Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 6/2017

01.02.2017

Magnetic resonance elastography in the assessment of hepatic fibrosis: a study comparing transient elastography and histological data in the same patients

verfasst von: Masafumi Toguchi, Masakatsu Tsurusaki, Norihisa Yada, Keitaro Sofue, Tomoko Hyodo, Minori Onoda, Isao Numoto, Mitsuru Matsuki, Izumi Imaoka, Masatoshi Kudo, Takamichi Murakami

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the quantitative measurement of liver stiffness (LS), compare the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and ultrasound-based transient elastography (TE), and evaluate two different MRE-based LS measurement methods.

Methods

Between October 2013 and January 2015, 116 consecutive patients with chronic liver disease underwent MRE to measure LS (kilopascals; kPa). Of the 116 patients, 51 patients underwent both TE and liver biopsy, and the interval between the liver biopsy and both the MRE and TE was less than 90 days. MRE-derived LS values were measured on the anterior segment of the right lobe (single small round regions of interest per slice; srROIs) and whole right lobe of the liver (free hand region of interest; fhROI), and these values were correlated with pathological fibrosis grades and diagnostic performance.

Results

Pathological fibrosis stage was significantly correlated with srROIs (r = 0.87, p < 0.001), fhROI (r = 0.80, p < 0.001), and TE (r = 0.73, p < 0.001). For detection of significant fibrosis (≥F2), advanced fibrosis (≥F3), and cirrhosis, the area under the curve (AUC) associated with the srROIs was largest, and there was a significant difference between srROIs and TE (0.93 vs. 0.82, p = 0.006), srROIs and fhROI (0.93 vs. 0.89, p = 0.04) for detection of ≥F2. For advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis detection, AUCs were not significant (0.92–0.96).

Conclusions

MRE and TE detected liver fibrosis with comparable accuracy. In particular, the srROIs method was effective for detecting of significant fibrosis.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bensamoun SF, Wang L, Robert L, et al. (2008) Measurement of liver stiffness with two imaging techniques: magnetic resonance elastography and ultrasound elastometry. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:1287–1292CrossRefPubMed Bensamoun SF, Wang L, Robert L, et al. (2008) Measurement of liver stiffness with two imaging techniques: magnetic resonance elastography and ultrasound elastometry. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:1287–1292CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon JH, Lee JM, Joo I, et al. (2014) Hepatic fibrosis: prospective comparison of MR elastography and US shear-wave elastography for evaluation. Radiology 273:772–782CrossRefPubMed Yoon JH, Lee JM, Joo I, et al. (2014) Hepatic fibrosis: prospective comparison of MR elastography and US shear-wave elastography for evaluation. Radiology 273:772–782CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Huwart L, Sempoux C, Vicaut E, et al. (2008) Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology 135:32–40CrossRefPubMed Huwart L, Sempoux C, Vicaut E, et al. (2008) Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology 135:32–40CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bohte AE, de Niet A, Jansen L, et al. (2014) Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis: a comparison of ultrasound-based transient elastography and MR elastography in patients with viral hepatitis B and C. Eur Radiol 24:638–648CrossRefPubMed Bohte AE, de Niet A, Jansen L, et al. (2014) Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis: a comparison of ultrasound-based transient elastography and MR elastography in patients with viral hepatitis B and C. Eur Radiol 24:638–648CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Beers BE, Daire JL, Garteiser P (2015) New imaging techniques for liver diseases. J Hepatol 62:690–700CrossRefPubMed Van Beers BE, Daire JL, Garteiser P (2015) New imaging techniques for liver diseases. J Hepatol 62:690–700CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Venkatesh SK, Yin M, Ehman RL (2013) Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: technique, analysis, and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:544–555CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Venkatesh SK, Yin M, Ehman RL (2013) Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: technique, analysis, and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:544–555CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagan M, Asrani SK, Talwalkar J (2015) Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis and prognosis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:1251–1260CrossRefPubMed Hagan M, Asrani SK, Talwalkar J (2015) Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis and prognosis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:1251–1260CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinzani M, Rombouts K, Colagrande S (2005) Fibrosis in chronic liver diseases: diagnosis and management. J Hepatol 42(1):S22–S36CrossRefPubMed Pinzani M, Rombouts K, Colagrande S (2005) Fibrosis in chronic liver diseases: diagnosis and management. J Hepatol 42(1):S22–S36CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rusak G, Zawada E, Lemanowicz A, Serafin Z (2015) Whole-organ and segmental stiffness measured with liver magnetic resonance elastography in healthy adults: significance of the region of interest. Abdom Imaging 40:776–782CrossRefPubMed Rusak G, Zawada E, Lemanowicz A, Serafin Z (2015) Whole-organ and segmental stiffness measured with liver magnetic resonance elastography in healthy adults: significance of the region of interest. Abdom Imaging 40:776–782CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Amemiya F, et al. (2012) Cross-validation of MR elastography and ultrasound transient elastography in liver stiffness measurement: discrepancy in the results of cirrhotic liver. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:607–610CrossRefPubMed Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Amemiya F, et al. (2012) Cross-validation of MR elastography and ultrasound transient elastography in liver stiffness measurement: discrepancy in the results of cirrhotic liver. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:607–610CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee DH, Lee JM, Han JK, Choi BI (2013) MR elastography of healthy liver parenchyma: normal value and reliability of the liver stiffness value measurement. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:1215–1223CrossRefPubMed Lee DH, Lee JM, Han JK, Choi BI (2013) MR elastography of healthy liver parenchyma: normal value and reliability of the liver stiffness value measurement. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:1215–1223CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bedossa P (1994) Intraobserver and interobserver variations in liver biopsy interpretation in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The French METAVIR cooperative study group. Hepatology 20:15–20CrossRef Bedossa P (1994) Intraobserver and interobserver variations in liver biopsy interpretation in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The French METAVIR cooperative study group. Hepatology 20:15–20CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Rouvière O, Yin M, Dresner MA, et al. (2006) MR elastography of the liver: preliminary results. Radiology 240:440–448CrossRefPubMed Rouvière O, Yin M, Dresner MA, et al. (2006) MR elastography of the liver: preliminary results. Radiology 240:440–448CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Yada N, Sakurai T, Minami T, et al. (2014) Ultrasound elastography correlates treatment response by antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Oncology 87(suppl 1):118–123CrossRefPubMed Yada N, Sakurai T, Minami T, et al. (2014) Ultrasound elastography correlates treatment response by antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Oncology 87(suppl 1):118–123CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM, et al. (2003) Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:1705–1713CrossRefPubMed Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM, et al. (2003) Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:1705–1713CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat R Development Core Team. R (2007) A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing/2001. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/ R Development Core Team. R (2007) A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing/2001. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0. http://​www.​R-project.​org/​
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen J, Talwalkar JA, Yin M, et al. (2001) Early detection of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by using MR elastography. Radiology 259:749–756CrossRef Chen J, Talwalkar JA, Yin M, et al. (2001) Early detection of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by using MR elastography. Radiology 259:749–756CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong GL (2013) Update of liver fibrosis and steatosis with transient elastography (Fibroscan). Gastroenterol Rep 1:19–26CrossRef Wong GL (2013) Update of liver fibrosis and steatosis with transient elastography (Fibroscan). Gastroenterol Rep 1:19–26CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ, et al. (2007) Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:1207–1213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ, et al. (2007) Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:1207–1213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitsufuji T, Shinagawa Y, Fujimitsu R, et al. (2013) Measurement consistency of MR elastography at 3.0T: comparison among three different region-of-interest placement methods. Jpn J Radiol 31:336–341CrossRefPubMed Mitsufuji T, Shinagawa Y, Fujimitsu R, et al. (2013) Measurement consistency of MR elastography at 3.0T: comparison among three different region-of-interest placement methods. Jpn J Radiol 31:336–341CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Dzyubak B, Glaser K, Yin M, et al. (2013) Automated liver stiffness measurements with magnetic resonance elastography. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:371–379CrossRefPubMed Dzyubak B, Glaser K, Yin M, et al. (2013) Automated liver stiffness measurements with magnetic resonance elastography. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:371–379CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hines CD, Bley TA, Lindstrom MJ, Reeder SB (2010) Repeatability of magnetic resonance elastography for quantification of hepatic stiffness. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:725–731CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hines CD, Bley TA, Lindstrom MJ, Reeder SB (2010) Repeatability of magnetic resonance elastography for quantification of hepatic stiffness. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:725–731CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Magnetic resonance elastography in the assessment of hepatic fibrosis: a study comparing transient elastography and histological data in the same patients
verfasst von
Masafumi Toguchi
Masakatsu Tsurusaki
Norihisa Yada
Keitaro Sofue
Tomoko Hyodo
Minori Onoda
Isao Numoto
Mitsuru Matsuki
Izumi Imaoka
Masatoshi Kudo
Takamichi Murakami
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1045-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

Abdominal Radiology 6/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.