Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Dysphagia 1/2016

01.02.2016 | Original Article

The Effect of the Cervical Orthosis on Swallowing Physiology and Cervical Spine Motion During Swallowing

verfasst von: Kojiro Mekata, Tomoyuki Takigawa, Jun Matsubayashi, Kazukiyo Toda, Yasuhiro Hasegawa, Yasuo Ito

Erschienen in: Dysphagia | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Cervical orthosis is used to immobilize the neck in various disorders such as trauma and post-operation. However, it is still uncertain how cervical orthosis restricts the degree of movement of the cervical spine during swallowing and how they affect swallowing physiology. The purpose of this study was to evaluate these issues using the Philadelphia® Collar. We conducted videofluorography of swallowing in 39 healthy subjects (23 men, 16 women; mean age of 34.3 years) with and without cervical orthosis. To compare the two conditions regarding the cervical spine motion, we determined the angular and positional changes of the occipital bone (C0) and each cervical vertebra (C1–C7) from the oral phase to the pharyngeal phase. Similarly, to compare swallowing physiology, we assessed the start and end times and the durations of soft palate elevation, rapid hyoid anterosuperior movement, epiglottis inversion, closure of the laryngeal vestibule, and pharyngoesophageal segment (PES) opening. Finally, we compared the transit times of contrast agent in the two conditions. The respective extensions of C1, C2, and C3 were 0.31°, 0.07°, and 0.05° (mean) with cervical orthosis, and the respective flexions of C1, C2, and C3 were 0.98°, 1.42°, and 0.85° (mean) without. These results suggested that cervical orthosis restricted the flexion of C1–C3. Analysis of swallowing physiology revealed that the average durations of hyoid anterosuperior elevation, epiglottic inversion, and PES opening were prolonged by 0.09, 0.19, and 0.05 s, respectively. In conclusion, the cervical orthosis restricted the movement of the cervical spine during swallowing and changed swallowing physiology.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Pimenta AP. Dysphagia and cervical exostoses. Arq Gastroenterol. 1979;16:86–90.PubMed Pimenta AP. Dysphagia and cervical exostoses. Arq Gastroenterol. 1979;16:86–90.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rihn JA, Kane J, Albert TJ, et al. What is the incidence and severity of dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:658–65.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Rihn JA, Kane J, Albert TJ, et al. What is the incidence and severity of dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:658–65.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Stachniak JB, Diebner JD, Brunk ES, et al. Analysis of prevertebral soft-tissue swelling and dysphagia in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in patients at risk for pseudarthrosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14:244–9.CrossRefPubMed Stachniak JB, Diebner JD, Brunk ES, et al. Analysis of prevertebral soft-tissue swelling and dysphagia in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in patients at risk for pseudarthrosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14:244–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, Cunningham BW, et al. Lower incidence of dysphagia with cervical arthroplasty compared with ACDF in a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010;23:1–8.CrossRefPubMed McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, Cunningham BW, et al. Lower incidence of dysphagia with cervical arthroplasty compared with ACDF in a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010;23:1–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Riew KD. Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis. Spine. 2008;33:1305–12.CrossRefPubMed Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Riew KD. Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis. Spine. 2008;33:1305–12.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Radcliff KE, Koyonos L, Clyde C, et al. What is the incidence of dysphagia after posterior cervical surgery? Spine. 2013;38:1082–8.CrossRefPubMed Radcliff KE, Koyonos L, Clyde C, et al. What is the incidence of dysphagia after posterior cervical surgery? Spine. 2013;38:1082–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bisch EM, Logemann JA, Rademaker AW, et al. Swallow effects of the SOMI brace. Abstracts of the 1992 ASHA convention; 1992. 130. Bisch EM, Logemann JA, Rademaker AW, et al. Swallow effects of the SOMI brace. Abstracts of the 1992 ASHA convention; 1992. 130.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Odderson IR, Lietzow D. Dysphagia complications of the Minerva brace. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:1386–8.CrossRefPubMed Odderson IR, Lietzow D. Dysphagia complications of the Minerva brace. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:1386–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Logemann JA. Manual for the videofluorographic study of swallowing. Austin: PRO-ED Inc; 1993. Logemann JA. Manual for the videofluorographic study of swallowing. Austin: PRO-ED Inc; 1993.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Marshall DL, Tuchin PJ. Correlation of cervical lordosis measurement with incidence of motor vehicle accidents. Australas Chiropr Osteopat. 1996;5:79–85. Marshall DL, Tuchin PJ. Correlation of cervical lordosis measurement with incidence of motor vehicle accidents. Australas Chiropr Osteopat. 1996;5:79–85.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Inamoto Y, Saitoh E, Okada S, et al. The effect of bolus viscosity on laryngeal closure in swallowing: kinematic analysis using 320-row area detector CT. Dysphagia. 2013;28:33–42.CrossRefPubMed Inamoto Y, Saitoh E, Okada S, et al. The effect of bolus viscosity on laryngeal closure in swallowing: kinematic analysis using 320-row area detector CT. Dysphagia. 2013;28:33–42.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Beavis A. Cervical orthoses. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1989;13:6–13.PubMed Beavis A. Cervical orthoses. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1989;13:6–13.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Stambolis V, Brady S, Klos D, et al. The effects of cervical bracing upon swallowing in young, normal, healthy volunteers. Dysphagia. 2003;18:39–45.CrossRefPubMed Stambolis V, Brady S, Klos D, et al. The effects of cervical bracing upon swallowing in young, normal, healthy volunteers. Dysphagia. 2003;18:39–45.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Logemann JA. Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. London: College-Hill Press; 1998. Logemann JA. Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. London: College-Hill Press; 1998.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Logemann JA, Kahrilas PJ, Cheng J, et al. Closure mechanisms of laryngeal vestibule during swallow. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:338–44. Logemann JA, Kahrilas PJ, Cheng J, et al. Closure mechanisms of laryngeal vestibule during swallow. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:338–44.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kendall KA, Leonard RJ, McKenzie S. Airway protection: evaluation with videofluoroscopy. Dysphagia. 2004;19:65–70.PubMed Kendall KA, Leonard RJ, McKenzie S. Airway protection: evaluation with videofluoroscopy. Dysphagia. 2004;19:65–70.PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bryant M. Biofeedback in the treatment of a selected dysphagic patient. Dysphagia. 1991;6:140–4.CrossRefPubMed Bryant M. Biofeedback in the treatment of a selected dysphagic patient. Dysphagia. 1991;6:140–4.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Logemann JA, Pauloski BR, Rademaker AW, et al. Oropharyngeal swallow in younger and older women: videofluoroscopic analysis. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002;45:434–45.CrossRefPubMed Logemann JA, Pauloski BR, Rademaker AW, et al. Oropharyngeal swallow in younger and older women: videofluoroscopic analysis. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002;45:434–45.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahrilas PJ, Logemann JA. Volume accommodation during swallowing. Dysphagia. 1993;8:259–65.CrossRefPubMed Kahrilas PJ, Logemann JA. Volume accommodation during swallowing. Dysphagia. 1993;8:259–65.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Reimers-Neils L, Logemann J, Larson C. Viscosity effects on EMG activity in normal swallow. Dysphagia. 1994;9:101–6.CrossRefPubMed Reimers-Neils L, Logemann J, Larson C. Viscosity effects on EMG activity in normal swallow. Dysphagia. 1994;9:101–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The Effect of the Cervical Orthosis on Swallowing Physiology and Cervical Spine Motion During Swallowing
verfasst von
Kojiro Mekata
Tomoyuki Takigawa
Jun Matsubayashi
Kazukiyo Toda
Yasuhiro Hasegawa
Yasuo Ito
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Dysphagia / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-015-9660-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Dysphagia 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

16.04.2024 HNO-Chirurgie Nachrichten

Mit Blick auf das Risiko für Komplikationen nach elektiven Eingriffen im HNO-Bereich scheint das Alter der Patienten kein ausschlaggebender Faktor zu sein. Entscheidend ist offenbar, wie fit die Betroffenen tatsächlich sind.

Intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie gewinnt an Boden

16.04.2024 Tonsillektomie Nachrichten

Gegenüber der vollständigen Entfernung der Gaumenmandeln hat die intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie einige Vorteile, wie HNO-Fachleute aus den USA hervorheben. Sie haben die aktuelle Literatur zu dem Verfahren gesichtet.

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.