Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2013

01.11.2013

Can laparoscopy for colon resection reduce the need for discharge to skilled care facility?

verfasst von: Abhijit Shaligram, Lynette Smith, Pradeep Pallati, Anton Simorov, Jane Meza, Dmitry Oleynikov

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 11/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

A significant proportion of patients, especially the elderly undergoing colon resections, are likely to be discharged to a skilled care facility. This study aims to examine whether the technique of colectomy, open versus laparoscopic, contributed to their discharge to a skilled care facility.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis using discharge data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Adult patients who underwent colectomy in 2009 were evaluated. SAS and SUDAAN software were used to provide weighted estimates and to account for the complex sampling design of the NIS. We compared routine discharge to nonroutine discharge, defined as transfer to short-term hospital, skilled nursing facility, intermediate care, home health, or another type of facility.

Results

A weighted total of 221,294 adult patients underwent colectomy in 2009 and had the primary outcome of discharge available. Of these colon resections, 70,361 (32 %) were performed laparoscopically and 150,933 (68 %) by open technique. A total of 139,047 (62.8 %) patients had routine discharge and 73,572 (33.3 %) nonroutine. A total of 8,445 (3.8 %) patients died while in the hospital, and 229 (0.1 %) left against medical advice and were excluded from further analysis. On univariate analysis, age ≥65 years, female gender, Black/Hispanic race, open technique (compared to laparoscopic), Medicare/Medicaid insurance status, comorbidity index of ≥1, and malignant primary diagnosis predicted nonroutine discharge. A multivariate logistic model was then used to predict nonroutine discharge in these patients using variables significant in the univariate analysis at the α = 0.05 significance level. In the multivariate analysis, open compared to laparoscopic technique was independently associated with increased likelihood of discharge to skilled care facilities (odds ratio 2.85, 95 % confidence interval 2.59–3.14).

Conclusions

In addition to the expected factors like advancing age, female gender, and increasing comorbidity index, open compared to laparoscopic technique for colectomy is associated with an increased likelihood of discharge to skilled care facilities. When feasible, the laparoscopic technique should be considered as an option, especially in the elderly patients who require colon resection, because it may reduce their likelihood of discharge to a skilled care facility.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(3):144–150PubMed Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(3):144–150PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kemp JA, Finlayson SR (2008) Outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy: a national population-based comparison. Surg Innov 15(4):277–283PubMedCrossRef Kemp JA, Finlayson SR (2008) Outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy: a national population-based comparison. Surg Innov 15(4):277–283PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat COST Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef COST Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Lacy AM, Castells A, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Brown J, Delgado S, Kuhrij E, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Transatlantic Laparoscopically Assisted vs Open Colectomy Trials Study Group (2007) Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 142(3):298–303PubMedCrossRef Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Lacy AM, Castells A, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Brown J, Delgado S, Kuhrij E, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Transatlantic Laparoscopically Assisted vs Open Colectomy Trials Study Group (2007) Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 142(3):298–303PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: shortterm outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: shortterm outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M (2008) Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 247(5):819–824PubMedCrossRef Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M (2008) Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 247(5):819–824PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Simorov A, Shaligram A, Shostrom V, Boilesen E, Thompson J, Oleynikov D (2012) Laparoscopic colon resection trends in utilization and rate of conversion to open procedure: a national database review of academic medical centers. Ann Surg 256(3):462–468PubMedCrossRef Simorov A, Shaligram A, Shostrom V, Boilesen E, Thompson J, Oleynikov D (2012) Laparoscopic colon resection trends in utilization and rate of conversion to open procedure: a national database review of academic medical centers. Ann Surg 256(3):462–468PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cone MM, Herzig DO, Diggs BS, Rea JD, Hardiman KM, Lu KC (2012) Effect of surgical approach on 30-day mortality and morbidity after elective colectomy: a NSQIP study. J Gastrointest Surg 16(6):1212–1217PubMedCrossRef Cone MM, Herzig DO, Diggs BS, Rea JD, Hardiman KM, Lu KC (2012) Effect of surgical approach on 30-day mortality and morbidity after elective colectomy: a NSQIP study. J Gastrointest Surg 16(6):1212–1217PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Collins TC, Daley J, Henderson WH, Khuri SF (1999) Risk factors for prolonged length of stay after major elective surgery. Ann Surg 230(2):251–259PubMedCrossRef Collins TC, Daley J, Henderson WH, Khuri SF (1999) Risk factors for prolonged length of stay after major elective surgery. Ann Surg 230(2):251–259PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung JM, Dzankic S (2001) Relative importance of preoperative health status versus intraoperative factors in predicting postoperative adverse outcomes in geriatric surgical patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 49(8):1080–1085PubMedCrossRef Leung JM, Dzankic S (2001) Relative importance of preoperative health status versus intraoperative factors in predicting postoperative adverse outcomes in geriatric surgical patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 49(8):1080–1085PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Legner VJ, Doerner D, Reilly DF, McCormick WC (2004) Risk factors for nursing home placement following major nonemergent surgery. Am J Med 117(2):82–86PubMedCrossRef Legner VJ, Doerner D, Reilly DF, McCormick WC (2004) Risk factors for nursing home placement following major nonemergent surgery. Am J Med 117(2):82–86PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Legner VJ, Massarweh NN, Symons RG, McCormick WC, Flum DR (2009) The significance of discharge to skilled care after abdominopelvic surgery in older adults. Ann Surg 249(2):250–255PubMedCrossRef Legner VJ, Massarweh NN, Symons RG, McCormick WC, Flum DR (2009) The significance of discharge to skilled care after abdominopelvic surgery in older adults. Ann Surg 249(2):250–255PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Oyetunji TA, Turner PL, Onguti SK, Ehanire ID, Dorsett FO, Fullum TM, Cornwell EE III, Haider AH (2013) Predictors of postdischarge complications: role of in-hospital length of stay. Am J Surg 205(1):71–76PubMedCrossRef Oyetunji TA, Turner PL, Onguti SK, Ehanire ID, Dorsett FO, Fullum TM, Cornwell EE III, Haider AH (2013) Predictors of postdischarge complications: role of in-hospital length of stay. Am J Surg 205(1):71–76PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Masoomi H, Kang CY, Chen A, Mills S, Dolich MO, Carmichael JC, Stamos MJ (2012) Predictive factors of in-hospital mortality in colon and rectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 215(2):255–261PubMedCrossRef Masoomi H, Kang CY, Chen A, Mills S, Dolich MO, Carmichael JC, Stamos MJ (2012) Predictive factors of in-hospital mortality in colon and rectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 215(2):255–261PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, Saunders LD, Beck CA, Feasby TE, Ghali WA (2005) Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 43(11):1130–1139PubMedCrossRef Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, Saunders LD, Beck CA, Feasby TE, Ghali WA (2005) Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 43(11):1130–1139PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Can laparoscopy for colon resection reduce the need for discharge to skilled care facility?
verfasst von
Abhijit Shaligram
Lynette Smith
Pradeep Pallati
Anton Simorov
Jane Meza
Dmitry Oleynikov
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2013
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 11/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3052-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.