Introduction
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a chronic liver disease commonly encountered in clinical practice in Western countries [
1]. There has been a rise in the prevalence of NAFLD in developing countries as well, making NAFLD a more common liver disease worldwide and resulting in a growing global burden of disease [
2]. NAFLD is a general term encompassing a spectrum of liver diseases from hepatosteatosis, steatohepatitis, steatohepatofibrosis to end-stage liver diseases, such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [
1]. Furthermore, it can aggravate glucose and lipid metabolic disorders, giving rise to diabetes, coronary heart disease and other metabolic diseases [
3]. As the pathogenesis of NAFLD is complicated and remains to be further elucidated, there is still no pharmacological treatment with definite curative effects for NAFLD. Lifestyle intervention remains the most important treatment.
In recent years, the role of the tumor suppressor p53 in metabolic diseases has drawn increasing attention. The function of p53 has been studied for years in apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, cell senescence, differentiation and angiogenesis. Recent studies found that p53 also plays an important role in regulating energy metabolism [
4‐
7]. It has been reported that the expression level of p53 in the adipose tissue of hereditary ob/ob obese mice is significantly higher than that of wild-type mice [
8]. In addition, p53 can increase the accumulation of lipid droplets by regulating endoplasmic reticulum stress [
9] and participate in the development of obesity by regulating adipose tissue differentiation [
10]. In addition, p53 is involved in free fatty acid-induced pancreatic beta cell dysfunction and apoptosis [
11]. Moreover, in a high-fat diet (HFD)-induced NAFLD mouse model, the p53 inhibitor attenuated weight gain, alanine aminotransferase levels, hepatosteatosis, oxidative stress and apoptosis compared to the control treatment [
12]. Pharmacological stimulation of p53 ameliorated diet-induced nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [
13]. Together, the results of these studies suggest a close relationship between p53 and NAFLD.
On the other hand, autophagy, which is a natural, regulated mechanism of cell growth, differentiation, survival and homeostasis in eukaryotic cells, also plays an important role in lipid metabolism. During starvation, autophagy pathways in cells are activated to maintain cellular energy metabolism [
14]. Therefore, autophagy activation is a self-protective mechanism. Studies have shown that intracellular lipid droplets colocalize with autophagic lysosomes [
11,
15], while intracellular lipid accumulation is significantly increased in autophagy-deficient cells compared with that in normal cells under the stimulation of fatty acids [
15]. In addition, the activity of autophagy is altered during NAFLD, showing short-term activation and long-term inhibition [
16]. Moreover, several compounds have been proven to be effective in alleviating NAFLD through autophagy activation [
17‐
19].
Previous studies suggested a complex and dual relationship between p53 and autophagy that depended on the activation state, intracellular distribution and mutation of p53 [
20]. P53 pathway has been found to regulate ATG genes such as LC3B and ATG7 [
21]. On the one hand, p53 activation induced autophagy through multiple pathways via AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), damage-regulated autophagy modulator (DRAM) and Sestrin 2 [
22‐
24]. Interestingly, on the other hand, loss of p53 also induced autophagy. In p53-functional HCT116 cells, p53 was found to bind to the HMGB1 protein in the nucleus, and silencing of p53 activated autophagy by promoting the expression of cytosolic HMGB1 and the autophagy modulator Beclin-1 (BCL1) [
25]. Furthermore, the mutation of p53 also affected autophagy through additional regulatory mechanisms [
26‐
28].
Collectively, these published studies suggested the involvement of the p53–autophagy axis in the pathogenesis of NAFLD, although its mechanism remains obscure. In this study, we focused on the effect of functional p53 silencing on hepatic autophagy and NAFLD as well as the associated mechanisms.
Materials and methods
Animals and HFD modeling
p53 heterozygous knockout mice (C57BL/6 background) were purchased from Biocytogen Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Animals were bred and maintained at 23 ± 2 °C with a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle at the Medical Science Institution of Zhejiang Province (Hangzhou, China). The p53 genotypes of the offspring mice were identified by the methods used by the facility (Supplementary Figure 1). Male adult wild-type (p53
+/+) and knockout (p53
−/−) mice weighing 19–23 g were randomly separated into two groups. For mice of both genotypes, the mice were randomly divided into two groups that were fed either a standard chow diet (SCD) provided by the Medical Science Institution of Zhejiang Province (Hangzhou, China) or a high-fat diet (D12492; Research Diets, New Brunswick, NJ, USA) for 8 weeks (
n = 6). During the study, mice were given free access to water. The mice were killed, and the liver samples were separated and fixed in 10% neutral formalin or rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen for further analysis. The fixed liver samples were embedded in paraffin, sectioned and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for histological examination according to the morphological criteria described previously [
29]. The liver samples were analyzed with a transmission electron microscope (HT7700, Hitachi, Japan) after being fixed in 2.5% malondialdehyde. All institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals were followed.
Glucose tolerance test (GTT) and insulin tolerance test (ITT)
For GTT, the mice were fasted for 16 h in advance in the 6th week of modeling. For ITT, the mice were fasted for 6 h in advance in the 7th week of modeling. A blank blood sample was taken from the tail end at time 0 to test the glycemic index using commercial test strips. The mice were then intraperitoneally injected with glucose (1 g/kg) for GTT or insulin (1 U/kg) for ITT, and blood samples were collected and tested to determine the glycemic index at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after injection. Feeding was resumed immediately after the experiment.
Cell culture, PA modeling and drug treatment
HepG2 and Huh7 cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 100 U penicillin/streptomycin under 5% CO2 at 37 °C. The cells were seeded overnight to allow them to adhere to the plate. PA was dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 25% BSA and added to the cell culture medium, followed by 24 h of incubation before harvest. For the evaluation of autophagic flux, the cells were treated with 10 μM chloroquine for 4 h.
Cell transfection
Lipofectamine RNAiMAX reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA) was used for siRNA transfection according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The siRNAs were synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and the cells were transfected with the siRNAs at a final concentration of 50 μM and maintained for 48 h until harvest. The sequences of the siRNAs are as follows: NC (forward: UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGU dTdT, reverse: ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAA dTdT); human p53 (forward: CACUACAACUACAUGUGUA dTdT, reverse: UACACAUGUAGUUGUAGUG dTdT); human HMGB1 (forward: CUGAUGCAGCUUAUACGAA dTdT, reverse: UUCGUAUAAGCUGCAUCAG dTdT); mouse p53 (forward: GUAAACGCUUCGAGAUGUU dTdT, reverse: AACAUCUCGAAGCGUUUAC dTdT); mouse Hmgb1 (forward: AUGCAGCUUAUACGAAGAUAA dTdT, reverse: UUAUCUUCGUAUAAGCUGCAU dTdT). Lipofectamine 3000 reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for plasmid transfection, and 2 μg plasmids were transfected into each well (6-well plate). The pEGFP-LC3 plasmid was a generous gift from Professor Min Zheng (Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China).
Mouse primary hepatocyte isolation and culture
Hepatocytes from male p53 wild-type or null mice (8 weeks) were isolated using a two-step perfusion and collagenase digestion method as described previously [
30]. The isolated cells were seeded on plates coated with rat tail collagen (Yisheng Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) and cultured in DMEM (supplemented with 10% FBS and 100 U penicillin/streptomycin) for the first 4 h, and then the medium was exchanged (DMEM/F12 without FBS) until harvest.
Triglyceride (TG) determination
The hepatic and intracellular TG levels were analyzed using a commercial kit (E1013-105, Applygen Technologies, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the liver tissues or collected cells were treated with lysis buffer on ice. The homogenates or lysates were incubated at 70 °C for 10 min and then centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 min at room temperature. The supernatant was assessed with the relevant working solution. The protein concentration in the resulting lysates was determined using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (P1513, Applygen Technologies Inc.). The TG values were normalized according to the total protein levels.
Oil red O (ORO) staining
Cryosections of liver tissues or cell slides were stained with oil red O according to a standard protocol (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China). The results were examined using a Leica DM5000B microscope (Leica, Heidelberg, Germany). The data shown were obtained from one representative experiment with three independent replicates.
Immunochemistry
Paraffinized liver sections were deparaffinized with xylene and rehydrated, followed by incubation with 3% hydrogen peroxide. Heat epitope retrieval was performed in target retrieval solution at pH 7.5 for 20 min. The sections were preblocked with 10% goat serum (ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China) and then incubated with HMGB1 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA) at a dilution of 1:100 overnight at 4°C. Tissue sections were stained with HPR secondary antibody (dilution: 1:100, ZSGB-BIO) for 1 h at 37 °C in an incubator. Immunoreactivity was detected using a DAB kit (ZLI-9017, ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China) and visualized as brown staining. Slides were counterstained with hematoxylin. The data shown were obtained from one representative experiment with three independent replicates.
Immunofluorescent staining
Cells were seeded onto rat tail collagen-coated cover glasses (in a 24-well plate). The cell slides were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and incubated with 0.3% Triton X-100. Then, the cells were incubated in goat serum solution (ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China) for 30 min at room temperature, followed by incubation with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight and a secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L Alexa Fluor 488/594 ab150077/ab150080, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at room temperature for 1 h. DAPI staining (1 μg/ml, Thermo Fisher) was performed immediately before mounting. Images were captured with an Olympus IX81-FV1000 confocal microscope. For the liver slides, the first few steps were the same until the overnight primary antibody incubation was performed, and the subsequent steps were the same as those used for the cell slides described above. The data shown were obtained from one representative experiment with three independent replicates.
Total RNA extraction and qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from the liver tissues or cultured cells using RNAiso Plus reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (TaKaRa Biotech, Kyoto, Japan), followed by random reverse transcription to cDNA using the PrimeScript RT reagent kit DRR036A (TaKaRa Biotech). Quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis was performed using the SYBR Premix Ex Taq II kit RR820A (TaKaRa Biotech) on a CFX96 real-time PCR system (Bio-rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene was included with each run for the normalization expression. The gene-specific primer sequences were as follows (5′–3′): human GAPDH (forward: TCAACGACCACTTTGTCAAGCTCA, reverse: GCTGGTGGTCCAGGGGTCTTACT); human p53 (forward: GAGGTTGGCTCTGACTGTACC, reverse: TCCGTCCCAGTAGATTACCAC); human HMGB1 (forward: TATGGCAAAAGCGGACAAGG; reverse: CTTCGCAACATCACCAATGGA); mouse Gapdh (forward: AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG, reverse: GGGGTCGTTGATGGCAACA); mouse p53 (forward: AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG, reverse: GGGGTCGTTGATGGCAACA); and mouse Hmgb1 (forward: AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG, reverse: GGGGTCGTTGATGGCAACA).
Protein extraction and western blot
Total proteins were extracted from liver tissues or cultured cells using RIPA assay lysis buffer (Applygen Technologies, Beijing, China) and quantified using the BCA Protein Assay (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China). Nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins were extracted using a commercial kit (P1201, Applygen Technologies, Beijing, China). Forty micrograms of protein extract was separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and electrophoretically transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (0.2 μM, Millipore, MA). Then the membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk in Tris-buffered saline at room temperature and incubated at 4 °C overnight with primary antibodies, including GAPDH (#2118), ACTB (#4970), LC3 (#4108), Beclin1 (#3495), HMGB1 (#6893), and LaminB1 (#13435) from Cell Signaling Technology, p53(ab26) from Abcam, p21(556430) from BD (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), and P62 (#PM045) from MBL International (Woburn, MA, USA). Incubation with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (Dawen Biotec, Hangzhou, China) was performed for 1 h at room temperature. Specific bands were visualized using an ECL detection kit (P0018, Beyotime, Jiangsu, China) and photographed with a ChemiScope 6000 Pro Touch (Clinx Science Instruments, Shanghai, China). The data shown were obtained from one representative experiment with three independent replicates.
Statistics
The data were expressed as the mean ± SEM and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison post hoc test or an unpaired Student’s t test was used for the statistical analysis. Only the comparisons indicated above the bars were performed, and differences were considered significant if the probability (p value) was less than 0.05 (p < 0.05).
Discussion
Here, we identified and characterized a novel HMGB1-mediated autophagy pathway involved in the regulatory mechanism of p53 in NAFLD. We investigated the effect of functional p53 silencing on hepatic autophagy and NAFLD in vitro and in vivo and demonstrated the association between hepatic autophagy and lipid accumulation. We found that HMGB1 is a key protein mediating p53 function and regulating autophagy. The ameliorating effect of p53 silencing on NAFLD and its inductive effect on autophagy were counteracted when HMGB1 was knocked down, as we demonstrated in both primary hepatocytes and HepG2 cells. Due to limited resources, we did not utilize double knockout mice to investigate the role of HMGB1. Interestingly, in the livers of mice without HFD modeling, p53-null mice exhibited decreased TG levels and reduced lipid accumulation, indicating that p53 loss could alter physiological hepatic lipid metabolism.
Mutation of p53, a well-known tumor suppressor, in humans and its loss in mice contribute to tumorigenesis. In our study, HepG2 cells present a WT p53, whereas Huh7 are cells with a mutant p53 gene (C220T,
https://p53.free.fr/). Interestingly, our study demonstrated that silencing of functional p53 could ameliorate NAFLD, a metabolic disease, which indicated a close but complicated link between lipid metabolism and cancer. In general, p53 mutation leads to the alteration of the normal biological function of p53, mainly in anti-tumor functions. Importantly, the mutation R172H of p53 can affect hepatosteatosis [
31]. Similarly, in our study, the mutant p53 in Huh7 cells also exhibited different regulation pattern from normal p53, which was probably caused by the impaired binding of mutated p53 to HMGB1. As a result, p53 knockdown resulted in neither the intracellular translocation of HMGB1 nor induced autophagy in Huh7 cells. These results suggested that p53 mutation should be considered a strategy to exploit p53 silencing in clinical practice to combat NAFLD.
The interaction of p53 and HMGB1 was first discovered in colon-derived HCT116 cells [
25] and confirmed in the current study to also occur in liver-derived cells. We found that p53 knockout/knockdown caused HMGB1 to translocate from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and to induce BCL1 expression, eventually promoting autophagy.
Interestingly, the signaling molecule HMGB1 has been demonstrated to be a “dangerous factor” in the pathogenesis of NAFLD. HMGB1 expression is elevated in NAFLD mouse livers, and inhibition of HMGB1 protects against NAFLD [
32,
33]. In our study, we also observed the protective effect of HMGB1 knockdown on PA-induced TG elevation in primary hepatocytes and HepG2 cells. However, the reported mechanism of the function of HMGB1 in NAFLD is associated with the TLR4 pathway [
34]. Thus, the role that HMGB1 plays in the development of NAFLD through the autophagy pathway has not yet been reported. In this study, we observed alternative expression of p62 and LC3II following HMGB1 knockdown in primary hepatocytes and HepG2 cells, strongly suggesting a potential novel mechanism involving HMGB1 in NAFLD that requires further investigation.
In addition, degradation of p62 and an increase in LC3II/LC3I expression were found in both the livers of HFD-fed wild-type mice and PA-treated HepG2 cells in our study (Supplementary Figure 7a, b), in accordance with the reported promotion of autophagy in a short-term NAFLD model [
16,
35]. Considering the protective role of autophagy against NAFLD, activation of autophagy can be a compensatory mechanism for hepatocytes to process excess intracellular lipids. P53 silencing upregulates autophagy at the basal level to accelerate the disposal of excess lipids, and the activation of autophagy is a process secondary to HFD modeling. A similar situation also applies to HepG2 cells. On the other hand, in wild-type mouse livers and HepG2 cells, NAFLD modeling resulted in p53 activation (Supplementary Figure 7a, b), in accordance with previous studies [
36‐
38]. Scores of studies have demonstrated that multiple pathways are involved in p53 activation to induce autophagy, such as the AMPK/mTOR, DRAM and SESEN2 pathways. Interestingly, p53 activation could also lead to autophagy arrest [
39]. Therefore, the effect of activated p53 on autophagy during NAFLD can be complicated. We cannot identify whether the activation of autophagy by NAFLD modeling is a result of p53 activation or just a compensatory process. Therefore, the functional mechanism of p53 activation in NAFLD requires further research. What’s more, a recently published study proves the reciprocal regulation of autophagy on p53 [
40]. So it is also interesting to further discover this possible regulation pattern in NAFLD.
In summary, we have demonstrated that the functional silencing of p53 plays an important role in protecting against NAFLD by activating autophagy in vivo and in vitro via the HMGB1 pathway. These findings are especially noteworthy for developing a NAFLD therapeutic strategy utilizing the pharmacological inhibition of p53. Since there is still no drug therapy for NAFLD, understanding the mechanisms can provide insight useful for identifying therapeutic targets and developing drugs for the treatment of NAFLD.
Compliance with ethical standards
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.