Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2014

01.02.2014

Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Breast DCE-MRI Images Using Bilateral Asymmetry of Contrast Enhancement Between Two Breasts

verfasst von: Qian Yang, Lihua Li, Juan Zhang, Guoliang Shao, Chengjie Zhang, Bin Zheng

Erschienen in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of breasts is an important imaging modality in breast cancer diagnosis with higher sensitivity but relatively lower specificity. The objective of this study is to investigate a new approach to help improve diagnostic performance of DCE-MRI examinations based on the automated detection and analysis of bilateral asymmetry of characteristic kinetic features between the left and right breast. An image dataset involving 130 DCE-MRI examinations was assembled and used in which 80 were biopsy-proved malignant and 50 were benign. A computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme was developed to segment breast areas depicted on each MR image, register images acquired from the sequential MR image scan series, compute average contrast enhancement of all pixels in one breast, and a set of kinetic features related to the difference of contrast enhancement between the left and right breast, and then use a multi-feature based Bayesian belief network to classify between malignant and benign cases. A leave-one-case-out validation method was applied to test CAD performance. The computed area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is 0.78 ± 0.04. The positive and negative predictive values are 0.77 and 0.64, respectively. The study indicates that bilateral asymmetry of kinetic features between the left and right breasts is a potentially useful image biomarker to enhance the detection of angiogenesis associated with malignancy. It also demonstrates the feasibility of applying a simple CAD approach to classify between malignant and benign DCE-MRI examinations based on this new image biomarker.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E: Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 60:277–300, 2010PubMedCrossRef Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E: Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 60:277–300, 2010PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cady B, Michaelson JS: The life-sparing potential of mammographic screening. Cancer 91:1699–1703, 2001PubMedCrossRef Cady B, Michaelson JS: The life-sparing potential of mammographic screening. Cancer 91:1699–1703, 2001PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH, et al: Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 91:1724–1731, 2001PubMedCrossRef Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH, et al: Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 91:1724–1731, 2001PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith RA, Cokkindes V, Brooks D, et al: Cancer screening in the United States, 2011. CA Cancer J Clin 61:8–30, 2011PubMedCrossRef Smith RA, Cokkindes V, Brooks D, et al: Cancer screening in the United States, 2011. CA Cancer J Clin 61:8–30, 2011PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, et al: Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval-and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1081–1087, 2000PubMedCrossRef Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, et al: Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval-and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1081–1087, 2000PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH: Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165–175, 2002PubMedCrossRef Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH: Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165–175, 2002PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al: Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830–849, 2004PubMedCrossRef Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al: Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830–849, 2004PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al: American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57:75–89, 2007PubMedCrossRef Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al: American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57:75–89, 2007PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, et al: Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 365:1769–1778, 2005PubMedCrossRef Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, et al: Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 365:1769–1778, 2005PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al: Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8469–8476, 2005PubMedCrossRef Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al: Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8469–8476, 2005PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sardanelli F, Podo F, D’Agnolo G, et al: Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. Radiology 242:698–715, 2007PubMedCrossRef Sardanelli F, Podo F, D’Agnolo G, et al: Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. Radiology 242:698–715, 2007PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al: Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351:427–437, 2004PubMedCrossRef Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al: Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351:427–437, 2004PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al: Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition. Cancer 106:2318–2326, 2006PubMedCrossRef Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al: Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition. Cancer 106:2318–2326, 2006PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Warner E: Intensive radiologic surveillance: a focus on the psychological issues. Ann Oncol 15:143–147, 2004CrossRef Warner E: Intensive radiologic surveillance: a focus on the psychological issues. Ann Oncol 15:143–147, 2004CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Blume JD, Adams AM, et al: Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666. Radiology 254:79–87, 2010PubMedCrossRef Berg WA, Blume JD, Adams AM, et al: Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666. Radiology 254:79–87, 2010PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gibbs P, Turnbull LW: Textural analysis of contrast-enhanced MR image of the breast. Magn Reson Med 50:92–98, 2003PubMedCrossRef Gibbs P, Turnbull LW: Textural analysis of contrast-enhanced MR image of the breast. Magn Reson Med 50:92–98, 2003PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen W, Giger ML, Bick U, Newstead GM: Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. Med Phys 33:2878–2887, 2006PubMedCrossRef Chen W, Giger ML, Bick U, Newstead GM: Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. Med Phys 33:2878–2887, 2006PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Meinel LA, Stolpen AH, Berbaun KS, Reinhardt JM: Breast MRI lesion classification: improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:89–95, 2007PubMedCrossRef Meinel LA, Stolpen AH, Berbaun KS, Reinhardt JM: Breast MRI lesion classification: improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:89–95, 2007PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams TC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, et al: Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Radiology 244:94–103, 2007PubMedCrossRef Williams TC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, et al: Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Radiology 244:94–103, 2007PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhooshan N, Giger ML, Jansen SA, Li H, Lan L, Newstead GM: Cancerous breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: computerized characterization for image-based prognostic markers. Radiology 254:680–690, 2010PubMedCrossRef Bhooshan N, Giger ML, Jansen SA, Li H, Lan L, Newstead GM: Cancerous breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: computerized characterization for image-based prognostic markers. Radiology 254:680–690, 2010PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuan Y, Giger ML, Li H, Bhooshan N, Sennett CA: Multimodality computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis with FFDM and DCE-MRI. Acad Radiol 17:1158–1167, 2010PubMedCrossRef Yuan Y, Giger ML, Li H, Bhooshan N, Sennett CA: Multimodality computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis with FFDM and DCE-MRI. Acad Radiol 17:1158–1167, 2010PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat King V, Brooks JD, Bernstein JL, Reiner AS, Pike MC, Morris EA: Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk. Radiology 260:50–60, 2011PubMedCrossRef King V, Brooks JD, Bernstein JL, Reiner AS, Pike MC, Morris EA: Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk. Radiology 260:50–60, 2011PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Uematsu T, Kasami M, Watanabe J: Does the degree of background enhancement in breast MRI affect the detection and staging of breast cancer? Eur Radiol 21:2261–2267, 2011PubMedCrossRef Uematsu T, Kasami M, Watanabe J: Does the degree of background enhancement in breast MRI affect the detection and staging of breast cancer? Eur Radiol 21:2261–2267, 2011PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Harvey J, Bovbjerg VE: Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology 230:29–41, 2004PubMedCrossRef Harvey J, Bovbjerg VE: Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology 230:29–41, 2004PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kopans DB: Basic physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk. Radiology 246:348–353, 2008PubMedCrossRef Kopans DB: Basic physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk. Radiology 246:348–353, 2008PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim M, Wu G, Shen D: Hierarchical alignment of breast DCE-MR images by groupwise registration and robust feature matching. Med Phys 39:353–366, 2012PubMedCrossRef Kim M, Wu G, Shen D: Hierarchical alignment of breast DCE-MR images by groupwise registration and robust feature matching. Med Phys 39:353–366, 2012PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Filev P, Hadjiiski L, Sahiner B, Chan HP, Helvie MA: Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms. Med Phys 32:515–529, 2005PubMedCrossRef Filev P, Hadjiiski L, Sahiner B, Chan HP, Helvie MA: Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms. Med Phys 32:515–529, 2005PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang XH, Park SC, Zheng B: Improving performance of content-based image retrieval schemes in searching for similar breast mass regions: an assessment. Phys Med Biol 54:949–961, 2009PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wang XH, Park SC, Zheng B: Improving performance of content-based image retrieval schemes in searching for similar breast mass regions: an assessment. Phys Med Biol 54:949–961, 2009PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahn CE, Robert LM, Wang K, et al: Construction of a Bayesian network for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer. Comput. Biol. Med. 27:1929–1940, 1997CrossRef Kahn CE, Robert LM, Wang K, et al: Construction of a Bayesian network for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer. Comput. Biol. Med. 27:1929–1940, 1997CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang X, Zheng B, Good WF, King JK, Chang Y: Computer-assisted diagnosis of breast cancer using a data-driven Bayesian belief network. Int J Med Informatics 54:115–126, 1999CrossRef Wang X, Zheng B, Good WF, King JK, Chang Y: Computer-assisted diagnosis of breast cancer using a data-driven Bayesian belief network. Int J Med Informatics 54:115–126, 1999CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang X, Lederman D, Tan J, Zheng B: Computer-aided detection: the impact of machine learning classifier and image feature selection on scheme performance. Int J Intell Inf Process 1:30–40, 2010 Wang X, Lederman D, Tan J, Zheng B: Computer-aided detection: the impact of machine learning classifier and image feature selection on scheme performance. Int J Intell Inf Process 1:30–40, 2010
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell TM: Machine learning. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA, 1997 Mitchell TM: Machine learning. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA, 1997
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang X, Li L, Xu W, Liu W, Lederman D, Zheng B: Improving performance of computer-aided detection of subtle breast masses using an adaptive cueing method. Phys Med Biol 57:561–575, 2012PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wang X, Li L, Xu W, Liu W, Lederman D, Zheng B: Improving performance of computer-aided detection of subtle breast masses using an adaptive cueing method. Phys Med Biol 57:561–575, 2012PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Zheng B, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Wang X, Klym AH, Gur D: Bilateral mammographic density asymmetry and breast cancer risk: a preliminary assessment. Eur J Radiol. 81:3222–3228, 2012PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Zheng B, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Wang X, Klym AH, Gur D: Bilateral mammographic density asymmetry and breast cancer risk: a preliminary assessment. Eur J Radiol. 81:3222–3228, 2012PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Breast DCE-MRI Images Using Bilateral Asymmetry of Contrast Enhancement Between Two Breasts
verfasst von
Qian Yang
Lihua Li
Juan Zhang
Guoliang Shao
Chengjie Zhang
Bin Zheng
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Elektronische ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-013-9617-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.