ, Leary WP, et al. (1986) Sampling variability and its influence on the diagnostic yield of percutaneous needle biopsy of the liver. Lancet 1(8480):523–525CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Merriman RB, Ferrell LD, Patti MG, et al. (2006) Correlation of paired liver biopsies in morbidly obese patients with suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 44(4):874–880. doi:10.1002/hep.21346 CrossRefPubMed Merriman RB, Ferrell LD, Patti MG, et al. (2006) Correlation of paired liver biopsies in morbidly obese patients with suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 44(4):874–880. doi:10.​1002/​hep.​21346 CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Heurtier A, et al. (2005) Sampling variability of liver biopsy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, Gastroenterology 128(7):1898–1906CrossRefPubMed Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Heurtier A, et al. (2005) Sampling variability of liver biopsy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, Gastroenterology 128(7):1898–1906CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Grant A, Neuberger J (1999) Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice, British Society of Gastroenterology. Gut 45(Suppl 4):IV1–IV11PubMedCentralPubMed Grant A, Neuberger J (1999) Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice, British Society of Gastroenterology. Gut 45(Suppl 4):IV1–IV11PubMedCentralPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Perrault J, McGill DB, Ott BJ, Taylor WF (1978) Liver biopsy: complications in 1000 inpatients and outpatients. Gastroenterology 74(1):103–106PubMed Perrault J, McGill DB, Ott BJ, Taylor WF (1978) Liver biopsy: complications in 1000 inpatients and outpatients. Gastroenterology 74(1):103–106PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Castera L, Vergniol J, Foucher J, et al. (2005) Prospective comparison of transient elastography, Fibrotest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 128(2):343–350CrossRefPubMed Castera L, Vergniol J, Foucher J, et al. (2005) Prospective comparison of transient elastography, Fibrotest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 128(2):343–350CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Leclerc GE, Charleux F, Robert L, et al. (2013) Analysis of liver viscosity behavior as a function of multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography (MMRE) postprocessing. J Magn Reson Imaging 38(2):422–428. doi:10.1002/jmri.23986 CrossRefPubMed Leclerc GE, Charleux F, Robert L, et al. (2013) Analysis of liver viscosity behavior as a function of multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography (MMRE) postprocessing. J Magn Reson Imaging 38(2):422–428. doi:10.​1002/​jmri.​23986 CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bensamoun SF, Leclerc GE, Debernard L, et al. (2013) Cutoff values for alcoholic liver fibrosis using magnetic resonance elastography technique. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 37(5):811–817. doi:10.1111/acer.12025 CrossRefPubMed Bensamoun SF, Leclerc GE, Debernard L, et al. (2013) Cutoff values for alcoholic liver fibrosis using magnetic resonance elastography technique. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 37(5):811–817. doi:10.​1111/​acer.​12025 CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo J, Hirsch S, Streitberger KJ, et al. (2014) Patient-activated three-dimensional multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography for high-resolution mechanical imaging of the liver and spleen. RoFo 186(3):260–266. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1350510 PubMed Guo J, Hirsch S, Streitberger KJ, et al. (2014) Patient-activated three-dimensional multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography for high-resolution mechanical imaging of the liver and spleen. RoFo 186(3):260–266. doi:10.​1055/​s-0033-1350510 PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Castera L, Foucher J, Bernard PH, et al. (2010) Pitfalls of liver stiffness measurement: a 5-year prospective study of 13,369 examinations. Hepatology 51(3):828–835. doi:10.1002/hep.23425 PubMed Castera L, Foucher J, Bernard PH, et al. (2010) Pitfalls of liver stiffness measurement: a 5-year prospective study of 13,369 examinations. Hepatology 51(3):828–835. doi:10.​1002/​hep.​23425 PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Koizumi Y, Hirooka M, Kisaka Y, et al. (2011) Liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C: noninvasive diagnosis by means of real-time tissue elastography–establishment of the method for measurement. Radiology 258(2):610–617. doi:10.1148/radiol.10100319 CrossRefPubMed Koizumi Y, Hirooka M, Kisaka Y, et al. (2011) Liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C: noninvasive diagnosis by means of real-time tissue elastography–establishment of the method for measurement. Radiology 258(2):610–617. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​10100319 CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedrich-Rust M, Wunder K, Kriener S, et al. (2009) Liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis: noninvasive assessment with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging versus transient elastography. Radiology 252(2):595–604. doi:10.1148/radiol.2523081928 CrossRefPubMed Friedrich-Rust M, Wunder K, Kriener S, et al. (2009) Liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis: noninvasive assessment with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging versus transient elastography. Radiology 252(2):595–604. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2523081928 CrossRefPubMed
25.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Bensamoun SF, Wang L, Robert L, et al. (2008) Measurement of liver stiffness with two imaging techniques: magnetic resonance elastography and ultrasound elastometry. J Magn Reson Imaging 28(5):1287–1292. doi:10.1002/jmri.21523 CrossRefPubMed Bensamoun SF, Wang L, Robert L, et al. (2008) Measurement of liver stiffness with two imaging techniques: magnetic resonance elastography and ultrasound elastometry. J Magn Reson Imaging 28(5):1287–1292. doi:10.​1002/​jmri.​21523 CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Dodd GD 3rd, Baron RL, Oliver JH 3rd, Federle MP (1999) Spectrum of imaging findings of the liver in end-stage cirrhosis: part I, gross morphology and diffuse abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173(4):1031–1036CrossRefPubMed Dodd GD 3rd, Baron RL, Oliver JH 3rd, Federle MP (1999) Spectrum of imaging findings of the liver in end-stage cirrhosis: part I, gross morphology and diffuse abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173(4):1031–1036CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin DR (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging of diffuse liver diseases. Topics Magn Reson Imaging 13(3):151–163CrossRef Martin DR (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging of diffuse liver diseases. Topics Magn Reson Imaging 13(3):151–163CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PM (2003) The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 56(11):1129–1135CrossRefPubMed Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PM (2003) The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 56(11):1129–1135CrossRefPubMed
36.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Song F, Khan KS, Dinnes J, Sutton AJ (2002) Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy. Int J Epidemiol 31(1):88–95CrossRefPubMed Song F, Khan KS, Dinnes J, Sutton AJ (2002) Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy. Int J Epidemiol 31(1):88–95CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi YR, Lee JM, Yoon JH, Han JK, Choi BI (2013) Comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of hepatic fibrosis. Investig Radiol 48(8):607–613. doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e318289ff8f CrossRef Choi YR, Lee JM, Yoon JH, Han JK, Choi BI (2013) Comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of hepatic fibrosis. Investig Radiol 48(8):607–613. doi:10.​1097/​RLI.​0b013e318289ff8f​ CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Ichikawa S, Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, et al. (2012) Magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Magn Reson Med Sci 11(4):291–297CrossRefPubMed Ichikawa S, Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, et al. (2012) Magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Magn Reson Med Sci 11(4):291–297CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamphues C, Klatt D, Bova R, et al. (2012) Viscoelasticity-based magnetic resonance elastography for the assessment of liver fibrosis in hepatitis C patients after liver transplantation. Rofo 184(11):1013–1019. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1313126 CrossRefPubMed Kamphues C, Klatt D, Bova R, et al. (2012) Viscoelasticity-based magnetic resonance elastography for the assessment of liver fibrosis in hepatitis C patients after liver transplantation. Rofo 184(11):1013–1019. doi:10.​1055/​s-0032-1313126 CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim BH, Lee JM, Lee YJ, et al. (2011) MR elastography for noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: experience from a tertiary center in Asia. J Magn Reson Imaging 34(5):1110–1116. doi:10.1002/jmri.22723 Kim BH, Lee JM, Lee YJ, et al. (2011) MR elastography for noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: experience from a tertiary center in Asia. J Magn Reson Imaging 34(5):1110–1116. doi:10.​1002/​jmri.​22723
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Y, Ganger DR, Levitsky J, et al. (2011) Assessment of chronic hepatitis and fibrosis: comparison of MR elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging. AJR A J Roentgenol 196(3):553–561. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.4580 CrossRef Wang Y, Ganger DR, Levitsky J, et al. (2011) Assessment of chronic hepatitis and fibrosis: comparison of MR elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging. AJR A J Roentgenol 196(3):553–561. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​10.​4580 CrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Ye XP, Ran HT, Cheng J, et al. (2012) Liver and spleen stiffness measured by acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and esophageal varices in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Ultrasound Med 31(8):1245–1253PubMed Ye XP, Ran HT, Cheng J, et al. (2012) Liver and spleen stiffness measured by acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and esophageal varices in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Ultrasound Med 31(8):1245–1253PubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Fierbinteanu-Braticevici C, Andronescu D, Usvat R, et al. (2009) Acoustic radiation force imaging sonoelastography for noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. World J Gastroenterol 15(44):5525–5532CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Fierbinteanu-Braticevici C, Andronescu D, Usvat R, et al. (2009) Acoustic radiation force imaging sonoelastography for noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. World J Gastroenterol 15(44):5525–5532CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Karlas T, Pfrepper C, Wiegand J, et al. (2011) Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) for noninvasive detection of liver fibrosis: examination standards and evaluation of interlobe differences in healthy subjects and chronic liver disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 46(12):1458–1467. doi:10.3109/00365521.2011.610004 CrossRefPubMed Karlas T, Pfrepper C, Wiegand J, et al. (2011) Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) for noninvasive detection of liver fibrosis: examination standards and evaluation of interlobe differences in healthy subjects and chronic liver disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 46(12):1458–1467. doi:10.​3109/​00365521.​2011.​610004 CrossRefPubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Noruegas MJ, Matos H, Goncalves I, Cipriano MA, Sanches C (2012) Acoustic radiation force impulse-imaging in the assessment of liver fibrosis in children. Pediatric Radiol 42(2):201–204. doi:10.1007/s00247-011-2257-2 CrossRef Noruegas MJ, Matos H, Goncalves I, Cipriano MA, Sanches C (2012) Acoustic radiation force impulse-imaging in the assessment of liver fibrosis in children. Pediatric Radiol 42(2):201–204. doi:10.​1007/​s00247-011-2257-2 CrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Rizzo L, Calvaruso V, Cacopardo B, et al. (2011) Comparison of transient elastography and acoustic radiation force impulse for non-invasive staging of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Am J Gastroenterol 106(12):2112–2120. doi:10.1038/ajg.2011.341 CrossRefPubMed Rizzo L, Calvaruso V, Cacopardo B, et al. (2011) Comparison of transient elastography and acoustic radiation force impulse for non-invasive staging of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Am J Gastroenterol 106(12):2112–2120. doi:10.​1038/​ajg.​2011.​341 CrossRefPubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Sporea I, Badea R, Sirli R, et al. (2011) How efficient is acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the evaluation of liver stiffness? Hepat Mon 11(7):532–538PubMedCentralPubMed Sporea I, Badea R, Sirli R, et al. (2011) How efficient is acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the evaluation of liver stiffness? Hepat Mon 11(7):532–538PubMedCentralPubMed
56.
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Toshima T, Shirabe K, Takeishi K, et al. (2011) New method for assessing liver fibrosis based on acoustic radiation force impulse: a special reference to the difference between right and left liver. J Gastroenterol 46(5):705–711. doi:10.1007/s00535-010-0365-7 CrossRefPubMed Toshima T, Shirabe K, Takeishi K, et al. (2011) New method for assessing liver fibrosis based on acoustic radiation force impulse: a special reference to the difference between right and left liver. J Gastroenterol 46(5):705–711. doi:10.​1007/​s00535-010-0365-7 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Magnetic resonance elastography and acoustic radiation force impulse for staging hepatic fibrosis: a meta-analysis
verfasst von
Yang Guo
Sudharshan Parthasarathy
Preeya Goyal
Robert J. McCarthy
Andrew C. Larson
Frank H. Miller
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0137-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

Abdominal Radiology 4/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.