Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Emergency Radiology 2/2013

01.04.2013 | Original Article

Significance of size and location of appendicoliths as exacerbating factor of acute appendicitis

verfasst von: Mitsutomi Ishiyama, Fumitaka Yanase, Takashi Taketa, Akari Makidono, Koyu Suzuki, Fumio Omata, Yukihisa Saida

Erschienen in: Emergency Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the significance of appendicoliths as an exacerbating factor of acute appendicitis using multivariate analysis. A total of 254 patients with pathologically proved acute appendicitis were enrolled in this retrospective study (male, 51 %; mean age, 40.1 years; range, 15–91 years). Two radiologists performed a consensus evaluation of preoperative CT images for the presence of appendicoliths in consensus. When there were appendicoliths, they assessed the number and location of appendicoliths, and measured the longest diameter of the largest appendicolith. Pathological diagnosis was used for the reference standard. The relationships of appendicoliths to gangrenous appendicitis and to perforated appendicitis were each assessed with multiple logistic regression models, which were adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics of patients. Significant relationships were identified between gangrenous appendicitis and the presence of appendicoliths (OR, 2.2; 95 % CI, 1.2–4.0), the largest appendicolith more than 5 mm in the longest (OR, 3.0; 95 % CI, 1.6–5.7), and location of an appendicolith at the root of the appendix (OR, 2.0; 95 % CI, 1.1–3.8). Among the CT characteristics, the location of an appendicolith at the root of the appendix only showed significant relationship with perforated appendicitis (OR, 4.5; 95 % CI, 1.4–15.4). Size of the largest appendicolith and location of appendicoliths at the root of the appendix are exacerbating factors of acute appendicitis.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Horrow MM, White DS, Horrow JC (2003) Differentiation of perforated from nonperforated appendicitis at CT. Radiology 227:46–51PubMedCrossRef Horrow MM, White DS, Horrow JC (2003) Differentiation of perforated from nonperforated appendicitis at CT. Radiology 227:46–51PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Foley TA, Earnest F 4th, Nathan MA, Hough DM, Schiller HJ, Hoskin TL (2005) Differentiation of nonperforated from perforated appendicitis: accuracy of CT diagnosis and relationship of CT findings to length of hospital stay. Radiology 235:89–96PubMedCrossRef Foley TA, Earnest F 4th, Nathan MA, Hough DM, Schiller HJ, Hoskin TL (2005) Differentiation of nonperforated from perforated appendicitis: accuracy of CT diagnosis and relationship of CT findings to length of hospital stay. Radiology 235:89–96PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bixby SD, Lucey BC, Soto JA, Theysohn JM, Ozonoff A, Varghese JC (2006) Perforated versus nonperforated acute appendicitis: accuracy of multidetector CT detection. Radiology 241:780–786PubMedCrossRef Bixby SD, Lucey BC, Soto JA, Theysohn JM, Ozonoff A, Varghese JC (2006) Perforated versus nonperforated acute appendicitis: accuracy of multidetector CT detection. Radiology 241:780–786PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsuboi M, Takase K, Kaneda I et al (2008) Perforated and nonperforated appendicitis: defect in enhancing appendiceal wall–depiction with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 246:142–147PubMed Tsuboi M, Takase K, Kaneda I et al (2008) Perforated and nonperforated appendicitis: defect in enhancing appendiceal wall–depiction with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 246:142–147PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Moteki T, Horikoshi H (2007) New CT criterion for acute appendicitis: maximum depth of intraluminal appendiceal fluid. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1313–1319PubMedCrossRef Moteki T, Horikoshi H (2007) New CT criterion for acute appendicitis: maximum depth of intraluminal appendiceal fluid. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1313–1319PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeung KW, Chang MS, Hsiao CP (2004) Evaluation of perforated and nonperforated appendicitis with CT. Clin Imaging 28:422–427PubMedCrossRef Yeung KW, Chang MS, Hsiao CP (2004) Evaluation of perforated and nonperforated appendicitis with CT. Clin Imaging 28:422–427PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai V, Chan WC, Lau HY, Yeung TW, Wong YC, Yuen MK (2012) Diagnostic power of various computed tomography signs in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Clin Imaging 36:29–34PubMedCrossRef Lai V, Chan WC, Lau HY, Yeung TW, Wong YC, Yuen MK (2012) Diagnostic power of various computed tomography signs in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Clin Imaging 36:29–34PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Raja AS, Wright C, Sodickson AD et al (2010) Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective. Radiology 256:460–465PubMedCrossRef Raja AS, Wright C, Sodickson AD et al (2010) Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective. Radiology 256:460–465PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cabarrus M, Sun YL, Courtier JL et al. (2012) The prevalence and patterns of intraluminal air in acute appendicitis at CT. Emergency Radiology Sep 21. [Epub ahead of print] Cabarrus M, Sun YL, Courtier JL et al. (2012) The prevalence and patterns of intraluminal air in acute appendicitis at CT. Emergency Radiology Sep 21. [Epub ahead of print]
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Vons C, Barry C, Maitre S et al (2011) Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 377:1573–1579PubMedCrossRef Vons C, Barry C, Maitre S et al (2011) Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 377:1573–1579PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DN (2012) Safety and efficacy of antibiotics compared with appendicectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 344:e2156PubMedCrossRef Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DN (2012) Safety and efficacy of antibiotics compared with appendicectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 344:e2156PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadhan KK, Humes DJ, Neal KR, Lobo DN (2010) Antibiotic therapy versus appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a meta-analysis. World J Surg 34:199–209PubMedCrossRef Varadhan KK, Humes DJ, Neal KR, Lobo DN (2010) Antibiotic therapy versus appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a meta-analysis. World J Surg 34:199–209PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Simillis C, Symeonides P, Shorthouse AJ, Tekkis PP (2010) A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon). Surgery 147:818–829PubMedCrossRef Simillis C, Symeonides P, Shorthouse AJ, Tekkis PP (2010) A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon). Surgery 147:818–829PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Konstantinidis KM, Anastasakou KA, Vorias MN, Sambalis GH, Georgiou MK, Xiarchos AG (2008) A decade of laparoscopic appendectomy: presentation of 1,026 patients with suspected appendicitis treated in a single surgical department. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:248–258PubMedCrossRef Konstantinidis KM, Anastasakou KA, Vorias MN, Sambalis GH, Georgiou MK, Xiarchos AG (2008) A decade of laparoscopic appendectomy: presentation of 1,026 patients with suspected appendicitis treated in a single surgical department. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:248–258PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ein SH, Langer JC, Daneman A (2005) Nonoperative management of pediatric ruptured appendix with inflammatory mass or abscess: presence of an appendicolith predicts recurrent appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 40:1612–1615PubMedCrossRef Ein SH, Langer JC, Daneman A (2005) Nonoperative management of pediatric ruptured appendix with inflammatory mass or abscess: presence of an appendicolith predicts recurrent appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 40:1612–1615PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kondo NI, Kohno H (2009) Retained appendicolith in an inflamed appendix. Emerg Radiol 16:105–109PubMedCrossRef Kondo NI, Kohno H (2009) Retained appendicolith in an inflamed appendix. Emerg Radiol 16:105–109PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Shindoh J, Niwa H, Kawai K et al (2010) Predictive factors for negative outcomes in initial non-operative management of suspected appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg 14:309–314PubMedCrossRef Shindoh J, Niwa H, Kawai K et al (2010) Predictive factors for negative outcomes in initial non-operative management of suspected appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg 14:309–314PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Significance of size and location of appendicoliths as exacerbating factor of acute appendicitis
verfasst von
Mitsutomi Ishiyama
Fumitaka Yanase
Takashi Taketa
Akari Makidono
Koyu Suzuki
Fumio Omata
Yukihisa Saida
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Emergency Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1070-3004
Elektronische ISSN: 1438-1435
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-012-1093-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

Emergency Radiology 2/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.