Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2016

19.02.2016

Minimally invasive entero-enteral dual-path bypass using self-assembling magnets

verfasst von: Marvin Ryou, Hiroyuki Aihara, Christopher C. Thompson

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 10/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

A minimally invasive method of entero-enteral bypass may be desirable for treatment of obstruction, obesity, or metabolic syndrome. We have developed a technology based on miniature self-assembling magnets which create large-caliber anastomoses (incisionless anastomosis system or IAS). The aim of this study was to assess (a) procedural characteristics of IAS deployment and (b) long-term integrity and patency of the resulting jejuno-ileal dual-path bypass.

Methods

Endoscopic jejuno-ileal bypass creation using IAS magnets was performed in 8 Yorkshire pigs survived 3 months. Procedure: The jejunal magnet was endoscopically deployed. However, the ileal magnet required surgical delivery given restraints of porcine anatomy. A 5-mm enterotomy was created through which the ileal magnet was inserted using a modified laparoscopic delivery tool. Magnets were manually coupled. Pigs underwent serial endoscopies for anastomosis assessment. Three-month necropsies were performed, followed by pressure testing of anastomoses and histological analysis.

Results

Jejuno-ileal bypass creation using self-assembling IAS magnets was successful in all 8 pigs (100 %). Patent, leak-free bypasses formed in all animals by day 10. All IAS magnets were expelled by day 12. Anastomoses were widely patent at 3 months, with mean maximal diameter of 30 mm. At necropsy, adhesions were minimal. Pressure testing confirmed superior integrity of anastomotic tissue. Histology showed full epithelialization across the anastomosis with no evidence of submucosal fibrosis or inflammation.

Conclusions

Entero-enteral bypass using self-assembling IAS magnets is safe and technically feasible in the porcine model. IAS magnets can be rapidly delivered endoscopically or through a modified laparoscopic device. Expulsion of fused magnets avoids retention of prosthetic material. Anastomoses are widely patent and fully re-epithelialized. Three-month pressure testing reveals anastomotic tissue to be as robust as native tissue, while necropsy and histology suggests minimal/absent tissue inflammation. In human anatomy, a fully endoscopic jejuno-ileal bypass using IAS magnets may be feasible.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ly J, O’Grady G, Mittal A, Plank L, Windsor JA (2010) A systematic review of methods to palliate malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Surg Endosc 24:290–297CrossRefPubMed Ly J, O’Grady G, Mittal A, Plank L, Windsor JA (2010) A systematic review of methods to palliate malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Surg Endosc 24:290–297CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gentileschi P, Kini S, Catarci M, Gagner M (2002) Evidence-based medicine: open and laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 16:736–744CrossRefPubMed Gentileschi P, Kini S, Catarci M, Gagner M (2002) Evidence-based medicine: open and laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 16:736–744CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Duan J, Tan C, Xu H et al (2015) Side-to-side jejunoileal bypass induces better glucose-lowering effect than end-to-side jejunoileal bypass on nonobese diabetic rats. Obes Surg 25:1458–1467CrossRefPubMed Duan J, Tan C, Xu H et al (2015) Side-to-side jejunoileal bypass induces better glucose-lowering effect than end-to-side jejunoileal bypass on nonobese diabetic rats. Obes Surg 25:1458–1467CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Himpens JM (2004) The gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Semin Laparosc Surg 11:171–177PubMed Himpens JM (2004) The gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Semin Laparosc Surg 11:171–177PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H et al (2005) Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62:287–292CrossRefPubMed Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H et al (2005) Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62:287–292CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Swain P, Park P (2006) Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 63:307–312CrossRefPubMed Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Swain P, Park P (2006) Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 63:307–312CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiu PW, Wai Ng EK, Teoh AY et al (2010) Transgastric endoluminal gastrojejunostomy: technical development from bench to animal study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 71:390–393CrossRefPubMed Chiu PW, Wai Ng EK, Teoh AY et al (2010) Transgastric endoluminal gastrojejunostomy: technical development from bench to animal study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 71:390–393CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Shang E, Hasenberg T, Magdeburg R, Keese M, Post S, Weiner R (2009) First experiences with a circular stapled gastrojejunostomy by a new transorally introducible stapler system in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 19:230–236CrossRefPubMed Shang E, Hasenberg T, Magdeburg R, Keese M, Post S, Weiner R (2009) First experiences with a circular stapled gastrojejunostomy by a new transorally introducible stapler system in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 19:230–236CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Swain CP, Mills TN (1991) Anastomosis at flexible endoscopy: an experimental study of compression button gastrojejunostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 37:626–631CrossRef Swain CP, Mills TN (1991) Anastomosis at flexible endoscopy: an experimental study of compression button gastrojejunostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 37:626–631CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Villaverde A, Cope C, Chopita N et al (2004) Long term follow-up of endoscopic gastroenteric anastomoses with magnets (EGAM) [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 59:AB92CrossRef Villaverde A, Cope C, Chopita N et al (2004) Long term follow-up of endoscopic gastroenteric anastomoses with magnets (EGAM) [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 59:AB92CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse CA, Mukherjee D et al (2003) Transluminal endosurgery: single lumen access anastomotic device for flexible endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 58:585–591CrossRefPubMed Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse CA, Mukherjee D et al (2003) Transluminal endosurgery: single lumen access anastomotic device for flexible endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 58:585–591CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Jamshidi R, Stephenson JT, Clay JG et al (2009) Magnamosis: magnetic compression anastomosis with comparison to suture and staple techniques. J Pediatr Surg 44:222–228CrossRefPubMed Jamshidi R, Stephenson JT, Clay JG et al (2009) Magnamosis: magnetic compression anastomosis with comparison to suture and staple techniques. J Pediatr Surg 44:222–228CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pichakron KO, Jelin EB, Hirose S et al (2011) Magnamosis II: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy. J Am Coll Surg 212:42–49CrossRefPubMed Pichakron KO, Jelin EB, Hirose S et al (2011) Magnamosis II: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy. J Am Coll Surg 212:42–49CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzales KD, Douglas G, Pichakron KO et al (2012) Magnamosis III: delivery of a magnetic compression anastomosis device using minimally invasive endoscopic techniques. Pediatr Surg 47:1291–1295CrossRef Gonzales KD, Douglas G, Pichakron KO et al (2012) Magnamosis III: delivery of a magnetic compression anastomosis device using minimally invasive endoscopic techniques. Pediatr Surg 47:1291–1295CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wall J, Diana M, Leroy J et al (2013) Magnamosis IV: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Endoscopy 45:643–648CrossRefPubMed Wall J, Diana M, Leroy J et al (2013) Magnamosis IV: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Endoscopy 45:643–648CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Diana M, Wall J, Perretta S et al (2011) Totally endoscopic magnetic enteral bypass by external guided rendezvous technique. Surg Innov 18:317–320CrossRefPubMed Diana M, Wall J, Perretta S et al (2011) Totally endoscopic magnetic enteral bypass by external guided rendezvous technique. Surg Innov 18:317–320CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chopita N, Vaillaverde A, Cope C et al (2005) Endoscopic gastroenteric anastomosis using magnets. Endoscopy 37:313–317CrossRefPubMed Chopita N, Vaillaverde A, Cope C et al (2005) Endoscopic gastroenteric anastomosis using magnets. Endoscopy 37:313–317CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Cope C (1995) Creation of compression gastroenterostomy by means of the oral, percutaneous, or surgical introduction of magnets: feasibility study in swine. J Vasc Interv Radiol 6:539–545CrossRefPubMed Cope C (1995) Creation of compression gastroenterostomy by means of the oral, percutaneous, or surgical introduction of magnets: feasibility study in swine. J Vasc Interv Radiol 6:539–545CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cope C, Ginsberg GG (2001) Long-term patency of experimental magnetic compression gastroenteric anastomoses achieved with covered stents. Gastrointest Endosc 53:780–784CrossRefPubMed Cope C, Ginsberg GG (2001) Long-term patency of experimental magnetic compression gastroenteric anastomoses achieved with covered stents. Gastrointest Endosc 53:780–784CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryou M, Cantillon-Murphy P, Azagury D et al (2011) Smart self-assembling magnets for endoscopy (SAMSEN) for transoral endoscopic creation of immediate gastrojejunostomy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 73:353–359CrossRefPubMed Ryou M, Cantillon-Murphy P, Azagury D et al (2011) Smart self-assembling magnets for endoscopy (SAMSEN) for transoral endoscopic creation of immediate gastrojejunostomy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 73:353–359CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Romagnuolo J, Morris J, Palesch S et al (2010) Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery for inadvertent colon injury repair: feasibility, risk of abdominal adhesions, and peritoneal contamination in a porcine survival model. Gastrointest Endosc 71:817–823CrossRefPubMed Romagnuolo J, Morris J, Palesch S et al (2010) Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery for inadvertent colon injury repair: feasibility, risk of abdominal adhesions, and peritoneal contamination in a porcine survival model. Gastrointest Endosc 71:817–823CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryou M, Fong DG, Pai RD et al (2008) Transluminal closure for NOTES: an ex vivo study comparing leak pressures of various gastrostomy and colotomy closure modalities. Endoscopy 40:432–436CrossRefPubMed Ryou M, Fong DG, Pai RD et al (2008) Transluminal closure for NOTES: an ex vivo study comparing leak pressures of various gastrostomy and colotomy closure modalities. Endoscopy 40:432–436CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Minimally invasive entero-enteral dual-path bypass using self-assembling magnets
verfasst von
Marvin Ryou
Hiroyuki Aihara
Christopher C. Thompson
Publikationsdatum
19.02.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4789-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.