Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2009

01.03.2009 | Original Article

Combined spinal–epidural analgesia for labor pain: best timing of epidural infusion following spinal dose

verfasst von: Toshiyuki Okutomi, Miwako Saito, Junko Mochizuki, Krzysztof M. Kuczkowski

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 3/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The combined spinal–epidural analgesia (CSEA) technique for labor pain has attained wide spread popularity in obstetric anesthesia. The onset of analgesia is rapid and reliable, and maternal satisfaction is very high. However, the best timing of an epidural infusion following the spinal dose and its effect on the total local anesthetics consumption has not been well determined.

Methods

A total of 144 consenting healthy nulliparous parturients whose labor was induced and who labored under regional analgesia were enrolled in this study. Following induction of the CSEA with intrathecal injection of bupivacaine, 2.5 mg and fentanyl, 25 μg, the patients were randomized into one of four groups to receive a subsequent continuous epidural infusion [E (3), E (30), E (60) and E (90)], depending on the timing of the initiation of epidural infusion of 0.1% ropivacaine, 0.0002% fentanyl and 1:500,000 epinephrine at the rate of 10 ml/h. In study Groups E (3), E (30), E (60) and E (90), epidural infusion was initiated 3, 30, 60 and 90 min, respectively following spinal induction dose. Patients requesting additional labor analgesia were given an epidural bolus (8 ml) of ropivacaine, 0.2%. The number of parturients requesting additional boluses of ropivacaine and the total dose of ropivacaine required for labor analgesia were registered.

Results

The numbers of patients who required additional boluses of ropivacaine in Group E (3) and Group E (30) were significantly less than those in Group E (60) and Group E (90). The total dose of ropivacaine required for labor pain in Group E (3) and Group E (30) was insignificantly smaller than the total dose required in Group E (60) and Group E (90).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the best timing of epidural infusion following spinal dose was within 30 min of spinal induction dose.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuczkowski KM (2004) Ambulation with combined spinal–epidural labor analgesia: the technique. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 55:29–34PubMed Kuczkowski KM (2004) Ambulation with combined spinal–epidural labor analgesia: the technique. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 55:29–34PubMed
4.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sia AT, Ruban P, Chong JL, Wong K (1999) Motor blockade is reduced with ropivacaine 0.125% for parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour. Can J Anaesth 46:1019–1023PubMedCrossRef Sia AT, Ruban P, Chong JL, Wong K (1999) Motor blockade is reduced with ropivacaine 0.125% for parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour. Can J Anaesth 46:1019–1023PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Pace MC, Aurilio C, Bulletti C, Iannotti M, Passavanti MB, Palagiano A (2004) Subarachnoid analgesia in advanced labor: a comparison of subarachnoid analgesia and pudendal block in advanced labor: analgesic quality and obstetric outcome. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1034:356–363. doi:10.1196/annals.1335.037 PubMedCrossRef Pace MC, Aurilio C, Bulletti C, Iannotti M, Passavanti MB, Palagiano A (2004) Subarachnoid analgesia in advanced labor: a comparison of subarachnoid analgesia and pudendal block in advanced labor: analgesic quality and obstetric outcome. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1034:356–363. doi:10.​1196/​annals.​1335.​037 PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodman SR, Kim-Lo SH, Ciliberto CF, Ridley DM, Smiley RM (2002) Epinephrine is not a useful addition to intrathecal fentanyl or fentanyl–bupivacaine for labor analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 27:374–379. doi:10.1053/rapm.2002.33283 PubMedCrossRef Goodman SR, Kim-Lo SH, Ciliberto CF, Ridley DM, Smiley RM (2002) Epinephrine is not a useful addition to intrathecal fentanyl or fentanyl–bupivacaine for labor analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 27:374–379. doi:10.​1053/​rapm.​2002.​33283 PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Okutomi T, Saito M, Hoka S, Mochizuki J, Amano K (2004) The effect of timing in the initiation of epidural infusion at combined spinal–epidural analgesia for labor on the total dose of local anesthetic. Anesthesiology 101:A1225. doi:10.1097/00000542-200411000-00024 CrossRef Okutomi T, Saito M, Hoka S, Mochizuki J, Amano K (2004) The effect of timing in the initiation of epidural infusion at combined spinal–epidural analgesia for labor on the total dose of local anesthetic. Anesthesiology 101:A1225. doi:10.​1097/​00000542-200411000-00024 CrossRef
12.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee BB, Ngan Kee WD, Lau WM, Wong AS (2000) Epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a comparison of 0.2% ropivacaine, 0.1% ropivacaine, and 0.1% ropivacaine with fentanyl. Reg Anesth Pain Med 27:31–36. doi:10.1053/rapm.2002.27836 CrossRef Lee BB, Ngan Kee WD, Lau WM, Wong AS (2000) Epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a comparison of 0.2% ropivacaine, 0.1% ropivacaine, and 0.1% ropivacaine with fentanyl. Reg Anesth Pain Med 27:31–36. doi:10.​1053/​rapm.​2002.​27836 CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat James KS, McGrady E, Quasim I, Patrick A (1998) Comparison of epidural bolus administration of 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.1% bupivacaine with 0.0002% fentanyl for analgesia during labour. Br J Anaesth 81:507–510PubMed James KS, McGrady E, Quasim I, Patrick A (1998) Comparison of epidural bolus administration of 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.1% bupivacaine with 0.0002% fentanyl for analgesia during labour. Br J Anaesth 81:507–510PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chestnut DH, Owen CL, Bates JN (1988) Continuous infusion epidural analgesia during labor: a randomized, double-blind comparison of 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.0002% fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine. Anesthesiology 68:754–759PubMedCrossRef Chestnut DH, Owen CL, Bates JN (1988) Continuous infusion epidural analgesia during labor: a randomized, double-blind comparison of 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.0002% fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine. Anesthesiology 68:754–759PubMedCrossRef
17.
Metadaten
Titel
Combined spinal–epidural analgesia for labor pain: best timing of epidural infusion following spinal dose
verfasst von
Toshiyuki Okutomi
Miwako Saito
Junko Mochizuki
Krzysztof M. Kuczkowski
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-008-0725-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2009

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Antikörper-Wirkstoff-Konjugat hält solide Tumoren in Schach

16.05.2024 Zielgerichtete Therapie Nachrichten

Trastuzumab deruxtecan scheint auch jenseits von Lungenkrebs gut gegen solide Tumoren mit HER2-Mutationen zu wirken. Dafür sprechen die Daten einer offenen Pan-Tumor-Studie.

Mammakarzinom: Senken Statine das krebsbedingte Sterberisiko?

15.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Frauen mit lokalem oder metastasiertem Brustkrebs, die Statine einnehmen, haben eine niedrigere krebsspezifische Mortalität als Patientinnen, die dies nicht tun, legen neue Daten aus den USA nahe.

Neue S3-Leitlinie zur unkomplizierten Zystitis: Auf Antibiotika verzichten?

15.05.2024 Harnwegsinfektionen Nachrichten

Welche Antibiotika darf man bei unkomplizierter Zystitis verwenden und wovon sollte man die Finger lassen? Welche pflanzlichen Präparate können helfen? Was taugt der zugelassene Impfstoff? Antworten vom Koordinator der frisch überarbeiteten S3-Leitlinie, Prof. Florian Wagenlehner.

Gestationsdiabetes: In der zweiten Schwangerschaft folgenreicher als in der ersten

13.05.2024 Gestationsdiabetes Nachrichten

Das Risiko, nach einem Gestationsdiabetes einen Typ-2-Diabetes zu entwickeln, hängt nicht nur von der Zahl, sondern auch von der Reihenfolge der betroffenen Schwangerschaften ab.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.