Imaging findings of the orbital and intracranial complications of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis

The transition from uncomplicated URI to acute bacterial rhinosinusitis is not straightforward. There is considerable overlap between the symptoms and clinical findings of both entities. Imaging has not been shown to be helpful in distinguishing acute bacterial rhinosinusitis from viral URI. In children younger than 3 years with untreated, uncomplicated, rhinosinusitis or in patients of any age who have an uncomplicated cold for less than 10 days, imaging is not indicated [1, 5]. Especially in the paediatric population soft tissue swelling of the paranasal sinuses on CT and MRI is very common. Extensive mucosal thickening is present in up to 68 % of cases [13, 14]. Generally, rhinosinusitis is a diagnosis based on clinical symptoms. However, distinguishing self-limiting infection from rhinosinusitis with orbital or intracranial complications can be challenging. If complications are clinically suspected contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) and/or MRI (ceMRI) of the paranasal sinuses should be obtained [1]. To date, there are no head-to-head comparisons of the diagnostic accuracy of ceCT to ceMRI in evaluation of complicated rhinosinusitis in children. Since bony sinus anatomy can be best depicted by CT, CT is often the imaging modality of first choice [15]. In addition CT is widely available, fast, and provides high spatial resolution images. Because of the speed of the acquisition, sedation is usually not required. An important disadvantage of ceCT is the use of ionizing radiation. Especially in children, exposure to radiation should be kept at a minimum. An important disadvantage of ceMRI is that it requires patient sedation in young children. In addition, MRI may not be available around the clock in all hospitals. However, some reports have illustrated that abnormalities responsible for the clinical symptoms are better seen on ceMRI. This seems to be especially true for intracranial complications [16, 17]. In patients that do not require sedation, ceMRI may be preferred over ceCT. If ceCT shows no abnormalities, but the patient has persisting symptoms suspicious for orbital or intracranial complications ceMRI should be obtained [1].

The acquisition of an orbital ceCT at our institution is done with 0.9 mm slice thickness, 0.45 mm increment, 120 kV, 55 mAs, 140 FOV, and a 512 × 512 matrix. The CT is acquired 2 minutes after manual injection of 100 ml of iodinated contrast material. Two mm thick axial and coronal slices are reconstructed using filtered backprojection with a soft tissue kernel. In addition, multiplanar reconstructions can be made in any plane from the thin slice source data.

An MRI protocol of the orbit should comprise at least coronal T2 STIR, axial T1, and axial and coronal T1 SPIR after gadolinium with a slice thickness of 3 mm or less and a pixel size of 1 mm or less [18]. In addition diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has shown to be helpful in the evaluation of orbital infection [19].

The MRI protocol for intracranial complications should in addition to contrast enhanced T1 weighted (T1w) images comprise DWI, and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images. DWI is known to be highly sensitive to pus formation and FLAIR can be helpful in detecting oedema and leptomeningitis [20‐22].

The orbital complications of rhinosinusitis have been classified by Chandler et al. into five categories: 1) preseptal cellulitis; 2) orbital cellulitis; 3) subperiosteal abscess; 4) orbital abscess; and 5) cavernous sinus thrombosis [23]. Chandler 1 to 3 is primarily treated with intravenous antibiotics. However, if the patient develops loss of vision or shows progressive signs of systemic disease within 24-48 hours, additional functional endoscopic sinus surgery will be performed [24]. Chandler 4 and 5 are directly treated with functional endoscopic sinus surgery and orbital drainage in addition to intravenous antibiotics. In case of cavernous sinus thrombosis anticoagulation therapy can be applied. This is however controversial since intracranial haemorrhage may occur [25].

Preseptal cellulitis refers to swelling of the eyelid due to inflammatory oedema anterior to the orbital septum. The eyelid is usually not painful, there is no chemosis, and extraocular muscle movement and vision are not impaired. On CT, preseptal cellulitis is seen as thickening and infiltration of the eyelid (Fig. 3). Formation of a preseptal cellulitis in preseptal abscess is rare [10]. In these cases CT images will show a preseptal fluid collection with a thick enhancing rim (Fig. 4).

Orbital cellulitis refers to oedema and inflammation of the orbital contents without abscess formation. Proptosis and impaired eye movement are reliable signs of orbital cellulitis. Also chemosis is usually present. At this stage loss of vision is still rare [8, 10]. The vision should, however, be monitored. On CT, orbital cellulitis results in smudging of the intraorbital fat usually in combination with preseptal cellulitis (Fig. 5). If the CT findings are unclear and orbital cellulitis is still suspected, MRI may be of help. Especially fat saturated T2 weighted MR sequences (like STIR) are highly sensitive to inflammatory changes in the orbit and should be included in every MRI protocol for orbital imaging. In addition, DWI can aid in the differentiation between orbital cellulitis and entities with overlapping imaging characteristics like orbital inflammatory syndrome and lymphoid lesions [26].

Subperiosteal abscess refers to abscess formation between the bone, usually the medial or superior orbital wall, and the periorbita. The abscess collection can displace the orbital content, thereby causing proptosis and impaired extraocular muscle movement. Again, chemosis is usually present. Vision is usually not affected [8]. On CT, subperiosteal abscess can be hard to detect especially at an early stage. The orbital fat adjacent to the medial orbital wall should be impeccable. Any soft tissue density at this site in the presence of a fluid-filled paranasal sinus is suspicious for subperiosteal abscess formation [27, 28]. Once the abscess becomes larger it will appear as a fluid-filled crescent shaped mass with rim enhancement. Since the abscess is positioned below the periosteum, the angles between the mass and the orbital wall will typically be obtuse (Fig. 6).

Orbital abscess refers to pus within the orbital content, resulting from progression of orbital cellulitis or rupture of a subperiosteal abscess. Orbital abscess results in severe proptosis, ophthalmoplegia, and often loss of vision [3, 8]. In patients with bacterial rhinosinusitis the abscess will usually be extraconal. On CT, orbital abscess can be seen as a rim-enhancing fluid collection that has sharp angles with the orbital wall (Fig. 7) [28].

On ceMRI, both subperiosteal and orbital abscesses are seen as T1 isointense, T2 hyperintense fluid collections with rim enhancement. In addition, the presence of pus will result in restricted diffusion on DWI [19].

Cavernous sinus thrombosis is both classified as an orbital and intracranial complication [1]. It is a result of infectious spread from the orbit through valveless veins [8, 12]. In patients with cavernous sinus thrombosis the classical symptoms are ptosis, proptosis, chemosis, and cranial nerve palsies [29]. The diagnosis can be made both with ceCT and ceMRI (Figs. 8 and 9). If cavernous sinus thrombosis is bilateral, it can be easily missed. The best clue to the presence of a cavernous sinus thrombosis is a filling defect in the sinus that does not represent fat. Fatty deposition in the cavernous sinus is a normal finding that may be more prominent in obese patients or patients with hypercortisolism [30]. In addition to filling defects, a convex margin of the sinus can be seen as a result of mass effect. Since thrombus can have varying signal intensity on MRI, the diagnosis can be challenging on MRI [31]. Subacute thrombus often has high signal intensity on both T1w as well as T2w images [32]. Susceptibility weighted images are particularly useful in visualizing the paramagnetic blood breakdown products of venous thrombi with very high sensitivity [31]. Some thrombi show diffusion restriction on DWI, this finding is however not very specific [31, 33]. Additional helpful findings on MRI are increased dural enhancement along the lateral borders of the cavernous sinus and ipsilateral tentorium [30]. On both ceCT and ceMRI, dilatation or a filling defect of the superior ophthalmic vein can be another important clue to the diagnosis (Fig. 9).

Besides cavernous sinus thrombosis, intracranial complications that can occur in patients with acute bacterial rhinosinusitis are: subdural empyema, epidural empyema, cerebritis, brain abscess, and meningitis [2]. Patients usually present with severe headache in combination with photophobia, seizures, or other focal neurologic findings [4]. If intracranial complications occur, functional endoscopic sinus surgery is mandatory. In the presence of empyema and brain abscess, neurosurgical intervention is required.

Intracranial complications, other than cavernous sinus thrombosis, are often secondary to frontal sinusitis. As mentioned earlier, frontal sinusitis can spread to the anterior cranial fossa directly through bony dehiscences or through osteomyelitis of the frontal bone. In rare cases, osteomyelitis of the frontal bone spreads outward and results in subperiosteal abscess (Pott’s puffy tumour) [34]. The subperiosteal abscess can present with a tender swelling on the forehead in a patient with frontal sinusitis. CT and MRI will show a subperiosteal fluid collection overlying the frontal bone (Fig. 10). Communication between the fluid collection and frontal sinus can usually be seen.

Infectious spread from the frontal sinus to the anterior cranial fossa primarily results in subdural and epidural empyema. These two entities present as extra-axial fluid collections between the skull and the brain parenchyma. The fluid collections will typically show an enhancing rim. In addition, there will be mass effect on the adjacent brain and reactive oedema [21]. Differentiation between a subdural and an epidural empyema can be difficult. In patients with rhinosinusitis these are often located adjacent to the falx cerebri. If the empyema crosses the falx anteriorly, this is indicative of an epidural location (Fig. 11a). If it stays on one side of the falx and even runs posteriorly along the falx, it lies subdurally (Fig. 11b). On MRI, pus containing fluid collections will show diffusion restriction on DWI allowing differentiation from hygroma [20].

If the infection spreads from the extra-axial space to the brain parenchyma, focal cerebritis and later brain abscess can develop. At an early stage, this can be hard to detect with CT. The ceCT may only show focal hypodensity with mass effect (Fig. 12a) and sometimes patchy enhancement. T2w sequences and FLAIR are more sensitive in detecting focal oedema (Fig. 12b) and early abscess formation, which is seen as increased signal intensity [21]. If a full blown abscess has formed, a fluid collection with a well-defined enhancing rim with mass effect and pronounced swelling of the surrounding brain parenchyma can be seen both on CT and MRI (Fig. 13). Similar to extra-axial pus collections, pus within a brain abscess will show restricted diffusion.

Meningitis is even more difficult to detect on CT, and MRI should be obtained if this diagnosis is sought for. At an early stage, MRI may be normal. On contrast enhanced images, abnormal meningeal enhancement may be seen of both pachymeninges and leptomeninges (Fig. 14). On FLAIR images a high signal extending into the sulci may be seen as a result of the thickened, oedematous meninges and arachnoid [21, 22, 35]. Meningitis may further be complicated by adjacent brain oedema, focal ischemic injury, and hydrocephalus [36]. Ischemia is best seen on DWI, showing restricted diffusion in the brain parenchyma. In some cases, purulent exudate can form in the subarachnoid space, which will also cause restricted diffusion [20].