Skip to main content
Erschienen in: General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 3/2020

Open Access 24.01.2020 | Review Article

Remote monitoring for better management of LVAD patients: the potential benefits of CardioMEMS

verfasst von: Jesse F. Veenis, Jasper J. Brugts

Erschienen in: General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2020

Abstract

Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are frequently used in the treatment of end-stage heart failure (HF), and due to the shortage of heart donors and destination programs, it is likely to keep on growing. Still, LVAD therapy is not without complications and morbidity and rehospitalization rates are high. New ways to improve LVAD care both from the side of the patient and the physician are warranted. Remote monitoring could be a tool to tailor treatment in these patients, as no feedback exists at all about patient functioning on top of the static pump parameters. We aim to provide an overview and evaluation of the novel remote monitoring strategies to optimize LVAD management and elaborate on the opportunities of remote hemodynamic monitoring with CardioMEMS, at home in these patients as the next step to improve care.
Hinweise

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Epidemiological data on end-stage heart failure (HF) is scarce. Estimations performed by the America Heart Association suggest that < 1% of all HF patients are in end-stage HF [1]. Other studies estimated that approximately 5–10% of the HF population develop at some moment in life advanced HF despite optimal medical treatment [2]. These patients become refractory for medical therapy and are frequently hospitalized and have high mortality rates, leaving heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation as the only treatment options. Due to shortness in available heart donors, LVAD implantation rates continue to rise [3, 4].
Despite new LVAD designs and technological improvements, LVAD care remains very complex and associated with high mortality and with many rehospitalization and outpatient contacts [3, 5, 6]. The main reason for hospitalization is gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding or LVAD-related (driveline) infection, followed by decompensated HF and arrhythmia [7, 8]. Due to the growing number of patients treated with a LVAD, combined with the high hospitalization and complication rates, LVAD care places a high burden on hospital resources, with many logistical challenges with available hospital beds, as many other departments are not familiar with LVAD devices, so LVAD patients preferably are admitted at a cardiology ward despite non-cardiac admission indications.
It is difficult for pump optimization to be available in a short time at the outpatient clinic and so it is only based on echocardiographic images and static pump parameters.
Patient self-management and remote monitoring is an important part of chronic HF care, to prevent admission. Due to the complexity of LVAD care, remote monitoring has the potential to provide valuable information to help the physician in structured decision making. It has been suggested that remote monitoring of pump parameters, combined with remote monitoring of blood pressure, pacemaker-related parameters, coagulation values, and driveline exit parameters could improve LVAD care [9]. However, many of these investigations are still unexplored, and not yet tested in large populations. We aim to provide an overview of these new technological advances for the remote monitoring of LVAD patients.

The LVAD and hemodynamics

Different LVAD designs, pump mechanisms (axial or centrifugal), and implantation techniques are used. The two most common used LVADs are the HeartMate 3 (HM3, Abbott Inc, Atlanta, GA, USA) and the HVAD (Medtronic Inc, Framingham, MA, USA) (Fig. 1. Both are centrifugal pumps, placed in the pericardial space. The HM3 uses a fully magnetic levitated pump rotor, whereas the HVAD uses passive magnetic and hydrodynamic thrust bearings [1012].
LVAD care can be lifesaving, however, it is also associated with several LVAD-related complications, such as right ventricular (RV) failure, LVAD-related infection, cardiac arrhythmia, hemolysis and thrombosis, GI bleeding due to angiodysplasia and renal dysfunction [13]. An overview of the incidence rates of common LVAD complications in HM3 and HVAD LVADs is presented in Table 1.
Table 1
Common LVAD-related complications
 
HeartMate 3
HeartWare
Short term
Medium term
Long term
Short term
Medium term
Long term
RV failure
8.0
10.0–14.7
14.0–31.7
25.4
 Resulting in RVAD implantation
4.0
4.0–6.7
3.2–4.0
2.1–4.0
1.4–3.3
6.0
Bleeding
30.0
25.1–38
42.9–50.0
   
 GI bleeding
4.0
6.0–8.0
20.0–27.0
3.3–4.3
9.9–12.7
 Resulting in surgical intervention
12.0
10.2–14.0
12.2–16.0
12.0–16.0
14.3–14.8
20.0
Infection
20.0
35.2–36.0
52.0
   
 Driveline infection
2.0
11.7–16.0
23.8–24.0
0.0–3.6
12.1–16.9
18.0
 Sepsis
8.0
9.1–16
13.8–22.0
2.0–3.0
11.4–17.2
10.0
Suspected or confirmed pump thrombosis
0.0
0.0
1.1
0.0
2.1
 Resulting in surgical intervention
0.0
0.3
4.2
Stroke
4.0
5.4–12.0
10.1–24.0
   
 Ischemic
0.0
3.9–4.0
6.3–24.0
3.3–5.0
7.1–14.1
4.0
 Hemorrhagic
4.0
1.5–8.0
4.2–8.0
0.0–2.1
5.7–12.7
8.0
Cardiac arrhythmia
28.0
34.0
37.6
 Ventricular
23.8
2.0–10.2
20.7–20.8
4.0
 Supra-ventricular
17.5
14.8–15.0
20.0–21.4
Organ dysfunction
      
 Renal dysfunction
10.0
10.0
13.2
5.1–10.0
8.6–9.6
10.0
 Hepatic dysfunction
2.0
2.0
4.2
1.8–2.1
2.9–4.8
6.0
 Respiratory dysfunction
14.0
16.0
23.8
14.0–16.0
20.0–22.0
16.0
References
[24]
[15, 17, 24]
[15, 16, 26]
[25, 28]
[18, 25, 26]
[28]
Short term defined as < 1 month; medium term defined as 6–12 months; long term defined as 2 years; – data not available
RV right ventricle, RVAD right ventricular assist device, GI Gastrointestinal
RV failure is a serious hemodynamic complication, occurring in up to 20–30% of the LVAD patients [1417]. Signs of RV failure are elevated central venous pressure (CVP) and manifestations of elevated CVP, such as edema, ascites or increasing renal dysfunction [18].
Tamponade, which can develop shortly after LVAD implantation, is a feared complication, occurring in up to 20% of the LVAD patients [19]. Symptoms usually occur in a late stage, and common hemodynamic signs, such as tachycardia, shock or pulsus paradoxus can be masked by the LVAD pump [20]. Late tamponade can be hard to visualize on echocardiography until the patient is in shock, and the first sign might be a drop in pump parameters [21, 22].
GI bleeding is a common complication in LVAD patients, affecting up to 20–30% of the patients [1417, 2325]. GI bleeding has different presenting symptoms, 50% of patients present with melena, 25% with unexplained anemia, 15% with hematochezia and 10% with hematemesis [26].
LVAD-related infections occur in 10–25% of the LVAD patients in the first 3 months after LVAD implantation [1416, 2325, 27]. Presenting symptoms are fever, erythema at the driveline site, or purulent fluids from the driveline exit site.
Pump thrombosis affects approximately 15% of axial-flow LVAD, and 1% of centrifugal-flow LVADs [1416, 23, 25]. Pump thrombosis is characterized by signs of worsening HF in the patients, which cannot be explained otherwise, abnormal pump parameters and signs of hemolysis in laboratory results, such as elevated LDH [28, 29].

Quality of life

All the above-mentioned LVAD-related complications affect the mortality and morbidity of LVAD patients. However, the complications and the hospitalizations due to these complications also affect the quality of life of LVAD patients. Especially in patients with an LVAD as the destination therapy, quality of life should be the main focus [30]. Remote monitoring of LVAD patients could aid in improving the quality of life of LVAD patients. By earlier detection of LVAD-related complications, earlier intervention is possible, potentially reducing the number of rehospitalizations. Additionally, LVAD settings and the patient’s status could be better monitored, allowing for better optimization of the pump settings, improving the pump function [31].

Monitoring strategies

Non-invasive remote monitoring

An overview of remote monitoring strategies in LVAD patients is showed in Table 2. One of the keystones in traditional ambulant HF management is the active participation of patients with their medical care team. The use of non-invasive remote monitoring, or structured telephone monitoring in HF patients, has been investigated in multiple trials showing different results [32]. A recent Cochrane review showed that the use of non-invasive and structured telephone remote monitoring reduced mortality and HF-related hospitalizations [32].
Table 2
Remote monitoring strategies
 
Number of patients
Main findings
Refs.
Non-invasive remote monitoring
 Schloglhöfer et al.
96
At 2 years of follow-up, using bi-weekly telephone calls (consisting of an inquiry about LVAD parameters, alarms, blood pressure, INR, body weight, temperature, driveline exit status, symptoms and presence of edema), the overall survival was significantly better compared to standard care (89% vs. 57%, p = 0.027); but no significant difference in time free of readmission
[32]
Remote antithrombotic monitoring
 Dionizovik-Dimanovski et al.
50
Moderate correlation between INR measured using a POC device and in a central laboratory(correlation coefficient of 0.83)
[34]
 Joshi et al.
41 samples
Good correlation between INR measured by a POC device and in a central laboratory(correlation coefficient of 0.96)
[35]
 Bishop et al.
11
Using a POC-INR measurement device at home leads patients to be more often within therapeutic range compared with regular INR measurements at a central laboratory (44% vs. 31%, p = 0.026)
[36]
 Gavalas et al.
956 samples
The statistical performance of positive urine hemoglobin to predict LDH ≥ 600 IU/L is: sensitivity 60.4%; specificity 85.5%; PPV 42.7%; NPV 92.4%
[39]
Remote pump monitoring
 Pektok et al.
5
Demonstrates the feasibility of remote pump parameter monitoring, providing additional information to the treating clinicians
[41]
 Kawahito
 
Adding a vibration sensor to an LVAD could adequately detect pieces of silicone, acting like thrombi, at the four most common thrombus locations
[43]
 Bishop et al.
6
In patients with no or minimal AoV regurgitation, adding a specific algorithm could adequately predict AoV opening
[47]
Intrathoracic impedance
 Bartoli et al.
1
Demonstrates the potential utility of intrathoracic impedance measurements in a patient with an LVAD, with an increased intrathoracic impedance preceded intravascular volume depletion and dangerous LVAD dysfunction
[49]
Implantable hemodynamic monitoring devices
 Feldman et al.
27
Using remote monitored PAP, by the CardioMEMS, leads to a large reduction of PAP and an optimized timing of LVAD implantation compared to those receiving standard care
[54]
 Hubert et al.
4
Significant correlation between left atrial pressure sensor, and pump speed, LV and LA size and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (r = 0.92–0.99, p < 0.05)
[55]
POC point-of-care, LDH lactate dehydrogenase, PPV positive predicting value, NPV negative predicting value, AoV aortic valve, LVAD left ventricular assist device, PAP pulmonary artery pressure, LV left ventricle, LA left atrial
At this moment, there is one study that investigated the use of a structured telephone remote monitoring system in LVAD patients [33]. This retrospective study investigated 96 LVAD patients, among who 25 received bi-weekly telephone calls, consisting of an inquiry about LVAD parameters, alarms, blood pressure, INR, body weight, temperature, driveline exit status, symptoms and presence of edema. They found after 2 years a better overall survival in the intervention group (89% vs. 57%, p = 0.027), however, there was no effect on time free of readmission between the groups.

Remote antithrombotic monitoring

LVAD care is associated with thromboembolic complications, such as pump thrombosis, which could be a life-threatening complication, thus showing the need for adequate chronic anticoagulation [7]. However, LVADs are also associated with bleeding events, particularly GI bleeding, thus requiring a small target window of chronic anticoagulation to minimize the risk of bleeding events [7, 34]. The development of accurate point-of-care (POC) INR monitors made patient self-testing possible. In patients with other indications for anticoagulation therapy, self-testing led to a higher percentage of time in the therapeutic range [35]. Two studies showed a moderate to good correlation between the INR measured by the POC system and laboratory results [36, 37]. Bishop et al. [38] compared 11 LVAD patients using a POC-INR monitoring system or regular laboratory INR monitoring in the outpatient setting. Patients using a POC system were significantly more frequently tested (7.4 vs. 21.4 days, p < 0.01), and were more often within the therapeutic range (44% vs. 31%, p = 0.03). Furthermore, they investigated the potential differences in the number of bleeding or thromboembolic events, however, due to the small sample size, no significant difference was found. Self-testing in LVAD patients has the potential to increase the frequency of INR monitoring. By doing so, dosage changes can be made more often, leading to a higher percentage of “time in therapeutic INR range”. This could contribute to reducing the number of thromboembolic and bleeding events in LVAD patients, but has not been shown yet.
The diagnosis of pump thrombosis is complex, consisting of an evaluation of symptoms of HF, pump parameters, echocardiographic analysis and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). LDH is a sign of hemolysis, and probably one of the most reliable markers of pump thrombosis [39, 40]. LDH monitoring is usually only performed during regular outpatient clinic follow-up visits, leading to potential delays in pump thrombosis detection of weeks. Gavalas et al. [41] demonstrated a good correlation between a simple dipstick urine analysis for urine hemoglobin and serum-measured LDH. Absent of urine hemoglobin had a negative predicting value for LDH ≥ 600 IU/L (significant hemolysis) of > 90%, thus indicating the potential use for easy remote monitoring at home of pump thrombosis in LVAD patients.

Remote pump monitoring

Although experience with remote monitoring especially in ICDs and CRTs is growing [42], experience with a remote monitoring function within an LVAD system is limited. However, the first experiences with remote monitoring of pump parameters have been described [43, 44]. The HeartAssist 5 and aVAD LVADs have these remote monitoring functions, allowing to transmit pump parameters, such as pump speed, rounds per minute (rpm) and pump flow, as well as errors, to a website accessible to the care team. This new information can be used in earlier detection of pump complications. Hypovolemia and LVAD thrombosis could be detected by a downward LVAD flow trend [44].
Furthermore, new technologies and algorithms are developed which use the LVAD parameters and help with troubleshooting, and patient monitoring. Detection of vibrations as a sign of mechanical failure is widely used in the biomechanical industry, however, it is not yet used in LVAD management. Kawahito [45] investigated the use of a vibration sensor in combination with an LVAD detect pump thrombosis. This study investigated vibration signals caused by pieces of silicon, acting like actual thrombi, attached at the four most common locations for thrombus in an LVAD: the total area of the bottom of the impeller, an eccentric shape on the bottom of the impeller, a circular shape around the shaft top and an eccentric shape on the top of the impeller. Thrombi at these specific locations can be detected by specific vibration signals, indicating the potential use for early detection of pump thrombosis in LVAD patients.
The aortic valve opening rate is an important aspect of LVAD care. When the aortic valve is not opening the risk of adverse cerebrovascular events increases [46] and commissural fusion can occur, one of the causes of aortic valve regurgitation [47]. Bishop et al. [48] described a novel algorithm to analyze in patients with no or minimal aortic valve regurgitation whether the aortic valve is opening or not. This algorithm uses the electric current waveforms provided by the HeartMate-II LVAD and analyzes this data using a modified Karhunen–Loève transformation. The algorithm could accurately predict aortic valve opening and closing. This algorithm can also be used in an automatic regulation program which can automatically change the rpm settings of the LVAD based on this physiological feedback to maintain a predefined aortic valve opening rate.

Intrathoracic impedance

Remote intrathoracic impedance monitoring is possible in the newer ICD and CRT devices. A drop in intrathoracic impedance is seen during pulmonary congestion, as an early sign of HF decompensation. Due to the remote monitoring function of newer ICD and CRT devices, the intrathoracic impedance can be used to detect HF decompensation at an earlier stage. Multiple studies investigated whether remote monitoring of intrathoracic impedance could lead to a better outcome in chronic HF patients. A recent systematic review [49] showed that intrathoracic impedance was associated with lower health care costs due to a reduction in planned hospital visits, despite a slight increase in unplanned visits. However, the use of remote impedance monitoring did not affect all-cause or cardiac mortality.
At this moment, there is only one case report [50] describing the use and potential benefits of remote monitoring of intrathoracic impedance in LVAD patients. This patient experienced shortly after LVAD implantation an increase in the impedance as a sign of intravascular fluid depletion. The patient was admitted and treated with fluid repletion and the impedance was increased. This case showed that intrathoracic impedance measurements in LVAD patients might provide some information on their fluid status. However, the use of remote monitoring of impedance in chronic HF holds limited additional value, and it is unclear whether this will be better in LVAD patients.

Implantable hemodynamic monitor devices

Due to the failure of simple non-invasive and intrathoracic impedance remote monitoring strategies to improve the outcome of chronic HF patients, new, wireless implantable hemodynamic monitor systems were developed. These systems measure filling pressures, and work according to the hypothesis that filling pressures will increase before other signs of decompensated HF occur, as shown in Fig. 2. As has been shown, intracardiac pressures will rise weeks before patients are hospitalized due to decompensated HF [51]. Recently, Abraham provided an overview of multiple implantable hemodynamic monitor devices, which were developed in recent years [52]. In chronic HF patients, one of the most promising techniques is the CardioMEMS system (Abbott Inc, Atlanta, GA, USA) (Fig. 3). This device is implanted in the pulmonary artery during right-heart catheterization, and consists of a pressure-sensitive capacitor combined with a coil and can be powered by coupling this electrical circuit with an external antenna. When powered, the capacitor resonates, which is received by the external antenna. When pressure by the pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), is applied, the frequency of resonated energy changes via a characteristic pattern and can be converted into a pressure wave. This system has been shown in clinical trials as well as in real-world clinical practice to be effective in reducing HF hospitalization rates by maintaining normal PAP [53, 54].
A subgroup analysis of the CHAMPION trial, the initial clinical trial investigating the CardioMEMS, consisting of 27 chronic HF patients, who received an LVAD, showed that patients who received an LVAD were sicker, and had a higher PAP when compared to the group who did not receive an LVAD [55]. The intervention group received more medical changes, based on the hemodynamic feedback provided by the CardioMEMS compared to the control group. However, the PAP did not decrease significantly in the patients who received an LVAD, indicating that a lack of decrease of PAP can be a sign of refractory HF, and thus providing useful information in the timing of an LVAD implantation. Post-LVAD implantation, the PAP dropped in both groups, however, using the hemodynamic feedback in the intervention group, the PAP dropped even lower. This indicates that the use of the PAP provided by the CardioMEMS leads to a better and more optimal LVAD management, leading to a better pump function.
Hubbert et al. [56] investigated in four LVAD patients an implantable left atrial pressure (LAP) monitor, the Titan LAP monitoring system (ISS Inc. Ypsilanti, MI). They showed a significant correlation between LAP and pump speed, LV and left atrial size and the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, thus indicating the potential use of pressures obtained by an implantable hemodynamic monitor for optimization of the pump settings during a ramped speed test.

Potential impact of implantable hemodynamic monitoring

We believe that the implantable hemodynamic monitors hold more potential in LVAD patients than currently shown. Using the daily pressure readings, which provide real-time insight into patients’ fluid status, the clinicians could optimize patients shortly prior to the LVAD implantation, thereby improving patients’ status and their clinical outcome. Also, this hemodynamic information provides direct feedback on medical changes made. We believe that using this hemodynamic feedback will lead to better optimization, thus improving patients’ status and potentially improving their clinical outcome [57]. Furthermore, optimizing patients will lead to a better decongestion and thereby better unloading of the RV, thus, reducing the impact of the LVAD implantation on the RV and reducing the risk of RV failure.
Changes in filling pressures post-LVAD implantation might indicate potential postoperative complications. An increase in filling pressures might indicate a tamponade, since the venous return reduces due to inflow obstruction due to elevated pressures in the pericardium. An earlier detection and thereby earlier intervention might prevent late-stage tamponade and more severe complications.
Multiple complications, such as pump thrombosis, hemodynamic important arrhythmias or aortic valve regurgitation, will lead to congestion. Similar to chronic HF patients, in LVAD patients filling pressures will rise as a result of congestion [58]. A rise in filling pressures might indicate one of these complications is occurring. Hospitalization and the worsening outcome can potentially be prevented by acting on rising filling pressures. Furthermore, investigating the waveforms and rhythm could provide insight into potential arrhythmias.
A drop in filling pressures might indicate a loss of circulating volume, which might point to a GI bleeding.
LVAD therapy will increase cardiac output, and thereby increase the renal perfusion and resolve the congestion, lowering the renal venous pressure and thereby improving the renal function [59]. Filling pressures might aid in optimizing LVAD therapy, and thus improve the renal function even further.
Fixed pulmonary hypertension is an absolute contraindication for heart transplantation. In these patients, the by ischemic stunned right ventricle will be unable to overcome the elevated afterload and is most likely to fail immediately after heart transplantation. In patients with fixed pulmonary hypertension, LVAD therapy can be used as a bridge to candidacy for heart transplantation, since LVAD therapy is more effective in treating fixed pulmonary hypertension, compared to medical therapy alone [60]. Pulmonary hypertension should be evaluated periodically using a right-heart catheterization, as recommended by the ISHLT guidelines to evaluate whether the patient has become eligible for heart transplantation [61]. However, remote hemodynamic monitoring could replace these periodically right-heart catheterizations, and provide daily feedback on hemodynamic changes. Providing continues insight when a patient could be considered eligible for heart transplantation.
Recently, it has been shown that preforming hemodynamically guided ramp testing could reduce the number of LVAD-related complications and the number of hospitalizations [31, 62, 63]. However, this technique is limited by the need for frequent Swan-Ganz measurements, which increases the risk of bleeding events. Using the hemodynamic information provided by the CardioMEMS, this limitation could be overcome and allowing for easy hemodynamic optimizing of LVAD pump settings.

Future perspectives: design of the HEMO-VAD study to guide LVAD management by hemodynamic feedback

To investigate the potential impact of an implantable hemodynamic monitor in LVAD patients, we designed the HEMO-VAD pilot study[64]. In this study, we will investigate ten consecutive end-stage HF patients, who are accepted for LVAD implantation. These patients will receive prior to LVAD implantation a CardioMEMS device, which will be used for daily hemodynamic monitoring to optimize patients prior to LVAD implantation and monitoring of complications and patient status after LVAD implantation.

Conclusion

Many remote monitoring strategies are currently investigated and developed for LVAD patients, ranging from non-invasive telephone monitoring programs to implantable hemodynamic monitoring systems. Based on results from trials investigating the use of remote monitoring of regular heart failure, it is warranted to study these devices in LVAD patients. This technique holds the potential to provide additional information for determining the optimal LVAD implantation window, optimizing the patients prior to and post-LVAD implantation, and monitoring for LVAD-related complications to identify the patients most likely to benefit from such therapy and for early discovery of its complications.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

Die Chirurgie

Print-Titel

Das Abo mit mehr Tiefe

Mit der Zeitschrift Die Chirurgie erhalten Sie zusätzlich Online-Zugriff auf weitere 43 chirurgische Fachzeitschriften, CME-Fortbildungen, Webinare, Vorbereitungskursen zur Facharztprüfung und die digitale Enzyklopädie e.Medpedia.

Bis 30. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr nur 199 € zahlen!

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ammar KA, Jacobsen SJ, Mahoney DW, Kors JA, Redfield MM, Burnett JC Jr, et al. Prevalence and prognostic significance of heart failure stages: application of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association heart failure staging criteria in the community. Circulation. 2007;115(12):1563–70.PubMed Ammar KA, Jacobsen SJ, Mahoney DW, Kors JA, Redfield MM, Burnett JC Jr, et al. Prevalence and prognostic significance of heart failure stages: application of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association heart failure staging criteria in the community. Circulation. 2007;115(12):1563–70.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mancini D, Lietz K. Selection of cardiac transplantation candidates in 2010. Circulation. 2010;122(2):173–83.PubMed Mancini D, Lietz K. Selection of cardiac transplantation candidates in 2010. Circulation. 2010;122(2):173–83.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Briasoulis A, Inampudi C, Akintoye E, Adegbala O, Alvarez P, Bhama J. Trends in utilization, mortality, major complications, and cost after left ventricular assist device implantation in the United States (2009 to 2014). Am J Cardiol. 2018;121(10):1214–8.PubMed Briasoulis A, Inampudi C, Akintoye E, Adegbala O, Alvarez P, Bhama J. Trends in utilization, mortality, major complications, and cost after left ventricular assist device implantation in the United States (2009 to 2014). Am J Cardiol. 2018;121(10):1214–8.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel N, Kalra R, Doshi R, Bajaj NS, Arora G, Arora P. Trends and cost of heart transplantation and left ventricular assist devices: impact of proposed federal cuts. JACC Heart Fail. 2018;6(5):424–32.PubMed Patel N, Kalra R, Doshi R, Bajaj NS, Arora G, Arora P. Trends and cost of heart transplantation and left ventricular assist devices: impact of proposed federal cuts. JACC Heart Fail. 2018;6(5):424–32.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Pagani FD, Kormos RL, Stevenson LW, Blume ED, et al. Seventh INTERMACS annual report: 15,000 patients and counting. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(12):1495–504.PubMed Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Pagani FD, Kormos RL, Stevenson LW, Blume ED, et al. Seventh INTERMACS annual report: 15,000 patients and counting. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(12):1495–504.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirklin JK, Xie R, Cowger J, de By TMMH, Nakatani T, Schueler S, et al. Second annual report from the ISHLT mechanically assisted circulatory support (IMACS) registry. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37:685–91.PubMed Kirklin JK, Xie R, Cowger J, de By TMMH, Nakatani T, Schueler S, et al. Second annual report from the ISHLT mechanically assisted circulatory support (IMACS) registry. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37:685–91.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasin T, Marmor Y, Kremers W, Topilsky Y, Severson CJ, Schirger JA, et al. Readmissions after implantation of axial flow left ventricular assist device. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(2):153–63.PubMed Hasin T, Marmor Y, Kremers W, Topilsky Y, Severson CJ, Schirger JA, et al. Readmissions after implantation of axial flow left ventricular assist device. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(2):153–63.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehra MR, Salerno C, Cleveland JC, Pinney S, Yuzefpolskaya M, Milano CA, et al. Health care resource use and cost implications in the MOMENTUM 3 long-term outcome study: a randomized controlled trial of a magnetically levitated cardiac pump in advanced heart failure. Circulation. 2018;138:1923–34.PubMed Mehra MR, Salerno C, Cleveland JC, Pinney S, Yuzefpolskaya M, Milano CA, et al. Health care resource use and cost implications in the MOMENTUM 3 long-term outcome study: a randomized controlled trial of a magnetically levitated cardiac pump in advanced heart failure. Circulation. 2018;138:1923–34.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Reiss N, Schmidt T, Boeckelmann M, Schulte-Eistrup S, Hoffmann JD, Feldmann C, et al. Telemonitoring of left-ventricular assist device patients-current status and future challenges. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(Suppl 15):S1794–801.PubMedPubMedCentral Reiss N, Schmidt T, Boeckelmann M, Schulte-Eistrup S, Hoffmann JD, Feldmann C, et al. Telemonitoring of left-ventricular assist device patients-current status and future challenges. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(Suppl 15):S1794–801.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bourque K, Cotter C, Dague C, Harjes D, Dur O, Duhamel J, et al. Design rationale and preclinical evaluation of the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist system for hemocompatibility. ASAIO J. 2016;62(4):375–83.PubMed Bourque K, Cotter C, Dague C, Harjes D, Dur O, Duhamel J, et al. Design rationale and preclinical evaluation of the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist system for hemocompatibility. ASAIO J. 2016;62(4):375–83.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Larose JA, Tamez D, Ashenuga M, Reyes C. Design concepts and principle of operation of the HeartWare ventricular assist system. ASAIO J. 2010;56(4):285–9.PubMed Larose JA, Tamez D, Ashenuga M, Reyes C. Design concepts and principle of operation of the HeartWare ventricular assist system. ASAIO J. 2010;56(4):285–9.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Burkhoff D, Sayer G, Doshi D, Uriel N. Hemodynamics of mechanical circulatory support. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(23):2663–74.PubMed Burkhoff D, Sayer G, Doshi D, Uriel N. Hemodynamics of mechanical circulatory support. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(23):2663–74.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirklin JK, Pagani FD, Kormos RL, Stevenson LW, Blume ED, Myers SL, et al. Eighth annual INTERMACS report: special focus on framing the impact of adverse events. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36(10):1080–6.PubMed Kirklin JK, Pagani FD, Kormos RL, Stevenson LW, Blume ED, Myers SL, et al. Eighth annual INTERMACS report: special focus on framing the impact of adverse events. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36(10):1080–6.PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmitto JD, Pya Y, Zimpfer D, Krabatsch T, Garbade J, Rao V, et al. Long-term evaluation of a fully magnetically levitated circulatory support device for advanced heart failure-two-year results from the HeartMate 3 CE Mark Study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018;21:90–7.PubMed Schmitto JD, Pya Y, Zimpfer D, Krabatsch T, Garbade J, Rao V, et al. Long-term evaluation of a fully magnetically levitated circulatory support device for advanced heart failure-two-year results from the HeartMate 3 CE Mark Study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018;21:90–7.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehra MR, Goldstein DJ, Uriel N, Cleveland JC Jr, Yuzefpolskaya M, Salerno C, et al. Two-year outcomes with a magnetically levitated cardiac pump in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(15):1386–95.PubMed Mehra MR, Goldstein DJ, Uriel N, Cleveland JC Jr, Yuzefpolskaya M, Salerno C, et al. Two-year outcomes with a magnetically levitated cardiac pump in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(15):1386–95.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gustafsson F, Shaw S, Lavee J, Saeed D, Pya Y, Krabatsch T, et al. Six-month outcomes after treatment of advanced heart failure with a full magnetically levitated continuous flow left ventricular assist device: report from the ELEVATE registry. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(37):3454–60.PubMed Gustafsson F, Shaw S, Lavee J, Saeed D, Pya Y, Krabatsch T, et al. Six-month outcomes after treatment of advanced heart failure with a full magnetically levitated continuous flow left ventricular assist device: report from the ELEVATE registry. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(37):3454–60.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bashir J, Legare JF, Freed DH, Cheung A, Rao V, Toma M. Multicentre Canadian experience with the HeartWare ventricular assist device: concerns about adverse neurological outcomes. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30(12):1662–7.PubMed Bashir J, Legare JF, Freed DH, Cheung A, Rao V, Toma M. Multicentre Canadian experience with the HeartWare ventricular assist device: concerns about adverse neurological outcomes. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30(12):1662–7.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lampert BC, Teuteberg JJ. Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(9):1123–30.PubMed Lampert BC, Teuteberg JJ. Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(9):1123–30.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kohmoto T, Oz MC, Naka Y. Late bleeding from right internal mammary artery after HeartMate left ventricular assist device implantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(2):689–91.PubMed Kohmoto T, Oz MC, Naka Y. Late bleeding from right internal mammary artery after HeartMate left ventricular assist device implantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(2):689–91.PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Topilsky Y, Price TN, Atchison FW, Joyce LD. Atypical tamponade hemodynamic in a patient with temporary left ventricular assist device. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12(5):832–4.PubMed Topilsky Y, Price TN, Atchison FW, Joyce LD. Atypical tamponade hemodynamic in a patient with temporary left ventricular assist device. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12(5):832–4.PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Jett GK. ABIOMED BVS 5000: experience and potential advantages. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61(1):301–4 (discussion 11-3).PubMed Jett GK. ABIOMED BVS 5000: experience and potential advantages. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61(1):301–4 (discussion 11-3).PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Smart K, Jett GK. Late tamponade with mechanical circulatory support. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66(6):2027–8.PubMed Smart K, Jett GK. Late tamponade with mechanical circulatory support. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66(6):2027–8.PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Netuka I, Sood P, Pya Y, Zimpfer D, Krabatsch T, Garbade J, et al. Fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist system for treating advanced HF: a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(23):2579–89.PubMed Netuka I, Sood P, Pya Y, Zimpfer D, Krabatsch T, Garbade J, et al. Fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist system for treating advanced HF: a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(23):2579–89.PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Slaughter MS, Pagani FD, McGee EC, Birks EJ, Cotts WG, Gregoric I, et al. HeartWare ventricular assist system for bridge to transplant: combined results of the bridge to transplant and continued access protocol trial. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32(7):675–83.PubMed Slaughter MS, Pagani FD, McGee EC, Birks EJ, Cotts WG, Gregoric I, et al. HeartWare ventricular assist system for bridge to transplant: combined results of the bridge to transplant and continued access protocol trial. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32(7):675–83.PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Aaronson KD, Slaughter MS, Miller LW, McGee EC, Cotts WG, Acker MA, et al. Use of an intrapericardial, continuous-flow, centrifugal pump in patients awaiting heart transplantation. Circulation. 2012;125(25):3191–200.PubMed Aaronson KD, Slaughter MS, Miller LW, McGee EC, Cotts WG, Acker MA, et al. Use of an intrapericardial, continuous-flow, centrifugal pump in patients awaiting heart transplantation. Circulation. 2012;125(25):3191–200.PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Marsano J, Desai J, Chang S, Chau M, Pochapin M, Gurvits GE. Characteristics of gastrointestinal bleeding after placement of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: a case series. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60(6):1859–67.PubMed Marsano J, Desai J, Chang S, Chau M, Pochapin M, Gurvits GE. Characteristics of gastrointestinal bleeding after placement of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: a case series. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60(6):1859–67.PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Strueber M, O’Driscoll G, Jansz P, Khaghani A, Levy WC, Wieselthaler GM, et al. Multicenter evaluation of an intrapericardial left ventricular assist system. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(12):1375–82.PubMed Strueber M, O’Driscoll G, Jansz P, Khaghani A, Levy WC, Wieselthaler GM, et al. Multicenter evaluation of an intrapericardial left ventricular assist system. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(12):1375–82.PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah P, Tantry US, Bliden KP, Gurbel PA. Bleeding and thrombosis associated with ventricular assist device therapy. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36(11):1164–73.PubMed Shah P, Tantry US, Bliden KP, Gurbel PA. Bleeding and thrombosis associated with ventricular assist device therapy. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36(11):1164–73.PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Stulak JM, Sharma S, Maltais S. Management of pump thrombosis in patients with left ventricular assist devices. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2015;15(2):89–94.PubMed Stulak JM, Sharma S, Maltais S. Management of pump thrombosis in patients with left ventricular assist devices. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2015;15(2):89–94.PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams EE, Wrightson ML. Quality of life with an LVAD: a misunderstood concept. Heart Lung. 2018;47(3):177–83.PubMed Adams EE, Wrightson ML. Quality of life with an LVAD: a misunderstood concept. Heart Lung. 2018;47(3):177–83.PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Uriel N, Burkhoff D, Rich JD, Drakos SG, Teuteberg JJ, Imamura T, et al. Impact of hemodynamic ramp test-guided HVAD speed and medication adjustments on clinical outcomes. Circ Heart Fail. 2019;12(4):e006067.PubMed Uriel N, Burkhoff D, Rich JD, Drakos SG, Teuteberg JJ, Imamura T, et al. Impact of hemodynamic ramp test-guided HVAD speed and medication adjustments on clinical outcomes. Circ Heart Fail. 2019;12(4):e006067.PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Inglis SC, Clark RA, Dierckx R, Prieto-Merino D, Cleland JG. Structured telephone support or non-invasive telemonitoring for patients with heart failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;10:CD007228. Inglis SC, Clark RA, Dierckx R, Prieto-Merino D, Cleland JG. Structured telephone support or non-invasive telemonitoring for patients with heart failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;10:CD007228.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Schloglhofer T, Horvat J, Moscato F, Hartner Z, Necid G, Schwingenschlogl H, et al. A standardized telephone intervention algorithm improves the survival of ventricular assist device outpatients. Artif Organs. 2018;42:961–9.PubMedPubMedCentral Schloglhofer T, Horvat J, Moscato F, Hartner Z, Necid G, Schwingenschlogl H, et al. A standardized telephone intervention algorithm improves the survival of ventricular assist device outpatients. Artif Organs. 2018;42:961–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Demirozu ZT, Radovancevic R, Hochman LF, Gregoric ID, Letsou GV, Kar B, et al. Arteriovenous malformation and gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30(8):849–53.PubMed Demirozu ZT, Radovancevic R, Hochman LF, Gregoric ID, Letsou GV, Kar B, et al. Arteriovenous malformation and gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30(8):849–53.PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Heneghan C, Ward A, Perera R, Self-Monitoring Trialist C, Bankhead C, Fuller A, et al. Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet. 2012;379(9813):322–34.PubMed Heneghan C, Ward A, Perera R, Self-Monitoring Trialist C, Bankhead C, Fuller A, et al. Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet. 2012;379(9813):322–34.PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Dionizovik-Dimanovski M, Levin AP, Fried J, Mody KP, Simonich E, Garan AR, et al. Correlation between home INR and core laboratory INR in patients supported with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. ASAIO J. 2015;61(4):386–90.PubMed Dionizovik-Dimanovski M, Levin AP, Fried J, Mody KP, Simonich E, Garan AR, et al. Correlation between home INR and core laboratory INR in patients supported with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. ASAIO J. 2015;61(4):386–90.PubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Joshi A, Smith D, Arora M, Poston R. Anticoagulant monitoring in ventricular assist device patients: a feasibility study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008;7(6):1035–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Joshi A, Smith D, Arora M, Poston R. Anticoagulant monitoring in ventricular assist device patients: a feasibility study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008;7(6):1035–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Bishop MA, Streiff MB, Ensor CR, Tedford RJ, Russell SD, Ross PA. Pharmacist-managed international normalized ratio patient self-testing is associated with increased time in therapeutic range in patients with left ventricular assist devices at an academic medical center. ASAIO J. 2014;60(2):193–8.PubMed Bishop MA, Streiff MB, Ensor CR, Tedford RJ, Russell SD, Ross PA. Pharmacist-managed international normalized ratio patient self-testing is associated with increased time in therapeutic range in patients with left ventricular assist devices at an academic medical center. ASAIO J. 2014;60(2):193–8.PubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Uriel N, Morrison KA, Garan AR, Kato TS, Yuzefpolskaya M, Latif F, et al. Development of a novel echocardiography ramp test for speed optimization and diagnosis of device thrombosis in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: the Columbia ramp study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(18):1764–75.PubMedPubMedCentral Uriel N, Morrison KA, Garan AR, Kato TS, Yuzefpolskaya M, Latif F, et al. Development of a novel echocardiography ramp test for speed optimization and diagnosis of device thrombosis in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: the Columbia ramp study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(18):1764–75.PubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah P, Mehta VM, Cowger JA, Aaronson KD, Pagani FD. Diagnosis of hemolysis and device thrombosis with lactate dehydrogenase during left ventricular assist device support. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014;33(1):102–4.PubMed Shah P, Mehta VM, Cowger JA, Aaronson KD, Pagani FD. Diagnosis of hemolysis and device thrombosis with lactate dehydrogenase during left ventricular assist device support. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014;33(1):102–4.PubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Gavalas MV, Breskin A, Yuzefpolskaya M, Eisenberger A, Castagna F, Demmer RT, et al. Discriminatory performance of positive urine hemoglobin for detection of significant hemolysis in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36(1):59–63.PubMed Gavalas MV, Breskin A, Yuzefpolskaya M, Eisenberger A, Castagna F, Demmer RT, et al. Discriminatory performance of positive urine hemoglobin for detection of significant hemolysis in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36(1):59–63.PubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Varma N, Ricci RP. Telemedicine and cardiac implants: what is the benefit? Eur Heart J. 2013;34(25):1885–95.PubMed Varma N, Ricci RP. Telemedicine and cardiac implants: what is the benefit? Eur Heart J. 2013;34(25):1885–95.PubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Pektok E, Demirozu ZT, Arat N, Yildiz O, Oklu E, Eker D, et al. Remote monitoring of left ventricular assist device parameters after HeartAssist-5 implantation. Artif Organs. 2013;37(9):820–5.PubMed Pektok E, Demirozu ZT, Arat N, Yildiz O, Oklu E, Eker D, et al. Remote monitoring of left ventricular assist device parameters after HeartAssist-5 implantation. Artif Organs. 2013;37(9):820–5.PubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Hohmann S, Veltmann C, Duncker D, Konig T, Berliner D, Hanke J, et al. Initial experience with telemonitoring in left ventricular assist device patients. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(Suppl 6):S853–63.PubMedPubMedCentral Hohmann S, Veltmann C, Duncker D, Konig T, Berliner D, Hanke J, et al. Initial experience with telemonitoring in left ventricular assist device patients. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(Suppl 6):S853–63.PubMedPubMedCentral
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawahito K. Transformation of vibration signals in rotary blood pumps: the diagnostic potential of pump failure. J Artif Organs. 2013;16(3):393–6.PubMed Kawahito K. Transformation of vibration signals in rotary blood pumps: the diagnostic potential of pump failure. J Artif Organs. 2013;16(3):393–6.PubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Lazar RM, Shapiro PA, Jaski BE, Parides MK, Bourge RC, Watson JT, et al. Neurological events during long-term mechanical circulatory support for heart failure: the Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) experience. Circulation. 2004;109(20):2423–7.PubMed Lazar RM, Shapiro PA, Jaski BE, Parides MK, Bourge RC, Watson JT, et al. Neurological events during long-term mechanical circulatory support for heart failure: the Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) experience. Circulation. 2004;109(20):2423–7.PubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Saito T, Wassilew K, Gorodetski B, Stein J, Falk V, Krabatsch T, et al. Aortic valve pathology in patients supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. Circ J. 2016;80(6):1371–7.PubMed Saito T, Wassilew K, Gorodetski B, Stein J, Falk V, Krabatsch T, et al. Aortic valve pathology in patients supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. Circ J. 2016;80(6):1371–7.PubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Bishop CJ, Mason NO, Kfoury AG, Lux R, Stoker S, Horton K, et al. A novel non-invasive method to assess aortic valve opening in HeartMate II left ventricular assist device patients using a modified Karhunen–Loeve transformation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29(1):27–31.PubMed Bishop CJ, Mason NO, Kfoury AG, Lux R, Stoker S, Horton K, et al. A novel non-invasive method to assess aortic valve opening in HeartMate II left ventricular assist device patients using a modified Karhunen–Loeve transformation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29(1):27–31.PubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Klersy C, Boriani G, De Silvestri A, Mairesse GH, Braunschweig F, Scotti V, et al. Effect of telemonitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices on healthcare utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18(2):195–204.PubMed Klersy C, Boriani G, De Silvestri A, Mairesse GH, Braunschweig F, Scotti V, et al. Effect of telemonitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices on healthcare utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18(2):195–204.PubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartoli CR, Vessels KM, McCants KC. Increased intrathoracic impedance may predict adverse events in LVAD patients. J Card Surg. 2013;28(5):616–8.PubMed Bartoli CR, Vessels KM, McCants KC. Increased intrathoracic impedance may predict adverse events in LVAD patients. J Card Surg. 2013;28(5):616–8.PubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Zile MR, Bennett TD, St John Sutton M, Cho YK, Adamson PB, Aaron MF, et al. Transition from chronic compensated to acute decompensated heart failure: pathophysiological insights obtained from continuous monitoring of intracardiac pressures. Circulation. 2008;118(14):1433–41.PubMed Zile MR, Bennett TD, St John Sutton M, Cho YK, Adamson PB, Aaron MF, et al. Transition from chronic compensated to acute decompensated heart failure: pathophysiological insights obtained from continuous monitoring of intracardiac pressures. Circulation. 2008;118(14):1433–41.PubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Abraham WT, Perl L. Implantable hemodynamic monitoring for heart failure patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(3):389–98.PubMed Abraham WT, Perl L. Implantable hemodynamic monitoring for heart failure patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(3):389–98.PubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Abraham WT, Stevenson LW, Bourge RC, Lindenfeld JA, Bauman JG, Adamson PB, et al. Sustained efficacy of pulmonary artery pressure to guide adjustment of chronic heart failure therapy: complete follow-up results from the CHAMPION randomised trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10017):453–61.PubMed Abraham WT, Stevenson LW, Bourge RC, Lindenfeld JA, Bauman JG, Adamson PB, et al. Sustained efficacy of pulmonary artery pressure to guide adjustment of chronic heart failure therapy: complete follow-up results from the CHAMPION randomised trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10017):453–61.PubMed
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Heywood JT, Jermyn R, Shavelle D, Abraham WT, Bhimaraj A, Bhatt K, et al. Impact of practice-based management of pulmonary artery pressures in 2000 patients implanted with the CardioMEMS sensor. Circulation. 2017;135(16):1509–17.PubMed Heywood JT, Jermyn R, Shavelle D, Abraham WT, Bhimaraj A, Bhatt K, et al. Impact of practice-based management of pulmonary artery pressures in 2000 patients implanted with the CardioMEMS sensor. Circulation. 2017;135(16):1509–17.PubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Feldman DS, Moazami N, Adamson PB, Vierecke J, Raval N, Shreenivas S, et al. The utility of a wireless implantable hemodynamic monitoring system in patients requiring mechanical circulatory support. ASAIO J. 2018;64(3):301–8.PubMed Feldman DS, Moazami N, Adamson PB, Vierecke J, Raval N, Shreenivas S, et al. The utility of a wireless implantable hemodynamic monitoring system in patients requiring mechanical circulatory support. ASAIO J. 2018;64(3):301–8.PubMed
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Hubbert L, Baranowski J, Delshad B, Ahn H. Left atrial pressure monitoring with an implantable wireless pressure sensor after implantation of a left ventricular assist device. ASAIO J. 2017;63(5):e60–5.PubMedPubMedCentral Hubbert L, Baranowski J, Delshad B, Ahn H. Left atrial pressure monitoring with an implantable wireless pressure sensor after implantation of a left ventricular assist device. ASAIO J. 2017;63(5):e60–5.PubMedPubMedCentral
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Cowger J, Shah P, Stulak J, Maltais S, Aaronson KD, Kirklin JK, et al. INTERMACS profiles and modifiers: heterogeneity of patient classification and the impact of modifiers on predicting patient outcome. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35(4):440–8.PubMed Cowger J, Shah P, Stulak J, Maltais S, Aaronson KD, Kirklin JK, et al. INTERMACS profiles and modifiers: heterogeneity of patient classification and the impact of modifiers on predicting patient outcome. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35(4):440–8.PubMed
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Abraham WT, Adamson PB, Bourge RC, Aaron MF, Costanzo MR, Stevenson LW, et al. Wireless pulmonary artery haemodynamic monitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9766):658–66.PubMed Abraham WT, Adamson PB, Bourge RC, Aaron MF, Costanzo MR, Stevenson LW, et al. Wireless pulmonary artery haemodynamic monitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9766):658–66.PubMed
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Verma S, Bassily E, Leighton S, Mhaskar R, Sunjic I, Martin A, et al. Renal function and outcomes with use of left ventricular assist device implantation and inotropes in end-stage heart failure: a retrospective single center study. J Clin Med Res. 2017;9(7):596–604.PubMedPubMedCentral Verma S, Bassily E, Leighton S, Mhaskar R, Sunjic I, Martin A, et al. Renal function and outcomes with use of left ventricular assist device implantation and inotropes in end-stage heart failure: a retrospective single center study. J Clin Med Res. 2017;9(7):596–604.PubMedPubMedCentral
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumarasinghe G, Jain P, Jabbour A, Lai J, Keogh AM, Kotlyar E, et al. Comparison of continuous-flow ventricular assist device therapy with intensive medical therapy in fixed pulmonary hypertension secondary to advanced left heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2018;5(4):695–702.PubMedPubMedCentral Kumarasinghe G, Jain P, Jabbour A, Lai J, Keogh AM, Kotlyar E, et al. Comparison of continuous-flow ventricular assist device therapy with intensive medical therapy in fixed pulmonary hypertension secondary to advanced left heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2018;5(4):695–702.PubMedPubMedCentral
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehra MR, Canter CE, Hannan MM, Semigran MJ, Uber PA, Baran DA, et al. The 2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation listing criteria for heart transplantation: a 10-year update. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35(1):1–23.PubMed Mehra MR, Canter CE, Hannan MM, Semigran MJ, Uber PA, Baran DA, et al. The 2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation listing criteria for heart transplantation: a 10-year update. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35(1):1–23.PubMed
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Imamura T, Nguyen A, Kim G, Raikhelkar J, Sarswat N, Kalantari S, et al. Optimal haemodynamics during left ventricular assist device support are associated with reduced haemocompatibility-related adverse events. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21(5):655–62.PubMed Imamura T, Nguyen A, Kim G, Raikhelkar J, Sarswat N, Kalantari S, et al. Optimal haemodynamics during left ventricular assist device support are associated with reduced haemocompatibility-related adverse events. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21(5):655–62.PubMed
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Imamura T, Jeevanandam V, Kim G, Raikhelkar J, Sarswat N, Kalantari S, et al. Optimal hemodynamics during left ventricular assist device support are associated with reduced readmission rates. Circ Heart Fail. 2019;12(2):e005094.PubMed Imamura T, Jeevanandam V, Kim G, Raikhelkar J, Sarswat N, Kalantari S, et al. Optimal hemodynamics during left ventricular assist device support are associated with reduced readmission rates. Circ Heart Fail. 2019;12(2):e005094.PubMed
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Veenis JF, Manintveld OC, Constantinescu AA, Caliskan K, Birim O, Bekkers JA, et al. Design and rationale of haemodynamic guidance with CardioMEMS in patients with a left ventricular assist device: the HEMO-VAD pilot study. ESC Heart Fail. 2019;6:194–201.PubMedPubMedCentral Veenis JF, Manintveld OC, Constantinescu AA, Caliskan K, Birim O, Bekkers JA, et al. Design and rationale of haemodynamic guidance with CardioMEMS in patients with a left ventricular assist device: the HEMO-VAD pilot study. ESC Heart Fail. 2019;6:194–201.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Remote monitoring for better management of LVAD patients: the potential benefits of CardioMEMS
verfasst von
Jesse F. Veenis
Jasper J. Brugts
Publikationsdatum
24.01.2020
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1863-6705
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-6713
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-020-01286-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.