Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 6/2016

25.03.2016

CT negative attenuation pixel distribution and texture analysis for detection of fat in small angiomyolipoma on unenhanced CT

verfasst von: Naoki Takahashi, Mitsuru Takeuchi, Kohei Sasaguri, Shuai Leng, Adam Froemming, Akira Kawashima

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the paper is to evaluate if CT pixel distribution and texture analysis can identify fat in angiomyolipoma (AML) on unenhanced CT.

Methods

Thirty-seven patients with 38 AMLs and 75 patients with 83 renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) were evaluated. Region of interest (ROI) was manually placed over renal mass on unenhanced CT. In-house software generated multiple overlapping small-ROIs of various sizes within whole-lesion-ROI. Maximal number of pixels under cutoff attenuation values in the multiple small-ROIs was calculated. Skewness of CT attenuation histogram was calculated from whole-lesion-ROI. Presence of fat in renal mass was also evaluated subjectively. Performance of subjective evaluation and objective methods for identifying fat was compared using McNemar test.

Results

Macroscopic fat was identified in 15/38 AMLs and 1/83 RCCs by both subjective evaluation and by CT negative pixel distribution analysis (p = 1.0). Optimal threshold was ≥6 pixels below −30 HU within 13-pixel-ROI. Skewness of < −0.4 in whole-lesion-ROI identified fat in 10/38 AMLs and 0/83 RCCs. By combining CT negative pixel distribution analysis and skewness, fat was identified in 20/38 AMLs and 1/83 RCCs, but the difference to the subjective method was not statistically significant (p = 0.07).

Conclusion

CT negative attenuation pixel distribution analysis does not identify fat in AML beyond subjective evaluation. Addition of skewness by texture analysis may help improve identifying fat in AML.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, et al. (2003) Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol 170:2217–2220CrossRefPubMed Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, et al. (2003) Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol 170:2217–2220CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujii Y, Komai Y, Saito K, et al. (2008) Incidence of benign pathologic lesions at partial nephrectomy for presumed RCC renal masses: Japanese dual-center experience with 176 consecutive patients. Urology 72:598–602CrossRefPubMed Fujii Y, Komai Y, Saito K, et al. (2008) Incidence of benign pathologic lesions at partial nephrectomy for presumed RCC renal masses: Japanese dual-center experience with 176 consecutive patients. Urology 72:598–602CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kutikov A, Fossett LK, Ramchandani P, et al. (2006) Incidence of benign pathologic findings at partial nephrectomy for solitary renal mass presumed to be renal cell carcinoma on preoperative imaging. Urology 68:737–740CrossRefPubMed Kutikov A, Fossett LK, Ramchandani P, et al. (2006) Incidence of benign pathologic findings at partial nephrectomy for solitary renal mass presumed to be renal cell carcinoma on preoperative imaging. Urology 68:737–740CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bosniak MA, Megibow AJ, Hulnick DH, Horii S, Raghavendra BN (1988) CT diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma: the importance of detecting small amounts of fat. AJR Am J Roentgenol 151:497–501CrossRefPubMed Bosniak MA, Megibow AJ, Hulnick DH, Horii S, Raghavendra BN (1988) CT diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma: the importance of detecting small amounts of fat. AJR Am J Roentgenol 151:497–501CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Israel GM, Hindman N, Hecht E, Krinsky G (2005) The use of opposed-phase chemical shift MRI in the diagnosis of renal angiomyolipomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1868–1872CrossRefPubMed Israel GM, Hindman N, Hecht E, Krinsky G (2005) The use of opposed-phase chemical shift MRI in the diagnosis of renal angiomyolipomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1868–1872CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi K, Honda M, Okubo RS, et al. (1993) CT pixel mapping in the diagnosis of small angiomyolipomas of the kidneys. J Comput Assist Tomogr 17:98–101CrossRefPubMed Takahashi K, Honda M, Okubo RS, et al. (1993) CT pixel mapping in the diagnosis of small angiomyolipomas of the kidneys. J Comput Assist Tomogr 17:98–101CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Catalano OA, Samir AE, Sahani DV, Hahn PF (2008) Pixel distribution analysis: can it be used to distinguish clear cell carcinomas from angiomyolipomas with minimal fat? Radiology 247:738–746CrossRefPubMed Catalano OA, Samir AE, Sahani DV, Hahn PF (2008) Pixel distribution analysis: can it be used to distinguish clear cell carcinomas from angiomyolipomas with minimal fat? Radiology 247:738–746CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JY, Kim JK, Kim N, Cho KS (2008) CT histogram analysis: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging. Radiology 246:472–479CrossRefPubMed Kim JY, Kim JK, Kim N, Cho KS (2008) CT histogram analysis: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging. Radiology 246:472–479CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Simpfendorfer C, Herts BR, Motta-Ramirez GA, et al. (2009) Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat on MDCT: can counts of negative-attenuation pixels aid diagnosis? AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:438–443CrossRefPubMed Simpfendorfer C, Herts BR, Motta-Ramirez GA, et al. (2009) Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat on MDCT: can counts of negative-attenuation pixels aid diagnosis? AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:438–443CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Davenport MS, Neville AM, Ellis JH, et al. (2011) Diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma with Hounsfield unit thresholds: effect of size of region of interest and nephrographic phase imaging. Radiology 260:158–165. doi:10.1148/radiol.11102476 CrossRefPubMed Davenport MS, Neville AM, Ellis JH, et al. (2011) Diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma with Hounsfield unit thresholds: effect of size of region of interest and nephrographic phase imaging. Radiology 260:158–165. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​11102476 CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaudhry HS, Davenport MS, Nieman CM, Ho LM, Neville AM (2012) Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 198:377–383. doi:10.2214/ajr.11.6887 CrossRef Chaudhry HS, Davenport MS, Nieman CM, Ho LM, Neville AM (2012) Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 198:377–383. doi:10.​2214/​ajr.​11.​6887 CrossRef
14.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng F, Ganeshan B, Kozarski R, Miles KA, Goh V (2013) Assessment of primary colorectal cancer heterogeneity by using whole-tumor texture analysis: contrast-enhanced CT texture as a biomarker of 5-year survival. Radiology 266:177–184. doi:10.1148/radiol.12120254 CrossRefPubMed Ng F, Ganeshan B, Kozarski R, Miles KA, Goh V (2013) Assessment of primary colorectal cancer heterogeneity by using whole-tumor texture analysis: contrast-enhanced CT texture as a biomarker of 5-year survival. Radiology 266:177–184. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​12120254 CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Downey K, Riches SF, Morgan VA, et al. (2013) Relationship between imaging biomarkers of stage I cervical cancer and poor-prognosis histologic features: quantitative histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:314–320. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9545 CrossRefPubMed Downey K, Riches SF, Morgan VA, et al. (2013) Relationship between imaging biomarkers of stage I cervical cancer and poor-prognosis histologic features: quantitative histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:314–320. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​12.​9545 CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kyriazi S, Collins DJ, Messiou C, et al. (2011) Metastatic ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer: assessing chemotherapy response with diffusion-weighted MR imaging–value of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficients. Radiology 261:182–192. doi:10.1148/radiol.11110577 CrossRefPubMed Kyriazi S, Collins DJ, Messiou C, et al. (2011) Metastatic ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer: assessing chemotherapy response with diffusion-weighted MR imaging–value of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficients. Radiology 261:182–192. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​11110577 CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodgdon T, McInnes MD, Schieda N, et al. (2015) Can quantitative CT texture analysis be used to differentiate fat-poor renal angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma on unenhanced CT images? Radiology 276:787–796. doi:10.1148/radiol.2015142215 CrossRefPubMed Hodgdon T, McInnes MD, Schieda N, et al. (2015) Can quantitative CT texture analysis be used to differentiate fat-poor renal angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma on unenhanced CT images? Radiology 276:787–796. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2015142215 CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi N, Leng S, Kitajima K, et al. (2015) Small (<4 cm) renal masses: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma using unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:1194–1202. doi:10.2214/AJR.14.14183 CrossRefPubMed Takahashi N, Leng S, Kitajima K, et al. (2015) Small (<4 cm) renal masses: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma using unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:1194–1202. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​14.​14183 CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jinzaki M, Tanimoto A, Narimatsu Y, et al. (1997) Angiomyolipoma: imaging findings in lesions with minimal fat. Radiology 205:497–502CrossRefPubMed Jinzaki M, Tanimoto A, Narimatsu Y, et al. (1997) Angiomyolipoma: imaging findings in lesions with minimal fat. Radiology 205:497–502CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurosaki Y, Tanaka Y, Kuramoto K, Itai Y (1993) Improved CT fat detection in small kidney angiomyolipomas using thin sections and single voxel measurements. J Comput Assist Tomogr 17:745–748CrossRefPubMed Kurosaki Y, Tanaka Y, Kuramoto K, Itai Y (1993) Improved CT fat detection in small kidney angiomyolipomas using thin sections and single voxel measurements. J Comput Assist Tomogr 17:745–748CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
CT negative attenuation pixel distribution and texture analysis for detection of fat in small angiomyolipoma on unenhanced CT
verfasst von
Naoki Takahashi
Mitsuru Takeuchi
Kohei Sasaguri
Shuai Leng
Adam Froemming
Akira Kawashima
Publikationsdatum
25.03.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0714-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Abdominal Radiology 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The “beak” sign

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.