Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 4/2010

01.10.2010 | Original Article

Speech Recognition Performance in Children with Cochlear Implants Using Bimodal Stimulation

verfasst von: S. B. Rathna Kumar, P. Mohanty, S. G. R. Prakash

Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Cochlear implantees have considerably good speech understanding abilities in quiet surroundings. But, ambient noise poses significant difficulties in understanding speech for these individuals. Bimodal stimulation is still not used by many Indian implantees in spite of reports that bimodal stimulation is beneficial for speech understanding in noise as compared to cochlear implant alone and also prevents auditory deprivation in the un-implanted ear. The aim of the study is to evaluate the benefits of bimodal stimulation in children in an Indian cochlear implant clinic. A group of 14 children who have been using cochlear implants served as subjects in this study. They were fitted with advanced digital hearing aids in their un-implanted ears to provide bimodal stimulation. Results revealed that bimodal stimulation did not bring greater change in speech scores in quiet surroundings but have shown a noticeable improvement in noisy ambience. Hence the present study suggests that bimodal stimulation would benefit children with cochlear implants especially in adverse listening conditions.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ching TYC (2005) The evidence calls for making binaural-bimodal fittings routine. Hear J 58:32–41 Ching TYC (2005) The evidence calls for making binaural-bimodal fittings routine. Hear J 58:32–41
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ching TYC, Psarros C, Hill M, Dillon H, Incerti P (2001) Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear? Ear Hear 22(5):365–380CrossRefPubMed Ching TYC, Psarros C, Hill M, Dillon H, Incerti P (2001) Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear? Ear Hear 22(5):365–380CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ching TYC, Hill M, Brew J, Incerti P, Priolo S, Rushbrook E, Forsythe L (2005) The effect of auditory experience on speech perception, localization, and functional performance of children who use a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears. Int J Audiol 44:513–520CrossRefPubMed Ching TYC, Hill M, Brew J, Incerti P, Priolo S, Rushbrook E, Forsythe L (2005) The effect of auditory experience on speech perception, localization, and functional performance of children who use a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears. Int J Audiol 44:513–520CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ching TYC, Wanrooy E, Dillon H (2007) Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: a review. Trends Amplif 11(3):161–192CrossRefPubMed Ching TYC, Wanrooy E, Dillon H (2007) Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: a review. Trends Amplif 11(3):161–192CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gifford RH, Dorman MF, McKarns SA & Spahr AJ (2007) Combined electric and contra lateral acoustic hearing: word and sentence recognition with bimodal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res 50(4):835–843CrossRefPubMed Gifford RH, Dorman MF, McKarns SA & Spahr AJ (2007) Combined electric and contra lateral acoustic hearing: word and sentence recognition with bimodal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res 50(4):835–843CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamzavi J, Pok S, Gstoettner W, Baumgartner W (2004) Speech perception with a cochlear implant used in conjunction with a hearing aid in the opposite ear. Int J Audiol 43:61–66CrossRefPubMed Hamzavi J, Pok S, Gstoettner W, Baumgartner W (2004) Speech perception with a cochlear implant used in conjunction with a hearing aid in the opposite ear. Int J Audiol 43:61–66CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Holt RF, Kirk KI, Eisenberg LS, Martinez AS, Campbell W (2005) Spoken word recognition development in children with residual hearing using cochlear implants and hearing aids in opposite ears. Ear Hear 26:82–91CrossRef Holt RF, Kirk KI, Eisenberg LS, Martinez AS, Campbell W (2005) Spoken word recognition development in children with residual hearing using cochlear implants and hearing aids in opposite ears. Ear Hear 26:82–91CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Huart SA, Sammeth CA (2008) Hearing aids plus cochlear implants: Optimizing the bimodal pediatric fitting. Hear J 61:54–58 Huart SA, Sammeth CA (2008) Hearing aids plus cochlear implants: Optimizing the bimodal pediatric fitting. Hear J 61:54–58
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Luntz M, Shpak T, Weiss H (2005) Binaural-bimodal hearing: Concomitant use of a unilateral cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid. Acta Oto-Laryngol 8:863–869CrossRef Luntz M, Shpak T, Weiss H (2005) Binaural-bimodal hearing: Concomitant use of a unilateral cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid. Acta Oto-Laryngol 8:863–869CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez A, Cavella L, Huarte A, Castillo C et al. (2005) Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Acta Oto-Laryngol 125:596–606 Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez A, Cavella L, Huarte A, Castillo C et al. (2005) Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Acta Oto-Laryngol 125:596–606
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nascimento LT, Bevilaqua MC (2005) Evaluation of speech perception in noise in cochlear implanted adults. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 71(4):432–438PubMed Nascimento LT, Bevilaqua MC (2005) Evaluation of speech perception in noise in cochlear implanted adults. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 71(4):432–438PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat RathnaKumar SB (2008) A survey among cochlear implant recipients. An unpublished survey report carried out in Andhra Pradesh, University of Hyderabad RathnaKumar SB (2008) A survey among cochlear implant recipients. An unpublished survey report carried out in Andhra Pradesh, University of Hyderabad
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Seeber BU, Baumann U, Fastl H (2004) In: Huart SA, Sammeth CA (2008) Hearing aids plus cochlear implants: optimizing the bimodal pediatric fitting. Hear J 61:56 Seeber BU, Baumann U, Fastl H (2004) In: Huart SA, Sammeth CA (2008) Hearing aids plus cochlear implants: optimizing the bimodal pediatric fitting. Hear J 61:56
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Shallop JK, Arndt PL, Turnacliff KE (1992) In: Huart SA, Sammeth CA (2008) Hearing aids plus cochlear implants: optimizing the bimodal pediatric fitting. Hear J 61:56 Shallop JK, Arndt PL, Turnacliff KE (1992) In: Huart SA, Sammeth CA (2008) Hearing aids plus cochlear implants: optimizing the bimodal pediatric fitting. Hear J 61:56
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma A, Dorman MF, Kral A (2005) The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants. J Hear Res 203:134–143CrossRef Sharma A, Dorman MF, Kral A (2005) The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants. J Hear Res 203:134–143CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Van der Westhuizen L, Van Dijk C (2007) In: Huart SA, Sammeth CA (2008) Hearing aids plus cochlear implants: optimizing the bimodal pediatric fitting. Hear J 61:56 Van der Westhuizen L, Van Dijk C (2007) In: Huart SA, Sammeth CA (2008) Hearing aids plus cochlear implants: optimizing the bimodal pediatric fitting. Hear J 61:56
Metadaten
Titel
Speech Recognition Performance in Children with Cochlear Implants Using Bimodal Stimulation
verfasst von
S. B. Rathna Kumar
P. Mohanty
S. G. R. Prakash
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2010
Print ISSN: 2231-3796
Elektronische ISSN: 0973-7707
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-010-0050-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2010

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 4/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

16.04.2024 HNO-Chirurgie Nachrichten

Mit Blick auf das Risiko für Komplikationen nach elektiven Eingriffen im HNO-Bereich scheint das Alter der Patienten kein ausschlaggebender Faktor zu sein. Entscheidend ist offenbar, wie fit die Betroffenen tatsächlich sind.

Intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie gewinnt an Boden

16.04.2024 Tonsillektomie Nachrichten

Gegenüber der vollständigen Entfernung der Gaumenmandeln hat die intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie einige Vorteile, wie HNO-Fachleute aus den USA hervorheben. Sie haben die aktuelle Literatur zu dem Verfahren gesichtet.

Bilateraler Hörsturz hat eine schlechte Prognose

15.04.2024 Hörsturz Nachrichten

Die Mehrzahl der Menschen mit Hörsturz ist einseitig betroffen, doch auch ein beidseitiger Hörsturz ist möglich. Wie häufig solche Fälle sind und wie sich ihr Verlauf darstellt, hat eine HNO-Expertenrunde aus den USA untersucht.

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.