Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Virchows Archiv 1/2014

01.01.2014 | Original Article

Umbilical cord coiling: clinical outcomes in an unselected population and systematic review

verfasst von: F. A. Jessop, C. C. Lees, S. Pathak, C. E. Hook, N. J. Sebire

Erschienen in: Virchows Archiv | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the frequency of pre-defined clinical outcomes in relation to umbilical cord coiling indices >90th percentile and <10th percentile in an unselected population of >1,000 women with a singleton pregnancy resulting in livebirth delivering at or near term and to report these findings in the context of a systematic review. Placentas of consecutive deliveries from an unselected low-risk population with >15 cm attached umbilical cords were included in the study. Clinical outcomes included interventional delivery, birthweight <10th percentile, Apgar score <7 at 1 min, neonatal acidosis (pH < 7.2) and admission to neonatal special care. Standard MOOSE (Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines were observed for the systematic review. Umbilical coiling index was determined for 1,082 placentas. Mean maternal age was 30.7 years (standard deviation [SD] = 5.7) and 519 women (48 %) were primiparous. Mean cord length was 43 cm (SD = 13) and mean cord coiling index 0.20 (SD = 0.09). A total of 866 cords were normally coiled, and 108 cases were hypercoiled (>90th centile) and 108 cases were undercoiled (<10th percentile). There were no differences between cases of overcoiled, normally coiled or undercoiled cords for any clinical outcome studied. The systematic review yielded a small number of clinical studies which were too statistically and clinically heterogenous to permit meta-analysis. There is insufficient evidence either from this unselected cohort study or from a systematic review to support the previous suggestion that cord coiling index >90th centile or <10th centile is associated with adverse clinical outcome in an unselected population. Previous studies that draw a link between abnormal cord coiling and clinical outcome are generally too small and/or selective to allow meaningful conclusions or applicability to low-risk populations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Strong TH Jr, Jarles DL, Vega JS, Feldman DB (1994) The umbilical coiling index. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:29–32PubMedCrossRef Strong TH Jr, Jarles DL, Vega JS, Feldman DB (1994) The umbilical coiling index. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:29–32PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Azocarespin B (1964) Significance of coiling of the umbilical cord. Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez 24:771–781PubMed Azocarespin B (1964) Significance of coiling of the umbilical cord. Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez 24:771–781PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bankowski M (1964) Intrauterine asphyxia due to excessive coiling of the umbilical cord. Pol Tyg Lek 19:1248–1249PubMed Bankowski M (1964) Intrauterine asphyxia due to excessive coiling of the umbilical cord. Pol Tyg Lek 19:1248–1249PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat de Laat MW, Franx A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Nikkels PG (2006) Umbilical coiling index in normal and complicated pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 107:1049–1055PubMedCrossRef de Laat MW, Franx A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Nikkels PG (2006) Umbilical coiling index in normal and complicated pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 107:1049–1055PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat de Laat MW, Franx A, Nikkels PG, Visser GH (2006) Prenatal ultrasonographic prediction of the umbilical coiling index at birth and adverse pregnancy outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:704–709PubMedCrossRef de Laat MW, Franx A, Nikkels PG, Visser GH (2006) Prenatal ultrasonographic prediction of the umbilical coiling index at birth and adverse pregnancy outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:704–709PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Degani S, Leibovich Z, Shapiro I, Gonen R, Ohel G (2001) Early second-trimester low umbilical coiling index predicts small-for-gestational-age fetuses. J Ultrasound Med 20:1183–1188PubMed Degani S, Leibovich Z, Shapiro I, Gonen R, Ohel G (2001) Early second-trimester low umbilical coiling index predicts small-for-gestational-age fetuses. J Ultrasound Med 20:1183–1188PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ercal T, Lacin S, Altunyurt S, Saygili U, Cinar O, Mumcu A (1996) Umbilical coiling index: is it a marker for the foetus at risk? Br J Clin Pract 50:254–256PubMed Ercal T, Lacin S, Altunyurt S, Saygili U, Cinar O, Mumcu A (1996) Umbilical coiling index: is it a marker for the foetus at risk? Br J Clin Pract 50:254–256PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kashanian M, Akbarian A, Kouhpayehzadeh J (2006) The umbilical coiling index and adverse perinatal outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 95:8–13PubMedCrossRef Kashanian M, Akbarian A, Kouhpayehzadeh J (2006) The umbilical coiling index and adverse perinatal outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 95:8–13PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rana J, Ebert GA, Kappy KA (1995) Adverse perinatal outcome in patients with an abnormal umbilical coiling index. Obstet Gynecol 85:573–577PubMedCrossRef Rana J, Ebert GA, Kappy KA (1995) Adverse perinatal outcome in patients with an abnormal umbilical coiling index. Obstet Gynecol 85:573–577PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Machin GA, Ackerman J, Gilbert-Barness E (2000) Abnormal umbilical cord coiling is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Pediatr Dev Pathol 3:462–471PubMedCrossRef Machin GA, Ackerman J, Gilbert-Barness E (2000) Abnormal umbilical cord coiling is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Pediatr Dev Pathol 3:462–471PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sebire NJ (2007) Pathophysiological significance of abnormal umbilical cord coiling index. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:804–806PubMedCrossRef Sebire NJ (2007) Pathophysiological significance of abnormal umbilical cord coiling index. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:804–806PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pathak S, Hook E, Hackett G, Murdoch E, Sebire NJ, Jessop F, Lees C (2010) Cord coiling, umbilical cord insertion and placental shape in an unselected cohort delivering at term: relationship with common obstetric outcomes. Placenta 31:963–968PubMedCrossRef Pathak S, Hook E, Hackett G, Murdoch E, Sebire NJ, Jessop F, Lees C (2010) Cord coiling, umbilical cord insertion and placental shape in an unselected cohort delivering at term: relationship with common obstetric outcomes. Placenta 31:963–968PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gersell DJ (1998) ASCP survey on placental examination. Am J Clin Pathol 109:127–143PubMed Gersell DJ (1998) ASCP survey on placental examination. Am J Clin Pathol 109:127–143PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hargitai B, Marton T, Cox PM (2004) Examination of the human placenta. J Clin Pathol 57:785–792PubMedCrossRef Hargitai B, Marton T, Cox PM (2004) Examination of the human placenta. J Clin Pathol 57:785–792PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Pathak S, Lees CC, Hackett G, Jessop F, Sebire NJ (2011) Frequency and clinical significance of placental histological lesions in an unselected population at or near term. Virchows Arch 459:565–572PubMedCrossRef Pathak S, Lees CC, Hackett G, Jessop F, Sebire NJ (2011) Frequency and clinical significance of placental histological lesions in an unselected population at or near term. Virchows Arch 459:565–572PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pathak S, Sebire NJ, Hook L, Hackett G, Murdoch E, Jessop F, Lees C (2011) Relationship between placental morphology and histological findings in an unselected population near term.). Virchows Arch 459:11–20PubMedCrossRef Pathak S, Sebire NJ, Hook L, Hackett G, Murdoch E, Jessop F, Lees C (2011) Relationship between placental morphology and histological findings in an unselected population near term.). Virchows Arch 459:11–20PubMedCrossRef
19.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012PubMedCrossRef Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions.The Cochrane Collaboration. http://handbook.cochrane.org (version 5.1.0, updated March 2011). Accessed 31 August 2011. Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions.The Cochrane Collaboration. http://​handbook.​cochrane.​org (version 5.1.0, updated March 2011). Accessed 31 August 2011.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Chitra T, Sushanth YS, Raghavan S (2012) Umbilical coiling index as a marker of perinatal outcome: an analytical study. Obstet Gynecol Int 2012:213–689CrossRef Chitra T, Sushanth YS, Raghavan S (2012) Umbilical coiling index as a marker of perinatal outcome: an analytical study. Obstet Gynecol Int 2012:213–689CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat de Laat MW, van Alderen ED, Franx A, Visser GH, Bots ML, Nikkels PG (2007) The umbilical coiling index in complicated pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 130:66–72PubMedCrossRef de Laat MW, van Alderen ED, Franx A, Visser GH, Bots ML, Nikkels PG (2007) The umbilical coiling index in complicated pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 130:66–72PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Predanic M, Perni SC, Chasen ST, Baergen RN, Chervenak FA (2005) Ultrasound evaluation of abnormal umbilical cord coiling in second trimester of gestation in association with adverse pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:387–394PubMedCrossRef Predanic M, Perni SC, Chasen ST, Baergen RN, Chervenak FA (2005) Ultrasound evaluation of abnormal umbilical cord coiling in second trimester of gestation in association with adverse pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:387–394PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Otsubo Y, Yoneyama Y, Suzuki S, Sawa R, Araki T (1999) Sonographic evaluation of umbilical cord insertion with umbilical coiling index. J Clin Ultrasound 27:341–344PubMedCrossRef Otsubo Y, Yoneyama Y, Suzuki S, Sawa R, Araki T (1999) Sonographic evaluation of umbilical cord insertion with umbilical coiling index. J Clin Ultrasound 27:341–344PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Casey BM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ (2001) The continuing value of the Apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants. New Engl J Med 344:467–471PubMedCrossRef Casey BM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ (2001) The continuing value of the Apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants. New Engl J Med 344:467–471PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Armstrong L, Stenson BJ (2007) Use of umbilical cord blood gas analysis in the assessment of the newborn. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 92:430–434CrossRef Armstrong L, Stenson BJ (2007) Use of umbilical cord blood gas analysis in the assessment of the newborn. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 92:430–434CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ernst LM, Minturn L, Huang MH, Curry E, Su EJ (2013) Gross patterns of umbilical cord coiling: correlations with placental histology and stillbirth. Placenta 34:583–588PubMedCrossRef Ernst LM, Minturn L, Huang MH, Curry E, Su EJ (2013) Gross patterns of umbilical cord coiling: correlations with placental histology and stillbirth. Placenta 34:583–588PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Umbilical cord coiling: clinical outcomes in an unselected population and systematic review
verfasst von
F. A. Jessop
C. C. Lees
S. Pathak
C. E. Hook
N. J. Sebire
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Virchows Archiv / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0945-6317
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2307
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-013-1513-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Virchows Archiv 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Pathologie

Molekularpathologische Untersuchungen im Wandel der Zeit

Open Access Biomarker Leitthema

Um auch an kleinen Gewebeproben zuverlässige und reproduzierbare Ergebnisse zu gewährleisten ist eine strenge Qualitätskontrolle in jedem Schritt des Arbeitsablaufs erforderlich. Eine nicht ordnungsgemäße Prüfung oder Behandlung des …

Vergleichende Pathologie in der onkologischen Forschung

Pathologie Leitthema

Die vergleichende experimentelle Pathologie („comparative experimental pathology“) ist ein Fachbereich an der Schnittstelle von Human- und Veterinärmedizin. Sie widmet sich der vergleichenden Erforschung von Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschieden von …

Gastrointestinale Stromatumoren

Open Access GIST CME-Artikel

Gastrointestinale Stromatumoren (GIST) stellen seit über 20 Jahren ein Paradigma für die zielgerichtete Therapie mit Tyrosinkinaseinhibitoren dar. Eine elementare Voraussetzung für eine mögliche neoadjuvante oder adjuvante Behandlung bei …

Personalisierte Medizin in der Onkologie

Aufgrund des erheblichen technologischen Fortschritts in der molekularen und genetischen Diagnostik sowie zunehmender Erkenntnisse über die molekulare Pathogenese von Krankheiten hat in den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten ein grundlegender …