nach oben

Erschienen in:

Open Access 18.02.2021 | COVID-19 | Brief Report

(Ex-)breast cancer patients with (pre-existing) symptoms of anxiety and/or depression experience higher barriers to contact health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic

verfasst von: Dieuwke R. Mink van der Molen, Claudia A. Bargon, Marilot C. T. Batenburg, Roxanne Gal, Danny A. Young-Afat, Lilianne E. van Stam, Iris E. van Dam, Femke van der Leij, Inge O. Baas, Miranda F. Ernst, Wiesje Maarse, Nieke Vermulst, Ernst J. P. Schoenmaeckers, Thijs van Dalen, Rhodé M. Bijlsma, Annemiek Doeksen, Helena M. Verkooijen, UMBRELLA study group

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 2/2021

Abstract

Purpose

To identify factors associated with (perceived) access to health care among (ex-)breast cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Cross-sectional study within a large prospective, multicenter cohort of (ex-)breast cancer patients, i.e., UMBRELLA. All participants enrolled in the UMBRELLA cohort between October 2013 and April 2020 were sent a COVID-19-specific survey, including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire.

Results

In total, 1051 (66.0%) participants completed the survey. During COVID-19, 284 (27.0%) participants reported clinically relevant increased levels of anxiety and/or depression, i.e., total HADS score ≥ 12. Participants with anxiety and/or depression reported statistically significant higher barriers to contact their general practitioner (47.5% vs. 25.0%, resp.) and breast cancer physicians (26.8% vs. 11.2%, resp.) compared to participants without these symptoms. In addition, a higher proportion of participants with anxiety and/or depression reported that their current treatment or (after)care was affected by COVID-19 compared to those without these symptoms (32.7% vs. 20.5%, resp.). Factors independently associated with symptoms of anxiety and/or depression during COVID-19 were pre-existent anxiety (OR 6.1, 95% CI 4.1–9.2) or depression (OR 6.0, 95% CI 3.5–10.2).

Conclusion

During the COVID-19 pandemic, (ex-)breast cancer patients with symptoms of anxiety and/or depression experience higher barriers to contact health care providers. Also, they more often report that their health care was affected by COVID-19. Risk factors for anxiety and/or depression during COVID-19 are pre-existent symptoms of anxiety or depression. Extra attention—including mental health support—is needed for this group.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

95% Confidence interval

COVID-19

Coronavirus disease 2019

DCIS

Ductal carcinoma in situ

EORTC

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer

HADS

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

IQR

Interquartile range

Number

NKR

Netherlands Cancer Registry

Odds ratio

PRO(s)

Patient-reported outcome(s)

Standard deviation

SPSS

Statistical package for social sciences

UMBRELLA

Utrecht cohort for Multiple BREast cancer intervention studies and Long-term evaluation

UMCU

University Medical Center Utrecht

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic is having a major impact on global health. During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands, a 46% decline in general practitioner consultations, and a sharp decrease in cancer diagnoses were reported [1, 2]. Increased (perceived) thresholds to health care access may negatively affect patients’ (psycho)social and physical well-being as well as their prognosis.

Symptoms of anxiety and depression among cancer patients and survivors have been reported to affect their health care behavior and health care consumption during a health threat of the magnitude of COVID-19 [3].

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of anxiety and depression among a large cohort of breast cancer patients and survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, we assessed the association between the presence of symptoms of anxiety and/or depression and COVID-19-specific concerns, including health care behavior and consumption.

Materials and methods

The present study was conducted within the prospective observational multicenter 'Utrecht cohort for Multiple BREast cancer intervention studies and Long-term evaLuAtion' (UMBRELLA), including patients with histologically proven invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) referred from regional and tertiary referral hospitals to the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) for adjuvant radiation therapy [4, 5]. All participants completed self-reported UMBRELLA questionnaires, including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), at regular time intervals during and after their breast cancer treatment.

All active participants, who enrolled in the UMBRELLA cohort between October 2013 and April 2020 and consented to receiving online questionnaires, were sent a survey (April 7, 2020), including the HADS and COVID-19-related questions [6, 7]. Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of the UMCU (NL52651.041.15, METC 15/165). The UMBRELLA study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02839863).

HADS is a 14-item questionnaire using a 4-point Likert scale. Scores ≥ 12 on the total HADS, and scores ≥ 8 on the 7-item anxiety and depression subscales indicated increased risk of depression or anxiety disorder [8].

Demographic and clinical data, including age, highest educational level, type of surgery, most invasive axillary treatment, (neo-)adjuvant systemic treatment, radiotherapy, and pathological T and N stage (AJCC 7th edition), were collected in the context of UMBRELLA and provided by the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR) [9].

Frequencies, proportions, means with standard deviation, or medians with interquartile ranges were used to describe patient demographics, treatment characteristics and HADS scores. A Chi-square test was performed to compare differences in proportions of patients scoring above the clinically relevant HADS threshold scores before and during COVID-19 [10]. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate to what extent relevant clinical demographic, tumor- and treatment characteristics affected clinically relevant symptoms of anxiety and/or depression during COVID-19. Two-sided p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed with IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 25 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY).

Results

Of the 3239 participants enrolled in the UMBRELLA cohort between October 2013 and April 2020, 1595 participants met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 1051 (66.0%) participants completed the COVID-19-specific questionnaire, of which 4.9% (n = 51) were under active treatment for their breast cancer.

Prevalence and risk factors for anxiety and/or depression during COVID-19

Overall, 284 (27.0%) participants experienced clinically relevant symptoms of anxiety and/or depression during COVID-19 (Table 1). Of all participants who experienced symptoms of anxiety and/or depression during COVID-19, 62.7% (n = 156) already experienced these symptoms pre-COVID-19. A total of 18.2% (n = 191) of all participants reported symptoms of anxiety and 16.0% (n = 168) symptoms of depression during the pandemic. The proportion of participants experiencing symptoms of anxiety and/or depression was slightly, but significantly lower before the pandemic (23.4%, n = 220).

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of participants with or without a clinically relevant increase in total HADS score (≥ 12), i.e., symptoms of anxiety and/or depression, as measured by the HADS questionnaire during the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 1051)

	Participants with a total HADS score < 12^a (n = 767)		Participants with a total HADS score ≥ 12^a (n = 284)		p value
Patient characteristics
Age in years at inclusion, mean (SD)	57	9.6	55	10.1	0.003
Sex, No. (%)					0.135
Female	761	99.2	284	100.0
Male	6	0.8	0	0.0
Highest educational level					0.185
Primary or (post-)secondary school	326	42.5	133	46.8
College or university	434	56.6	147	51.8
Unknown	7	0.9	4	1.4
Time since diagnosis (months), median (IQR)	24	6–42	24	6–42	0.859
Unknown, No. (%)	6	0.8	3	1.1
Tumor characteristics
Pathological T stadium					0.698
In situ (IS), 0, I or II	698	91.0	256	90.1
III or IV	15	2.0	8	2.8
X or unknown	54	7.0	20	7.0
Pathological N stadium					0.005
0	461	60.1	145	51.1
I, II or III	198	25.8	102	35.9
X or unknown	108	14.1	37	13.0
Treatment characteristics
Type of breast surgery					0.112
Breast conserving therapy	596	77.7	217	76.4
Mastectomy	70	9.1	24	8.5
Mastectomy with direct breast reconstruction	65	8.5	28	9.9
No breast surgery	0	0.0	2	0.7
Unknown	36	4.7	13	4.6
Most invasive axillary treatment					0.509
Sentinel node procedure	572	74.6	212	74.6
Axillary lymph node dissection^b	56	7.3	26	9.2
Unknown or not performed	139	18.1	46	16.2
Systemic therapy^c					0.008
No systemic therapy	168	21.9	38	13.4
Chemotherapy^d	261	34.0	117	41.2
Endocrine therapy or immunotherapy	102	13.3	45	15.8
Unknown	236	30.8	84	29.6
Radiation therapy					0.003
Local	515	67.1	163	57.4
Locoregional^e	158	20.6	86	30.3
No radiation therapy or type unknown	94	12.3	35	12.3
Currently receiving active breast cancer treatment^f					0.779
Yes	37	4.8	14	4.9
No	723	94.3	266	93.7
Other	7	0.9	4	1.4
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Total HADS score before COVID-19^a,g					< 0.001
Above threshold	64	9.3	156	62.7
Below threshold	627	90.7	93	37.3
HADS anxiety score before COVID-19^a,g					< 0.001
Above threshold	57	8.2	124	49.8
Below threshold	634	91.8	125	50.2
HADS depression score before COVID-19^a,g					< 0.001
Above threshold	26	3.8	89	35.7
Below threshold	665	96.2	160	64.3

As a result of rounding, percentages may not total to 100%

IQR interquartile range, n number, SD standard deviation, HADS Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score

^aA clinically relevant total HADS score ≥ 12 (above threshold) indicates a probable depression and/or anxiety disorder

^bAxillary lymph node dissection (in combination with sentinel node procedure)

^cPre- and/or postoperative therapy

^dChemotherapy (in combination with other systemic therapy, i.e., immunotherapy, endocrine therapy)

^eIncluding supraclavicular and/or axillary lymph nodes

^fActive treatment includes chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy

^gOnly patients with known HADS scores as obtained in UMBRELLA within 2 years before the first official COVID-19 diagnosis in the Netherlands (February 27, 2020) were included for comparative analyses with HADS scores from the COVID-19-specific questionnaire (n = 940)

Lower age, higher pathological N stage, receipt of systemic therapy or radiotherapy and pre-existent symptoms of anxiety or depression were significantly associated with anxiety and/or depression during COVID-19 (Table 1). In multivariable analysis, only pre-existent symptoms of anxiety or depression were independently and significantly associated with symptoms of anxiety and/or depression during COVID-19 (OR 6.1, 95%CI 4.1–9.2 and OR 6.0, 95% CI 3.5–10.2, resp., Table 2).

Table 2

Multivariable logistic regression analysis of risk factors for clinically relevant increase in symptoms of anxiety and/or depression, i.e., total HADS score above threshold (≥ 12), during the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 940)

Variables	OR	95% CI
Age	0.99	0.97–1.01
Pathological N stadium
0	Ref.
I, II or III	1.12	0.67–1.85
X or unknown	1.36	0.75–2.45
Systemic therapy^a
No systemic therapy	Ref.
Chemotherapy^b	1.48	0.85–2.55
Endocrine therapy or immunotherapy	1.55	0.83–2.88
Unknown	1.41	0.81–2.44
Radiation therapy
Local	Ref.
Locoregional^c	1.49	0.89–2.51
No radiation therapy or type unknown	0.83	0.45–1.55
HADS anxiety score before COVID-19^a
Below threshold	Ref.
Above threshold	6.12	4.05–9.24
HADS depression score before COVID-19^a
Below threshold	Ref.
Above threshold	5.95	3.48–10.18

^aPre- and/or postoperative therapy

^bChemotherapy (in combination with other systemic therapy, i.e., immunotherapy, endocrine therapy)

^cIncluding supraclavicular and/or axillary lymph nodes

COVID-19-specific concerns and health care consumption

Significantly more participants with anxiety and/or depression experienced higher barriers to contact their general practitioner (47.5% vs. 25.0%, resp.) and breast cancer physicians (26.8% vs. 11.2%, resp.) compared to patients without these symptoms (Table 3). In addition, a higher proportion of participants with anxiety and/or depression reported that their current treatment or (after)care was affected by COVID-19 compared to those without these symptoms (32.7% vs. 20.5%, resp.).

Table 3

Patient-reported outcomes of COVID-19-specific concerns in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands (n = 1051)

	Participants with a total HADS score < 12 during COVID-19^a		Participants with a total HADS score ≥ 12 during COVID-19^a		p value
	No.	%	No.	%	p value
Are/were you infected by the COVID-19?					0.368
Yes, confirmed by nasopharyngeal swab	1	0.1	0	0.0
Possibly, I have or had fever	66	8.6	34	12.0
No, I was tested negative	7	0.9	2	0.7
No, I had/have no symptoms and I was not tested	693	90.4	248	87.3
Is the current COVID-19 measure affecting your current treatment or aftercare?					< 0.001
Yes	184	24.0	102	35.9
No	583	76.0	182	64.1
Do you expect that the current COVID-19 measures will affect your treatment or aftercare in the future?					< 0.001
Yes	157	20.5	93	32.7
No	610	79.5	191	67.3
Did the threshold to contact your general practitioner change, because of the COVID-19 situation?					< 0.001
Yes, I contact my general practitioner more easily	13	1.7	6	2.1
Yes, I contact my general practitioner less easily	192	25.0	135	47.5
No	562	73.3	143	50.4
Did the threshold to contact the physicians treating your breast cancer change, because of the COVID-19 situation?					< 0.001
Yes, I contact my breast cancer physicians more easily	7	0.9	1	0.4
Yes, I contact my breast cancer physicians less easily	86	11.2	76	26.8
No	674	87.9	207	72.9

^aA clinically relevant total HADS score ≥ 12 (above threshold) indicates a probable depression and/or anxiety disorder

Discussion

During the COVID-19 pandemic, 27.0% of the (ex-)breast cancer patients reported clinically relevant symptoms of anxiety and/or depression. (Ex-)breast cancer patients with anxiety and/or depression reported to experience higher thresholds to contact their health care providers. Factors independently associated with anxiety and/or depression during COVID-19 were pre-existent symptoms of anxiety or depression.

In the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, a sharp decrease in cancer diagnoses and a 46% decline in general practitioner consultations were observed in the Netherlands [1, 2]. In this study, participants with anxiety and/or depression reported higher barriers to contact their health care providers during COVID-19 compared to those without these symptoms. The COVID-19 pandemic might have increased the perceived burden on patients with symptoms of anxiety and/or depression. High levels of anxiety and perceived threat have been shown to be related to increased avoidance behavior [11]. Anxiety for a COVID-19 infection, a higher level of moral concerns about wasting the physicians’ time for non-COVID-19-related symptoms, and assumptions about scarcity in the capacity of health care services for non-COVID-19-related care might also explain these barriers in seeking health care among patients with symptoms of anxiety and/or depression [1]. These results suggest that, in case of subsequent waves or a future pandemic, (ex-)breast cancer patients experiencing anxiety and/or depression are especially at risk for reduced health care consumption and may need extra encouragement to contact their health care providers, when necessary.

The proportion of participants experiencing anxiety and/or depression increased only slightly during COVID-19 (27.0%), when compared to pre-COVID-19 (23.4%). However, there was a considerable shift: quite some patients with pre-existing symptoms of anxiety and/or depression no longer experienced clinically relevant levels of anxiety and/or depression during COVID-19 and vice versa. The participants’ perception of the COVID-19 pandemic and different coping mechanisms might play a role in this shift [11]. Higher tolerance for uncertainty is related to better coping strategies and lower threat appraisal. For example, patients who tolerated uncertainty better, experienced lower levels of anxiety during the H1N1 pandemic in 2009 and showed higher levels of problem-focused coping [11]. However, further studies are needed to better understand these coping mechanisms in the context of a major health threat, and their effect on health care consumption.

Our findings that 18.2% of all participants reported symptoms of anxiety and 16.0% symptoms of depression, are in line with outcomes previously reported among UMBRELLA participants with early invasive breast cancer or DCIS prior to COVID-19 at 24 months after diagnosis (anxiety 12.5–17.1%, depression 6.0–16.1%) [12]. Moreover, the observed proportion of (ex-)breast cancer patients with anxiety and/or depression during COVID-19 seemed even lower when compared to the general population. A recent meta-analysis assessing anxiety and depression among a general population in Europe during COVID-19 observed that 32.4% (n = 8.341) experienced symptoms of anxiety and 23.8% (n = 8.341) symptoms of depression [13].

Although previous research showed that mental health can be impaired in the context of a major health threat, there are still insufficient clinical (screening) tools that can help identify those at risk [14]. Pre-existent anxiety and/or depression was reported by 62.7% (n = 156) of the participants with anxiety and/or depression during COVID-19. Similarly, a recent global study among non-cancer patients with pre-existent anxiety or depression (n = 2.734) reported worsening of psychological well-being in at least 50.0% during COVID-19 [15].

With the aim of providing adequate (mental) health support in the context of a health threat of this magnitude, surveillance and clear documentation of symptoms of anxiety and/or depression prior to and during major health threats seem a valuable tool to identify those at risk for reduced health care consumption. Especially in times of lockdown and social distancing, integration of e-mental health applications and digital psychological interventions is important to improve supportive care for those at risk. Last, raising public awareness about the importance of encouraging these particularly vulnerable individuals to contact their health care professionals, when necessary, is warranted.

Conclusion

Reduced health care consumption, and increased thresholds to contact health care professionals following the COVID-19 pandemic are reasons for concern. We found that (ex-)breast cancer patients with symptoms of anxiety and/or depression experienced higher barriers in seeking health care. Patients with pre-existent symptoms of anxiety or depression were particularly at risk for (worsening of) anxiety and/or depression during the pandemic.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

This study was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent from all individual participants was obtained within the UMBRELLA cohort.

Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Jetzt e.Med zum Sonderpreis bestellen!

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Jetzt bestellen und 100 € sparen!

Jetzt testen ¹

e.Med Gynäkologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Gynäkologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen der beiden Fachgebiete, den Premium-Inhalten der Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten gynäkologischen oder urologischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Jetzt testen ²

Dinmohamed AG, Visser O, Verhoeven RHA et al (2020) Fewer cancer diagnoses during the COVID-19 epidemic in the Netherlands. Lancet Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30265-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Batenburg R, Vis E, Keuper J, Bosmans MLC (2020) Drukte en uitgestelde zorgvraag door de COVID-19-pandemie: regionale verschillen. Gevolgen corona in de huisartsenpraktijk. Nivel, Utrecht. https://www.nivel.nl/sites/default/files/bestanden/1003770_2.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2020

Wang Y, Duan Z, Ma Z et al (2020) Epidemiology of mental health problems among patients with cancer during COVID-19 pandemic. Transl Psychiatry 10:263. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-00950-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Young-Afat DA, van Gils CH, van den Bongard HJGD et al (2017) The Utrecht cohort for Multiple BREast cancer intervention studies and Long-term evaLuAtion (UMBRELLA): objectives, design, and baseline results. Breast Cancer Res Treat 164:445–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4242-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gal R, Monninkhof EM, van Gils CH et al (2019) The Trials within cohorts design faced methodological advantages and disadvantages in the exercise oncology setting. J Clin Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.017CrossRefPubMed

Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/85.5.365CrossRefPubMed

Spinhoven P, Ormel J, Sloekers PPA et al (1997) A validation study of the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychol Med. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291796004382CrossRefPubMed

Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.xCrossRefPubMed

Netherlands Cancer Registry (2020) http://www.cijfersoverkanker.nl. Accessed 10 Jun 2020

10.

Giesinger JM, Loth FLC, Aaronson NK et al (2020) Thresholds for clinical importance were established to improve interpretation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in clinical practice and research. J Clin Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.003CrossRefPubMed

11.

Taha S, Matheson K, Cronin T et al (2014) Intolerance of uncertainty, appraisals, coping, and anxiety: the case of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Br J Health Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12058CrossRefPubMed

12.

Gregorowitsch ML, van den Bongard HJGD, Young-Afat DA et al (2018) Severe depression more common in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ than early-stage invasive breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 167:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4495-yCrossRefPubMed

13.

Salari N, Hosseinian-Far A, Jalali R et al (2020) Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00589-wCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE et al (2020) The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Gobbi S, Plomecka MB, Ashraf Z et al (2020) Worsening of pre-existing psychiatric conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.28.20116178CrossRef

Titel: (Ex-)breast cancer patients with (pre-existing) symptoms of anxiety and/or depression experience higher barriers to contact health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic
verfasst von: Dieuwke R. Mink van der Molen
Claudia A. Bargon
Marilot C. T. Batenburg
Roxanne Gal
Danny A. Young-Afat
Lilianne E. van Stam
Iris E. van Dam
Femke van der Leij
Inge O. Baas
Miranda F. Ernst
Wiesje Maarse
Nieke Vermulst
Ernst J. P. Schoenmaeckers
Thijs van Dalen
Rhodé M. Bijlsma
Annemiek Doeksen
Helena M. Verkooijen
UMBRELLA study group
Publikationsdatum: 18.02.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Schlagwort: COVID-19
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06112-y

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

(Ex-)breast cancer patients with (pre-existing) symptoms of anxiety and/or depression experience higher barriers to contact health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic