Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 4/2020

02.01.2020 | Original Paper

Echocardiographic discrepancies in severity grading of aortic valve stenosis with left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) cut-off values in an Asian population

verfasst von: Nicholas W. S. Chew, Jinghao Nicholas Ngiam, Benjamin Yong-Qiang Tan, Ching-Hui Sia, Hui Wen Sim, Ivandito Kuntjoro, William K. F. Kong, Edgar L. W. Tay, Tiong-Cheng Yeo, Kian Keong Poh

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Inconsistencies in grading of aortic stenosis (AS) severity have been reported. However, it remains to be studied in an Asian population. We investigated consistency of grading AS severity at various left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOTd) categories, and postulated alternative cut-offs for more consistent grading of AS severity. Consecutive Asian patients (n = 350) with index echocardiographic diagnosis of severe AS were divided them into three groups based on LVOTd: ‘small’ (< 20 mm), ‘average’ (20–22 mm) and ‘large’ (> 22 mm). In each group, the consistency of flow-dependent (transaortic mean pressure gradient (MG)) and flow-independent parameters (AVA) were used for classification of AS severity. Of 350 patients, 51.7% had small LVOTd, while 30.8% and 17.5% had average and large LVOTd respectively. Consistent grading by LVOTd based on AVA and MG, was seen in 33.7% of patients with small, 47.6% with average, 57.7% with large LVOTd. When an AVA cut-off of 0.9 cm2 was used, consistent grading improved to 38.0% in small, 56.5% in average and 70.0% in large LVOTd. At an AVA cut-off of 0.8 cm2, there was further incremental improvement in the small LVOTd group to 54.1% (p < 0.05). In conclusion, current severe AS guidelines are most inconsistent with those in the small LVOTd group. With majority of the study’s Asian population having small LVOTd, this raises concerns that current AS guidelines may overestimate the severity of AS in the Asian cohort. Improved consistency in echocardiographic grading may be attained with a lower AVA cut-off in this Asian cohort.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K et al (2006) ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:e1–48CrossRef Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K et al (2006) ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:e1–48CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J et al (2007) Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: the task force on the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 28:230–268PubMed Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J et al (2007) Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: the task force on the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 28:230–268PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J et al (2009) Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:1–23CrossRef Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J et al (2009) Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:1–23CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tay EL, Lew PS, Poh KK et al (2013) Demographics of severe valvular aortic stenosis in Singapore. Singapore Med J 54:36–39CrossRef Tay EL, Lew PS, Poh KK et al (2013) Demographics of severe valvular aortic stenosis in Singapore. Singapore Med J 54:36–39CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Michelena HI, Margaryan E, Miller FA, Eleid M, Maalouf J, Suri R et al (2013) Inconsistent echocardiographic grading of aortic stenosis: is the left ventricular outflow tract important? Heart 99:921–931CrossRef Michelena HI, Margaryan E, Miller FA, Eleid M, Maalouf J, Suri R et al (2013) Inconsistent echocardiographic grading of aortic stenosis: is the left ventricular outflow tract important? Heart 99:921–931CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Oh JK, Seward JB, Tajik AJ (2006) The echo manual, Chapter 12, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 189–225. Oh JK, Seward JB, Tajik AJ (2006) The echo manual, Chapter 12, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 189–225.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Edvardsen T, Goldstein S et al (2017) Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18:254–275CrossRef Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Edvardsen T, Goldstein S et al (2017) Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18:254–275CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG (2010) Assessment of aortic stenosis severity: when the gradient does not fit with the valve area. Heart 96:1431–1433CrossRef Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG (2010) Assessment of aortic stenosis severity: when the gradient does not fit with the valve area. Heart 96:1431–1433CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Leye M, Brochet E, Lepage L et al (2009) Size-adjusted left ventricular outflow tract diameter reference values: a safeguard for the evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:445–451CrossRef Leye M, Brochet E, Lepage L et al (2009) Size-adjusted left ventricular outflow tract diameter reference values: a safeguard for the evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:445–451CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Oh JK, Taliercio CP, Holmes DR Jr et al (1988) Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 11:1227–1234CrossRef Oh JK, Taliercio CP, Holmes DR Jr et al (1988) Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 11:1227–1234CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bohbot Y, Kowalski C, Rusinaru D, Ringle A, Marechaux S, Tribouilloy C (2017) Impact of mean transaortic pressure gradient on long-term outcome in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc 6:1–12CrossRef Bohbot Y, Kowalski C, Rusinaru D, Ringle A, Marechaux S, Tribouilloy C (2017) Impact of mean transaortic pressure gradient on long-term outcome in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc 6:1–12CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C et al (2008) Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J 29:1043–1048CrossRef Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C et al (2008) Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J 29:1043–1048CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Carabello BA (2002) Clinical practice. Aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 346:677–682CrossRef Carabello BA (2002) Clinical practice. Aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 346:677–682CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C et al (2010) Inconsistent grading of aortic valve stenosis by current guidelines: haemodynamic studies in patients with apparently normal left ventricular function. Heart 96:1463–1468CrossRef Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C et al (2010) Inconsistent grading of aortic valve stenosis by current guidelines: haemodynamic studies in patients with apparently normal left ventricular function. Heart 96:1463–1468CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P et al (2007) Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation 115:2856–2864CrossRef Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P et al (2007) Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation 115:2856–2864CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ngiam JN, Kuntjoro I, Tan BYQ et al (2017) Predicting changes in flow category in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction on medical therapy. Echocardiography 34(11):1568–1574CrossRef Ngiam JN, Kuntjoro I, Tan BYQ et al (2017) Predicting changes in flow category in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction on medical therapy. Echocardiography 34(11):1568–1574CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ngiam JN, Tan BYQ, Sia CH et al (2017) Comparing characteristics and clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in low-flow vs normal-flow severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction in an Asian population. Echocardiography 34(5):638–648CrossRef Ngiam JN, Tan BYQ, Sia CH et al (2017) Comparing characteristics and clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in low-flow vs normal-flow severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction in an Asian population. Echocardiography 34(5):638–648CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohty D, Malouf JF, Girard SE et al (2006) Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St Jude medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Circulation 113:420–426CrossRef Mohty D, Malouf JF, Girard SE et al (2006) Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St Jude medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Circulation 113:420–426CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Malouf J, Le Tourneau T, Pellikka P et al (2012) Aortic valve stenosis in community medical practice: determinants of outcome and implications for aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:1421–1427CrossRef Malouf J, Le Tourneau T, Pellikka P et al (2012) Aortic valve stenosis in community medical practice: determinants of outcome and implications for aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:1421–1427CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Chew N, Hon JKF, Yip WLJ et al (2017) Mid-term study of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in an Asian population with severe aortic stenosis: two-year valve academic research consortium-2 outcomes. Singapore Med J 58(9):543–550CrossRef Chew N, Hon JKF, Yip WLJ et al (2017) Mid-term study of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in an Asian population with severe aortic stenosis: two-year valve academic research consortium-2 outcomes. Singapore Med J 58(9):543–550CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tay EL, Ngiam JN, Kong WK, Poh KK (2018) Management of severe aortic stenosis: the Singapore and Asian perspective. Singapore Med J 59(9):452–454CrossRef Tay EL, Ngiam JN, Kong WK, Poh KK (2018) Management of severe aortic stenosis: the Singapore and Asian perspective. Singapore Med J 59(9):452–454CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Echocardiographic discrepancies in severity grading of aortic valve stenosis with left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) cut-off values in an Asian population
verfasst von
Nicholas W. S. Chew
Jinghao Nicholas Ngiam
Benjamin Yong-Qiang Tan
Ching-Hui Sia
Hui Wen Sim
Ivandito Kuntjoro
William K. F. Kong
Edgar L. W. Tay
Tiong-Cheng Yeo
Kian Keong Poh
Publikationsdatum
02.01.2020
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Elektronische ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01755-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 4/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Schadet Ärger den Gefäßen?

14.05.2024 Arteriosklerose Nachrichten

In einer Studie aus New York wirkte sich Ärger kurzfristig deutlich negativ auf die Endothelfunktion gesunder Probanden aus. Möglicherweise hat dies Einfluss auf die kardiovaskuläre Gesundheit.

Intervallfasten zur Regeneration des Herzmuskels?

14.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Die Nahrungsaufnahme auf wenige Stunden am Tag zu beschränken, hat möglicherweise einen günstigen Einfluss auf die Prognose nach akutem ST-Hebungsinfarkt. Darauf deutet eine Studie an der Uniklinik in Halle an der Saale hin.

Shunt-Therapie bei Herzinsuffizienz: Kein Anzug, der allen passt

13.05.2024 Chronische Herzinsuffizienz Nachrichten

Die Anlage eines interatrialen Shunts zur Reduktion des linksatrialen Drucks ist ein neuer Therapieansatz bei Herzinsuffizienz. Viele Patienten sprechen darauf an, andere jedoch nicht. 

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.