Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2018

16.01.2018

Impact of laparoscopy in patients aged over 70 years requiring distal pancreatectomy: a French multicentric comparative study

verfasst von: Regis Souche, David Fuks, Julie Perinel, Astrid Herrero, Françoise Guillon, Isabelle Pirlet, Thierry Perniceni, Frederic Borie, Antonio Sa Cunha, Brice Gayet, Jean-Michel Fabre

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 7/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Few data are available concerning short-term results of minimally invasive surgery in patients > 70 years old requiring distal pancreatectomy. The aim of this study was to compare short-term results after laparoscopic (LDP) versus open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) in this subgroup of patients.

Methods

All patients > 70 years who underwent distal pancreatectomy in 3 expert centers between 1995 and 2017 were included and data were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic, intraoperative data and postoperative outcomes in LDP and ODP groups were compared.

Results

A distal pancreatectomy was performed in 109 elderly patients; LDP group included 53 patients while ODP group included 56. There were 55 (50.5%) males and 54 (49.5%) women with a median age of 75 years (range 70–87). Fifty (45.9%) patients were 70–74, 40 (36.7%) patients were 75–79, and 19 (17.4%) patients were over 80 years. Nine (8.2%) patients required conversion to open surgery. The median operative time was not different between LDP and ODP (204 vs. 220 min, p = 0.62). The intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the LDP group (238 ± 312 vs. 425 ± 582 ml, p = 0.009) with no difference regarding the intraoperative transfusion rate. 90-day mortality (0 vs. 5%, p = 0.42), overall complication (45.4 vs. 51.8%, p = 0.53), major complication (18.2 vs. 12.5%, p = 0.43), grade B/C pancreatic fistula (6.8 vs. 7.1%, p = 0.71), were comparable in the 2 groups. Only postoperative confusion rate was significantly lower in the LDP group (4.5 vs. 25%, p = 0.01). Median length of stay was significantly lower in the LDP group (14 ± 10 vs. 16 ± 11 days, p = 0.04). R0 resection was performed in 94% of LDP patients and 89% in ODP patients without significant difference (p = 0.73).

Conclusions

The laparoscopic approach seems to reduce blood loss, postoperative confusion, and length of stay in elderly patients requiring distal pancreatectomy.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Riviere D, Gurusamy KS, Kooby DA, Vollmer CM, Besselink MG, Davidson BR et al (2016) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD011391PubMed Riviere D, Gurusamy KS, Kooby DA, Vollmer CM, Besselink MG, Davidson BR et al (2016) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD011391PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwin B, Sahakyan MA, Hilal MA, Besselink MG, Braga M, Fabre JM et al.Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic neoplasms: the European association for endoscopic surgery clinical consensus conference. Surg Endosc. 2017 Edwin B, Sahakyan MA, Hilal MA, Besselink MG, Braga M, Fabre JM et al.Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic neoplasms: the European association for endoscopic surgery clinical consensus conference. Surg Endosc. 2017
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Shin SH, Kim SC, Song KB, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Park KM et al (2016) Appraisal of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: a large volume cohort study of 152 consecutive patients. PLoS ONE 11(9):e0163266CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shin SH, Kim SC, Song KB, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Park KM et al (2016) Appraisal of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: a large volume cohort study of 152 consecutive patients. PLoS ONE 11(9):e0163266CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura M, Nakashima H (2013) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy: is it worthwhile? A meta-analysis of laparoscopic pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20(4):421–428CrossRefPubMed Nakamura M, Nakashima H (2013) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy: is it worthwhile? A meta-analysis of laparoscopic pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20(4):421–428CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura M, Wakabayashi G, Miyasaka Y, Tanaka M, Morikawa T, Unno M et al (2015) Multicenter comparative study of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy using propensity score-matching. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22(10):731–736CrossRefPubMed Nakamura M, Wakabayashi G, Miyasaka Y, Tanaka M, Morikawa T, Unno M et al (2015) Multicenter comparative study of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy using propensity score-matching. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22(10):731–736CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehta SS, Doumane G, Mura T, Nocca D, Fabre JM (2012) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution case-control study. Surg Endosc 26(2):402–407CrossRefPubMed Mehta SS, Doumane G, Mura T, Nocca D, Fabre JM (2012) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution case-control study. Surg Endosc 26(2):402–407CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fong Y, Blumgart LH, Fortner JG, Brennan MF (1995) Pancreatic or liver resection for malignancy is safe and effective for the elderly. Ann Surg 222(4):426–434. (discussion 34–37)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fong Y, Blumgart LH, Fortner JG, Brennan MF (1995) Pancreatic or liver resection for malignancy is safe and effective for the elderly. Ann Surg 222(4):426–434. (discussion 34–37)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeo CJ, Sohn TA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA (1998) Periampullary adenocarcinoma: analysis of 5-year survivors. Ann Surg 227(6):821–831CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yeo CJ, Sohn TA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA (1998) Periampullary adenocarcinoma: analysis of 5-year survivors. Ann Surg 227(6):821–831CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Balcom JHT, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C (2001) Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 136(4):391–398CrossRefPubMed Balcom JHT, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C (2001) Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 136(4):391–398CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Arnold MA, Chang DC, Coleman J et al (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10(9):1199–1210. (discussion 210–211)CrossRefPubMed Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Arnold MA, Chang DC, Coleman J et al (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10(9):1199–1210. (discussion 210–211)CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Makary MA, Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Chang D, Cunningham SC et al (2006) Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the very elderly. J Gastrointest Surg 10(3):347–356CrossRefPubMed Makary MA, Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Chang D, Cunningham SC et al (2006) Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the very elderly. J Gastrointest Surg 10(3):347–356CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Talamini MA, Hruban RH et al (1998) Should pancreaticoduodenectomy be performed in octogenarians? J Gastrointest Surg 2(3):207–216CrossRefPubMed Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Talamini MA, Hruban RH et al (1998) Should pancreaticoduodenectomy be performed in octogenarians? J Gastrointest Surg 2(3):207–216CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Scurtu R, Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E, Rosso E, Maroni R, Jaeck D (2006) Outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer in elderly patients. J Gastrointest Surg 10(6):813–822CrossRefPubMed Scurtu R, Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E, Rosso E, Maroni R, Jaeck D (2006) Outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer in elderly patients. J Gastrointest Surg 10(6):813–822CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Riall TS, Reddy DM, Nealon WH, Goodwin JS (2008) The effect of age on short-term outcomes after pancreatic resection: a population-based study. Ann Surg 248(3):459–467PubMedPubMedCentral Riall TS, Reddy DM, Nealon WH, Goodwin JS (2008) The effect of age on short-term outcomes after pancreatic resection: a population-based study. Ann Surg 248(3):459–467PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bathe OF, Levi D, Caldera H, Franceschi D, Raez L, Patel A et al (2000) Radical resection of periampullary tumors in the elderly: evaluation of long-term results. World J Surg 24(3):353–358CrossRefPubMed Bathe OF, Levi D, Caldera H, Franceschi D, Raez L, Patel A et al (2000) Radical resection of periampullary tumors in the elderly: evaluation of long-term results. World J Surg 24(3):353–358CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Brozzetti S, Mazzoni G, Miccini M, Puma F, De Angelis M, Cassini D et al (2006) Surgical treatment of pancreatic head carcinoma in elderly patients. Arch Surg 141(2):137–142CrossRefPubMed Brozzetti S, Mazzoni G, Miccini M, Puma F, De Angelis M, Cassini D et al (2006) Surgical treatment of pancreatic head carcinoma in elderly patients. Arch Surg 141(2):137–142CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sukharamwala P, Thoens J, Szuchmacher M, Smith J, DeVito P (2012) Advanced age is a risk factor for post-operative complications and mortality after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. HPB 14(10):649–657CrossRefPubMed Sukharamwala P, Thoens J, Szuchmacher M, Smith J, DeVito P (2012) Advanced age is a risk factor for post-operative complications and mortality after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. HPB 14(10):649–657CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Casadei R, Ricci C, Lazzarini E, Taffurelli G, D’Ambra M, Mastroroberto M et al (2014) Pancreatic resection in patients 80 years or older: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Pancreas 43(8):1208–1218CrossRefPubMed Casadei R, Ricci C, Lazzarini E, Taffurelli G, D’Ambra M, Mastroroberto M et al (2014) Pancreatic resection in patients 80 years or older: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Pancreas 43(8):1208–1218CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Nomi T, Levard H, Gayet B (2015) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy employing radical en bloc procedure for adenocarcinoma: technical details and outcomes. Surgery 157(6):1106–1112CrossRefPubMed Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Nomi T, Levard H, Gayet B (2015) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy employing radical en bloc procedure for adenocarcinoma: technical details and outcomes. Surgery 157(6):1106–1112CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanchez-Cabus S, Adam JP, Pittau G, Gelli M, Cunha AS (2016). Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy: early results after 115 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 30(10):4480–4488CrossRefPubMed Sanchez-Cabus S, Adam JP, Pittau G, Gelli M, Cunha AS (2016). Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy: early results after 115 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 30(10):4480–4488CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kimura W, Yano M, Sugawara S, Okazaki S, Sato T, Moriya T et al (2010) Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein: techniques and its significance. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17(6):813–823CrossRefPubMed Kimura W, Yano M, Sugawara S, Okazaki S, Sato T, Moriya T et al (2010) Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein: techniques and its significance. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17(6):813–823CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Warshaw AL (1988) Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 123(5):550–553CrossRefPubMed Warshaw AL (1988) Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 123(5):550–553CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2007) Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins. J Am Coll Surg 204(2):244–249CrossRefPubMed Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2007) Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins. J Am Coll Surg 204(2):244–249CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1):8–13CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1):8–13CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142(1):20–25CrossRefPubMed Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142(1):20–25CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Brouquet A, Cudennec T, Benoist S, Moulias S, Beauchet A, Penna C et al (2010) Impaired mobility, ASA status and administration of tramadol are risk factors for postoperative delirium in patients aged 75 years or more after major abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 251(4):759–765CrossRefPubMed Brouquet A, Cudennec T, Benoist S, Moulias S, Beauchet A, Penna C et al (2010) Impaired mobility, ASA status and administration of tramadol are risk factors for postoperative delirium in patients aged 75 years or more after major abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 251(4):759–765CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Mise Y, Day RW, Vauthey JN, Brudvik KW, Schwarz L, Prakash L et al. (2015) After pancreatectomy, the “90 days from surgery” definition is superior to the “30 days from discharge” definition for capture of clinically relevant readmissions. J Gastrointest Surg 20(1):77–84CrossRef Mise Y, Day RW, Vauthey JN, Brudvik KW, Schwarz L, Prakash L et al. (2015) After pancreatectomy, the “90 days from surgery” definition is superior to the “30 days from discharge” definition for capture of clinically relevant readmissions. J Gastrointest Surg 20(1):77–84CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Jusoh AC, Ammori BJ (2012) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of comparative studies. Surg Endosc 26(4):904–913CrossRefPubMed Jusoh AC, Ammori BJ (2012) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of comparative studies. Surg Endosc 26(4):904–913CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Venkat R, Edil BH, Schulick RD, Lidor AO, Makary MA, Wolfgang CL (2012) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 255(6):1048–1059CrossRefPubMed Venkat R, Edil BH, Schulick RD, Lidor AO, Makary MA, Wolfgang CL (2012) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 255(6):1048–1059CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Sui CJ, Li B, Yang JM, Wang SJ, Zhou YM (2012) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 35(1):1–8CrossRefPubMed Sui CJ, Li B, Yang JM, Wang SJ, Zhou YM (2012) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 35(1):1–8CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Sahakyan MA, Edwin B, Kazaryan AM, Barkhatov L, Buanes T, Ignjatovic D et al (2017) Perioperative outcomes and survival in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 24(1):42–48CrossRefPubMed Sahakyan MA, Edwin B, Kazaryan AM, Barkhatov L, Buanes T, Ignjatovic D et al (2017) Perioperative outcomes and survival in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 24(1):42–48CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Yi X, Chen S, Wang W, Zou L, Diao D, Zheng Y et al. (2017) A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy of nonductal adenocarcinomatous pancreatic tumor (NDACPT) in the pancreatic body and tail. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 27(4):206–219CrossRefPubMed Yi X, Chen S, Wang W, Zou L, Diao D, Zheng Y et al. (2017) A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy of nonductal adenocarcinomatous pancreatic tumor (NDACPT) in the pancreatic body and tail. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 27(4):206–219CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SC, Park KT, Hwang JW, Shin HC, Lee SS, Seo DW et al (2008) Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection and open distal pancreatic resection at a single institution. Surg Endosc 22(10):2261–2268CrossRefPubMed Kim SC, Park KT, Hwang JW, Shin HC, Lee SS, Seo DW et al (2008) Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection and open distal pancreatic resection at a single institution. Surg Endosc 22(10):2261–2268CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Teh SH, Tseng D, Sheppard BC (2007) Laparoscopic and open distal pancreatic resection for benign pancreatic disease. J Gastrointest Surg 11(9):1120–1125CrossRefPubMed Teh SH, Tseng D, Sheppard BC (2007) Laparoscopic and open distal pancreatic resection for benign pancreatic disease. J Gastrointest Surg 11(9):1120–1125CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Shoup M, Brennan MF, McWhite K, Leung DH, Klimstra D, Conlon KC (2002) The value of splenic preservation with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 137(2):164–168CrossRefPubMed Shoup M, Brennan MF, McWhite K, Leung DH, Klimstra D, Conlon KC (2002) The value of splenic preservation with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 137(2):164–168CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z’Graggen K, Hinz U, Wagner M, Bachmann J et al (2007) Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 245(4):573–582CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z’Graggen K, Hinz U, Wagner M, Bachmann J et al (2007) Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 245(4):573–582CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh BK, Tan YM, Chung YF, Cheow PC, Ong HS, Chan WH et al (2008) Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution. Arch Surg 143(10):956–965CrossRefPubMed Goh BK, Tan YM, Chung YF, Cheow PC, Ong HS, Chan WH et al (2008) Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution. Arch Surg 143(10):956–965CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Kneuertz PJ, Patel SH, Chu CK, Fisher SB, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM et al (2012) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: trends and lessons learned through an 11-year experience. J Am Coll Surg 215(2):167–176CrossRefPubMed Kneuertz PJ, Patel SH, Chu CK, Fisher SB, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM et al (2012) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: trends and lessons learned through an 11-year experience. J Am Coll Surg 215(2):167–176CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Kooby DA, Gillespie T, Bentrem D, Nakeeb A, Schmidt MC, Merchant NB et al (2008) Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann Surg 248(3):438–446PubMed Kooby DA, Gillespie T, Bentrem D, Nakeeb A, Schmidt MC, Merchant NB et al (2008) Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann Surg 248(3):438–446PubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Finlayson E, Fan Z, Birkmeyer JD (2007) Outcomes in octogenarians undergoing high-risk cancer operation: a national study. J Am Coll Surg 205(6):729–734CrossRefPubMed Finlayson E, Fan Z, Birkmeyer JD (2007) Outcomes in octogenarians undergoing high-risk cancer operation: a national study. J Am Coll Surg 205(6):729–734CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan S, Sclabas G, Lombardo KR, Sarr MG, Nagorney D, Kendrick ML et al (2010) Pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma in the very elderly; is it safe and justified? J Gastrointest Surg 14(11):1826–1831CrossRefPubMed Khan S, Sclabas G, Lombardo KR, Sarr MG, Nagorney D, Kendrick ML et al (2010) Pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma in the very elderly; is it safe and justified? J Gastrointest Surg 14(11):1826–1831CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Magge D, Gooding W, Choudry H, Steve J, Steel J, Zureikat A et al (2013) Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma. JAMA Surg 148(6):525–531CrossRefPubMed Magge D, Gooding W, Choudry H, Steve J, Steel J, Zureikat A et al (2013) Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma. JAMA Surg 148(6):525–531CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Duran H, Ielpo B, Caruso R, Ferri V, Quijano Y, Diaz E et al (2014) Does robotic distal pancreatectomy surgery offer similar results as laparoscopic and open approach? A comparative study from a single medical center. Int J Med Robot 10(3):280–285CrossRefPubMed Duran H, Ielpo B, Caruso R, Ferri V, Quijano Y, Diaz E et al (2014) Does robotic distal pancreatectomy surgery offer similar results as laparoscopic and open approach? A comparative study from a single medical center. Int J Med Robot 10(3):280–285CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Marangos IP, Buanes T, Rosok BI, Kazaryan AM, Rosseland AR, Grzyb K et al (2012) Laparoscopic resection of exocrine carcinoma in central and distal pancreas results in a high rate of radical resections and long postoperative survival. Surgery 151(5):717–723CrossRefPubMed Marangos IP, Buanes T, Rosok BI, Kazaryan AM, Rosseland AR, Grzyb K et al (2012) Laparoscopic resection of exocrine carcinoma in central and distal pancreas results in a high rate of radical resections and long postoperative survival. Surgery 151(5):717–723CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang CM, Lee SH, Lee WJ (2014) Minimally invasive radical pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: current status and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 20(9):2343–2351CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kang CM, Lee SH, Lee WJ (2014) Minimally invasive radical pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: current status and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 20(9):2343–2351CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ (2010) Ten years of experience with resection of left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evolution and initial experience to a laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 24(7):1533–1541CrossRefPubMed Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ (2010) Ten years of experience with resection of left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evolution and initial experience to a laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 24(7):1533–1541CrossRefPubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Song KB, Kim SC, Park JB, Kim YH, Jung YS, Kim MH et al (2011) Single-center experience of laparoscopic left pancreatic resection in 359 consecutive patients: changing the surgical paradigm of left pancreatic resection. Surg Endosc 25(10):3364–3372CrossRefPubMed Song KB, Kim SC, Park JB, Kim YH, Jung YS, Kim MH et al (2011) Single-center experience of laparoscopic left pancreatic resection in 359 consecutive patients: changing the surgical paradigm of left pancreatic resection. Surg Endosc 25(10):3364–3372CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu M, Zhao G, Wang F, Zhao Z, Li C, Liu R (2014) Laparoscopic versus open distal splenopancreatectomy for the treatment of pancreatic body and tail cancer: a retrospective, mid-term follow-up study at a single academic tertiary care institution. Surg Endosc 28(9):2584–2591CrossRefPubMed Hu M, Zhao G, Wang F, Zhao Z, Li C, Liu R (2014) Laparoscopic versus open distal splenopancreatectomy for the treatment of pancreatic body and tail cancer: a retrospective, mid-term follow-up study at a single academic tertiary care institution. Surg Endosc 28(9):2584–2591CrossRefPubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Sahakyan MA, Kim SC, Kleive D, Kazaryan AM, Song KB, Ignjatovic D et al. (2017) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: long-term oncologic outcomes after standard resection. Surgery 162(4):802–811CrossRefPubMed Sahakyan MA, Kim SC, Kleive D, Kazaryan AM, Song KB, Ignjatovic D et al. (2017) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: long-term oncologic outcomes after standard resection. Surgery 162(4):802–811CrossRefPubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Sulpice L, Farges O, Goutte N, Bendersky N, Dokmak S, Sauvanet A et al. (2015) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: time for a randomized controlled trial? results of an all-inclusive national observational study. Ann Surg 262(5):868–873. (discussion 73–74)CrossRefPubMed Sulpice L, Farges O, Goutte N, Bendersky N, Dokmak S, Sauvanet A et al. (2015) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: time for a randomized controlled trial? results of an all-inclusive national observational study. Ann Surg 262(5):868–873. (discussion 73–74)CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Impact of laparoscopy in patients aged over 70 years requiring distal pancreatectomy: a French multicentric comparative study
verfasst von
Regis Souche
David Fuks
Julie Perinel
Astrid Herrero
Françoise Guillon
Isabelle Pirlet
Thierry Perniceni
Frederic Borie
Antonio Sa Cunha
Brice Gayet
Jean-Michel Fabre
Publikationsdatum
16.01.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6033-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.