nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.01.2012 | Clinical trial

18F-FDG PET/CT as a staging procedure in primary stage II and III breast cancer: comparison with conventional imaging techniques

verfasst von: Bas B. Koolen, Marie-Jeanne T. F. D. Vrancken Peeters, Tjeerd S. Aukema, Wouter V. Vogel, Hester S. A. Oldenburg, Jos A. van der Hage, Cornelis A. Hoefnagel, Marcel P. M. Stokkel, Claudette E. Loo, Sjoerd Rodenhuis, Emiel J. Th. Rutgers, Renato A. Valdés Olmos

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate if 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) outperforms conventional imaging techniques for excluding distant metastases prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) treatment in patients with stage II and III breast cancer. Second, we assessed the clinical importance of false positive findings. One hundred and fifty four patients with stage II or III breast cancer, scheduled to receive NAC, underwent an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan and conventional imaging, consisting of bone scintigraphy, ultrasound of the liver, and chest radiography. Suspect additional lesions at staging examination were confirmed by biopsy and histopathology and/or additional imaging. Metastases that were detected within 6 months after the PET/CT scan were considered evidence of occult metastasis, missed by staging examination. Forty-two additional distant lesions were seen in 25 patients with PET/CT and could be confirmed in 20 (13%) of 154 patients. PET/CT was false positive for 8 additional lesions (19%) and misclassified the presence of metastatic disease in 5 (3%) of 154 patients. In 16 (80%) of 20 patients, additional lesions were exclusively seen with PET/CT, leading to a change in treatment in 13 (8%) of 154 patients. In 129 patients with a negative staging PET/CT, no metastases developed during the follow-up of 9.0 months. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of PET/CT in the detection of additional distant lesions in patients with stage II or III breast cancer are 100, 96, 80, 100, and 97%, respectively. FDG PET/CT is superior to conventional imaging techniques in the detection of distant metastases in patients with untreated stage II or III breast cancer and is associated with a low false positive rate. PET/CT may be of additional value in the staging of breast cancer prior to NAC.

Kaufmann M, Hortobagyi GN, Goldhirsch A, Scholl S, Makris A, Valagussa P et al (2006) Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update. J Clin Oncol 24:1940–1949PubMedCrossRef

Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, Mamounas E, Brown A, Fisher ER et al (1998) Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:2672–2685PubMed

Mieog JS, van der Hage JA, van de Velde CJ (2007) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. Br J Surg 94:1189–1200PubMedCrossRef

Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Smith TL, Ames FC, Hunt KK, Dhingra K et al (1999) Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 17:460–469PubMed

Hannemann J, Oosterkamp HM, Bosch CA, Velds A, Wessels LF, Loo C et al (2005) Changes in gene expression associated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:3331–3342PubMedCrossRef

Loo CE, Straver ME, Rodenhuis S, Muller SH, Wesseling J, Vrancken Peeters MJ, Gilhuijs KG (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging response monitoring of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: relevance of breast cancer subtype. J Clin Oncol 29:660–666PubMedCrossRef

Samant R, Ganguly P (1999) Staging investigations in patients with breast cancer: the role of bone scans and liver imaging. Arch Surg 134:551–553 (discussion 554)PubMedCrossRef

Rondeau V, Mathoulin-Pélissier S, Tanneau L, Sasco AJ, MacGrogan G, Debled M (2010) Separate and combined analysis of successive dependent outcomes after breast-conservation surgery: recurrence, metastases, second cancer and death. BMC Cancer 10:697PubMedCrossRef

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast Cancer, version 2.2011. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf. Accessed 22 Jun 2011

10.

Dutch National Guideline for the Treatment of Breast Cancer, Version 1.1 (Sept 2008). http://www.oncoline.nl/mammacarcinoom. Accessed 22 Jun 2011

11.

Kasem AR, Desai A, Daniell S, Sinha P (2006) Bone scan and liver ultrasound scan in the preoperative staging for primary breast cancer. Breast J 12:544–548PubMedCrossRef

12.

Dose J, Bleckmann C, Bachmann S, Bohuslavizki KH, Berger J, Jenicke L, Habermann CR, Jänicke F (2002) Comparison of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and “conventional diagnostic procedures” for the detection of distant metastases in breast cancer patients. Nucl Med Commun 23:857–864PubMedCrossRef

13.

Fuster D, Duch J, Paredes P, Velasco M, Muñoz M, Santamaría G, Fontanillas M, Pons F (2008) Preoperative staging of large primary breast cancer with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography compared with conventional imaging procedures. J Clin Oncol 26:4746–4751PubMedCrossRef

14.

Heusner TA, Kuemmel S, Umutlu L, Koeninger A, Freudenberg LS, Hauth EA et al (2008) Breast cancer staging in a single session: whole-body PET/CT mammography. J Nucl Med 49:1215–1222PubMedCrossRef

15.

Mahner S, Schirrmacher S, Brenner W, Jenicke L, Habermann CR, Avril N, Dose-Schwarz J (2008) Comparison between positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose, conventional imaging and computed tomography for staging of breast cancer. Ann Oncol 19:1249–1254PubMedCrossRef

16.

Aukema TS, Rutgers EJ, Vogel WV, Teertstra HJ, Oldenburg HS, Vrancken Peeters MT et al (2010) The role of FDG PET/CT in patients with locoregional breast cancer recurrence: a comparison to conventional imaging techniques. Eur J Surg Oncol 36:387–392PubMedCrossRef

17.

Morris PG, Lynch C, Feeney JN, Patil S, Howard J, Larson SM et al (2010) Integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography may render bone scintigraphy unnecessary to investigate suspected metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:3154–3159PubMedCrossRef

18.

Segaert I, Mottaghy F, Ceyssens S, De Wever W, Stroobants S, Van Ongeval C et al (2010) Additional value of PET-CT in staging of clinical stage IIB and III breast cancer. Breast J 16:617–624PubMedCrossRef

19.

van der Hoeven JJ, Krak NC, Hoekstra OS, Comans EF, Boom RP, van Geldere D et al (2004) 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in staging of locally advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:1253–1259PubMedCrossRef

20.

Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, Siegel BA, Lowe VJ, Lyman GH et al (2008) Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med 49:480–508PubMedCrossRef

21.

Hodgson NC, Gulenchyn KY (2008) Is there a role for positron emission tomography in breast cancer staging? J Clin Oncol 26:712–720PubMedCrossRef

22.

Niikura N, Ueno NT (2010) The role of F-FDG-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in staging primary breast cancer. J Cancer 1:51–53PubMed

23.

Avril N, Rosé CA, Schelling M, Dose J, Kuhn W, Bense S et al (2000) Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: use and limitations. J Clin Oncol 18:3495–3502PubMed

24.

Antoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H, Dahmen G, Mueller SP, Beyer T et al (2004) Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. J Clin Oncol 22:4357–4368PubMedCrossRef

25.

Kennecke H, Yerushalmi R, Woods R, Cheang MCU, Voduc D, Speers CH, Nielsen TO, Gelmon K (2010) Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol 28:3271–3277PubMedCrossRef

26.

Krüger S, Buck AK, Mottaghy FM, Hasenkamp E, Pauls S, Schumann C et al (2009) Detection of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer: 99mTc-MDP planar bone scintigraphy, 18F-fluoride PET or 18F-FDG PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36:1807–1812PubMedCrossRef

27.

Ak I, Sivrikoz MC, Entok E, Vardareli E (2010) Discordant findings in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: absolutely normal bone scans versus disseminated bone metastases on positron-emission tomography/computed tomography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 37:792–796PubMedCrossRef

28.

Cook GJ, Houston S, Rubens R, Maisey MN, Fogelman I (1998) Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer by 18FDG PET: differing metabolic activity in osteoblastic and osteolytic lesions. J Clin Oncol 16:3375–3379PubMed

29.

Aukema TS, Straver ME, Peeters MJ, Russell NS, Gilhuijs KG, Vogel WV, Rutgers EJ, Olmos RA (2010) Detection of extra-axillary lymph node involvement with FDG PET/CT in patients with stage II–III breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 46:3205–3210PubMedCrossRef

30.

Veronesi U, De Cicco C, Galimberti VE, Fernandez JR, Rotmensz N, Viale G et al (2007) A comparative study on the value of FDG-PET and sentinel node biopsy to identify occult axillary metastases. Ann Oncol 18:473–478PubMedCrossRef

31.

Straver ME, Aukema TS, Olmos RA, Rutgers EJ, Gilhuijs KG, Schot ME, Vogel WV, Peeters MJ (2010) Feasibility of FDG PET/CT to monitor the response of axillary lymph node metastases to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:1069–1076PubMedCrossRef

32.

McDermott GM, Welch A, Staff RT, Gilbert FJ, Schweiger L, Semple SI et al (2007) Monitoring primary breast cancer throughout chemotherapy using FDG-PET. Breast Cancer Res Treat 102:75–84PubMedCrossRef

33.

Avril N, Sassen S, Roylance R (2009) Response to therapy in breast cancer. J Nucl Med 50(Suppl 1):55S–63SPubMedCrossRef

34.

Duch J, Fuster D, Muñoz M, Fernández PL, Paredes P, Fontanillas M et al (2009) 18F-FDG PET/CT for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36:1551–1557PubMedCrossRef

35.

Kumar A, Kumar R, Seenu V, Gupta SD, Chawla M, Malhotra A, Mehta SN (2009) The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in evaluation of early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Eur Radiol 19:1347–1357PubMedCrossRef

36.

Schwarz-Dose J, Untch M, Tiling R, Sassen S, Mahner S, Kahlert S et al (2009) Monitoring primary systemic therapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer by using sequential positron emission tomography imaging with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose. J Clin Oncol 27:535–541PubMedCrossRef

37.

Martoni AA, Zamagni C, Quercia S, Rosati M, Cacciari N, Bernardi A et al (2010) Early (18)F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography may identify a subset of patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer who will not respond optimally to preoperative chemotherapy. Cancer 116:805–813PubMedCrossRef

Titel: 18F-FDG PET/CT as a staging procedure in primary stage II and III breast cancer: comparison with conventional imaging techniques
verfasst von: Bas B. Koolen
Marie-Jeanne T. F. D. Vrancken Peeters
Tjeerd S. Aukema
Wouter V. Vogel
Hester S. A. Oldenburg
Jos A. van der Hage
Cornelis A. Hoefnagel
Marcel P. M. Stokkel
Claudette E. Loo
Sjoerd Rodenhuis
Emiel J. Th. Rutgers
Renato A. Valdés Olmos
Publikationsdatum: 01.01.2012
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1767-9

Springer Medizin

18F-FDG PET/CT as a staging procedure in primary stage II and III breast cancer: comparison with conventional imaging techniques

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Labor, CT-Anthropometrie zeigen Risiko für Pankreaskrebs

Viel pflanzliche Nahrung, seltener Prostata-Ca.-Progression

Alter verschlechtert Prognose bei Endometriumkarzinom

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Update Onkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Regarding “Co-expression of SNAIL and TWIST determines prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer patients”

Glucocorticoid receptor activity discriminates between progesterone and medroxyprogesterone acetate effects in breast cells

FOXC1, a target of polycomb, inhibits metastasis of breast cancer cells

A retrospective review of the metabolic syndrome in women diagnosed with breast cancer and correlation with estrogen receptor

Erratum to: Glutathione S-transferase P1 Ile105Val polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis involving 34,658 subjects

Erratum to: The BRCA2 c.9004G>A (E3002K) variant is likely pathogenic and recurs in breast and/or ovarian cancer families of French Canadian descent

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Labor, CT-Anthropometrie zeigen Risiko für Pankreaskrebs

Viel pflanzliche Nahrung, seltener Prostata-Ca.-Progression

Alter verschlechtert Prognose bei Endometriumkarzinom

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Update Onkologie