Skip to main content
Erschienen in: La radiologia medica 6/2015

01.06.2015 | URO-GENITAL RADIOLOGY

MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy: technical features and preliminary results

verfasst von: Valeria Panebianco, Flavio Barchetti, Guglielmo Manenti, Tommaso Aversa, Carlo Catalano, Giovanni Simonetti

Erschienen in: La radiologia medica | Ausgabe 6/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Repeatedly negative prostate biopsies in individuals with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels can be frustrating for both the patient and the urologist. This study was performed to investigate if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided transrectal biopsy (MRGB) increases diagnostic performance in individuals with suspected prostate cancer (PCa).

Materials and methods

Twenty-three consecutive men with a total PSA >4 ng/mL, PSA density >0.15, PSA velocity >0.75 ng/mL/year and suspicious MRI findings were included (average age 64 years; age range 53–75 years; total PSA levels ranging from 4.7 to 54 ng/mL; median 9 ng/mL). MRGB was performed with a closed unit at 1.5 Tesla, an MRI compatible biopsy device, a needle guide, and a titanium double-shoot biopsy gun.

Result

At prebiopsy MRI, in the 23 patients, a total of 26 suspicious areas to which the MRGB should be directed were found, 23 of them in the peripheral zone and three in the transitional zone. The needle guide was depicted and could be positioned with MRI guidance in all 23 patients. The duration of the procedure ranged from 35 to 55 min (mean 40 min). MRGB was well tolerated by all patients, and no major complications were observed. The detection rate for the diagnosis of PCa was 80, and 90 % of detected PCa were of intermediate aggressiveness.

Conclusion

MRGB has the potential to improve cancer detection rates in men with suspected PCa to deliver the relevant treatment as soon as possible.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Carroll PR (2010) Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:1117–1123CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Carroll PR (2010) Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:1117–1123CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Scattoni V, Raber M, Abdollah F et al (2010) Biopsy schemes with the fewest cores for detecting 95% of the prostate cancers detected by a 24-core biopsy. Eur Urol 57:1–8CrossRefPubMed Scattoni V, Raber M, Abdollah F et al (2010) Biopsy schemes with the fewest cores for detecting 95% of the prostate cancers detected by a 24-core biopsy. Eur Urol 57:1–8CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Djavan B, Milani S, Remzi M (2005) Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update. Can J Urol 12:44–48PubMed Djavan B, Milani S, Remzi M (2005) Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update. Can J Urol 12:44–48PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lujan M, Paez A, Santonja C et al (2004) Prostate cancer detection and tumor characteristics in men with multiple biopsy sessions. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 7:238–242CrossRefPubMed Lujan M, Paez A, Santonja C et al (2004) Prostate cancer detection and tumor characteristics in men with multiple biopsy sessions. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 7:238–242CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Freedland SJ, Kane CJ, Amling CL et al (2007) Upgrading and downgrading of prostate needle biopsy specimens: risk factors and clinical implications. Urology 69:495–499CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Freedland SJ, Kane CJ, Amling CL et al (2007) Upgrading and downgrading of prostate needle biopsy specimens: risk factors and clinical implications. Urology 69:495–499CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed HU, Kirkham A, Arya M et al (2009) Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 6:197–206CrossRefPubMed Ahmed HU, Kirkham A, Arya M et al (2009) Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 6:197–206CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Valerio M, Panebianco V, Sciarra A et al (2009) Classification of prostatic diseases by means of multivariate analysis on in vivo proton MRSI and DCE-MRI data. NMR Biomed 22:1036–1046PubMed Valerio M, Panebianco V, Sciarra A et al (2009) Classification of prostatic diseases by means of multivariate analysis on in vivo proton MRSI and DCE-MRI data. NMR Biomed 22:1036–1046PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dickinson L, Ahmed HU, Allen C et al (2013) Clinical applications of multiparametric MRI within the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Urol Oncol 31:281–284CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Dickinson L, Ahmed HU, Allen C et al (2013) Clinical applications of multiparametric MRI within the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Urol Oncol 31:281–284CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoeks CM, Schouten MG, Bomers JG et al (2012) Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers. Eur Urol 62:902–909CrossRefPubMed Hoeks CM, Schouten MG, Bomers JG et al (2012) Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers. Eur Urol 62:902–909CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoeks CM, Hambrock T, Yakar D et al (2013) Transition zone prostate cancer: detection and localization with 3-T multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology 266:207–217CrossRefPubMed Hoeks CM, Hambrock T, Yakar D et al (2013) Transition zone prostate cancer: detection and localization with 3-T multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology 266:207–217CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Engelhard K, Hollenbach HP, Kiefer B et al (2006) Prostate biopsy in the supine position in a standard 1.5-T scanner under real time MR-imaging control using a MR-compatible endorectal biopsy device. Eur Radiol 16:1237–1243CrossRefPubMed Engelhard K, Hollenbach HP, Kiefer B et al (2006) Prostate biopsy in the supine position in a standard 1.5-T scanner under real time MR-imaging control using a MR-compatible endorectal biopsy device. Eur Radiol 16:1237–1243CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Anastasiadis AG, Lichy MP, Nagele U et al (2006) MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies. Eur Urol 50:738–748 (discussion 748–749)CrossRefPubMed Anastasiadis AG, Lichy MP, Nagele U et al (2006) MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies. Eur Urol 50:738–748 (discussion 748–749)CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Beyersdorff D, Winkel A, Hamm B et al (2005) MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: initial results. Radiology 234:576–581CrossRefPubMed Beyersdorff D, Winkel A, Hamm B et al (2005) MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: initial results. Radiology 234:576–581CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Roethke M, Anastasiadis AG, Lichy M et al (2012) MRI-guided prostate biopsy detects clinically significant cancer: analysis of a cohort of 100 patients after previous negative TRUS biopsy. World J Urol 30:213–218CrossRefPubMed Roethke M, Anastasiadis AG, Lichy M et al (2012) MRI-guided prostate biopsy detects clinically significant cancer: analysis of a cohort of 100 patients after previous negative TRUS biopsy. World J Urol 30:213–218CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Penzkofer T, Tempany-Afdhal CM (2013) Prostate cancer detection and diagnosis: the role of MR and its comparison with other diagnostic modalities—a radiologist’s perspective. NMR Biomed 27:3–15CrossRefPubMed Penzkofer T, Tempany-Afdhal CM (2013) Prostate cancer detection and diagnosis: the role of MR and its comparison with other diagnostic modalities—a radiologist’s perspective. NMR Biomed 27:3–15CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hambrock T, Somford DM, Hoeks C et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen. J Urol 183:520–527CrossRefPubMed Hambrock T, Somford DM, Hoeks C et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen. J Urol 183:520–527CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R et al (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22:745–746CrossRef Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R et al (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22:745–746CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Riaz A, Miller FH, Kulik LM et al (2010) Imaging response in the primary index lesion and clinical outcomes following transarterial locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. JAMA 303:1062–1069CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Riaz A, Miller FH, Kulik LM et al (2010) Imaging response in the primary index lesion and clinical outcomes following transarterial locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. JAMA 303:1062–1069CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kobus T, Vos PC, Hambrock T et al (2012) Prostate cancer aggressiveness: in vivo assessment of MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T. Radiology 265:457–467CrossRefPubMed Kobus T, Vos PC, Hambrock T et al (2012) Prostate cancer aggressiveness: in vivo assessment of MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T. Radiology 265:457–467CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller GJ, Cygan JM (1994) Morphology of prostate cancer: the effects of multifocalityon histological grade, tumor volume and penetration. J Urol 152:1709–1713PubMed Miller GJ, Cygan JM (1994) Morphology of prostate cancer: the effects of multifocalityon histological grade, tumor volume and penetration. J Urol 152:1709–1713PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuen JS, Thng CH, Tan PH et al (2004) Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for the detection of tumor foci in men with prior negative transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy. J Urol 171:1482–1486CrossRefPubMed Yuen JS, Thng CH, Tan PH et al (2004) Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for the detection of tumor foci in men with prior negative transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy. J Urol 171:1482–1486CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Panebianco V, Sciarra A, Ciccariello M et al (2010) Role of magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging ([1H]MRSI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in identifying prostate cancer foci in patients with negative biopsy and high levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Radiol Med 115:1314–1329CrossRefPubMed Panebianco V, Sciarra A, Ciccariello M et al (2010) Role of magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging ([1H]MRSI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in identifying prostate cancer foci in patients with negative biopsy and high levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Radiol Med 115:1314–1329CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonekamp D, Jacobs MA, El-Khouli R et al (2011) Advancements in MR imaging of the prostate: from diagnosis to interventions. Radiographics 31:677–703CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Bonekamp D, Jacobs MA, El-Khouli R et al (2011) Advancements in MR imaging of the prostate: from diagnosis to interventions. Radiographics 31:677–703CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Amico AV, Tempany CM, Cormack R et al (2000) Transperineal magnetic resonance image guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 164:385–387CrossRefPubMed D’Amico AV, Tempany CM, Cormack R et al (2000) Transperineal magnetic resonance image guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 164:385–387CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer GS, DiMaio SP, Iordachita II, Fichtinger G (2007) Robotic assistant or transperineal prostate interventions in 3 T closed MRI. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 10:425–433PubMed Fischer GS, DiMaio SP, Iordachita II, Fichtinger G (2007) Robotic assistant or transperineal prostate interventions in 3 T closed MRI. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 10:425–433PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Cleary K, Melzer A, Watson V et al (2006) Interventional robotic systems: applications and technology state-of-the-art. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 15:101–113CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Cleary K, Melzer A, Watson V et al (2006) Interventional robotic systems: applications and technology state-of-the-art. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 15:101–113CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Stone NN, Roy J, Hong S et al (2002) Prostate gland motion and deformation caused by needle placement during brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 1:154–160CrossRefPubMed Stone NN, Roy J, Hong S et al (2002) Prostate gland motion and deformation caused by needle placement during brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 1:154–160CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Dattoli M, Waller K (1997) A simple method to stabilize the prostate during transperineal prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 38:341–342CrossRefPubMed Dattoli M, Waller K (1997) A simple method to stabilize the prostate during transperineal prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 38:341–342CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Zangos S, Herzog C, Eichler K et al (2007) MR-compatible assistance system for punction in a high-field system: device and feasibility of transgluteal biopsies of the prostate gland. Eur Radiol 17:1118–1124CrossRefPubMed Zangos S, Herzog C, Eichler K et al (2007) MR-compatible assistance system for punction in a high-field system: device and feasibility of transgluteal biopsies of the prostate gland. Eur Radiol 17:1118–1124CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Hambrock T, Hoeks C, Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa C et al (2012) Prospective assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using 3-T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies versus a systematic 10-core transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy cohort. Eur Urol 61:177–184CrossRefPubMed Hambrock T, Hoeks C, Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa C et al (2012) Prospective assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using 3-T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies versus a systematic 10-core transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy cohort. Eur Urol 61:177–184CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Engehausen DG, Engelhard K, Schwab SA et al (2012) Magnetic resonance image-guided biopsies with a high detection rate of prostate cancer. Sci World J 2012:975971CrossRef Engehausen DG, Engelhard K, Schwab SA et al (2012) Magnetic resonance image-guided biopsies with a high detection rate of prostate cancer. Sci World J 2012:975971CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hadaschik BA, Kuru TH, Tulea C et al (2011) A novel stereotactic prostate biopsy system integrating preinterventional magnetic resonance imaging and live ultrasound fusion. J Urol 186:2214–2220CrossRefPubMed Hadaschik BA, Kuru TH, Tulea C et al (2011) A novel stereotactic prostate biopsy system integrating preinterventional magnetic resonance imaging and live ultrasound fusion. J Urol 186:2214–2220CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh AK, Kruecker J, Xu S et al (2008) Initial clinical experience with real-time transrectal ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusion-guided prostate biopsy. BJU Int 101:841–845CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Singh AK, Kruecker J, Xu S et al (2008) Initial clinical experience with real-time transrectal ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusion-guided prostate biopsy. BJU Int 101:841–845CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan I, Oldenburg NE, Meskell P et al (2002) Real-time MRI-ultrasound image guided stereotactic prostate biopsy. Magn Reson Imaging 20:295–299CrossRefPubMed Kaplan I, Oldenburg NE, Meskell P et al (2002) Real-time MRI-ultrasound image guided stereotactic prostate biopsy. Magn Reson Imaging 20:295–299CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore CM, Robertson NL, Arsanious N et al (2013) Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review. Eur Urol 63:125–140CrossRefPubMed Moore CM, Robertson NL, Arsanious N et al (2013) Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review. Eur Urol 63:125–140CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinto PA, Chung PH, Rastinehad AR et al (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 186:1281–1285CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Pinto PA, Chung PH, Rastinehad AR et al (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 186:1281–1285CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Sonn GA, Natarajan S, Margolis DJA et al (2012) Targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer using an office based magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion device. J Urol 189:86–91CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Sonn GA, Natarajan S, Margolis DJA et al (2012) Targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer using an office based magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion device. J Urol 189:86–91CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat de Rooij M, Crienen S, Witjes JA et al (2014) Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR-guided targeted biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer: a modelling study from a health care perspective. Eur Urol 66:430–436CrossRefPubMed de Rooij M, Crienen S, Witjes JA et al (2014) Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR-guided targeted biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer: a modelling study from a health care perspective. Eur Urol 66:430–436CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy: technical features and preliminary results
verfasst von
Valeria Panebianco
Flavio Barchetti
Guglielmo Manenti
Tommaso Aversa
Carlo Catalano
Giovanni Simonetti
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2015
Verlag
Springer Milan
Erschienen in
La radiologia medica / Ausgabe 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0033-8362
Elektronische ISSN: 1826-6983
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-014-0490-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2015

La radiologia medica 6/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.