nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.08.2012 | Clinical Trial

Locoregional lymph node involvement on 18F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer patients scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy

verfasst von: Bas B. Koolen, Renato A. Valdés Olmos, Paula H. M. Elkhuizen, Wouter V. Vogel, Marie-Jeanne T. F. D. Vrancken Peeters, Sjoerd Rodenhuis, Emiel J. Th. Rutgers

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The optimal method for locoregional staging in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), usually ultrasound (US) and pre- or post-chemotherapy sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), remains subject of debate. The aim of this study was to assess the value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting locoregional lymph node metastases in primary breast cancer patients scheduled for NAC. 311 breast cancer patients, scheduled for NAC, underwent PET/CT of the thorax in prone position with hanging breasts. A panel of four experienced reviewers examined PET/CT images, blinded for other diagnostic procedures. FDG uptake in locoregional nodes was determined qualitatively using a 4-point scale (0 = negative, 1 = questionable, 2 = moderately intense, and 3 = very intense). Results were compared with pathology obtained by US-guided fine needle aspiration or SLNB prior to NAC. All FDG-avid extra-axillary nodes were considered metastatic, based on the previously reported high positive predictive value of the technique. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of FDG-avid nodes for the detection of axillary metastases (score 2 or 3) were 82, 92, 98, 53, and 84 %, respectively. Of 28 patients with questionable axillary FDG uptake (score 1), 23 (82 %) were node-positive. Occult lymph node metastases in the internal mammary chain and periclavicular area were detected in 26 (8 %) and 32 (10 %) patients, respectively, resulting in changed regional radiotherapy planning in 50 (16 %) patients. In breast cancer patients scheduled for NAC, PET/CT renders pre-chemotherapy SLNB unnecessary in case of an FDG-avid axillary node, enables axillary response monitoring during or after NAC, and leads to changes in radiotherapy for a substantial number of patients because of detection of occult N3-disease. Based on these results, we recommend a PET/CT as a standard staging procedure in breast cancer patients scheduled for NAC.

Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (eds) (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York

Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2012) Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 62:10–29PubMedCrossRef

Carter CL, Allen C, Henson DE (1989) Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases. Cancer 63:181–187PubMedCrossRef

Newman LA, Kuerer HM, Fornage B, Mirza N, Hunt KK, Ross MI et al (2001) Adverse prognostic significance of infraclavicular lymph nodes detected by ultrasonography in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Am J Surg 181:313–318PubMedCrossRef

Brito RA, Valero V, Buzdar AU, Booser DJ, Ames F, Strom E et al (2001) Long-term results of combined-modality therapy for locally advanced breast cancer with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases: The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. J Clin Oncol 19:628–633PubMed

Sugg SL, Ferguson DJ, Posner MC, Heimann R (2000) Should internal mammary nodes be sampled in the sentinel lymph node era? Ann Surg Oncol 7:188–192PubMedCrossRef

Veronesi U, Marubini E, Mariani L, Valagussa P, Zucali R (1999) The dissection of internal mammary nodes does not improve the survival of breast cancer patients. 30-year results of a randomised trial. Eur J Cancer 35:1320–1325PubMedCrossRef

Stemmer SM, Rizel S, Hardan I, Adamo A, Neumann A, Goffman J et al (2003) The role of irradiation of the internal mammary lymph nodes in high-risk stage II to IIIA breast cancer patients after high-dose chemotherapy: a prospective sequential nonrandomized study. J Clin Oncol 21:2713–2718PubMedCrossRef

Chen RC, Lin NU, Golshan M, Harris JR, Bellon JR (2008) Internal mammary nodes in breast cancer: diagnosis and implications for patient management—a systematic review. J Clin Oncol 26:4981–4989PubMedCrossRef

10.

Veronesi U, Arnone P, Veronesi P, Galimberti V, Luini A, Rotmensz N et al (2008) The value of radiotherapy on metastatic internal mammary nodes in breast cancer. Results on a large series. Ann Oncol 19:1553–1560PubMedCrossRef

11.

Kaufmann M, von Minckwitz G, Mamounas EP, Cameron D, Carey LA, Cristofanilli M et al (2012) Recommendations from an international consensus conference on the current status and future of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19:1508–1516PubMedCrossRef

12.

Mieog JSD, van der Hage JA, van de Velde CJH (2007) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. Br J Surg 94:1189–1200PubMedCrossRef

13.

Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, Mamounas E, Brown A, Fisher ER et al (1998) Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:2672–2685PubMed

14.

Deurloo EE, Tanis PJ, Gilhuijs KGA, Muller SH, Kröger R, Peterse JL et al (2003) Reduction in the number of sentinel lymph node procedures by preoperative ultrasonography of the axilla in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 39:1068–1073PubMedCrossRef

15.

Altinyollar H, Dingil G, Berberoglu U (2005) Detection of infraclavicular lymph node metastases using ultrasonography in breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 92:299–303PubMedCrossRef

16.

Aukema TS, Straver ME, Peeters MJTFDV, Russell NS, Gilhuijs KGA, Vogel WV et al (2010) Detection of extra-axillary lymph node involvement with FDG PET/CT in patients with stage II–III breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 46:3205–3210PubMedCrossRef

17.

Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL (1994) Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 220:391–401PubMedCrossRef

18.

Estourgie SH, Tanis PJ, Nieweg OE, Valdés Olmos RA, Rutgers EJT, Kroon BBR (2003) Should the hunt for internal mammary chain sentinel nodes begin? An evaluation of 150 breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 10:935–941PubMedCrossRef

19.

Straver ME, Aukema TS, Olmos RAV, Rutgers EJT, Gilhuijs KGA, Schot ME et al (2010) Feasibility of FDG PET/CT to monitor the response of axillary lymph node metastases to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:1069–1076PubMedCrossRef

20.

Straver ME, Rutgers EJT, Russell NS, Oldenburg HSA, Rodenhuis S, Wesseling J et al (2009) Towards rational axillary treatment in relation to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 45:2284–2292PubMedCrossRef

21.

Gimbergues P, Abrial C, Durando X, Le Bouedec G, Cachin F, Penault-Llorca F et al (2008) Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate in breast cancer patients with a clinically negative axillary nodal status at presentation. Ann Surg Oncol 15:1316–1321PubMedCrossRef

22.

Pecha V, Kolarik D, Kozevnikova R, Hovorkova K, Hrabetova P, Halaska M, et al. (2011) Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer. doi:10.1002/cncr.26102

23.

Peare R, Staff RT, Heys SD (2010) The use of FDG-PET in assessing axillary lymph node status in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 123:281–290PubMedCrossRef

24.

Koolen BB, Vrancken Peeters MJTFDV, Aukema TS, Vogel WV, Oldenburg HSA, van der Hage JA et al (2012) 18F-FDG PET/CT as a staging procedure in primary stage II and III breast cancer: comparison with conventional imaging techniques. Breast Cancer Res Treat 131:117–126PubMedCrossRef

25.

Fuster D, Duch J, Paredes P, Velasco M, Muñoz M, Santamaría G et al (2008) Preoperative staging of large primary breast cancer with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography compared with conventional imaging procedures. J Clin Oncol 26:4746–4751PubMedCrossRef

26.

Groheux D, Giacchetti S, Espié M, Vercellino L, Hamy A-S, Delord M et al (2011) The yield of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with clinical stage IIA, IIB, or IIIA breast cancer: a prospective study. J Nucl Med 52:1526–1534PubMedCrossRef

27.

Ueda S, Tsuda H, Asakawa H, Omata J, Fukatsu K, Kondo N et al (2008) Utility of 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) in combination with ultrasonography for axillary staging in primary breast cancer. BMC Cancer 8:165PubMedCrossRef

28.

Veronesi U, De Cicco C, Galimberti VE, Fernandez JR, Rotmensz N, Viale G et al (2007) A comparative study on the value of FDG-PET and sentinel node biopsy to identify occult axillary metastases. Ann Oncol 18:473–478PubMedCrossRef

29.

Loo CE, Straver ME, Rodenhuis S, Muller SH, Wesseling J, Vrancken Peeters M-JTFD et al (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging response monitoring of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: relevance of breast cancer subtype. J Clin Oncol 29:660–666PubMedCrossRef

30.

Vidal-Sicart S, Aukema TS, Vogel WV, Hoefnagel CA, Valdes Olmos RA (2010) Added value of prone position technique for PET-TAC in breast cancer patients. Rev Esp Med Nucl 29:230–235PubMedCrossRef

31.

Hodgson NC, Gulenchyn KY (2008) Is there a role for positron emission tomography in breast cancer staging? J Clin Oncol 26:712–720PubMedCrossRef

32.

Rouzier R, Extra J-M, Klijanienko J, Falcou M-C, Asselain B, Vincent-Salomon A et al (2002) Incidence and prognostic significance of complete axillary downstaging after primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with T1 to T3 tumors and cytologically proven axillary metastatic lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol 20:1304–1310PubMedCrossRef

33.

Straver ME, Loo CE, Alderliesten T, Rutgers EJT, Vrancken Peeters MTFD (2010) Marking the axilla with radioactive iodine seeds (MARI procedure) may reduce the need for axillary dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Br J Surg 97:1226–1231PubMedCrossRef

34.

Groheux D, Giacchetti S, Moretti J-L, Porcher R, Espié M, Lehmann-Che J et al (2011) Correlation of high 18F-FDG uptake to clinical, pathological and biological prognostic factors in breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38:426–435PubMedCrossRef

35.

Gil-Rendo A, Martínez-Regueira F, Zornoza G, García-Velloso MJ, Beorlegui C, Rodriguez-Spiteri N (2009) Association between [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and prognostic parameters in breast cancer. Br J Surg 96:166–170PubMedCrossRef

36.

Giordano SH, Kuo Y-F, Freeman JL, Buchholz TA, Hortobagyi GN, Goodwin JS (2005) Risk of cardiac death after adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:419–424PubMedCrossRef

37.

Olivotto IA, Chua B, Allan SJ, Speers CH, Chia S, Ragaz J (2003) Long-term survival of patients with supraclavicular metastases at diagnosis of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:851–854PubMedCrossRef

38.

Bellon JR, Livingston RB, Eubank WB, Gralow JR, Ellis GK, Dunnwald LK et al (2004) Evaluation of the internal mammary lymph nodes by FDG-PET in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Am J Clin Oncol 27:407–410PubMedCrossRef

39.

Çermik TF, Mavi A, Basu S, Alavi A (2008) Impact of FDG PET on the preoperative staging of newly diagnosed breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:475–483PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Locoregional lymph node involvement on 18F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer patients scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy
verfasst von: Bas B. Koolen
Renato A. Valdés Olmos
Paula H. M. Elkhuizen
Wouter V. Vogel
Marie-Jeanne T. F. D. Vrancken Peeters
Sjoerd Rodenhuis
Emiel J. Th. Rutgers
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2012
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2179-1

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Locoregional lymph node involvement on 18F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer patients scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Erhöhte Mortalität bei postpartalem Brustkrebs

Hypertherme Chemotherapie bietet Chance auf Blasenerhalt

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Update Onkologie

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Whole genome in vivo RNAi screening identifies the leukemia inhibitory factor receptor as a novel breast tumor suppressor

Variability in hormone and growth factor receptor expression in primary versus recurrent, metastatic, and post-neoadjuvant breast carcinoma

MRI in residual tumor size measurement in patient with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy calls for caution

Feature extraction via composite scoring and voting in breast cancer

Comparison of relative versus absolute arm size change as criteria for quantifying breast cancer-related lymphedema: the flaws in current studies and need for universal methodology

Stage-specific breast cancer incidence rates among participants and non-participants of a population-based mammographic screening program

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Erhöhte Mortalität bei postpartalem Brustkrebs

Hypertherme Chemotherapie bietet Chance auf Blasenerhalt

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Update Onkologie