Erschienen in:
01.08.2015
Surgeons’ perceptions of transanal endoscopic microsurgery using minilaparoscopic instruments in a simulator: the thinner the better
verfasst von:
Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo, Carlos Ramon Silveira Mendes, Gustavo Lopes Carvalho, Marcos Lyra
Erschienen in:
Surgical Endoscopy
|
Ausgabe 8/2015
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Background
Several issues have limited the widespread adoption of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). The need for specialized equipment and the steep learning curve represent one of them. To operate on within a 4-cm diameter, rectoscope represents a major technical challenge. However, minilaparoscopic surgery has been introduced to reduce invasiveness and abdominal wall trauma. In TEM, instrument miniaturization may lead to technique optimization. We hypothesized that visualization and maneuverability during TEM performed with 3-mm minilaparoscopic instruments would be superior to TEM performed with conventional 5-mm instruments.
Methods
Eighteen general and colorectal surgeons with experience with TEM under ten cases were recruited. Two tasks should be accomplished using the TEO®-Neoderma simulator. First, using conventional 5-mm TEO® curved-tip instruments, a “polypoid lesion” should be excised. Next, closure of the “rectal” defect should be undertaken. In the second part, the same participants repeated the same excision/closure tasks using 3-mm minilaparoscopic instruments. After tasks conclusion, participants fulfilled an evaluation questionnaire with seven questions regarding visualization and maneuverability when using 3-mm compared to 5-mm instruments.
Results
For each one of the seven questions in the questionnaire, the score results were significantly higher for the 3-mm instruments indicating that performance with the 3-mm minilaparoscopic instruments in the TEO simulator was in all cases between “better than expected” and “much better than expected.” Appropriateness of the diameter of the minilaparoscopic instruments was the best evaluated parameter. The question addressing the ease of performing the tasks in the simulator presented the lowest mean score.
Conclusions
The perceptions of participating surgeons indicated that there is better visualization and maneuverability during basic transanal endoscopic microsurgery tasks conducted in a simulator using 3-mm minilaparoscopic instruments when compared to conventional 5-mm instruments.