Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2010

01.03.2010

Does robotic assistance improve efficiency in performing complex minimally invasive surgical procedures?

verfasst von: Shiva Jayaraman, Douglas Quan, Ibrahim Al-Ghamdi, Firas El-Deen, Christopher M. Schlachta

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 3/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

We used a model of biliary-enteric anastomosis to test whether da Vinci robotics improves performance on a complex minimally invasive surgical (MIS) procedure.

Methods

An ex vivo model for choledochojejunostomy was created using porcine livers with extrahepatic bile ducts and contiguous intestines. MIS choledochojejunostomies were performed in two arms: group 1 (laparoscopic, n = 30) and group 2 (da Vinci assisted, n = 30). Procedures were performed by three surgeons with graduated MIS expertise: surgeon A (MIS + robotics), surgeon B (experienced MIS), and surgeon C (basic MIS). Each surgeon performed ten procedures per group. The primary objective was time to complete anastomoses using each method. Secondary objectives included anastomosis quality, impact of experience on performance, and learning curve.

Results

da Vinci led to faster anastomoses than laparoscopy (28.0 vs. 35.9 min, p = 0.002). Surgeon A’s mean operative times were equivalent with both techniques (24.5 vs. 22.3 min). Surgeons B and C experienced faster operative times with robotics over laparoscopy alone (39.4 vs. 28.6 min, p = 0.01; and 43.8 vs. 33.0 min, p = 0.008, respectively). Surgeon A did not demonstrate a learning curve with either laparoscopy (22.4 vs. 22.4 min, p = not significant, NS) or robotics (24.7 vs. 19.8 min, p = NS). Surgeon B demonstrated nonsignificant improvement with laparoscopy (46.6 vs. 39.5 min, p = NS). With robotic assistance, a learning curve was demonstrated (36.8 vs. 24.7 min, p = 0.02). Surgeon C demonstrated a learning curve with laparoscopy (58.3 vs. 33.2 min, p = 0.004), but no improvement was noted with robot assistance (32.2 vs. 34.7 min, p = NS).

Conclusions

da Vinci improves time to completion and quality of choledochojejunostomy over laparoscopy in an ex vivo bench model. This advantage is more pronounced in the hands of surgeons with less MIS experience. Conversely, robotics may allow less experienced surgeons to perform more complex operations without first developing advanced laparoscopic skills; however, there may be benefit to first obtaining fundamental skills.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayaraman S, Davies W, Schlachta CM (2008) Robot-assisted minimally invasive common bile duct exploration: a Canadian first. Can J Surg 51:E93–E94PubMed Jayaraman S, Davies W, Schlachta CM (2008) Robot-assisted minimally invasive common bile duct exploration: a Canadian first. Can J Surg 51:E93–E94PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gutt CN, Oniu T, Mehrabi A et al (2004) Robot-assisted abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 91:1390–1397CrossRefPubMed Gutt CN, Oniu T, Mehrabi A et al (2004) Robot-assisted abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 91:1390–1397CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chitwood WR Jr, Nifong LW, Chapman WH, Felger JE, Bailey BM, Ballint T et al (2001) Robotic surgical training in an academic institution. Ann Surg 234:475–486CrossRefPubMed Chitwood WR Jr, Nifong LW, Chapman WH, Felger JE, Bailey BM, Ballint T et al (2001) Robotic surgical training in an academic institution. Ann Surg 234:475–486CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gettman MT, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R (2002) Anderson–Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system. Urology 60:509–513CrossRefPubMed Gettman MT, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R (2002) Anderson–Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system. Urology 60:509–513CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784CrossRefPubMed Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chekan EG, Clark L, Wu J, Pappas TN, Eubanks S (1999) Laparoscopic biliary and enteric bypass. Semin Surg Oncol 16:313–320CrossRefPubMed Chekan EG, Clark L, Wu J, Pappas TN, Eubanks S (1999) Laparoscopic biliary and enteric bypass. Semin Surg Oncol 16:313–320CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeyapalan M, Almeida JA, Michaelson RL, Franklin ME Jr (2002) Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy: review of a 4-year experience with an uncommon problem. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:148–153CrossRefPubMed Jeyapalan M, Almeida JA, Michaelson RL, Franklin ME Jr (2002) Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy: review of a 4-year experience with an uncommon problem. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:148–153CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Schob OM, Schmid RA, Morimoto AK, Largiader F, Zucker KA (1997) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy. Am J Surg 173:312–319CrossRefPubMed Schob OM, Schmid RA, Morimoto AK, Largiader F, Zucker KA (1997) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy. Am J Surg 173:312–319CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruurda JP, van Dongen KW, Dries J, Borel Rinkes IH, Broeders IA (2003) Robot-assisted laparoscopic choledochojejunostomy. Surg Endosc 17:1937–1942CrossRefPubMed Ruurda JP, van Dongen KW, Dries J, Borel Rinkes IH, Broeders IA (2003) Robot-assisted laparoscopic choledochojejunostomy. Surg Endosc 17:1937–1942CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Meehan JJ, Elliot S, Sandler A (2007) The robotic approach to complex hepatobiliary anomalies in children: preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg 42:2110–2114CrossRefPubMed Meehan JJ, Elliot S, Sandler A (2007) The robotic approach to complex hepatobiliary anomalies in children: preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg 42:2110–2114CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rothlin MA, Schob O, Weber M (1999) Laparoscopic gastro- and hepaticojejunostomy for palliation of pancreatic cancer: a case controlled study. Surg Endosc 13:1065–1069CrossRefPubMed Rothlin MA, Schob O, Weber M (1999) Laparoscopic gastro- and hepaticojejunostomy for palliation of pancreatic cancer: a case controlled study. Surg Endosc 13:1065–1069CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat El-Hakim A, Leung RA, Tewari A (2006) Robotic prostatectomy: a pooled analysis of published literature. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 6:11–20CrossRefPubMed El-Hakim A, Leung RA, Tewari A (2006) Robotic prostatectomy: a pooled analysis of published literature. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 6:11–20CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hakimi AA, Feder M, Ghavamian R (2007) Minimally invasive approaches to prostate cancer: a review of the current literature. Urol J 4:130–137PubMed Hakimi AA, Feder M, Ghavamian R (2007) Minimally invasive approaches to prostate cancer: a review of the current literature. Urol J 4:130–137PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Wexner SD, Begamaschi R, Lacy A, Udo J, Brölmann H, Kennedy RH et al (2008) The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results from a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Endosc 23:438–443CrossRefPubMed Wexner SD, Begamaschi R, Lacy A, Udo J, Brölmann H, Kennedy RH et al (2008) The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results from a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Endosc 23:438–443CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Welling TH, Heidt DG, Englesbe MJ, Magee JC, Sung RS, Campbell DA et al (2008) Biliary complications following liver transplantation in the model for end-stage liver disease era: effect of donor, recipient, and technical factors. Liver Transpl 14:73–80CrossRefPubMed Welling TH, Heidt DG, Englesbe MJ, Magee JC, Sung RS, Campbell DA et al (2008) Biliary complications following liver transplantation in the model for end-stage liver disease era: effect of donor, recipient, and technical factors. Liver Transpl 14:73–80CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Maheshwari A, Maley W, Li Z, Thuluvath PJ (2007) Biliary complications and outcomes of liver transplantation from donors after cardiac death. Liver Transpl 13:1645–1653CrossRefPubMed Maheshwari A, Maley W, Li Z, Thuluvath PJ (2007) Biliary complications and outcomes of liver transplantation from donors after cardiac death. Liver Transpl 13:1645–1653CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Alsharabi A, Zieniewicz K, Michałowicz B, Patkowski W, Nyckowski P, Wróblewski T et al (2007) Biliary complications in relation to the technique of biliary reconstruction in adult liver transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 39:2785–2787CrossRefPubMed Alsharabi A, Zieniewicz K, Michałowicz B, Patkowski W, Nyckowski P, Wróblewski T et al (2007) Biliary complications in relation to the technique of biliary reconstruction in adult liver transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 39:2785–2787CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Does robotic assistance improve efficiency in performing complex minimally invasive surgical procedures?
verfasst von
Shiva Jayaraman
Douglas Quan
Ibrahim Al-Ghamdi
Firas El-Deen
Christopher M. Schlachta
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0621-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2010

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.