nach oben

Current Cardiology Reports

Erschienen in:

01.08.2019 | Nuclear Cardiology (V Dilsizian, Section Editor)

Functional and Anatomical Imaging in Patients with Ischemic Symptoms and Known Coronary Artery Disease

verfasst von: Christopher A. Hanson, Jamieson M. Bourque

Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports | Ausgabe 8/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This review is aimed at summarizing recent advances in functional, anatomical, and hybrid imaging techniques used in the assessment of ischemic complaints in patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD).

Recent Findings

Cardiovascular imaging has seen significant growth over the last decade in the fields of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), FFR derived from CCTA, cardiac magnetic resonance, radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging, and hybrid imaging for the purposes of evaluating symptoms concerning for ischemia. This growth stems from refinement of imaging techniques and hardware and software advances that have made current techniques more accurate with less acquisition time. However, every anatomic and functional imaging modality has important technical and patient-specific limitations. This review assesses these issues, guides a patient-centered imaging approach, and identifies important research questions to resolve.

Summary

Recent advances in non-invasive cardiovascular imaging can provide important information in patients with known CAD beyond traditional imaging techniques; the use of these novel tools refines the clinical management of complex patients with ischemic symptoms and known CAD.

Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics-2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(4):447–54. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000366.CrossRefPubMed

•• Ouellette ML, Löffler AI, Beller GA, Workman VK, Holland E, Bourque JM. Clinical characteristics, sex differences, and outcomes in patients with normal or near-normal coronary arteries, non-obstructive or obstructive coronary artery disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(10). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007965. This study demonstrated that as many as 44.5% of patients undergoing non-emergent ICA have non-obstructive CAD despite high pretest risk, which raises the concern that CMD may play a significant role in causing angina in certain patients.

Bairey merz CN, Pepine CJ, Walsh MN, Fleg JL. Ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA): developing evidence-based therapies and research agenda for the next decade. Circulation. 2017;135(11):1075–92. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024534.CrossRefPubMed

Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, Gaber M, Hainer J, Klein J, et al. Association between coronary vascular dysfunction and cardiac mortality in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2012;126(15):1858–68. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.120402.CrossRef

• Marinescu MA, Löffler AI, Ouellette M, Smith L, Kramer CM, Bourque JM. Coronary microvascular dysfunction, microvascular angina, and treatment strategies. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(2):210–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.12.008. This is helpful review of what is known regarding treatments for CMD and microvascular angina.PubMed

• Wolk MJ, Bailey SR, Doherty JU, et al. ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(4):380–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.009. Most recent AUC document for use of different imaging modalities in the evaluation of stable ischemic heart disease.CrossRef

Villines TC, Hulten EA, Shaw LJ, Goyal M, Dunning A, Achenbach S, et al. Prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease and adverse events among symptomatic patients with coronary artery calcification scores of zero undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography: results from the CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(24):2533–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.851.CrossRef

• Fihn SD, Blankenship JC, Alexander KP, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(18):1929–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.017. Most recent guidelines regarding diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease.CrossRef

Beck KS, Kim JA, Choe YH, et al. 2017 multimodality appropriate use criteria for noninvasive cardiac imaging: expert consensus of the Asian Society of Cardiovascular Imaging. Korean J Radiol. 2017;18(6):871–80. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.6.871.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(22):2324–36. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0806576.CrossRef

11.

Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(25):2135–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.058.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(21):1724–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031.CrossRef

13.

Hacker M, Jakobs T, Matthiesen F, Vollmar C, Nikolaou K, Becker C, et al. Comparison of spiral multidetector CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging in the noninvasive detection of functionally relevant coronary artery lesions: first clinical experiences. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(8):1294–300.

14.

Rispler S, Keidar Z, Ghersin E, Roguin A, Soil A, Dragu R, et al. Integrated single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(10):1059–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.069.CrossRef

15.

Di carli MF, Dorbala S, Curillova Z, et al. Relationship between CT coronary angiography and stress perfusion imaging in patients with suspected ischemic heart disease assessed by integrated PET-CT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14(6):799–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.07.012.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Pache G, Saueressig U, Frydrychowicz A, Foell D, Ghanem N, Kotter E, et al. Initial experience with 64-slice cardiac CT: non-invasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(8):976–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi824.CrossRef

17.

Meyer TS, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, Will A, Kastrati A, Schömig A, et al. Improved noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts with 64-slice computed tomographic angiography in an unselected patient population. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(9):946–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.066.CrossRef

18.

Ropers D, Pohle FK, Kuettner A, Pflederer T, Anders K, Daniel WG, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation. Circulation. 2006;114(22):2334–41. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.631051.CrossRef

19.

Barbero U, Iannaccone M, D’ascenzo F, et al. 64 slice-coronary computed tomography sensitivity and specificity in the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft stenosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2016;216:52–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.156.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Carrabba N, Schuijf JD, De graaf FR, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17(3):470–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-010-9218-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Sun Z, Almutairi AM. Diagnostic accuracy of 64 multislice CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2010;73(2):266–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.025.CrossRefPubMed

22.

• Li Y, Yu M, Li W, Lu Z, Wei M, Zhang J. Third generation dual-source CT enables accurate diagnosis of coronary restenosis in all size stents with low radiation dose and preserved image quality. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(6):2647–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5256-3. The study demonstrated preserved sensitivity and reduced specificity for assessing in-stent restenosis in coronary stents < 3 mm with CCTA.CrossRef

23.

Harding SA, Wu EB, Lo S, Lim ST, Ge L, Chen JY, et al. A new algorithm for crossing chronic total occlusions from the Asia Pacific Chronic Total Occlusion Club. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(21):2135–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.071.PubMed

24.

• Luo C, Huang M, Li J, Liang C, Zhang Q, Liu H, et al. Predictors of interventional success of antegrade PCI for CTO. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(7):804–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.04.008. This study identified significant lesion characteristics of CTOs that predicted failure of antegrade PCI using pre-procedure CCTA.PubMed

25.

Rolf A, Werner GS, Schuhbäck A, Rixe J, Möllmann H, Nef HM, et al. Preprocedural coronary CT angiography significantly improves success rates of PCI for chronic total occlusion. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;29(8):1819–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-013-0258-y.CrossRef

26.

Opolski MP, Achenbach S, Schuhbäck A, Rolf A, Möllmann H, Nef H, et al. Coronary computed tomographic prediction rule for time-efficient guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion: insights from the CT-RECTOR multicenter registry (Computed Tomography Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(2):257–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2014.07.031.PubMed

27.

Opolski MP, Achenbach SCT. Angiography for revascularization of CTO: crossing the borders of diagnosis and treatment. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(7):846–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.05.001.CrossRefPubMed

28.

De bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(13):1208–17. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1408758.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK. Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(22):2233–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.083.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Nørgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, Seneviratne S, Ko BS, Ito H, et al. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(12):1145–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.043.CrossRef

31.

Gonzalez JA, Lipinski MJ, Flors L, Shaw PW, Kramer CM, Salerno M. Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography, computed tomography perfusion, and computed tomography-fractional flow reserve in functional myocardial ischemia assessment versus invasive fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116(9):1469–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.07.078.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

•• Nørgaard BL, Terkelsen CJ, Mathiassen ON, et al. Coronary CT angiographic and flow reserve-guided management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(18):2123–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.043. This study showed that FFR _CT can be an effective method in differentiating patients with epicardial CAD (FFR _CT cut-off of 0.80) who do not require further diagnostic testing or intervention.CrossRefPubMed

33.

• Neumann FJ, Sousa-uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2018;40:87–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394. Most recent European guidelines for myocardial revascularization.CrossRef

34.

Dweck MR, Puntman V, Vesey AT, Fayad ZA, Nagel E. MR imaging of coronary arteries and plaques. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(3):306–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.12.003.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Finn JP, et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(23):2614–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.011.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, Chaitman BR, Fletcher GF, Froelicher VF, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). Circulation. 2002;106(14):1883–92.

37.

Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, Do D, Partington S, Atwood JE. Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(11):793–801. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa011858.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Bourque JM, Holland BH, Watson DD, Beller GA. Achieving an exercise workload of > or = 10 metabolic equivalents predicts a very low risk of inducible ischemia: does myocardial perfusion imaging have a role? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(6):538–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.042.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Smith L, Myc L, Watson D, Beller GA, Bourque JM. A high exercise workload of ≥ 10 METS predicts a low risk of significant ischemia and cardiac events in older adults. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-1376-7.

40.

• Balfour PC, Gonzalez JA, Shaw PW, Caminero MP, Holland EM, Melson JW, Sobczak M, Izarnotegui V, Watson DD, Beller GA, Bourque JM High-frequency QRS analysis to supplement ST evaluation in exercise stress electrocardiography: incremental diagnostic accuracy and net reclassification. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-01530-w. This study utilized high-frequency QRS analysis to supplement ST evaluation during stress electrocardiography and demonstrated that this technique can be employed to avoid unnecessary imaging in certain patients referred for stress testing.

41.

Metz LD, Beattie M, Hom R, Redberg RF, Grady D, Fleischmann KE. The prognostic value of normal exercise myocardial perfusion imaging and exercise echocardiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(2):227–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.048.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Ottenhof MJ, Wai MC, Boiten HJ, et al. 12-year outcome after normal myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with known coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013;20(5):748–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-013-9713-3.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Pellikka PA, Nagueh SF, Elhendy AA, Kuehl CA, Sawada SG. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(9):1021–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2007.07.003.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 2003;107(23):2900–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000072790.23090.41.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Sorajja P, Chareonthaitawee P, Rajagopalan N, et al. Improved survival in asymptomatic diabetic patients with high-risk SPECT imaging treated with coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation. 2005;112(9 Suppl):I311–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.525022.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Hachamovitch R, Kang X, Amanullah AM, Abidov A, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, et al. Prognostic implications of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in the elderly. Circulation. 2009;120(22):2197–206. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.817387.CrossRef

47.

Agostini D, Marie PY, Ben-haim S, et al. Performance of cardiac cadmium-zinc-telluride gamma camera imaging in coronary artery disease: a review from the cardiovascular committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(13):2423–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3467-5.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Einstein AJ, Blankstein R, Andrews H, Fish M, Padgett R, Hayes SW, et al. Comparison of image quality, myocardial perfusion, and left ventricular function between standard imaging and single-injection ultra-low-dose imaging using a high-efficiency SPECT camera: the MILLISIEVERT study. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(9):1430–7. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.138222.CrossRef

49.

Chang SM, Nabi F, Xu J, Raza U, Mahmarian JJ. Normal stress-only versus standard stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging: similar patient mortality with reduced radiation exposure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(3):221–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.022.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Mc ardle BA, Dowsley TF, Dekemp RA, Wells GA, Beanlands RS. Does rubidium-82 PET have superior accuracy to SPECT perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary disease?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(18):1828–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.038.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Parker MW, Iskandar A, Limone B, Perugini A, Kim H, Jones C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac positron emission tomography versus single photon emission computed tomography for coronary artery disease: a bivariate meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(6):700–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.978270.

52.

Dorbala S, Di carli MF, Beanlands RS, et al. Prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography: results from a multicenter observational registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(2):176–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.043.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Dorbala S, Hachamovitch R, Curillova Z, Thomas D, Vangala D, Kwong RY, et al. Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2(7):846–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.04.009.PubMed

54.

Ziadi MC, Dekemp RA, Williams K, et al. Does quantification of myocardial flow reserve using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography facilitate detection of multivessel coronary artery disease? J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19(4):670–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-011-9506-5.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Naya M, Murthy VL, Taqueti VR, Foster CR, Klein J, Garber M, et al. Preserved coronary flow reserve effectively excludes high-risk coronary artery disease on angiography. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(2):248–55. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.113.121442.CrossRef

56.

Taqueti VR, Hachamovitch R, Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, Hainer J, et al. Global coronary flow reserve is associated with adverse cardiovascular events independently of luminal angiographic severity and modifies the effect of early revascularization. Circulation. 2015;131(1):19–27. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011939.CrossRef

57.

Slomka P, Berman DS, Germano G. Myocardial blood flow from SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24(1):278–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0386-y.CrossRefPubMed

58.

•• Bateman TM, Dilsizian V, Beanlands RS, Depuey EG, Heller GV, Wolinsky DA. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology and Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging joint position statement on the clinical indications for myocardial perfusion PET. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23(5):1227–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-016-0626-9. Very important position statement stating that PET MPI is the preferred and recommended over SPECT MPI in patients requiring pharmacologic stress.CrossRefPubMed

59.

•• Calnon DA. Will ¹⁸F flurpiridaz replace ⁸²rubidium as the most commonly used perfusion tracer for PET myocardial perfusion imaging?. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-1153-z. This paper is a very helpful review regarding the favorable properties of the new perfusion tracer ¹⁸ F flurpiridaz currently undergoing a phase 3 clinical trial. For more information regarding this clinical trial, visit https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03354273.

60.

Bax JJ, Delgado V. Detection of viable myocardium and scar tissue. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(10):1062–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jev200.CrossRefPubMed

61.

Greenwood JP, Motwani M, Maredia N, et al. Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease from the Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary Heart Disease (CE-MARC) trial. Circulation. 2013;129:1129–38.CrossRef

62.

Mordini FE, Haddad T, Hsu LY, Kellman P, Lowrey TB, Aletras AH, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative assessment. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7(1):14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.08.014.PubMed

63.

•• Zorach B, Shaw PW, Bourque J, et al. Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging identifies reduced flow reserve in microvascular coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018;20(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0435-1. This study showed that patients with risk factors for CMD with non-obstructive epicardial CAD on ICA have reduced MPR on CMR MPI compared with healthy controls.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Liu A, Wijesurendra RS, Liu JM, Forfar JC, Channon KM, Jerosch-Herold M, et al. Diagnosis of microvascular angina using cardiac magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(9):969–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.046.CrossRef

65.

Murthy VL, Naya M, Taqueti VR, Foster CR, Gaber M, Hainer J, et al. Effects of sex on coronary microvascular dysfunction and cardiac outcomes. Circulation. 2014;129(24):2518–27. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.008507.CrossRef

66.

Taqueti VR, Shaw LJ, Cook NR, Murthy VL, Shah NR, Foster CR, et al. Excess cardiovascular risk in women relative to men referred for coronary angiography is associated with severely impaired coronary flow reserve, not obstructive disease. Circulation. 2017;135(6):566–77. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023266.CrossRef

67.

Löffler AI, Bourque JM. Coronary microvascular dysfunction, microvascular angina, and management. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016;18(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-015-0682-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

68.

Ragosta M, Beller GA, Watson DD, Kaul S, Gimple LW. Quantitative planar rest-redistribution 201Tl imaging in detection of myocardial viability and prediction of improvement in left ventricular function after coronary bypass surgery in patients with severely depressed left ventricular function. Circulation. 1993;87(5):1630–41.CrossRef

69.

Allman KC, Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R, Udelson JE. Myocardial viability testing and impact of revascularization on prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(7):1151–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01726-6.CrossRefPubMed

70.

Bourque JM, Hasselblad V, Velazquez EJ, Borges-neto S, O’Connor CM. Revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease, left ventricular dysfunction, and viability: a meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2003;146(4):621–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00428-9.CrossRefPubMed

71.

• Patel MR, White RD, Abbara S, et al. 2013 ACCF/ACR/ASE/ASNC/SCCT/SCMR appropriate utilization of cardiovascular imaging in heart failure: a joint report of the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Committee and the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(21):2207–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.005. Most recent AUC document for car diovascular imaging in heart failure.CrossRef

72.

• Bonow RO, Maurer G, Lee KL, Holly TA, Binkley PF, Desvigne-Nickens P, et al. Myocardial viability and survival in ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(17):1617–25. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1100358. The frequently referenced STICH trial showed no differential survival benefit with a strategy of CABG-based revascularization guided by viability testing versus optimal medical therapy.CrossRef

73.

Beanlands RS, Nichol G, Huszti E, Humen D, Racine N, Freeman M, et al. F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging-assisted management of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and suspected coronary disease: a randomized, controlled trial (PARR-2). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(20):2002–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.006.CrossRef

74.

• Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey de Jr, Drazner MH, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(16):e147–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.019. Most recent guidelines for the management of heart failure.CrossRef

75.

• Rizvi A, Han D, Danad I, et al. Diagnostic performance of hybrid cardiac imaging methods for assessment of obstructive coronary artery disease compared with stand-alone coronary computed tomography angiography: a meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(4):589–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.05.020. An important study demonstrating how hybrid cardiac imaging may improve diagnostic specificity for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease compared with stand-alone CCTA.PubMed

76.

• Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Driessen RS, Leipsic J, Raju R, Naoum C, et al. Comparison of coronary CT angiography, SPECT, PET, and hybrid imaging for diagnosis of ischemic heart disease determined by fractional flow reserve. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(10):1100–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2471. This prospective study demonstrated that PET MPI exhibits the highest diagnostic accuracy for diagnosis of myocardial ischemia. The authors suggest that a combined anatomical and functional assessment does not add incremental diagnostic value.CrossRef

Titel: Functional and Anatomical Imaging in Patients with Ischemic Symptoms and Known Coronary Artery Disease
verfasst von: Christopher A. Hanson
Jamieson M. Bourque
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports / Ausgabe 8/2019
Print ISSN: 1523-3782
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-3170
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-019-1155-3

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

„Jeder Fall von plötzlichem Tod muss obduziert werden!“

17.05.2024 Plötzlicher Herztod Nachrichten

Ein signifikanter Anteil der Fälle von plötzlichem Herztod ist genetisch bedingt. Um ihre Verwandten vor diesem Schicksal zu bewahren, sollten jüngere Personen, die plötzlich unerwartet versterben, ausnahmslos einer Autopsie unterzogen werden.

Hirnblutung unter DOAK und VKA ähnlich bedrohlich

17.05.2024 Direkte orale Antikoagulanzien Nachrichten

Kommt es zu einer nichttraumatischen Hirnblutung, spielt es keine große Rolle, ob die Betroffenen zuvor direkt wirksame orale Antikoagulanzien oder Marcumar bekommen haben: Die Prognose ist ähnlich schlecht.

Schlechtere Vorhofflimmern-Prognose bei kleinem linken Ventrikel

17.05.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Nicht nur ein vergrößerter, sondern auch ein kleiner linker Ventrikel ist bei Vorhofflimmern mit einer erhöhten Komplikationsrate assoziiert. Der Zusammenhang besteht nach Daten aus China unabhängig von anderen Risikofaktoren.

Semaglutid bei Herzinsuffizienz: Wie erklärt sich die Wirksamkeit?

17.05.2024 Herzinsuffizienz Nachrichten

Bei adipösen Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz des HFpEF-Phänotyps ist Semaglutid von symptomatischem Nutzen. Resultiert dieser Benefit allein aus der Gewichtsreduktion oder auch aus spezifischen Effekten auf die Herzinsuffizienz-Pathogenese? Eine neue Analyse gibt Aufschluss.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Functional and Anatomical Imaging in Patients with Ischemic Symptoms and Known Coronary Artery Disease

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

„Jeder Fall von plötzlichem Tod muss obduziert werden!“

Hirnblutung unter DOAK und VKA ähnlich bedrohlich

Schlechtere Vorhofflimmern-Prognose bei kleinem linken Ventrikel

Semaglutid bei Herzinsuffizienz: Wie erklärt sich die Wirksamkeit?

Update Kardiologie

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2019

Pathology of the Aortic Valve: Aortic Valve Stenosis/Aortic Regurgitation

Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol After an Acute Coronary Syndrome: How Low to Go?

Effect of SGLT2 Inhibitors on the Sympathetic Nervous System and Blood Pressure

New Insights in the Control of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease

The Onco-cardiologist Dilemma: to Implant, to Defer, or to Avoid Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Cancer Patients with Aortic Stenosis?

Genetics, Dyslipidemia, and Cardiovascular Disease: New Insights

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

„Jeder Fall von plötzlichem Tod muss obduziert werden!“

Hirnblutung unter DOAK und VKA ähnlich bedrohlich

Schlechtere Vorhofflimmern-Prognose bei kleinem linken Ventrikel

Semaglutid bei Herzinsuffizienz: Wie erklärt sich die Wirksamkeit?

Update Kardiologie