Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2008

01.03.2008 | Review

Numeric Expression of Aesthetics and Beauty

verfasst von: B. S. Atiyeh, S. N. Hayek

Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Debate over what constitutes beauty, particularly beauty of the human body, has raged since philosophy began. Interested scholars have debated the meaning of beauty for centuries. However, it seems that numbers and the resulting numeric relationships play a fundamental role in the classification of the human body, and that a harmonic profile or body shape is produced only at certain definite numeric relationships. The beauty of individual features depends on “ideal” proportions, and it is suggested that expressing beauty in terms of geometry is possible. As the demand for aesthetic surgery has increased tremendously over the past few decades, it is becoming essential to be able to assess the possible satisfaction that can be expected after an aesthetic surgery procedure and to determine the beauty of the final result as precisely as possible.
Literatur
1.
Drury NE (2000) Beauty is only skin deep. J R Soc Med 93:89–92PubMed
2.
Greulich M Scoring beauty: Green means go, yellow is no (abstract). 14th International Congress of the International Confederation for Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (IPRAS), Berlin, Germany, 2007
3.
4.
Eisenthal Y, Dror G, Ruppin E (2006) Facial attractiveness: Beauty and the machine. Neural Computat 18:119–142CrossRef
5.
Baenninger M (1994) The development of face recognition: Featural or configurational processing? J Exper Child Psychol 57:377–396CrossRef
6.
Neumayer B (1990) Basic geometrical principles of profile harmony as an aid in planning and simulating maxillofacial surgery. Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 14:438–441PubMed
7.
Davis ST (2007) Aesthetic preferences for the unity ratio resist the influence of color illusions. Am J Psychol 120:47–71PubMedCrossRef
8.
Green CD (1995) All that glitters: A review of psychological research on the aesthetics of the golden section. Perception 8:937–968CrossRef
9.
10.
McManus IC (1980) The aesthetics of simple figures. Br J Psychol 71:505–524PubMed
11.
Jefferson Y (1996) Skeletal types: Key to unravelling the mystery of facial beauty and its biologic significance. J Gen Orthod 7:7–25PubMed
12.
Vegter F, Hage J (2000) Clinical anthropometry and canons of the face in historical perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1090–1096PubMedCrossRef
13.
Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Kolar JC, Munro IR (1985) Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: Revision of neoclassical canons. Plast Reconstr Surg 75:328–338PubMed
14.
Douglas WY, Glenn HS Jr (1999) Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature 399:321–322CrossRef
15.
Adamson AA, Zavod MB (2006) Changing perceptions of beauty: A surgeon’s perspective. Facial Plast Surg 22:188–193PubMedCrossRef
16.
Hagman G (2005) Hitler’s aesthetics: A psychoanalytic perspective on art and fascism. Psychoanalytic Rev 92:963–981CrossRef
17.
Hagman G (2000) The creative process. In: Goldberg A (ed) Progress in self psychology. The Analytic Press, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 277–297
18.
Fett B (2006) An in-depth investigation of the divine ratio. TMME The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast 13:157–175
19.
Yakubietz RG, Jakubietz MG, Kloss D, Gruenert JG (2005) Defining the basic aesthetics of the hand. Aesth Plast Surg 29:546–551CrossRef
20.
Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, Tartaglia G (1995) Facial morphology of television actresses compared with normal women. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:1008–1014PubMedCrossRef
21.
Jefferson Y (2004) Facial beauty: Establishing a universal standard. Int J Orthod Milwaukee 15:9–22PubMed
22.
Ishi H, Gyoba J, Kamachi M, Mukaida S, Akamatsu S (2004) Analyses of facial attractiveness on feminised and juvenilised faces. Perception 33:135–145PubMedCrossRef
23.
Bashour M (2006) History and current concepts in the analysis of facial attractiveness. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:741–756PubMedCrossRef
24.
Tolleth H (1998) Parameters of Caucasian attractiveness. In: Matory WE (ed) Ethnic considerations in facial aesthetic surgery. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, p. 39
25.
Larrabee W (1997) Facial beauty: Myth or reality? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:571–572PubMed
26.
Valenzano DR, Mennucci A, Tartarelli G, Cellerino A (2006) Shape analysis of female facial attractiveness. Vision Res 46:1282–1291PubMedCrossRef
27.
Ricketts RM (1982) The biologic significance of the divine proportion and Fibonacci series. Am J Orthod 81:351–370PubMedCrossRef
28.
29.
Jacobsen T, Schubotz RI, Höfel L, Cramon DYV (2006) Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. NeuroImage 1:276–285
30.
Cunningham WA, Johnson MK, Gatenby JC, Gore JC, Banaji MR (2003) Neural components of social evaluation. J Pers Soc Psychol 85:639–649PubMedCrossRef
31.
Cunningham WA, Raye CL, Johnson MK (2004) Implicit and explicit evaluation: FMRI correlates of valence, emotional intensity, and control in the processing of attitudes. J Cogn Neurosci 16:1717–1729PubMedCrossRef
32.
Moll J, Eslinger PJ, Oliveira-Souza R (2001) Frontopolar and anterior temporal cortex activation in a moral judgment task: Preliminary functional MRI results in normal subjects. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 59:657–664PubMed
33.
Moll J, de Oliveira-Souza R, Bramati IE, Grafman J (2001) Functional networks in emotional moral and nonmoral social judgments. Neuroimage 16:696–703CrossRef
34.
Tatarunaite E, Playle R, Hood K, Shaw W, Richmond S (2005) Facial attractiveness: A longitudinal study. Am J Orthodont Dentofacial Orthoped 127:676–682CrossRef
35.
Perrett DI, Lee KJ, Penton-Voak I, Rowland DA, et al (1998) Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394:826–827CrossRef
36.
Perrett DI, May KA, Yoshikawa S (1994) Facial shape and judgments of female attractiveness. Nature 368:239–242PubMedCrossRef
37.
Cunningham MR, Roberts AR, Wu CH, Barbee AP, Druen PB (1995) Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female attractiveness. J Pers Soc Psychol 68:261–279CrossRef
38.
Bashour M (2006) An objective system for measuring facial attractiveness. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:757–774PubMedCrossRef
39.
Langlois JH, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein AJ, et al (2000) Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull 126:390–423PubMedCrossRef
40.
Fan J, Dai W, Liu F, Wu J (2005) Visual perception of male body attractiveness. Proc R Soc B 272:219–226PubMedCrossRef
41.
Swami V, Tovée MJ (2007) Perceptions of female body weight and shape among indigenous and urban Europeans. Scand J Psychol 48:43–50PubMedCrossRef
42.
Gründl P, Eisenmann-Klein M The formula of female bodily beauty: An experiment on measuring the physical in physical attractiveness (abstract). 14th International Congress of the International Confederation for Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (IPRAS), Berlin, Germany, 2007
43.
Langlois H, Roggman LA, Musselman L (1994) What is average and what is not average about attractive faces? Psychol Sci 5:214–220CrossRef
44.
Slater A, Von der Schulenberg C, Brown E, Badenoch M, et al (1998) Newborn infants prefer attractive faces. Inf Behav Develop 21:345–354CrossRef
45.
Buss D, Schmitt P (1993) Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychol Rev 100:204–232PubMedCrossRef
46.
Shackelford TK, Weekes-Shackelford VA, LeBlanc GJ, Bleske AL, et al (2000) Female coital orgasm and male attractiveness. Hum Nature Interdisciplin Biosocial Perspect 11:299–306
47.
48.
Zaidel DW, Deblieck C (2007) Attractiveness of natural faces compared to computer constructed perfectly symmetrical faces. Int J Neurosci 117:423–431PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zadiel DW, Chen AC, German C (1995) She is not a beauty even when she smiles: Possible evolutionary basis for a relationship between facial attractiveness and hemispheric specialisation. Neuropsychologica 33:649–645CrossRef
50.
Heinemann W (1963) Aristotle—minor works: Physiognomics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
51.
Jeffries JM III, DiBernardo B, Rauscher GE (1995) Computer analysis of the African American face. Ann Plast Surg 34:318–322PubMedCrossRef
52.
McCurdy E (1954) Human proportions. In: McCurdy E (ed) The notebooks of Leonardo Da Vinci. Vol. 1. Reprint Society, London, pp 197–204
53.
Strauss WL (1974) The complete drawings of Albert Dürer, Vol. 5: Human proportions. Abaris Books, New York
54.
Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Hreczko TA, et al (1984) Anthropometric proportions in the upper lip–lower lip–chin area of the lower face in young white adults. Am J Orthod 86:52–60PubMedCrossRef
55.
Farkas LG, Forrest CR, Litsas L (2000) Revision of neoclassical facial canons in young adult Afro-Americans. Aesth Plast Surg 24:179–184CrossRef
56.
Dawei W, Guozheng Q, Mingli Z, et al (1997) Differences in horizontal, neoclassical facial canons in Chinese (Han) and North American Caucasian populations. Aesth Plast Surg 21:265–269CrossRef
57.
Le TT, Farkas LG, Ngim RC, Levin LS, Forrest CR (2002) Proportionality in Asian, North American Caucasian faces using neoclassical facial canons as criteria. Aesth Plast Surg 26:64–69CrossRef
58.
Gonzalez-Ulloa M (1962) Quantitative principles in cosmetic surgery of the face (profileplasty). Plast Reconstr Surg 29:186–198CrossRef
59.
Gonzalez-Ulloa M (1984) Aesthetic evaluation of the face: Profileplasty. In: Kaye BL, Gradinger GP (eds) Symposium on aesthetic surgery of the nose, ears, and chin. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 35–44
60.
Farkas LG, Sohm P, Kolar JC, Katic MJ, Munro IR (1985) Inclinations of the facial profile: Art versus reality. Plast Reconstr Surg 75:509–519PubMedCrossRef
61.
Farkas LG (1994) Anthropometry of the head and face. 2nd ed. Raven Press, New York, pp 21–25
62.
Seghers MJ, Longacre JJ, deStefano GA (1964) The golden proportion and beauty. Plast Reconstr Surg 34:382CrossRef
63.
Huntley HE (1970) The divine proportion. Dover, New York, pp 50–69
64.
65.
Vadachkoriia NR, Gumberidze NSh, Mandzhavidze NA (2007) “Gold proportion” and its application to calculate denture (abstract). Georgian Med News 142:87–94PubMed
66.
Green CD (1995) All that glitters: A review of psychological research on the aesthetics of the golden section. Perception 24:937–968PubMedCrossRef
67.
Amoric M (1995) The golden number: Applications to craniofacial evaluation. Funct Orthod 12:8–21, 24–25
68.
Amoric M (1989) The golden number: Applications to architectural and structural craniofacial analysis. Actual Odontostomatol Paris 42:205–219PubMed
69.
Thompson DAW (1992) On growth and form. Dover, New York
70.
Jefferson Y (1996) Skeletal types: Key to unravelling the mystery of facial beauty and its biological significance. J Gen Orthod 7:7–25PubMed
71.
Ghyka M (1977) The geometry of art and life. Dover: New York
72.
Ricketts RM (1968) Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation. Am J Orthod 54:272–289PubMedCrossRef
73.
Ricketts RM (1981) The golden divider. J Clin Orthod 15:752–759PubMed
74.
Ricketts RM (1982) Divine proportion in facial aesthetics. Clin Plast Surg 9:401–422PubMed
75.
Marquardt SR (1999) Method and apparatus for analyzing facial configurations and components. In: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, USA
76.
77.
Rhee SC, Koo SH (2007) An objective system for measuring facial attractiveness. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:1952–1953PubMedCrossRef
78.
Oumeish Y (2001) The cultural and philosophical concepts of cosmetics in beauty and art through the medical history of mankind. Clin Dermatol 19:375–386PubMedCrossRef
79.
80.
Furnas DW (1994) Foreword. In: Farkas LG (ed) Anthropometry of the head and face. Raven, New York, p xvii
81.
Konigova R (2005) Reflections on the past, present, and future of medicine. In: Gunn SWA, Masellis M (eds) Humanitarian medicine. Industria grafica editoriale, Palermo, Italy, pp 239–242
Metadaten
Titel
Numeric Expression of Aesthetics and Beauty
verfasst von
B. S. Atiyeh
S. N. Hayek
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-9074-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2008

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

RETRACTED ARTICLE: A Different Approach to the Reconstruction of the Stubborn Crooked Nose with a Different Spreader Graft: Nasal Bone Grafts Harvested from the Removed Nasal Hump

Original Article

The Use of Mechanical Acoustic Vibrations to Improve Abdominal Contour

Original Article

Endoscopic Transaxillary Capsular Contracture Treatment

Letter to the Editor

Compass Cutter for Periareolar Incisions

Original Article

Management of Prominent Ears: Personal Approach

Original Article

Transforming Growth Factor-β1-Antisense Modulates the Expression of Hepatocyte Growth Factor/Scatter Factor in Keloid Fibroblast Cell Culture

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.