nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.02.2014 | Musculoskeletal Radiology

Femoro-acetabular impingement: what the general radiologist should know

verfasst von: Alberto Aliprandi, Francesco Di Pietto, Paolo Minafra, Marcello Zappia, Simona Pozza, Luca Maria Sconfienza

Erschienen in: La radiologia medica | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) is a common condition in young active subjects, which can lead to the development of early osteoarthritis if not correctly diagnosed. Imaging evaluation of FAI, mainly based on plain film and magnetic resonance evaluation, must be performed according to precise guidelines and is fundamental for reaching a final diagnosis. The purpose of this paper is to provide a clinical and radiological overview of FAI by describing the most common clinical tests, the imaging techniques used in the diagnosis, and the main radiological signs that may be encountered.

Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M et al (2003) Femoro-acetabular impingement: an important cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop 417:112–120PubMed

Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE (2007) Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis—what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1540–1552CrossRefPubMed

Leunig M, Ganz R (2005) Femoroacetabular impingement: a common cause of hip complaints leading to arthrosis. Unfallchirurg 108:9–17CrossRefPubMed

Hoaglund FT, Steinbach LS (2001) Primary osteoarthritis of the hip: etiology and epidemiology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 9:320–327PubMed

Tanzer M, Noiseux N (2004) Osseous abnormalities and early osteoarthritis: the role of hip impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:170–177CrossRefPubMed

Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH et al (2002) The contour of the femoral head–neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:556–560CrossRefPubMed

Siebenrock KA, Schoeniger R, Ganz R (2003) Anterior femoro-acetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion. Treatment with periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:278–286PubMed

Leunig M, Beck M, Woo A et al (2003) Acetabular rim degeneration: a constant finding in the aged hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 413:201–207CrossRefPubMed

Beck M, Leunig M, Parvizi J et al (2004) Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part II. Midterm results of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 418:67–73CrossRefPubMed

10.

Burnett RS, Della Rocca GJ, Prather H et al (2006) Clinical presentation of patients with tears of the acetabular labrum. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1448–1457CrossRefPubMed

11.

Banerjee P, McLean CR (2011) Femoroacetabular impingement: a review of diagnosis and management. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 4:23–32PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

12.

Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaulé PE et al (2008) A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 4):47–66CrossRefPubMed

13.

Tannast M, Zheng G, Anderegg C et al (2005) Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 438:182–190CrossRefPubMed

14.

Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R (2005) Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1012–1018CrossRefPubMed

15.

Leunig M, Beck M, Kalhor M et al (2005) Fibrocystic changes at anterosuperior femoral neck: prevalence in hips with femoroacetabular impingement. Radiology 236:237–246CrossRefPubMed

16.

Martinez AE, Li SM, Ganz R, Beck M (2006) Os acetabuli in femoro-acetabular impingement: stress fracture or unfused secondary ossification centre of the acetabular rim? Hip Int 16:281–286PubMed

17.

Barton C, Salineros MJ, Rakhra KS, Beaulé PE (2011) Validity of the alpha angle measurement on plain radiographs in the evaluation of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:464–469CrossRefPubMed

18.

Domayer SE, Ziebarth K, Chan J et al (2011) Femoroacetabular cam-type impingement: diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of radiographic views compared to radial MRI. Eur J Radiol 80:805–810CrossRefPubMed

19.

Kappe T, Kocak T, Neuerburg C et al (2011) Reliability of radiographic signs for acetabular retroversion. Int Orthop 35:817–821PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

20.

Couture A, Baud C, Prodhomme O et al (2011) Ultrasound of the neonatal hip: initial evaluation and follow-up. J Radiol 92:142–165CrossRefPubMed

21.

Sconfienza LM, Perrone N, Lacelli F et al (2008) Ultrasound-guided injection of botulinum toxin A in the treatment of iliopsoas spasticity. J Ultrasound 11:113–117PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

22.

Troelsen A, Mechlenburg I, Gelineck J et al (2009) What is the role of clinical tests and ultrasound in acetabular labral tear diagnostics? Acta Orthop 80:314–318CrossRefPubMed

23.

Buck FM, Hodler J, Zanetti M et al (2011) Ultrasound for the evaluation of femoroacetabular impingement of the cam type. Diagnostic performance of qualitative criteria and alpha angle measurements. Eur Radiol 21:167–175CrossRefPubMed

24.

Czerny C, Hofmann S, Neuhold A et al (1996) Lesions of the acetabular labrum: accuracy of MR imaging and MR arthrography in detection and staging. Radiology 200:225–230PubMed

25.

Czerny C, Hofmann S, Urban M et al (1999) MR arthrography of the adult acetabular capsular–labral complex: correlation with surgery and anatomy. AJR 173:345–349CrossRefPubMed

26.

Pfirrmann CW, Mengiardi B, Dora C et al (2006) Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients. Radiology 240:778–785CrossRefPubMed

27.

Leopold SS, Battista V, Oliverio JA (2001) Safety and efficacy of intraarticular hip injection using anatomic landmarks. Clin Orthop Relat Res 391:192–197CrossRefPubMed

28.

Bredella MA, Stoller DW (2005) MR imaging of femoroacetabular impingement. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 13:653–664CrossRefPubMed

29.

Reichenbach S, Leunig M, Werlen S et al (2011) Association between cam-type deformities and magnetic resonance imaging-detected structural hip damage: a cross-sectional study in young men. Arthritis Rheum 63:4023–4030. doi:10.1002/art.30589 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Lage LA, Patel JV, Villos RN (1996) The acetabular labral tear: an arthroscopic classification. Arthroscopy 12:269–272CrossRefPubMed

31.

Schmid MR, Nötzli HP, Zanetti M et al (2003) Cartilage lesions in the hip: diagnostic effectiveness of MR arthrography. Radiology 226:382–386CrossRefPubMed

32.

Leunig M, Beaulé PE, Ganz R (2009) The concept of femoroacetabular impingement: current status and future perspectives. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:616–622CrossRefPubMed

33.

Peters CL, Erickson JA (2006) Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement with surgical dislocation and debridement in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1735–1741CrossRefPubMed

34.

Espinosa N, Rothenfluh DA, Beck M et al (2006) Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement: preliminary results of labral refixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:925–935CrossRefPubMed

35.

Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E et al (2001) Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:1119–1124CrossRefPubMed

36.

Lincoln M, Johnston K, Muldoon M, Santore R (2009) Combined arthroscopic and modified open approach for cam femoroacetabular impingement: a preliminary experience. Arthroscopy 25:392–399CrossRefPubMed

37.

Philippon MJ, Shenker ML (2006) Arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in the athlete. Clin Sport Med 25:299–308CrossRef

38.

Ribas M, Marín-Peña OR, Regenbrecht B et al (2007) Hip osteoplasty by an anterior minimally invasive approach for active patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Hip Int 17:91–98PubMed

39.

Matsuda DK, Carlisle JC, Arthurs SC et al (2011) Comparative systematic review of the open dislocation, mini-open, and arthroscopic surgeries for femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy 27:252–269CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Femoro-acetabular impingement: what the general radiologist should know
verfasst von: Alberto Aliprandi
Francesco Di Pietto
Paolo Minafra
Marcello Zappia
Simona Pozza
Luca Maria Sconfienza
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2014
Verlag: Springer Milan
Erschienen in: La radiologia medica / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0033-8362
Elektronische ISSN: 1826-6983
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-013-0314-7

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Femoro-acetabular impingement: what the general radiologist should know

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Acceptance of noninvasive computed tomography coronary angiography: for a patient-friendly medicine

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artefacts in hip prostheses: a comparison of different prosthetic compositions

Therapeutic impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT in recurrent differentiated thyroid carcinoma

Work stress and metabolic syndrome in radiologists: first evidence

Solid pseudopapillary tumour of the pancreas: distinct patterns of computed tomography manifestation for male versus female patients

Ultrasound-guided anterior axilla musculocutaneous nerve block

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

Update Radiologie