Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Virchows Archiv 6/2008

01.12.2008 | Original Article

Proficiency testing of immunohistochemical biomarker assays in breast cancer

verfasst von: Reinhard von Wasielewski, Svenja Hasselmann, Josef Rüschoff, Annette Fisseler-Eckhoff, Hans Kreipe

Erschienen in: Virchows Archiv | Ausgabe 6/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Steroid hormone receptor expression and HER2 status have become an integral part of histopathologic characterization of breast cancer and corresponding biomarker assays have gained important prognostic and predictive impact. Because testing inaccuracy could provide a major hazard to modern breast cancer therapy, a laboratory proficiency testing program has been implemented in Germany using tissue microarrays (TMAs). In four consecutive annual trials with 142 laboratories participating on average per trial, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2) were determined immunohistochemically by participating laboratories followed by central review of all immunostains. Performance strongly depended on the ambiguity of expression of the target molecule in the test samples. In clearly positive (Allred score 7–8; Her2 3+) or negative tissue samples, the majority of participants (86%) achieved concordance rates exceeding 85%. By contrast, low expression of ER or PR (Allred score 3–4) as well as Her2 status 2+ led to considerable lower concordance rates ranging from 41% (Her2 2+) to 75% (PR). Poor reproducibility was predominantly due to inadequate laboratory performance whereas interobserver agreement (weighted kappa statistics) usually was high (>0.81). Laboratories that participated in more than one of the four subsequent trials (n = 110) showed a highly significant improvement of performance. In conclusion, a TMA-based proficiency testing of biomarkers in breast cancer has been implemented in Germany over a 5-year period and revealed reliable assessment of unambiguously positive and negative test samples. Low-expressing tumor samples with regard to steroid hormone receptor expression and Her2 status 2+ led to inaccurate evaluations by up to 59% of participants. Regularly participating laboratories showed a significant improvement of performance.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldhirsch A, Glick JH, Gelber RD et al (2005) Meeting highlights: international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2005. Ann Oncol 16:1569–1583PubMedCrossRef Goldhirsch A, Glick JH, Gelber RD et al (2005) Meeting highlights: international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2005. Ann Oncol 16:1569–1583PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S et al (2001) Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 344:783–792PubMedCrossRef Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S et al (2001) Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 344:783–792PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Carlson RW, Moench SJ, Hammond ME et al (2006) NCCN HER2 testing in Breast Cancer Task Force. HER2 testing in breast cancer: NCCN Task Force report and recommendations. J Natl Compr Canc Netw Suppl 3:S1–S22 Carlson RW, Moench SJ, Hammond ME et al (2006) NCCN HER2 testing in Breast Cancer Task Force. HER2 testing in breast cancer: NCCN Task Force report and recommendations. J Natl Compr Canc Netw Suppl 3:S1–S22
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN et al (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology; College of America Pathologists. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:118–145PubMedCrossRef Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN et al (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology; College of America Pathologists. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:118–145PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ross JS, Symmans WF, Pusztai L et al (2007) Standardizing slide-based assays in breast cancer: hormone receptors, HER2, and sentinel lymph nodes. Clin Cancer Res 2007, 13:2831–2835CrossRef Ross JS, Symmans WF, Pusztai L et al (2007) Standardizing slide-based assays in breast cancer: hormone receptors, HER2, and sentinel lymph nodes. Clin Cancer Res 2007, 13:2831–2835CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Viale G, Regan MM, Maiorano E et al (2007) Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in a randomized trial comparing letrozole and tamoxifen adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal early breast cancer: BIG 1-98. J Clin Oncol 25:3846–3852PubMedCrossRef Viale G, Regan MM, Maiorano E et al (2007) Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in a randomized trial comparing letrozole and tamoxifen adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal early breast cancer: BIG 1-98. J Clin Oncol 25:3846–3852PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhodes A, Jasani B, Barnes DM et al (2000) Reliability of immunohistochemical demonstration of oestrogen receptors in routine practice: interlaboratory variance in the sensitivity of detection and evaluation of scoring systems. J Clin Pathol 53:125–130PubMedCrossRef Rhodes A, Jasani B, Barnes DM et al (2000) Reliability of immunohistochemical demonstration of oestrogen receptors in routine practice: interlaboratory variance in the sensitivity of detection and evaluation of scoring systems. J Clin Pathol 53:125–130PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wells CA, Sloane JP, Coleman D et al (2004) Consistency of staining and reporting of oestrogen receptor immunocytochemistry within the European Union—an interlaboratory study. Virchows Arch 445:119–128PubMed Wells CA, Sloane JP, Coleman D et al (2004) Consistency of staining and reporting of oestrogen receptor immunocytochemistry within the European Union—an interlaboratory study. Virchows Arch 445:119–128PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat von Wasielewski R, Mengel M, Wiese B et al (2002) Tissue array technology for testing interlaboratory and interobserver reproducibility of immunohistochemical estrogen receptor analysis in a large multicenter trial. Am J Clin Pathol 118:675–682CrossRef von Wasielewski R, Mengel M, Wiese B et al (2002) Tissue array technology for testing interlaboratory and interobserver reproducibility of immunohistochemical estrogen receptor analysis in a large multicenter trial. Am J Clin Pathol 118:675–682CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu FD, Nielsen TO, Alkushi A et al (2002) Tissue microarrays are an effective quality assurance tool for diagnostic immunohistochemistry. Mod Pathol 15:1374–1380PubMedCrossRef Hsu FD, Nielsen TO, Alkushi A et al (2002) Tissue microarrays are an effective quality assurance tool for diagnostic immunohistochemistry. Mod Pathol 15:1374–1380PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Allred DC, Harvey JM, Berardo M et al (1998) Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol 11:155–168PubMed Allred DC, Harvey JM, Berardo M et al (1998) Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol 11:155–168PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK et al (1999) Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:1474–1481PubMed Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK et al (1999) Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:1474–1481PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor CR, Levenson RM (2006) Quantification of immunohistochemistry—issues concerning methods, utility and semiquantitative assessment II. Histopathology 49:411–424PubMedCrossRef Taylor CR, Levenson RM (2006) Quantification of immunohistochemistry—issues concerning methods, utility and semiquantitative assessment II. Histopathology 49:411–424PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Swanson PE, Schmidt RA (2005) Beneath the surface of the mud, part II: the dichotomization of continuous biologic variables by maximizing immunohistochemical method sensitivity. Am J Clin Pathol 123:9–12PubMedCrossRef Swanson PE, Schmidt RA (2005) Beneath the surface of the mud, part II: the dichotomization of continuous biologic variables by maximizing immunohistochemical method sensitivity. Am J Clin Pathol 123:9–12PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Diaz LK, Sneige N (2005) Estrogen receptor analysis for breast cancer: current issues and keys to increasing testing accuracy. Adv Anat Pathol 12:10–19PubMedCrossRef Diaz LK, Sneige N (2005) Estrogen receptor analysis for breast cancer: current issues and keys to increasing testing accuracy. Adv Anat Pathol 12:10–19PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Layfield LJ, Goldstein N, Perkinson KR et al (2003) Interlaboratory variation in results from immunohistochemical assessment of estrogen receptor status. Breast J 9:257–259PubMedCrossRef Layfield LJ, Goldstein N, Perkinson KR et al (2003) Interlaboratory variation in results from immunohistochemical assessment of estrogen receptor status. Breast J 9:257–259PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fitzgibbons PL, Murphy DA, Dorfman DM et al (2006) Interlaboratory comparison of immunohistochemical testing for HER2: results of the 2004 and 2005 College of American Pathologists HER2 Immunohistochemistry Tissue Microarray Survey. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130:1440–1445PubMed Fitzgibbons PL, Murphy DA, Dorfman DM et al (2006) Interlaboratory comparison of immunohistochemical testing for HER2: results of the 2004 and 2005 College of American Pathologists HER2 Immunohistochemistry Tissue Microarray Survey. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130:1440–1445PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Proficiency testing of immunohistochemical biomarker assays in breast cancer
verfasst von
Reinhard von Wasielewski
Svenja Hasselmann
Josef Rüschoff
Annette Fisseler-Eckhoff
Hans Kreipe
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Virchows Archiv / Ausgabe 6/2008
Print ISSN: 0945-6317
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2307
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-008-0688-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2008

Virchows Archiv 6/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Pathologie

Molekularpathologische Untersuchungen im Wandel der Zeit

Open Access Biomarker Leitthema

Um auch an kleinen Gewebeproben zuverlässige und reproduzierbare Ergebnisse zu gewährleisten ist eine strenge Qualitätskontrolle in jedem Schritt des Arbeitsablaufs erforderlich. Eine nicht ordnungsgemäße Prüfung oder Behandlung des …

Vergleichende Pathologie in der onkologischen Forschung

Pathologie Leitthema

Die vergleichende experimentelle Pathologie („comparative experimental pathology“) ist ein Fachbereich an der Schnittstelle von Human- und Veterinärmedizin. Sie widmet sich der vergleichenden Erforschung von Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschieden von …

Gastrointestinale Stromatumoren

Open Access GIST CME-Artikel

Gastrointestinale Stromatumoren (GIST) stellen seit über 20 Jahren ein Paradigma für die zielgerichtete Therapie mit Tyrosinkinaseinhibitoren dar. Eine elementare Voraussetzung für eine mögliche neoadjuvante oder adjuvante Behandlung bei …

Personalisierte Medizin in der Onkologie

Aufgrund des erheblichen technologischen Fortschritts in der molekularen und genetischen Diagnostik sowie zunehmender Erkenntnisse über die molekulare Pathogenese von Krankheiten hat in den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten ein grundlegender …