Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 6/2017

04.02.2017

Assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using apparent diffusion coefficient values: impact of patient race and age

verfasst von: Tsutomu Tamada, Vinay Prabhu, Jianhong Li, James S. Babb, Samir S. Taneja, Andrew B. Rosenkrantz

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the impact of patient race and age on the performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness.

Materials and methods

457 prostate cancer patients who underwent 3T phased-array coil prostate MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI; maximal b-value 1000 s/mm2) before prostatectomy were included. Mean ADC of a single dominant lesion was measured in each patient, using histopathologic findings from the prostatectomy specimen as reference. In subsets defined by race and age, ADC values were compared between Gleason score (GS) ≤ 3 + 4 and GS ≥ 4 + 3 tumors.

Results

81% of patients were Caucasian, 12% African-American, 7% Asian-American. 13% were <55 years, 42% 55–64 years, 41% 65–74 years, and 4% ≥75 years. 63% were GS ≤ 3 + 4, 37% GS ≥ 4 + 3. ADC was significantly lower in GS ≥ 4 + 3 tumors than in GS ≤ 3 + 4 tumors in the entire cohort, as well as in Caucasian, African-American, and all four age groups (P ≤ 0.015). AUC for differentiation of GS ≤ 3 + 4 and GS ≥ 4 + 3 as well as optimal ADC threshold was Caucasian: 0.73/≤848; African-American: 0.76/≤780; Asian-American: 0.66/≤839: <55 years, 0.73/≤830; 55–64 years, 0.71/≤800; 65–74 years, 0.74/≤872; ≥75 years, 0.79/≤880. A race-optimized ADC threshold resulted in higher specificity in African-American than Caucasian men (84.9% vs. 67.1%, P = 0.045); age-optimized ADC threshold resulted in higher sensitivity in patients aged ≥75 years than <55 years or 55–64 years (100.0% vs. 53.6%–73.3%; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Patients’ race and age may impact the diagnostic performance and optimal threshold when applying ADC values for evaluation of prostate cancer aggressiveness.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Turkbey B, Mani H, Aras O, et al. (2013) Prostate cancer: can multiparametric MR imaging help identify patients who are candidates for active surveillance? Radiology 268:144–152CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Turkbey B, Mani H, Aras O, et al. (2013) Prostate cancer: can multiparametric MR imaging help identify patients who are candidates for active surveillance? Radiology 268:144–152CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Henderson DR, de Souza NM, Thomas K, et al. (2016) Nine-year follow-up for a study of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in a prospective prostate cancer active surveillance cohort. Eur Urol 69:1028–1033CrossRefPubMed Henderson DR, de Souza NM, Thomas K, et al. (2016) Nine-year follow-up for a study of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in a prospective prostate cancer active surveillance cohort. Eur Urol 69:1028–1033CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamada T, Sone T, Jo Y, Yamamoto A, Ito K (2014) Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging and its role in prostate cancer. NMR Biomed 27:25–38CrossRefPubMed Tamada T, Sone T, Jo Y, Yamamoto A, Ito K (2014) Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging and its role in prostate cancer. NMR Biomed 27:25–38CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Vos EK, Kobus T, Litjens GJ, et al. (2015) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating low-grade from high-grade prostate cancer. Invest Radiol 50:490–497CrossRefPubMed Vos EK, Kobus T, Litjens GJ, et al. (2015) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating low-grade from high-grade prostate cancer. Invest Radiol 50:490–497CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Donati OF, Mazaheri Y, Afaq A, et al. (2014) Prostate cancer aggressiveness: assessment with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient. Radiology 271:143–152CrossRefPubMed Donati OF, Mazaheri Y, Afaq A, et al. (2014) Prostate cancer aggressiveness: assessment with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient. Radiology 271:143–152CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenkrantz AB, Sigmund EE, Johnson G, et al. (2012) Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer. Radiology 264:126–135CrossRefPubMed Rosenkrantz AB, Sigmund EE, Johnson G, et al. (2012) Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer. Radiology 264:126–135CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bae H, Yoshida S, Matsuoka Y, et al. (2014) Apparent diffusion coefficient value as a biomarker reflecting morphological and biological features of prostate cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 46:555–561CrossRefPubMed Bae H, Yoshida S, Matsuoka Y, et al. (2014) Apparent diffusion coefficient value as a biomarker reflecting morphological and biological features of prostate cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 46:555–561CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lebovici A, Sfrangeu SA, Feier D, et al. (2014) Evaluation of the normal-to-diseased apparent diffusion coefficient ratio as an indicator of prostate cancer aggressiveness. BMC Med Imaging 14:15CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lebovici A, Sfrangeu SA, Feier D, et al. (2014) Evaluation of the normal-to-diseased apparent diffusion coefficient ratio as an indicator of prostate cancer aggressiveness. BMC Med Imaging 14:15CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Chatterjee A, Watson G, Myint E, et al. (2015) Changes in epithelium, stroma, and lumen space correlate more strongly with gleason pattern and are stronger predictors of prostate adc changes than cellularity metrics. Radiology 277:751–762CrossRefPubMed Chatterjee A, Watson G, Myint E, et al. (2015) Changes in epithelium, stroma, and lumen space correlate more strongly with gleason pattern and are stronger predictors of prostate adc changes than cellularity metrics. Radiology 277:751–762CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat van As NJ, de Souza NM, Riches SF, et al. (2009) A study of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in men with untreated localised prostate cancer on active surveillance. Eur Urol 56:981–987CrossRefPubMed van As NJ, de Souza NM, Riches SF, et al. (2009) A study of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in men with untreated localised prostate cancer on active surveillance. Eur Urol 56:981–987CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenkrantz AB, Ream JM, Nolan P, et al. (2015) Prostate cancer: utility of whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient metrics for prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:1208–1214CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rosenkrantz AB, Ream JM, Nolan P, et al. (2015) Prostate cancer: utility of whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient metrics for prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:1208–1214CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat American Cancer Society (2015) Cancer facts and figures 2015. Atlanta: American Cancer Society American Cancer Society (2015) Cancer facts and figures 2015. Atlanta: American Cancer Society
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsivian M, Bañez LL, Keto CJ, et al. (2013) African-American men with low-grade prostate cancer have higher tumor burdens: results from the Duke Prostate Center. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 16:91–94CrossRefPubMed Tsivian M, Bañez LL, Keto CJ, et al. (2013) African-American men with low-grade prostate cancer have higher tumor burdens: results from the Duke Prostate Center. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 16:91–94CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chornokur G, Dalton K, Borysova ME, Kumar NB (2011) Disparities at presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and survival in African-American men, affected by prostate cancer. Prostate 71:985–997CrossRefPubMed Chornokur G, Dalton K, Borysova ME, Kumar NB (2011) Disparities at presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and survival in African-American men, affected by prostate cancer. Prostate 71:985–997CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffman RM, Gilliland FD, Eley JW, et al. (2001) Racial and ethnic differences in advanced-stage prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:388–395CrossRefPubMed Hoffman RM, Gilliland FD, Eley JW, et al. (2001) Racial and ethnic differences in advanced-stage prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:388–395CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Oakley-Girvan I, Kolonel LN, Gallagher RP, et al. (2003) Stage at diagnosis and survival in a multiethnic cohort of prostate cancer patients. Am J Public Health 93:1753–1759CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oakley-Girvan I, Kolonel LN, Gallagher RP, et al. (2003) Stage at diagnosis and survival in a multiethnic cohort of prostate cancer patients. Am J Public Health 93:1753–1759CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chao GF, Krishna N, Aizer AA, et al. (2016) Asian Americans and prostate cancer: a nationwide population-based analysis. Urol Oncol 34:233.e7–233.e15CrossRef Chao GF, Krishna N, Aizer AA, et al. (2016) Asian Americans and prostate cancer: a nationwide population-based analysis. Urol Oncol 34:233.e7–233.e15CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou CK, Check DP, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. (2016) Prostate cancer incidence in 43 populations worldwide: an analysis of time trends overall and by age group. Int J Cancer 138:1388–1400CrossRefPubMed Zhou CK, Check DP, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. (2016) Prostate cancer incidence in 43 populations worldwide: an analysis of time trends overall and by age group. Int J Cancer 138:1388–1400CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall WH, Jani AB, Ryu JK, Narayan S, Vijayakumar S (2005) The impact of age and comorbidity on survival outcomes and treatment patterns in prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 8:22–30CrossRefPubMed Hall WH, Jani AB, Ryu JK, Narayan S, Vijayakumar S (2005) The impact of age and comorbidity on survival outcomes and treatment patterns in prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 8:22–30CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamada T, Prabhu V, Li J, et al. (2017) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of prostate cancer: comparison between conventional and kurtosis models. Radiology (in press) Tamada T, Prabhu V, Li J, et al. (2017) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of prostate cancer: comparison between conventional and kurtosis models. Radiology (in press)
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenkrantz AB, Kim S, Campbell N, et al. (2015) Transition zone prostate cancer: revisiting the role of multiparametric MRI at 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:W266–W272CrossRefPubMed Rosenkrantz AB, Kim S, Campbell N, et al. (2015) Transition zone prostate cancer: revisiting the role of multiparametric MRI at 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:W266–W272CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Meng X, Rosenkrantz AB, Mendhiratta N, et al. (2016) Relationship between prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), biopsy indication, and MRI-ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy outcomes. Eur Urol 69:512–517CrossRefPubMed Meng X, Rosenkrantz AB, Mendhiratta N, et al. (2016) Relationship between prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), biopsy indication, and MRI-ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy outcomes. Eur Urol 69:512–517CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL, ISUP Grading Committee (2005) The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1228–1242CrossRefPubMed Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL, ISUP Grading Committee (2005) The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1228–1242CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Klotz L, Zhang L, Lam A, et al. (2010) Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:126–131CrossRefPubMed Klotz L, Zhang L, Lam A, et al. (2010) Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:126–131CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Selvadurai ED, SingheraM Thomas K, et al. (2013) Medium-term outcomes of active surveillance for localised prostate cancer. Eur Urol 64:981–987CrossRefPubMed Selvadurai ED, SingheraM Thomas K, et al. (2013) Medium-term outcomes of active surveillance for localised prostate cancer. Eur Urol 64:981–987CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Bul M, van den Bergh RC, Zhu X, et al. (2012) Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 110:1672–1677CrossRefPubMed Bul M, van den Bergh RC, Zhu X, et al. (2012) Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 110:1672–1677CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamada T, Kanomata N, Sone T, et al. (2014) High b value (2000 s/mm2) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer at 3 Tesla: comparison with 1000 s/mm2 for tumor conspicuity and discrimination of aggressiveness. PLoS One 9:e96619CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tamada T, Kanomata N, Sone T, et al. (2014) High b value (2000 s/mm2) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer at 3 Tesla: comparison with 1000 s/mm2 for tumor conspicuity and discrimination of aggressiveness. PLoS One 9:e96619CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Rozenberg R, Thornhill RE, Flood TA, et al. (2016) Whole-tumor quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient histogram and texture analysis to predict gleason score upgrading in intermediate-risk 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206:775–782CrossRefPubMed Rozenberg R, Thornhill RE, Flood TA, et al. (2016) Whole-tumor quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient histogram and texture analysis to predict gleason score upgrading in intermediate-risk 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206:775–782CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using apparent diffusion coefficient values: impact of patient race and age
verfasst von
Tsutomu Tamada
Vinay Prabhu
Jianhong Li
James S. Babb
Samir S. Taneja
Andrew B. Rosenkrantz
Publikationsdatum
04.02.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1058-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

Abdominal Radiology 6/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.