Introduction
MRE protocol
Parameter | (1) True FISP | (2) Cine True FISP | (3) Diffusion | (4) T1 volumetric fat-saturated sequencea, b | (5) HASTEb | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Axial | Coronal | Coronal | Axial | Axial | Coronal | Axial | Coronalc | |
TR/TE (ms) | 4.09/1.77 | 4.19/2.1 | 74/1.48 | 5,600/82 | 5.43/2.41 | 5.43/2.36 | 900/83 | 1,000/217 |
Flip angle (degrees) | 53 | 70 | 63 | – | 10 | 10 | 150 | 139 |
Field of view (mm) | 400 | 450 | 450 | 350 | 400 | 450 | 400 | 400 |
Parallel imaging factor | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Section thickness (mm) | 4 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 5 |
Intersection gap (mm) | 0 | 3 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of sections per stack | 50 | 20 | 18 | 40-60 | 64 | 64 | 20 | 20 |
Breath-hold time per stack | 18 | 14 | Free breathing | Free breathing | 18 | 14 | 18 | 22 |
Number of stacks | 2 or 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 or 3 | 1 | 2 or 3 | 1 or 2 |
Bandwidth (Hz) | 454 | 488 | 965 | 1302 | 300 | 300 | 416 | 130 |
Rationale for MR sequences used in MRE
Comparison with other imaging techniques
Imaging Modality | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Barium follow-through | Good depiction of early bowel disease compared to CTE/MRE | Radiation burden; time consuming, operator and patient dependent leading to limited sensitivity; difficulty in assessing extramural complications |
Ultrasound | No radiation; may show terminal ileal disease well | Operator and patient dependent; comprehensive examination is not possible; time consuming |
CTE | Fast (< 5 mins); greater spatial resolution than MRE; multiplanar reformats are possible; mural and extramural complications are seen | Radiation burden; early disease is not well seen; cine imaging is not possible |
MRE | No radiation; high soft tissue contrast; multiplanar ability; shows mural and extramural complications; defines activity of disease; cine imaging is possible; can combine with perianal imaging | Longer scan time than CTE (20 mins); early disease is not well seen; suboptimal distention of proximal small bowel |
Enteroclysis (barium/CT/MRI) | Very good distension; can identify early ulceration, wall thickening, fistulae, sinus tracts | Radiation burden; invasive; time consuming |
Nuclear medicine techniquesa | Similar diagnostic accuracy to CTE and MRE | Radiation burden; time consuming; poor localisation (unless PET-CT) |
Balloon enteroscopy | Evaluate small bowel mucosa; biopsy is possible | Requires sedation/anesthesia; extramural complications not assessed; risk of pancreatitis, bleeding, small bowel perforation |
Capsule endoscopy | Evaluate small bowel mucosa | Cannot use in stricturing disease; battery exhaustion; poor localisation; extramural complications are not assessed |
Problem-solving in small bowel CD
Extent of bowel involvement at first presentation
Distinction between active inflammatory and stricturing disease
Features on MRE | Active inflammation | Fibrostenotic disease |
---|---|---|
Mural thickness | Moderate | Mild |
Mural enhancement | Avid | Mild |
Stratified mural enhancement | Yes | Variable |
Mural oedema | Yes | Mild/absent |
Increased mesenteric vascularity/adenopathy | Yes | No |
Mesenteric phlegmon, abscess | Present in penetrating disease | No |
Fistulae | Present in penetrating disease | Sometimes present |
Fibrofatty proliferation | Sometimes present | Yes |