nach oben

Erschienen in:

13.04.2020 | Original Article

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy as combined treatment for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse

verfasst von: G. Campagna, G. Panico, D. Caramazza, L. P. Anchora, A. Parello, V. Gallucci, L. Vacca, G. Scambia, A. Ercoli, C. Ratto

Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a dynamic disorder that affects the entire pelvic diaphragm. POP may often involve multiple organs. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is considered the gold standard to treat female anterior and apical prolapse. Abdominal ventral mesh rectopexy has gained increasing acceptance as an effective treatment for rectal prolapse. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety, feasibility and 1-year outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy as a combined treatment of multicompartment POP.

Methods

All female patients at our institution with anterior and apical prolapse with symptoms of obstructed defecation were examined by an urogynecologist and a colorectal surgeon, and were judged suitable for the study. Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system stage III and IV and concomitant rectal prolapse were treated by laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy. After surgery, 1- and 12-month follow-up was performed and the data were retrospectively analyzed. Patients’ symptoms were evaluated using the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS), Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12), and Wexner–Agachan constipation score.

Results

A total of 98 patients underwent surgery. No intraoperative or postoperative morbidity occurred. At the time of follow-up, all women expressed great satisfaction with the surgical treatment: all the patients had at most POP-Q Stage 1 and 78.8% had a Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score < 3. Significant improvement of symptoms related to POP and to obstructed defecation syndrome, as shown by the FSDS, PISQ-12, and Wexner–Agachan constipation score, was observed in all patients at follow-up

Conclusions

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with ventral rectopexy is a feasible and safe procedure for the combined surgical management of anterior, apical, and posterior prolapse, and provides excellent objective and subjective outcomes.

Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS et al (2014) Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. Obstet Gynecol 123(1):141–148. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000057 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mellgren A, Johansson C, Dolk A et al (1994) Enterocoele demonstrated by defecography is associated with other pelvic floor disorders. Int J Colorectal Dis 9:121–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290186 CrossRefPubMed

Ellerkman RM, Cundiff GW, Melick CF et al (2001) Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1332–1339. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.119078 CrossRef

Jackson SL, Weber AM, Hull TL et al (1997) Fecal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 89:423–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(96)00499-1 CrossRefPubMed

Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K et al (2013) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub4 CrossRefPubMed

Madoff RD, Mellgren A (1999) One hundred years of rectal prolapse surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02234164 CrossRefPubMed

Watts AM, Thompson MR (2000) Evaluation of Delorme's procedure as a treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 87(2):218–222. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01342.x CrossRefPubMed

Bachoo P, Brazzelli M, Grant A (2000) Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001758 CrossRefPubMed

Orrom WJ, Bartolo DC, Miller R et al (1991) Rectopexy is an ineffective treatment for obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 34(1):41–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02050205 CrossRefPubMed

10.

D’Hoore A, Cadoni R (2004) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 91:1500–1505. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4779 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Franceschilli L, Varvaras D, Capuano I et al (2015) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy using biologic mesh for the treatment of obstructed defaecation syndrome and/or faecal incontinence in patients with internal rectal prolapse: a critical appraisal of the first 100 cases. Tech Coloproctol 19(4):209–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1255-4 CrossRefPubMed

12.

González-Argenté FX, Jain A, Nogueras JJ et al (2001) Prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence and pelvic genital prolapse in females with anal incontinence or rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 44(7):920–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02235476 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Lim M, Sagar PM, Gonsalves S et al (2007) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in females: functional outcome of mesh sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy as a combined procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 50(9):1412–1421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-0255-0 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Baessler K, Schuessler B (2001) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy and anatomy and function of the posterior compartment. Obstet Gynecol 97:678–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01205-9 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Watadani Y, Vogler SA, Warshaw JS et al (2013) Sacrocolpopexy with rectopexy for pelvic floor prolapse improves bowel function and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 56:1415–1422. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182a62dbb CrossRefPubMed

16.

Sagar PM, Thekkinkattil DK, Heath RM et al (2008) Feasibility and functional outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolporectopexy for combined vaginal and rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 51(9):1414–1420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9371-8 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Van Iersel JJ, de Witte CJ, Verheijen PM et al (2016) Robot-assisted sacrocolporectopexy for multicompartment prolapse of the pelvic floor: a prospective cohort study evaluating functional and sexual outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 59(10):968–974. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000669 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Reddy J, Ridgeway B, Gurland B et al (2011) Robotic sacrocolpoperineopexy with ventral rectopexy for the combined treatment of rectal and pelvic organ prolapse: initial report and technique. J Robot Surg 5(3):167–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0257-8 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Jallad K, Ridgeway B, Paraiso MFR et al (2018) Long term outcomes after ventral rectopexy with sacrocolpo- or hysteropexy for the treatment of concurrent rectal and pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Sep/Oct 24(5):336–340. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000444 CrossRef

20.

Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD et al (2016) Erratum to: an International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J 27:655–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3003-y CrossRefPubMed

21.

Boons P, Collinson R, Cunningham C et al (2010) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse improves constipation and avoids de novo constipation. Colorectal Dis 12(6):526–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01859.x CrossRefPubMed

22.

Derogatis LR, Rosen R, Leiblum S et al (2002) The Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women. J Sex Marital Ther 28:317–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230290001448 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D et al (2003) A short form of the pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14(3):164–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-003-1063-2 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J et al (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39(6):681–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02056950 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Gadonneix P, Ercoli A, Salet-Lizee D et al (2004) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with two separate meshes along the anterior and posterior vaginal walls for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60006-0 CrossRefPubMed

26.

D'Hoore A, Penninckx F (2006) Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc 20(12):1919–1923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0485-y CrossRefPubMed

27.

Guzman Rojas R, Kamisan Atan I, Shek KL et al (2016) The prevalence of abnormal posterior compartment anatomy and its association with obstructed defecation symptoms in urogynecological patients. Int Urogynecol J 27(6):939–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2914-3 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Freeman RM, Pantazis K, Thomson A et al (2013) A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int Urogynecol J 24(3):377–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1885-x CrossRefPubMed

29.

Slawik S, Soulsby R, Carter H et al (2008) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy, posterior colporrhaphy and vaginal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of recto-genital prolapse and mechanical outlet obstruction. Colorectal Dis 10(2):138–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01259.x CrossRefPubMed

30.

Geltzeiler CB, Birnbaum EH, Silviera ML et al (2018) Combined rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy is safe for correction of pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:1453–1459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3140-5 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Bump RC, Mattiasson Bø AK, Brubaker LP et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70243-0 CrossRefPubMed

32.

Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L (2010) Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 21(5):523–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1069-5 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Berlit S, Tuschy B, Wuhrer A et al (2018) Sexual functioning after total versus subtotal laparoscopic hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 298(2):337–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4812-7 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Danesh M, Hamzehgardeshi Z, Moosazadeh M et al (2015) The effect of hysterectomy on women’s sexual function: a narrative review. Med Arch 69(6):387–392. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2015.69.387-392 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Thakar R (2015) Is the uterus a sexual organ? Sexual function following hysterectomy. Sex Med Rev 3:264–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/smrj.59 CrossRefPubMed

36.

LeClaire EL, Mukati MS, Juarez D et al (2014) Is de novo stress incontinence after sacrocolpopexy related to anatomical changes and surgical approach? Int Urogynecol J 25(9):1201–1206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2366-1 CrossRefPubMed

37.

Martín Del Olmo JC, Toledano M, Martín Esteban ML et al (2019) Outcomes of laparoscopic management of multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse. Surg Endosc 33(4):1075–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6357-z CrossRefPubMed

38.

Campagna G, Panico G, Caramazza D et al (2019) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 23(2):179–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-01940-z CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy as combined treatment for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse
verfasst von: G. Campagna
G. Panico
D. Caramazza
L. P. Anchora
A. Parello
V. Gallucci
L. Vacca
G. Scambia
A. Ercoli
C. Ratto
Publikationsdatum: 13.04.2020
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Elektronische ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02199-5

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2020

Cogito ergo sum

The Standardization of Outpatient Procedure (STOP) Narcotics after anorectal surgery: a prospective non-inferiority study to reduce opioid use

The 13th European Colorectal Congress (#ECCStGallen), 1–5 December 2019, St Gallen, Switzerland: Congress Report

Combined laparoscopic and transperineal endoscopic total pelvic exenteration for local recurrence of rectal cancer

Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: results from the CLIMHET study group

Italian society of colorectal surgery recommendations for good clinical practice in colorectal surgery during the novel coronavirus pandemic

Update Chirurgie