Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2018

08.01.2018

Update regarding the society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) grant distribution and impact on recipient’s academic career

verfasst von: Christopher DuCoin, Rebecca P. Petersen, David Urbach, Rajesh Aggarwal, Atul K. Madan, Aurora D. Pryor

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 7/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Small seed grants strongly impact academic careers, result in future funding, and lead to increased involvement in surgical societies. We hypothesize that, in accordance with the SAGES Research and Career Development committee mission, there has been a shift in grant support from senior faculty to residents and junior faculty. We hypothesize that these junior physician-researchers are subsequently remaining involved with SAGES and advancing within their academic institutions.

Methods

All current and previous SAGES grant recipients were surveyed through Survey Monkey™. Questions included current academic status and status at time of grant, ensuing funding, publication and presentation of grant, and impact on career. Results were verified through a Medline query. SAGES database was examined for involvement within the society. Respondent data were compared to 2009 data.

Results

One hundred and ninety four grants were awarded to 167 recipients. Of those, 75 investigators responded for a response rate 44.9%. 32% were trainees, 43% assistant professors, 16% associate professors, 3% full professors, 3% professors with tenure, and 3% in private practice. This is a shift from 2009 data with a considerable increase in funding of trainees by 19% and assistant professors by 10% and a decrease in funding of associate professors by 5% and professors by 10%. 41% of responders who were awarded the grant as assistant or associate professors had advanced to full professor and 99% were currently in academic medicine. Eighty-two percent indicated that they had completed their project and 93% believed that the award helped their career. All responders remained active in SAGES.

Conclusion

SAGES has chosen to reallocate an increased percentage of grant money to more junior faculty members and residents. It appears that these grants may play a role in keeping recipients interested in the academic surgical realm and involved in the society while simultaneously helping them advance in faculty rank.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldhamer ME, Cohen AP, Bates DW, Cook EF, Davis RB, Singer DE et al (2009) Protecting and endangered species: training physicians to conduct clinical research. Acad Med 84:439–445CrossRefPubMed Goldhamer ME, Cohen AP, Bates DW, Cook EF, Davis RB, Singer DE et al (2009) Protecting and endangered species: training physicians to conduct clinical research. Acad Med 84:439–445CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Pryor AD, Yurcisin BM, Bachman S, Maden A, Stefanidis D, Torquati A et al (2010) Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) grant impact on recipient academic career. Surg Endosc 24:1468–1472CrossRef Pryor AD, Yurcisin BM, Bachman S, Maden A, Stefanidis D, Torquati A et al (2010) Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) grant impact on recipient academic career. Surg Endosc 24:1468–1472CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham BL, Landis GH (1993) A study of the outcome of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery research grant program. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:1397–1401PubMed Cunningham BL, Landis GH (1993) A study of the outcome of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery research grant program. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:1397–1401PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Fung C, Hitchcock M, Fisher D (2005) Effects of funding family physicians for advanced research training. Fam Med 37:434–439PubMed Fung C, Hitchcock M, Fisher D (2005) Effects of funding family physicians for advanced research training. Fam Med 37:434–439PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanson CS, Schneider D, Hill AM (2008) Seed grants as a means of stimulating cancer research funding. Health Policy 88:243–249CrossRefPubMed Hanson CS, Schneider D, Hill AM (2008) Seed grants as a means of stimulating cancer research funding. Health Policy 88:243–249CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Keil MF, Lipman TH (2007) Outcomes associated with 12 years of grant funding: the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society grant program. J Pediatr Nurs 22:166–168CrossRefPubMed Keil MF, Lipman TH (2007) Outcomes associated with 12 years of grant funding: the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society grant program. J Pediatr Nurs 22:166–168CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller DR, Wozny D (2007) Research awards program of the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society/Canadian Anesthesia Research Foundation: survey of past recipients. Can J Anaesth 54:314–319CrossRefPubMed Miller DR, Wozny D (2007) Research awards program of the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society/Canadian Anesthesia Research Foundation: survey of past recipients. Can J Anaesth 54:314–319CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Paller MS, Cerra FB (2006) Investing in research: the impact of one academic health center’s research grant program. Acad Med 81:520–526CrossRefPubMed Paller MS, Cerra FB (2006) Investing in research: the impact of one academic health center’s research grant program. Acad Med 81:520–526CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rose RC, Prozialeck WC (2003) Productivity outcomes for recent grants and fellowships awarded by the American Osteopathic Association Bureau of Research. J Am Osteopath Assoc 103:435–440PubMed Rose RC, Prozialeck WC (2003) Productivity outcomes for recent grants and fellowships awarded by the American Osteopathic Association Bureau of Research. J Am Osteopath Assoc 103:435–440PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Young KD (2008) Productivity and career paths of previous recipients of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine research grant awards. Acad Emerg Med 15:560–566CrossRefPubMed Young KD (2008) Productivity and career paths of previous recipients of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine research grant awards. Acad Emerg Med 15:560–566CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Update regarding the society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) grant distribution and impact on recipient’s academic career
verfasst von
Christopher DuCoin
Rebecca P. Petersen
David Urbach
Rajesh Aggarwal
Atul K. Madan
Aurora D. Pryor
Publikationsdatum
08.01.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-6014-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.