Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 5/2015

Open Access 01.05.2015 | Original Article

Seven-Year Efficacy and Safety of Treatment with Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

verfasst von: Maria Buti, Naoky Tsai, Joerg Petersen, Robert Flisiak, Selim Gurel, Zahary Krastev, Raul Aguilar Schall, John F. Flaherty, Eduardo B. Martins, Prista Charuworn, Kathryn M. Kitrinos, G. Mani Subramanian, Edward Gane, Patrick Marcellin

Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Ausgabe 5/2015

Abstract

Background

Long-term tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) treatment for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is associated with sustained viral suppression and regression of fibrosis and cirrhosis at year 5 (240 weeks) and no TDF resistance through 6 years (288 weeks).

Aim

We assessed the efficacy, safety, and resistance of TDF for up to 7 years (336 weeks) in HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative CHB patients.

Methods

Patients who completed 1 year (48 weeks) of randomized treatment with TDF or adefovir dipivoxil were eligible to receive open-label TDF for a total duration of 8 years (384 weeks).

Results

Of 641 patients initially randomized, 585 (91.3 %) entered the open-label phase; 437/585 (74.7 %) remained on study at year 7. For patients on treatment at year 7, 99.3 % maintained viral suppression (HBV DNA < 69 IU/mL), 80.0 % achieved serum alanine aminotransferase normalization, and in HBeAg-positive patients, 84/154 (54.5 %) and 25/154 (11.8 %) achieved HBeAg and HBsAg loss, respectively. One/375 (0.3 %) HBeAg-negative patients achieved HBsAg loss. No resistance to TDF was detected through 7 years. During the open-label phase, grade 3/4 drug-related adverse events were uncommon (1.0 %); ten (1.7 %) patients had elevation of serum creatinine ≥0.5 mg/dL above baseline. No significant change in bone mineral density was observed from year 4 to year 7 (week 192 to week 336).

Conclusions

Long-term TDF treatment was associated with sustained virologic, biochemical, and serologic responses, without resistance. TDF treatment was well tolerated, with a low incidence of renal and bone events. These data confirm the safety and efficacy of long-term TDF for CHB.
Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1007/​s10620-014-3486-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Introduction

Disease progression to cirrhosis, liver failure, or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurs in up to 40 % of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) [1]. Elevated hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA viral load correlates with increased risk of HCC and cirrhosis [2], and conversely, treatments that suppress viral replication without breakthrough can delay disease progression [3]. Several antiviral agents are approved for treatment of CHB [4], although prospective long-term clinical data beyond 5 years of treatment with oral antiviral agents for CHB are limited.
TDF is an orally available prodrug of the nucleotide analogue tenofovir, a potent and selective inhibitor of HBV DNA polymerase/reverse transcriptase (pol/RT) in vitro [5]. TDF is currently approved for treatment of CHB in patients 12 years of age and older. In two international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase 3 studies of once-daily TDF versus once-daily adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) for 1 year (48 weeks) in 641 patients, TDF was more effective than ADV in viral suppression and improving histologic inflammation [6]. In addition, at year 5 (week 240), TDF therapy led to histological improvement (defined as a ≥2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score with no worsening of fibrosis) in 87.4 % (304/348) of patients, and 74.0 % (71/96) had reversal of baseline cirrhosis [7]. No evidence of resistance to TDF has been observed through year 6 (288 weeks) of treatment [8]. Here, we report the efficacy, safety, and resistance results of patients remaining on study at year 7 (week 336) of follow-up.

Methods

Study Design

The designs of the two randomized, controlled studies, GS-US-174-0102 (NCT00117676; Study 102) and GS-US-174-0103 (NCT00116805; Study 103), have been described previously [6]. Briefly, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive or (HBeAg)-negative CHB patients (18–69 years of age) with compensated liver disease and Knodell necroinflammatory score ≥3 were randomized 2:1 to TDF 300 mg once daily or ADV 10 mg once daily for 1 year, after which all patients switched to or continued on TDF during the open-label phase for up to 7 years, for a total study duration of up to 8 years (384 weeks). Emtricitabine (FTC) could be added to the treatment regimen, at the discretion of the investigator, for confirmed viremia on or after 1.5 years (week 72).
Efficacy assessments included virologic response, defined as plasma HBV DNA levels <69 IU/mL (<400 copies/mL). The proportion of patients with plasma HBV DNA <29 IU/mL (<169 copies/mL, the lower limit of quantification of the COBAS Taqman assay) was also analyzed. Biochemical response based on normalized alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels was assessed as described previously [6, 7]. Serologic endpoints included serum HBeAg loss and seroconversion to anti-HBe (HBeAg-positive patients), and serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss and seroconversion to anti-HBs. Patients with confirmed HBsAg loss or seroconversion could stop treatment at the investigator’s discretion, provided they remained on follow-up. Viral resistance testing for genotypic changes within the HBV reverse transcriptase (HBV pol/RT) was performed annually for patients with HBV DNA ≥69 IU/mL (≥400 copies/mL) who experienced virologic breakthrough or persistent viremia, and those who discontinued from the study with HBV DNA ≥69 IU/mL (≥400 copies/mL) [8]. Conserved-site changes or polymorphic-site changes detected in > 1 patient by genotypic analysis were confirmed by phenotyping, as described previously [8, 9].
Safety and tolerability assessments, including adverse events (AEs), treatment discontinuations, and patient deaths, were conducted on an ongoing basis. Predefined renal endpoints included creatinine clearance <50 mL/min, serum creatinine ≥0.5 mg/dL above baseline, and serum phosphate <2 mg/dL. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed annually by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan from year 4 (week 192) through year 7 (week 336).
Virologic and biochemical response were assessed using a modified, long-term evaluation-TDF (LTE-TDF) only analysis, in which (a) patients with missing data or with FTC added were counted as failures at all time points following addition, and (b) patients with HBsAg loss who discontinued study drug and met endpoint criteria at the last on-study visit were counted as successes and had the last value carried forward. An on-treatment analysis was also conducted, in which patients with non-missing data, regardless of the treatment received, were included in the analysis, and patients with missing data were excluded.

Results

Patient Disposition

At year 7, a total of 437/641 (68.2 %) of HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients initially randomized and 437/585 (74.7 %) of patients entering the open-label phase remained on study (Fig. 1). In total, 148 of 585 (25.3 %) patients discontinued during the open-label phase for withdrawal of consent (n = 51); loss to follow-up (n = 37); investigator discretion (n = 27); safety, tolerability, or efficacy reason (n = 17); HBsAg or HBeAg seroconversion (n = 8); protocol violation (n = 7); and sponsor decision (n = 1) (Fig. 1).

Virologic Response

Suppression of HBV DNA levels at both < 69 and < 29 IU/mL was observed in nearly all patients (99.3 % for both measures) who remained on study at year 7, including 99.3 % (both measures) of HBeAg-negative patients and 99.4 % (both measures) of HBeAg-positive patients (Table 1).
Table 1
Biochemical and virologic response to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate at year 7 (week 336)
 
By HBeAg status
All
HBeAg-negativea
HBeAg-positiveb
HBV DNA < 69 IU/mL [% (n/N)]
 LTE-TDFc
77.3 (269/348)
60.3 (149/247)
70.3 (418/595)
 On treatmentd
99.3 (271/273)
99.4 (159/160)
99.3 (430/433)
HBV DNA < 29 IU/mL [% (n/N)]
 LTE-TDFc
77.1 (269/349)
60.3 (149/247)
70.1(418/596)
 On treatmentd
99.3 (271/273)
99.4 (159/160)
99.3 (430/433)
ALT normalization [% (n/N)]
 LTE-TDFc
64.6 (210/325)
46.9 (113/241)
57.1 (323/566)
 On treatmentd
83.5 (213/255)
74.2 (115/155)
80.0 (328/410)
HBeAg loss [% (n/N)]
54.5 (84/154)
 HBeAg seroconversion [% (n/N)]
39.6 (61/154)
HBsAg loss [K-M % (95 % CI)]
11.8 (8.1, 16.9)
 HBsAg seroconversion [K-M % (95 % CI)]
9.7 (6.4, 14.6)
ALT alanine aminotransferase, CI confidence interval, HBeAg hepatitis B e-antigen, HBV hepatitis B virus, K–M Kaplan–Meier
aHBeAg-negative patients were enrolled in Study 102
bHBeAg-positive patients were enrolled in Study 103
cIn the long-term evaluation–TDF only (LTE-TDF) analysis, patients with missing data or emtricitabine added to their treatment regimen were counted as failures
dIn the on-treatment analysis, patients with missing data were excluded and patients with emtricitabine added to their treatment regimen were included in the analysis

Biochemical and Serologic Response

Biochemical responses at year 7 are summarized in Table 1. Of patients on study at year 7 who had abnormal ALT at baseline, 80.0 % experienced ALT normalization, including 83.5 % of HBeAg-negative patients and 74.2 % of HBeAg-positive patients. Of the 42 HBeAg-negative and 40 HBeAg-positive patients on study who did not achieve ALT normalization, the median [mean] ALT (U/L) levels were 49 [55] and 51 [57], respectively. Among 154 observed HBeAg-positive patients on study at year 7, 84 (54.5 %) experienced HBeAg loss and 61 (39.6 %) experienced seroconversion to anti-HBe. In a Kaplan–Meier analysis of the intent-to-treat population of HBeAg-positive patients, 27 (11.8 %) experienced HBsAg loss and 21 (9.7 %) experienced seroconversion to anti-HBs. Among 375 HBeAg-negative initially randomized patients, one experienced HBsAg loss at year 5. Of the 28 HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients who experienced HBsAg loss during the study, three remained on study drug through year 7, and 25 subsequently discontinued study drug and entered treatment-free follow-up (TFFU). Fourteen of these discontinued study participation before year 7, while 10 remained on study under TFFU, and one restarted treatment (Fig. 2).

Resistance Surveillance

Overall, the majority of patients (533/585, 91.1 %) who entered open-label treatment had HBV DNA < 69 IU/mL at their last time point on TDF through year 7. Fifty-two patients (8.8 %) qualified for genotypic analysis at their last time point on TDF, with three patients qualifying during year 7. Thirty-nine of the 585 patients (6.7 %) who entered open-label treatment switched to FTC/TDF through year 6 of open-label treatment. Seven patients qualified for genotypic analysis at their last time point on FTC/TDF, with one patient qualifying during year 7. The 48 patients that qualified for genotypic analysis prior to year 7 were previously evaluated [9]. For the four patients who qualified for genotypic analysis during year 7, two had no changes in HBV pol/RT from baseline and two were unable to be genotyped. Three of the patients who qualified for genotypic analysis were non-adherent to study treatment, as confirmed by undetectable levels of study drug in plasma. All four patients achieved HBV DNA < 69 IU/ml prior to year 7, and at their qualifying time point during year 7, the mean HBV DNA level was 100.1 IU/ml (range 89-113 IU/ml). One of the four subjects discontinued from the study prior to week 336 and is not included in the on-treatment HBV DNA suppression analysis.

Safety

Safety findings during the open-label period are summarized in Table 2. Of 585 patients who entered the open-label phase, 13 (2.2 %) patients discontinued study drug because of AEs, including three (0.5 %) that were considered study drug related. Reasons for discontinuation (in some cases multiple) for these 13 patients included hepatic neoplasm (n = 3), endometrial cancer (n = 1), lung neoplasm (n = 1), fatigue (n = 1), abdominal pain (n = 1), septic shock (n = 1), non-specified injury (n = 1), road traffic accident (n = 1), disturbance in attention (n = 1), dizziness (n = 1), increased blood creatinine (i = 1), osteoporosis (n = 1), breast cancer (n = 1), and drug dependence (n = 1). Seven (1.2 %) patients had study drug-related serious AEs during the open-label period, in some cases multiple events, although none had new onset during year 7. These serious AEs included acute pancreatitis (n = 1), osteopenia (n = 1), osteoporosis (n = 2), renal failure (n = 1), increased ALT (n = 2), and facial spasm (n = 1). To date, 12 deaths have occurred during the open-label phase, none of which were study drug related.
Table 2
Safety summary of the open-label period
Parameter
By initial treatment assignment
All (N = 585)
TDF–TDF (n = 389)
ADV–TDF (n = 196)
Deaths [n (%)]
9a (2.3)
3b (1.5)
12 (2.1)
Study drug-related AE leading to drug discontinuation [n (%)]
2 (0.5)
1 (0.5)
3 (0.5)
Study drug-related serious AE [n (%)]
5 (1.3)
2 (1.0)
7 (1.2)
Study drug–related grade 3 or 4 AE [n (%)]
3 (0.8)
3 (1.5)
6 (1.0)
Renal impairmentc,d [n (%)]
 Serum creatinine ≥ 0.5 mg/dL above baseline
6 (1.5)
4 (2.0)
10 (1.7)
 Serum phosphate < 2 mg/dL
5 (1.3)
4 (2.0)
9 (1.5)
 Creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min
3 (0.8)
3 (1.5)
6 (1.0)
ADV adefovir dipivoxil, AE adverse event, SD standard deviation, TDF tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
aCauses of death included motor vehicle accident (n = 2), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 2), liver cancer, lung cancer (n = 2), nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and unknown cause
bCauses of death included cervical cancer with pulmonary metastases, hepatocellular carcinoma, and multifocal carcinoma
cEach parameter was confirmed on retest
dA given patient may have had more than one event of renal impairment; 21 patients had 25 confirmed renal events
Overall, 21/585 (3.6 %) patients had 25 confirmed AEs under renal impairment (defined as serum creatinine increase ≥0.5 mg/dL above baseline, serum phosphate <2 mg/dL, and creatinine clearance [CrCl] <50 mL/min [Cockcroft–Gault]) during the open-label phase. Up to year 5, there were seven patients who experienced serum creatinine increase ≥0.5 mg/dL above baseline, seven patients with serum phosphate <2 mg/dL, and two patients with CrCl < 50 mL/min. Between year 5 and year 7, an additional three patients experienced an increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.5 mg/dL above baseline, two patients with serum phosphate <2 mg/dL, and four patients with CrCl < 50 mL/min. Comparing baseline characteristics of patients who did and did not have renal AEs, mean age (47 vs. 40 years; P = 0.003), mean CrCl (98.5 vs. 117.4 mL/min; P = 0.003), and mean serum phosphate (2.8 vs. 3.3 mg/dL; P = 0.002) were statistically different between groups. Of the 21 patients who developed renal insufficiency, seven patients had hypertension, two patients had diabetes mellitus, two patients had underlying renal disease (HBV-associated glomerulonephritis, IgA nephropathy), two patients had nephrolithiasis, three patients were older than 60 years of age, and 12 patients had no known risk factors listed in their medical history. Additionally, no patients experienced concurrent decrease in CrCl < 50 mL/min and serum phosphate <2 mg/dL.
Annual BMD assessments were undertaken at year 4 through year 7 in patients enrolled in the open-label phase. Overall, no significant changes in BMD were observed from year 4 (325 hip and spine scans) to year 7 (288 hip scans and 294 spine scans), and no trends in T or Z scores were apparent over the 3 years (Supplemental Table 1).

Discussion

The results described in this report demonstrate that long-term treatment with TDF for chronic HBV infection provides potent and durable viral suppression and normalization of serum ALT levels. In addition, the proportion of patients with HBsAg loss was 11.8 % (Kaplan–Meier estimation) at up to 7 years of TDF treatment. Of particular importance, no resistance to TDF has been detected with up to 7 years of treatment. These results also demonstrate that TDF treatment is safe and well tolerated, with few discontinuations related to AEs and no new safety signals identified through 7 years. Renal AEs occurred infrequently, were generally mild, and improved with dose modification. Although introduced only at year 4, serial assessments of BMD suggest no evidence of bone loss over 3 years of evaluation.
The lack of resistance to TDF after prolonged exposure is striking, considering the high rates of resistance observed with other nucleotide/nucleoside analogues, ranging from 20 % at 5 years of ADV treatment [10] to 65 % at 5 years of lamivudine treatment [11]. Entecavir treatment is associated with a low rate of resistance in treatment-naive patients (1.2 % of patients treated for up to 5 years) [12], although rates of entecavir resistance are considerably higher in those who are ADV nonresponders (4 % of patients treated for a median of 20 months) [13], lamivudine resistant (51 % of patients treated for up to 5 years) [12], and lamivudine and ADV dual resistant (91 % of patients with virologic breakthrough after treatment for a median of 24 months) [14]. In this study, we report the lack of resistance to TDF through 7 years in mostly treatment-naive patients. Additionally, lack of resistance to TDF has been reported through 3.5 years (168 weeks) in prior ADV-treated patients [15] and through 2 years (96 weeks) in lamivudine-resistant patients [16]. The absence of viral resistance to TDF carries important implications for clinical outcomes, because patients without resistance development may have a lower risk of liver disease progression [17].
The proportion of patients with HBsAg loss in HBeAg-positive patients through year 7 was 11.8 % by Kaplan–Meier analysis. This is consistent with rates of HBsAg loss determined by different methodologies reported in the literature for other oral antiviral agents: a retrospective study in HBeAg-positive patients reported HBsAg loss in 18/354 (5.1 %) patients after 96 weeks of entecavir treatment and 10/355 (2.8 %) patients after 96 weeks of lamivudine treatment [18], and an open-label extension of a randomized study of entecavir in HBeAg-positive patients reported HBsAg loss in 2/145 (1.4 %) patients after up to 5 years of treatment [19]. Although this is higher than the rate of spontaneous HBsAg loss (0.5–0.8 % per year) [20], HBsAg loss rates remain low with current CHB nucleos(t)ide therapy, indicating that achievement of HBsAg loss is a relatively rare but dependable clinical end point. Achieving higher rates of HBsAg loss might require the addition of immune-based therapies, with an approach currently under investigation in an ongoing TDF and pegylated interferon combination study (NCT01277601).
In summary, our 7-year follow-up is the first CHB study to show that long-term use of an oral nucleos(t)ide agent—TDF monotherapy for chronic HBV infection—is able to suppress viral replication without development of resistance and is well tolerated.

Acknowledgments

This study and the analyses presented were sponsored by Gilead Sciences, Inc. Anna Lau, PhD, and Evelyn Albu, PhD, of Percolation Communications LLC provided editorial assistance during manuscript development. Gilead Sciences, Inc., provided financial support for manuscript development.

Conflict of interest

The authors disclose the following financial relationships that may be viewed as potential conflict of interest.
Author
Employment
Stock ownership
Consultancy
Honoraria
Research grant
Paid expert testimony
Other
MB
   
Bristol-Myers Squibb; Gilead
Bristol-Myers Squibb; Gilead
  
NT
  
AbbVie; Gilead; Janssen
AbbVie; Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Gilead; Janssen; Merck; Roche; Salix
AbbVIe; Beckman; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Gilead; Janssen; Roche; Vertex
  
JP
  
Abbott; AbbVie; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Boehringer; Gilead; GlaxoSmithKline; Kedrion; Janssen; Merck; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Novartis, Roche
 
Bristol-Myers Squibb; Novartis; Roche
 
Abbott; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Boehringer; Gilead; Kedrion; Janssen; Merck; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Novartis; Roche
RF
  
AbbVie; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Gilead; Janssen; Merck; Novartis; Roche
AbbVie; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Gilead; Janssen; Merck; Novartis; Roche
Roche
  
SG
   
AbbVie; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Gilead; Janssen; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Roche
AbbVie; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Gilead; Janssen; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Roche
  
ZK
   
Gilead; Idenix; Jansen; Novartis; Receptos; Roche
   
RAS
Gilead
Gilead
     
JFF
Gilead
Gilead
     
EBM
Gilead
Gilead
     
PC
Gilead
Gilead
     
KMK
Gilead
Gilead
     
GMS
Gilead
Gilead
     
EG
  
Achillion; Gilead; Idenix; Janssen; Merck; Novartis; Novira; Roche
    
PM
  
Abbott; Boehringer Ingelheim; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Gilead; Janssen/Tibotec; Merck; Novartis; Pfizer; Roche; Vertex
Bristol-Myers Squibb; Gilead; Janssen/Tibotec; Merck; Novartis; Roche
   
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

e.Med Innere Medizin

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Innere Medizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Innere Medizin, den Premium-Inhalten der internistischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten internistischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

e.Med Allgemeinmedizin

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Allgemeinmedizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Premium-Inhalten der allgemeinmedizinischen Zeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Allgemeinmedizin-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Anhänge

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen CJ, Yang HI, Su J, et al. Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma across a biological gradient of serum hepatitis B virus DNA level. JAMA. 2006;295:65–73.CrossRefPubMed Chen CJ, Yang HI, Su J, et al. Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma across a biological gradient of serum hepatitis B virus DNA level. JAMA. 2006;295:65–73.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Iloeje UH, Yang HI, Su J, et al. Predicting cirrhosis risk based on the level of circulating hepatitis B viral load. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:678–686.CrossRefPubMed Iloeje UH, Yang HI, Su J, et al. Predicting cirrhosis risk based on the level of circulating hepatitis B viral load. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:678–686.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Marco V, Di Stefano R, Ferraro D, et al. HBV-DNA suppression and disease course in HBV cirrhosis patients on long-term lamivudine therapy. Antivir Ther.. 2005;10:431–439.PubMed Di Marco V, Di Stefano R, Ferraro D, et al. HBV-DNA suppression and disease course in HBV cirrhosis patients on long-term lamivudine therapy. Antivir Ther.. 2005;10:431–439.PubMed
5.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Heijtink RA, Kruining J, de Wilde GA, Balzarini J, de Clercq E, Schalm SW. Inhibitory effects of acyclic nucleoside phosphonates on human hepatitis B virus and duck hepatitis B virus infections in tissue culture. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:2180–2182.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Heijtink RA, Kruining J, de Wilde GA, Balzarini J, de Clercq E, Schalm SW. Inhibitory effects of acyclic nucleoside phosphonates on human hepatitis B virus and duck hepatitis B virus infections in tissue culture. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:2180–2182.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Marcellin P, Heathcote EJ, Buti M, et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus adefovir dipivoxil for chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2442–2455.CrossRefPubMed Marcellin P, Heathcote EJ, Buti M, et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus adefovir dipivoxil for chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2442–2455.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Marcellin P, Gane E, Buti M, et al. Regression of cirrhosis during treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for chronic hepatitis B: a 5-year open-label follow-up study. Lancet. 2013;381:468–475.CrossRefPubMed Marcellin P, Gane E, Buti M, et al. Regression of cirrhosis during treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for chronic hepatitis B: a 5-year open-label follow-up study. Lancet. 2013;381:468–475.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitrinos KM, Corsa A, Liu Y, et al. No detectable resistance to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate after 6 years of therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2013;59:434–442.CrossRef Kitrinos KM, Corsa A, Liu Y, et al. No detectable resistance to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate after 6 years of therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2013;59:434–442.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Heathcote EJ, Marcellin P, Buti M, et al. Three-year efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment for chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:132–143.CrossRefPubMed Heathcote EJ, Marcellin P, Buti M, et al. Three-year efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment for chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:132–143.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Marcellin P, Chang TT, Lim SG, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2008;48:750–758.CrossRefPubMed Marcellin P, Chang TT, Lim SG, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2008;48:750–758.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Marcellin P, Chang TT, Lim SG, et al. Adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:808–816.CrossRefPubMed Marcellin P, Chang TT, Lim SG, et al. Adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:808–816.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lok AS, Lai CL, Leung N, et al. Long-term safety of lamivudine treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:1714–1722.CrossRefPubMed Lok AS, Lai CL, Leung N, et al. Long-term safety of lamivudine treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:1714–1722.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tenney DJ, Rose RE, Baldick CJ, et al. Long-term monitoring shows hepatitis B virus resistance to entecavir in nucleoside-naive patients is rare through 5 years of therapy. Hepatology. 2009;49:1503–1514.CrossRefPubMed Tenney DJ, Rose RE, Baldick CJ, et al. Long-term monitoring shows hepatitis B virus resistance to entecavir in nucleoside-naive patients is rare through 5 years of therapy. Hepatology. 2009;49:1503–1514.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Zoutendijk R, Reijnders JG, Brown A, et al. Entecavir treatment for chronic hepatitis B: adaptation is not needed for the majority of naive patients with a partial virological response. Hepatology. 2011;54:443–451.CrossRefPubMed Zoutendijk R, Reijnders JG, Brown A, et al. Entecavir treatment for chronic hepatitis B: adaptation is not needed for the majority of naive patients with a partial virological response. Hepatology. 2011;54:443–451.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JW, Kim HS, Seo DD, et al. Long-term efficacy of entecavir in adefovir-refractory chronic hepatitis B patients with prior lamivudine resistance. J Viral Hepat.. 2011;18:e475–e481.CrossRefPubMed Park JW, Kim HS, Seo DD, et al. Long-term efficacy of entecavir in adefovir-refractory chronic hepatitis B patients with prior lamivudine resistance. J Viral Hepat.. 2011;18:e475–e481.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg T, Zoulim F, Moeller B, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of emtricitabine plus tenofovir DF vs. tenofovir DF monotherapy in adefovir-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients. J Hepatol. 2014;60:715–722.CrossRefPubMed Berg T, Zoulim F, Moeller B, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of emtricitabine plus tenofovir DF vs. tenofovir DF monotherapy in adefovir-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients. J Hepatol. 2014;60:715–722.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Fung S, Kwan P, Fabri M, et al. Randomized comparison of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2013;146:980–988.CrossRefPubMed Fung S, Kwan P, Fabri M, et al. Randomized comparison of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2013;146:980–988.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Liaw YF, Sung JJ, Chow WC, et al. Lamivudine for patients with chronic hepatitis B and advanced liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1521–1531.CrossRefPubMed Liaw YF, Sung JJ, Chow WC, et al. Lamivudine for patients with chronic hepatitis B and advanced liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1521–1531.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Gish RG, Chang TT, Lai CL, et al. Loss of HBsAg antigen during treatment with entecavir or lamivudine in nucleoside-naive HBeAg-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat.. 2010;17:16–22.CrossRefPubMed Gish RG, Chang TT, Lai CL, et al. Loss of HBsAg antigen during treatment with entecavir or lamivudine in nucleoside-naive HBeAg-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat.. 2010;17:16–22.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang TT, Lai CL, Kew Yoon S, et al. Entecavir treatment for up to 5 years in patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2010;51:422–430. Chang TT, Lai CL, Kew Yoon S, et al. Entecavir treatment for up to 5 years in patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2010;51:422–430.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat McMahon BJ. The natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology. 2009;49:S45–S55.CrossRefPubMed McMahon BJ. The natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology. 2009;49:S45–S55.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Seven-Year Efficacy and Safety of Treatment with Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection
verfasst von
Maria Buti
Naoky Tsai
Joerg Petersen
Robert Flisiak
Selim Gurel
Zahary Krastev
Raul Aguilar Schall
John F. Flaherty
Eduardo B. Martins
Prista Charuworn
Kathryn M. Kitrinos
G. Mani Subramanian
Edward Gane
Patrick Marcellin
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Ausgabe 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3486-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2015

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 5/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.