Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 5/2017

21.12.2016

Abdominal wall endometriosis: differentiation from other masses using CT features

verfasst von: Gail Yarmish, Evis Sala, Debra A. Goldman, Yulia Lakhman, Robert A. Soslow, Hedvig Hricak, Ginger J. Gardner, H. Alberto Vargas

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the utility of morphologic and quantitative CT features in differentiating abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) from other masses of the abdominal wall.

Methods

Retrospective IRB-approved study of 105 consecutive women from two institutions who underwent CT and biopsy/resection of abdominal wall masses. CTs were independently reviewed by two radiologists blinded to final histopathologic diagnoses. Associations between CT features and pathology were tested using Fisher’s Exact Test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were calculated. P values were adjusted for multiple variable testing.

Results

24.8% (26/105) of patients had histologically proven abdominal wall endometriosis. The other most common diagnoses included adenocarcinoma NOS (21%; 22/105), desmoid (14.3%; 15/105), and leiomyosarcoma (8.6%; 9/105). CT features significantly associated with endometriosis for both readers were location below the umbilicus (P = 0.0188), homogeneous density (P = 0.0188), and presence of linear infiltration irradiating peripherally from a central soft tissue nodule (i.e., “gorgon” sign) (P < 0.0001). The highest combined sensitivity (0.69, 95% CI: 0.48–0.86) and specificity (0.97, 95% CI: 0.91–1.00) for both readers occurred for patients having all three of these features present. Border type (P = 0.0199) was only significant for R2, peritoneal extension (P = 0.0188) was only significantly for R1, and the remainder of features were insignificant (P = 0.06–60). There was overlap in Hounsfield units on non-contrast CT (N = 26) between AWE (median: 45HU, range: 39–54) and other abdominal wall masses (median: 38.5HU, range: 15–58).

Conclusion

CT features are helpful in differentiating AWE from other abdominal wall soft tissue masses. Such differentiation may assist decisions regarding possible biopsy and treatment planning.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Horton JD, Dezee KJ, Ahnfeldt EP, Wagner M (2008) Abdominal wall endometriosis: a surgeon’s perspective and review of 445 cases. Am J Surg 196(2):207–212CrossRef Horton JD, Dezee KJ, Ahnfeldt EP, Wagner M (2008) Abdominal wall endometriosis: a surgeon’s perspective and review of 445 cases. Am J Surg 196(2):207–212CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Granese R, Cucinella G, Barresi V, et al. (2009) Isolated endometriosis on the rectus abdominis muscle in women without a history of abdominal surgery: a rare and intriguing finding. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16(6):798–801CrossRef Granese R, Cucinella G, Barresi V, et al. (2009) Isolated endometriosis on the rectus abdominis muscle in women without a history of abdominal surgery: a rare and intriguing finding. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16(6):798–801CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Matter M, Schneider N, McKee T (2003) Cystadenocarcinoma of the abdominal wall following caesarean section: case report and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 91(2):438–443CrossRef Matter M, Schneider N, McKee T (2003) Cystadenocarcinoma of the abdominal wall following caesarean section: case report and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 91(2):438–443CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gidwaney R, Badler RL, Yam BL, et al. (2012) Endometriosis of abdominal and pelvic wall scars: multimodality imaging findings, pathologic correlation, and radiologic mimics. Radiographics 32(7):2031–2043CrossRef Gidwaney R, Badler RL, Yam BL, et al. (2012) Endometriosis of abdominal and pelvic wall scars: multimodality imaging findings, pathologic correlation, and radiologic mimics. Radiographics 32(7):2031–2043CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hensen JH, Van Breda Vriesman AC, Puvlaert J (2006) Abdominal wall endometriosis: clinical presentation and imaging features with emphasis on sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:616–620CrossRef Hensen JH, Van Breda Vriesman AC, Puvlaert J (2006) Abdominal wall endometriosis: clinical presentation and imaging features with emphasis on sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:616–620CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu Z, Al-Beiti MA, Tang L, Liu X, Lu X (2008) Clinical characteristic analysis of 32 patients with abdominal incision endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol 28:742–745CrossRef Zhu Z, Al-Beiti MA, Tang L, Liu X, Lu X (2008) Clinical characteristic analysis of 32 patients with abdominal incision endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol 28:742–745CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Busard MP, Mijatovic V, van Kuijk C, Hompes PG, van Waesberghe JH (2010) Appearance of abdominal wall endometriosis on MR imaging. Eur Radiol 20:1267–1276CrossRef Busard MP, Mijatovic V, van Kuijk C, Hompes PG, van Waesberghe JH (2010) Appearance of abdominal wall endometriosis on MR imaging. Eur Radiol 20:1267–1276CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahn SE, Park SJ, Moon SK, Lee DH, Lim JW (2016) Sonography of abdominal wall masses and masslike lesions: correlation with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med 35(1):189–208CrossRef Ahn SE, Park SJ, Moon SK, Lee DH, Lim JW (2016) Sonography of abdominal wall masses and masslike lesions: correlation with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med 35(1):189–208CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Francica G (2012) Reliable clinical and sonographic findings in the diagnosis of abdominal wall endometriosis near cesarean section scar. World J Radiol 4(4):135–140CrossRef Francica G (2012) Reliable clinical and sonographic findings in the diagnosis of abdominal wall endometriosis near cesarean section scar. World J Radiol 4(4):135–140CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Savelli L, Manuzzi L, Di Donato N, et al. (2012) Endometriosis of the abdominal wall: ultrasonographic and Doppler characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:336–340CrossRef Savelli L, Manuzzi L, Di Donato N, et al. (2012) Endometriosis of the abdominal wall: ultrasonographic and Doppler characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:336–340CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Coley BD, Casola G (1993) Incisional endometrioma involving the rectus abdominis muscle and subcutaneous tissues: cT appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160(3):549–550CrossRef Coley BD, Casola G (1993) Incisional endometrioma involving the rectus abdominis muscle and subcutaneous tissues: cT appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160(3):549–550CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Giudice LC, Swiersz LM, Burney RO (2010) Endometriosis. In: Jameson JL, De Groot LJ (eds) Endocrinology, 6th edn. New York: Elsevier, pp 2356–2370 Giudice LC, Swiersz LM, Burney RO (2010) Endometriosis. In: Jameson JL, De Groot LJ (eds) Endocrinology, 6th edn. New York: Elsevier, pp 2356–2370
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Aytac HO, Aytac PC, Parlakgumus HA (2015) Scar endometriosis is a gynecological complication that general surgeons have to deal with. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 42(3):292–294PubMed Aytac HO, Aytac PC, Parlakgumus HA (2015) Scar endometriosis is a gynecological complication that general surgeons have to deal with. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 42(3):292–294PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Cornelius F, Petipierre F, Lasserre E, et al. (2014) Percutaneous cryoablation of symptomatic abdominal scar endometrioma: initial reports. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 37(6):1575CrossRef Cornelius F, Petipierre F, Lasserre E, et al. (2014) Percutaneous cryoablation of symptomatic abdominal scar endometrioma: initial reports. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 37(6):1575CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Carrafiello G, Fontana F, Pellegrino C, et al. (2009) Radiofrequency ablation of abdominal wall endometrioma. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 32(6):1300CrossRef Carrafiello G, Fontana F, Pellegrino C, et al. (2009) Radiofrequency ablation of abdominal wall endometrioma. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 32(6):1300CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Abdominal wall endometriosis: differentiation from other masses using CT features
verfasst von
Gail Yarmish
Evis Sala
Debra A. Goldman
Yulia Lakhman
Robert A. Soslow
Hedvig Hricak
Ginger J. Gardner
H. Alberto Vargas
Publikationsdatum
21.12.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0998-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

Abdominal Radiology 5/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The “Sister Mary Joseph Nodule”

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.