Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Digital Imaging 4/2005

01.12.2005

Assessment of PACS Display Systems

verfasst von: John E. Aldrich, Ph.D., FCCPM, John D. Rutledge, BSc

Erschienen in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2005

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This work describes our experience in reviewing the performance criteria for display systems and how we have implemented a practical approach to the assessment of the workstation environment in a large tertiary care hospital. The acceptance criteria contained in the draft report of Topic Group 18 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) were used as a basis for assessment of primary and secondary displays. A telescopic photometer was used to measure the maximum luminance and the contrast ratio of the image for the displays used in our radiology department and in the operating and emergency rooms using the standard Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) pattern, in ambient light and with light decreased as much as possible. About half of the displays met the AAPM criteria for minimum luminance and contrast ratio in low light. None of the systems met the contrast ratio criteria in ambient light. The challenges in improving the performance and calibrating displays are discussed.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Arenson, RL, Chakraborty, DP, Seshadri, SB, Kundel, HL 2003The digital imaging workstationJ Digit Imaging16142162CrossRefPubMed Arenson, RL, Chakraborty, DP, Seshadri, SB, Kundel, HL 2003The digital imaging workstationJ Digit Imaging16142162CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, J, Compton, K, Peng, Q 2003Proposal of a quality-index or metric for soft-copy display systems: contrast sensitivity studyJ Digit Imaging16185202CrossRefPubMed Wang, J, Compton, K, Peng, Q 2003Proposal of a quality-index or metric for soft-copy display systems: contrast sensitivity studyJ Digit Imaging16185202CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong, J, Anderson, J, Lane, T, Stetson, C, Moore, J 2000Contrast-detail characteristic evaluations of several display devicesJ Digit Imaging13162167PubMed Wong, J, Anderson, J, Lane, T, Stetson, C, Moore, J 2000Contrast-detail characteristic evaluations of several display devicesJ Digit Imaging13162167PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Badano, A, Flynn, MJ, Martin, S, Kanicki, J 2003Angular dependence of the luminance and contrast in medical monochrome liquid crystal displaysMed Phys3026022613CrossRefPubMed Badano, A, Flynn, MJ, Martin, S, Kanicki, J 2003Angular dependence of the luminance and contrast in medical monochrome liquid crystal displaysMed Phys3026022613CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Badano, A, Gagne, RM, Jennings, RJ, Drilling, SE, Imhoff, BR, Muka, E 2004Noise in flat-panel displays with subpixel structureMed Phys31715723CrossRefPubMed Badano, A, Gagne, RM, Jennings, RJ, Drilling, SE, Imhoff, BR, Muka, E 2004Noise in flat-panel displays with subpixel structureMed Phys31715723CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Evaluation and Constancy Tests—Image display devices. IEC Publication 61223-2-5, 1994 Evaluation and Constancy Tests—Image display devices. IEC Publication 61223-2-5, 1994
7.
Zurück zum Zitat SMPTE RP133, Specifications for Medical Diagnostic Imaging Test Pattern for Television Monitors and Hardcopy Recording Cameras, Society of Motion Picture & Television Engineers (SMPTE), 595 West Hartsdale Avenue, White Plains, NY 10607 SMPTE RP133, Specifications for Medical Diagnostic Imaging Test Pattern for Television Monitors and Hardcopy Recording Cameras, Society of Motion Picture & Television Engineers (SMPTE), 595 West Hartsdale Avenue, White Plains, NY 10607
8.
Zurück zum Zitat NEMA PS 3.14-2000, “Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Part 14: Grayscale Display Standard Function,” National Electrical Manufacturers Association, NEMA, 1300 North 17th Street, Suite 1847, Rosslyn, VA 22209, USA NEMA PS 3.14-2000, “Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Part 14: Grayscale Display Standard Function,” National Electrical Manufacturers Association, NEMA, 1300 North 17th Street, Suite 1847, Rosslyn, VA 22209, USA
9.
Zurück zum Zitat DIN 6868-57-2001, Image quality assurance in x-ray diagnostics, Acceptance testing for image display devices, The German Standards Institution, Deutsches Institut für Normunge, V., February 2001 DIN 6868-57-2001, Image quality assurance in x-ray diagnostics, Acceptance testing for image display devices, The German Standards Institution, Deutsches Institut für Normunge, V., February 2001
10.
Zurück zum Zitat ANSI 9241-3:1992 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 3: Visual display requirements, American National Standards Institute, 11 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036 ANSI 9241-3:1992 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 3: Visual display requirements, American National Standards Institute, 11 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Samei E, Badano A, Chakraborty D, Compton K, Cornelius C, Corrigan K, Flynn MJ, Hemminger B, Hangiandreou N, Johnson J, Moxley M, Pavlicek W, Roehrig H, Rutz L, Shepard J, Uzenoff R, Wang J, Willis C: Assessment of Display Performance for Medical Imaging Systems. Draft Report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 18, Version 9.0, October 2002 Samei E, Badano A, Chakraborty D, Compton K, Cornelius C, Corrigan K, Flynn MJ, Hemminger B, Hangiandreou N, Johnson J, Moxley M, Pavlicek W, Roehrig H, Rutz L, Shepard J, Uzenoff R, Wang J, Willis C: Assessment of Display Performance for Medical Imaging Systems. Draft Report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 18, Version 9.0, October 2002
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chakrabarti, K, Kaczmarek, RV, Thomas, JA, Romayuhha, A 2003Effect of room illuminance on monitor back level luminance and monitor calibrationJ Digit Imaging16350355CrossRefPubMed Chakrabarti, K, Kaczmarek, RV, Thomas, JA, Romayuhha, A 2003Effect of room illuminance on monitor back level luminance and monitor calibrationJ Digit Imaging16350355CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Seetzen H, Heidrich W, Stuerzlinger W, Ward G, Whitehead LA, Trentacoste M, Gosh A, Vorozcovs A: “High Dynamic Range Display Systems,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, special issue on Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH 2004, August 2004 Seetzen H, Heidrich W, Stuerzlinger W, Ward G, Whitehead LA, Trentacoste M, Gosh A, Vorozcovs A: “High Dynamic Range Display Systems,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, special issue on Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH 2004, August 2004
Metadaten
Titel
Assessment of PACS Display Systems
verfasst von
John E. Aldrich, Ph.D., FCCPM
John D. Rutledge, BSc
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2005
Erschienen in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2005
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Elektronische ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-005-6974-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2005

Journal of Digital Imaging 4/2005 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Blogging Your PACS

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.