Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Hernia 4/2007

01.08.2007 | Original Article

Discomfort five years after laparoscopic and Shouldice inguinal hernia repair: a randomised trial with 867 patients. A report from the SMIL study group

verfasst von: Fritz H. Berndsen, U. Petersson, D. Arvidsson, C.-E. Leijonmarck, C. Rudberg, S. Smedberg, A. Montgomery

Erschienen in: Hernia | Ausgabe 4/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

In recent years long-term discomfort after inguinal hernia surgery has become an issue of great concern to hernia surgeons. Long-term results on discomfort from large randomised studies are sparse.

Methods

One-thousand one-hundred and eighty-three patients were randomised in a multicentre trial with the primary aim of comparing recurrence rates after laparoscopic TAPP and Shouldice repair. Evaluating late discomfort and its possible risk factors were secondary objectives, and are reported here. The patients were clinically examined after 1 and 5 years, and answered questionnaires 2 and 3 years postoperation.

Results

Of 1,068 operated patients, 867 were eligible for analysis after 5 years (81.2%). The percentage of patients experiencing discomfort of any kind were 8.5% in the TAPP group and 11.4% (p = 0.156) in the Shouldice group. Although discomfort was usually mild it was severe for 0.2 and 0.7%, respectively. Severe pain the first postoperative week was a risk factor for late discomfort in the Shouldice group (OR 2.25, P = 0.022) but not in the TAPP group. No other risk factor for late discomfort was found.

Conclusion

There was no difference between late discomfort at five-year follow-up after laparoscopic TAPP and Shouldice repair. Discomfort was mostly mild and pain during the first postoperative week was a prognostic variable for late discomfort in Shouldice patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Welsh DRJ, Alexander MAJ (1993) The shouldice repair. Surg Clin North Am 73:451–469PubMed Welsh DRJ, Alexander MAJ (1993) The shouldice repair. Surg Clin North Am 73:451–469PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Devlin HB, Gillen PHA, Waxman BP, MacNay RA (1986) Short stay surgery for inguinal hernia: experience of the shouldice operation, 1970–1982. Br J Surg 73:123–124PubMedCrossRef Devlin HB, Gillen PHA, Waxman BP, MacNay RA (1986) Short stay surgery for inguinal hernia: experience of the shouldice operation, 1970–1982. Br J Surg 73:123–124PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat McGillicuddy JE (1998) Prospective randomized comparison of the shouldice and Lichtenstein hernia repair procedures. Arch Surg 133:974–978PubMedCrossRef McGillicuddy JE (1998) Prospective randomized comparison of the shouldice and Lichtenstein hernia repair procedures. Arch Surg 133:974–978PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Danielsson P, Isacson S, Hansen MV (1999) Randomized study of Lichtenstein compared with shouldice inguinal hernia repair by surgeons in training. Eur J Surg 165:49–53PubMed Danielsson P, Isacson S, Hansen MV (1999) Randomized study of Lichtenstein compared with shouldice inguinal hernia repair by surgeons in training. Eur J Surg 165:49–53PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tran VK, Pütz T, Rohde H (1992) A randomized controlled trial for inguinal hernia repair to compare the Shouldice and the Bassini–Kirschner operation. Int Surg 77:235–237PubMed Tran VK, Pütz T, Rohde H (1992) A randomized controlled trial for inguinal hernia repair to compare the Shouldice and the Bassini–Kirschner operation. Int Surg 77:235–237PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Beets GL, Oosterhuis KJ, Go PMNYH, Baeten CG, Kootstra G (1997) Longterm follow up (12–15 years) of a randomized controlled trial comparing Bassini–Stetten, Shouldice, and high ligation with narrowing of the internal ring for primary inguinal hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 185:365–370 Beets GL, Oosterhuis KJ, Go PMNYH, Baeten CG, Kootstra G (1997) Longterm follow up (12–15 years) of a randomized controlled trial comparing Bassini–Stetten, Shouldice, and high ligation with narrowing of the internal ring for primary inguinal hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 185:365–370
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Nordin P, Bartelmess P, Jansson C, Svensson C, Edlund G (2002) Randomized trial of Lichtenstein versus Shouldice hernia repair in general surgical practice. Br J Surg 89:45–49PubMedCrossRef Nordin P, Bartelmess P, Jansson C, Svensson C, Edlund G (2002) Randomized trial of Lichtenstein versus Shouldice hernia repair in general surgical practice. Br J Surg 89:45–49PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lichtenstein IL (1987) Herniorrhaphy—a personal experience with 6,321 cases. Am J Surg 153:553–559PubMedCrossRef Lichtenstein IL (1987) Herniorrhaphy—a personal experience with 6,321 cases. Am J Surg 153:553–559PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL (1994) A critical evaluation of the Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty. Int Surg 79:76–79PubMed Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL (1994) A critical evaluation of the Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty. Int Surg 79:76–79PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rutkow IM, Robbins AW (1993) “Tension-free” inguinal herniorrhaphy: a preliminary report on the “mesh plug” technique. Surgery 114:3–8PubMed Rutkow IM, Robbins AW (1993) “Tension-free” inguinal herniorrhaphy: a preliminary report on the “mesh plug” technique. Surgery 114:3–8PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kugel RD (2003) Minimally invasive, nonlaparoscopic, preperitoneal, and sutureless, inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg 178:298–302CrossRef Kugel RD (2003) Minimally invasive, nonlaparoscopic, preperitoneal, and sutureless, inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg 178:298–302CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Arregui ME, Navarrete J, Davis CJ, Castro D, Nagan RF (1993) Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy: techniques and controversies. Surg Clin North Am 73:513–527PubMed Arregui ME, Navarrete J, Davis CJ, Castro D, Nagan RF (1993) Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy: techniques and controversies. Surg Clin North Am 73:513–527PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Juul P, Christensen K (1999) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 86:316–319PubMedCrossRef Juul P, Christensen K (1999) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 86:316–319PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawrence K, McWhinnie D, Goodwin A, Doll H, Gordon A, Gray A, Britton J, Collin J (1995) Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: early results. BMJ 311:981–985PubMed Lawrence K, McWhinnie D, Goodwin A, Doll H, Gordon A, Gray A, Britton J, Collin J (1995) Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: early results. BMJ 311:981–985PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wellwood J, Sculpher MJ, Stoker D, Nicholls GJ, Geddes C, Whitehead A, Singh R, Spiegelhalter D (1998) Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost. BMJ 317:103–110PubMed Wellwood J, Sculpher MJ, Stoker D, Nicholls GJ, Geddes C, Whitehead A, Singh R, Spiegelhalter D (1998) Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost. BMJ 317:103–110PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Liem MSL, Van Der Graaf Y, Van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RU, Clevers GJ, Meijer WS, Stassen LP, Vente JP, Weidema WF, Schrijvers AJ, van Vroonhoven TJ (1997) Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair. N Engl J Med 336:1541–1547PubMedCrossRef Liem MSL, Van Der Graaf Y, Van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RU, Clevers GJ, Meijer WS, Stassen LP, Vente JP, Weidema WF, Schrijvers AJ, van Vroonhoven TJ (1997) Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair. N Engl J Med 336:1541–1547PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bay-Nielsen M, Nilsson E, Nordin P, Kehlet H (2004) Chronic pain after open mesh and sutured repair of indirect hernia in young males. Br J Surg 91:1372–1376PubMedCrossRef Bay-Nielsen M, Nilsson E, Nordin P, Kehlet H (2004) Chronic pain after open mesh and sutured repair of indirect hernia in young males. Br J Surg 91:1372–1376PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Callesen T, Bech K, Kehlet H (1999) Prospective study of chronic pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 86:1528–1531PubMedCrossRef Callesen T, Bech K, Kehlet H (1999) Prospective study of chronic pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 86:1528–1531PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Mitchell P, Nixon JA, Preshaw RM, Hagen NA (1996) Cooperative hernia study: pain in the postrepair patient. Ann Surg 224:598–602PubMedCrossRef Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Mitchell P, Nixon JA, Preshaw RM, Hagen NA (1996) Cooperative hernia study: pain in the postrepair patient. Ann Surg 224:598–602PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM and the EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1)CD001785 McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM and the EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1)CD001785
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bittner R, Sauerland S, Schmedt C-G (2005) Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:605–615PubMedCrossRef Bittner R, Sauerland S, Schmedt C-G (2005) Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:605–615PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmedt C-G, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open-mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:188–199PubMedCrossRef Schmedt C-G, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open-mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:188–199PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Douek M, Smith G, Oshowo A, Stoker DL, Wellwood JM (2003) Prospective randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia mesh repair: five year follow-up. BMJ 326:1012–1013PubMedCrossRef Douek M, Smith G, Oshowo A, Stoker DL, Wellwood JM (2003) Prospective randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia mesh repair: five year follow-up. BMJ 326:1012–1013PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Grant AM, Scott NW, O’Dwyer PJ, on behalf of the MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (2004) Five-year follow-up of a randomized trial to assess pain and numbness after laparoscopic or open repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 91:1570–1574 Grant AM, Scott NW, O’Dwyer PJ, on behalf of the MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (2004) Five-year follow-up of a randomized trial to assess pain and numbness after laparoscopic or open repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 91:1570–1574
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Liem MSL, van Duyn EB, van der Graaf Y, van Vroonhoven TJMV, on behalf of the Coala Trial Group (2003) Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A randomized comparison. Ann Surg 237:136–141 Liem MSL, van Duyn EB, van der Graaf Y, van Vroonhoven TJMV, on behalf of the Coala Trial Group (2003) Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A randomized comparison. Ann Surg 237:136–141
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Nienhuijs SW, van Oort I, Keemers-Gels ME, Strobbe LJA, Rosman C (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing the Prolene® hernia system, mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein method for open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:33–38PubMedCrossRef Nienhuijs SW, van Oort I, Keemers-Gels ME, Strobbe LJA, Rosman C (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing the Prolene® hernia system, mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein method for open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:33–38PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Berndsen F, Arvidsson D, Enander L-K, Leijonmarck CE, Wingren U, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Wickbom G, Montgomery A (2002) Postoperative convalescence after inguinal hernia surgery: prospective randomised multicenter study of laparoscopic versus Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in 1042 patients. Hernia 6:56–61PubMedCrossRef Berndsen F, Arvidsson D, Enander L-K, Leijonmarck CE, Wingren U, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Wickbom G, Montgomery A (2002) Postoperative convalescence after inguinal hernia surgery: prospective randomised multicenter study of laparoscopic versus Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in 1042 patients. Hernia 6:56–61PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Arvidsson D, Berndsen FH, Larsson LG, Leijonmarck CE, Rimback G, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Spangen L, Montgomery A (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing 5-year recurrence rate after laparoscopic versus Shouldice repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 92:1085–1091PubMedCrossRef Arvidsson D, Berndsen FH, Larsson LG, Leijonmarck CE, Rimback G, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Spangen L, Montgomery A (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing 5-year recurrence rate after laparoscopic versus Shouldice repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 92:1085–1091PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Nyhus LM (1993) Individualization of hernia repair: a new era. Surgery 114:1–2PubMed Nyhus LM (1993) Individualization of hernia repair: a new era. Surgery 114:1–2PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehlet H, Bay-Nielsen M, Kingsnorth A (2002) Chronic postherniorrhaphy pain—a call for uniform assessment. Hernia 6:178–181PubMedCrossRef Kehlet H, Bay-Nielsen M, Kingsnorth A (2002) Chronic postherniorrhaphy pain—a call for uniform assessment. Hernia 6:178–181PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Haapaniemi S, Nilsson E. Recurrence, pain three years after groin hernia repair (2002) Validation of postal questionnaire and selected physical examination as a method of follow-up. Eur J Surg 168:22–28 Haapaniemi S, Nilsson E. Recurrence, pain three years after groin hernia repair (2002) Validation of postal questionnaire and selected physical examination as a method of follow-up. Eur J Surg 168:22–28
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Klinge U, Junge K, Stumpf M, Öttinger AP, Klosterhalfen B (2002) Functional and morphological evaluation of a low-weight, monofilament polypropylene mesh for hernia repair. J Biomed Mater Res 63:129–136PubMedCrossRef Klinge U, Junge K, Stumpf M, Öttinger AP, Klosterhalfen B (2002) Functional and morphological evaluation of a low-weight, monofilament polypropylene mesh for hernia repair. J Biomed Mater Res 63:129–136PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Klosterhalfen B, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (1998) Functional and morphological evaluation of different polypropylene-mesh modifications for abdominal wall repair. Biomaterials 19:2235–2246PubMedCrossRef Klosterhalfen B, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (1998) Functional and morphological evaluation of different polypropylene-mesh modifications for abdominal wall repair. Biomaterials 19:2235–2246PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Dwyer PJ, Kingsnorth AN, Molloy RG, Small PK, Lammers B, Horeyseck G (2005) Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:166–170PubMedCrossRef O’Dwyer PJ, Kingsnorth AN, Molloy RG, Small PK, Lammers B, Horeyseck G (2005) Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:166–170PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Bringman S, Wollert S, Österberg J, Smedberg S, Granlund H, Fellander G, Heikkinen T (2005) One year results of a randomised controlled multi-centre study comparing Prolene and Vypro II- mesh in Lichtenstein herniaplasty. Hernia 9:223–227PubMedCrossRef Bringman S, Wollert S, Österberg J, Smedberg S, Granlund H, Fellander G, Heikkinen T (2005) One year results of a randomised controlled multi-centre study comparing Prolene and Vypro II- mesh in Lichtenstein herniaplasty. Hernia 9:223–227PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Topart P, Vanden broucke P, Lozac’h P (2005) Tisseel vs tack staples as mesh fixation in totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of groin hernias. Surg Endosc 19:724–727PubMedCrossRef Topart P, Vanden broucke P, Lozac’h P (2005) Tisseel vs tack staples as mesh fixation in totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of groin hernias. Surg Endosc 19:724–727PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwab R, Willms A, Kroger A, Becker HP (2006) Less chronic pain following mesh fixation using a fibrin sealant in TEP inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 10:272–277PubMedCrossRef Schwab R, Willms A, Kroger A, Becker HP (2006) Less chronic pain following mesh fixation using a fibrin sealant in TEP inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 10:272–277PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Lau H (2005) Fibrin sealant versus mechanical stapling for mesh fixation during endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. A randomised prospective trial. Ann Surg 242:670–675PubMedCrossRef Lau H (2005) Fibrin sealant versus mechanical stapling for mesh fixation during endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. A randomised prospective trial. Ann Surg 242:670–675PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Moreno-Egea A, Martinez JAT, Cuenca GM, Albasini JLA (2004) Randomized clinical trial of fixation vs nonfixation of mesh in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Arch Surg 139:1376–1379PubMedCrossRef Moreno-Egea A, Martinez JAT, Cuenca GM, Albasini JLA (2004) Randomized clinical trial of fixation vs nonfixation of mesh in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Arch Surg 139:1376–1379PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Fitzgibbons RJ, Giobbie-Hurder A et al (2006) Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 295:285–292PubMedCrossRef Fitzgibbons RJ, Giobbie-Hurder A et al (2006) Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 295:285–292PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Discomfort five years after laparoscopic and Shouldice inguinal hernia repair: a randomised trial with 867 patients. A report from the SMIL study group
verfasst von
Fritz H. Berndsen
U. Petersson
D. Arvidsson
C.-E. Leijonmarck
C. Rudberg
S. Smedberg
A. Montgomery
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Hernia / Ausgabe 4/2007
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Elektronische ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0214-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2007

Hernia 4/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.