nach oben

Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2010 | Research article

Role of interferon-gamma release assays in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in patients with advanced HIV infection

verfasst von: Adithya Cattamanchi, Isaac Ssewenyana, J Lucian Davis, Laurence Huang, William Worodria, Saskia den Boon, Samuel Yoo, Alfred Andama, Philip C Hopewell, Huyen Cao

Erschienen in: BMC Infectious Diseases | Ausgabe 1/2010

Abstract

Background

T-cell interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) may have a role in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis when evaluating patients for whom standard microbiology has limited sensitivity. Our objective was to examine the accuracy of a commercial IGRA for diagnosis of active tuberculosis in HIV-infected persons.

Methods

We enrolled HIV-infected patients admitted to Mulago Hospital in Kampala, Uganda with cough ≥ 2 weeks. All patients underwent standard medical evaluation. We collected peripheral blood specimens at enrollment and performed a commercial, ELISPOT-based IGRA according to the manufacturer's recommendations. IGRA sensitivity and specificity were determined using mycobacterial culture results as the reference standard.

Results

Overall, 236 patients were enrolled. The median CD4+ T-lymphocyte count was 49 cells/μl and 126 (53%) patients were diagnosed with active pulmonary tuberculosis. IGRAs were not performed in 24 (10%) patients due to insufficient mononuclear cell counts. In the remaining 212 patients, results were indeterminate in 54 (25%). IGRAs were positive in 95 of 158 (60%) patients with interpretable results. The proportion of positive test results was similar across CD4+ count strata. IGRA sensitivity was 73% and specificity 54%. IGRA results did not meaningfully alter the probability of active tuberculosis in patients with negative sputum smears.

Conclusions

An ELISPOT-based IGRA detected a high prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection in a hospitalized population of tuberculosis suspects with advanced HIV/AIDS but had limited utility for diagnosis of active tuberculosis in a high prevalence setting. Further research is needed to identify stronger and more specific immune responses in patients with active tuberculosis.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2334-10-75) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

AC conceived of the study, participated in study design, conducted the data analysis, and drafted the manuscript. IS coordinated the immunoassays and helped draft the manuscript. JLD participated in data analysis and helped draft the manuscript. LH helped conceive of the study and participated in drafting the manuscript. WW participated in design of the study and obtained regulatory approvals. SD supervised study enrollment. SY participated in study design. AA supervised specimen collection and processing. PB collected and processed specimens. PH helped with design of the study. HC helped conceive of the study, helped coordinate the immunoassays, and helped draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Background

T-cell interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) measure interferon-gamma release by sensitized T-lymphocytes stimulated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. TB)-specific antigens. Though IGRAs are highly accurate for diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) [1], their use as a diagnostic tool for active tuberculosis (TB) poses several challenges. IGRAs measure the host immune response to M. TB rather than the presence or absence of the organism in clinical specimens. In addition, IGRAs cannot distinguish an immune response to current active TB from an immune response to prior disease or latent infection [2]. However, standard microbiologic tests (smear microscopy, nucleic acid amplification tests, and mycobacterial culture) also have well known limitations, particularly in patients co-infected with HIV [3, 4]. Such patients more commonly present with atypical clinical and radiographic findings and pauci-bacillary disease [5]. The consequences of missing a diagnosis are also greater, as the disease is more likely to progress rapidly [6].

We hypothesized that the high sensitivity of IGRAs for detecting M. TB infection may help clinicians rule out a diagnosis of active TB in patients co-infected with HIV. In previous studies of HIV-infected adults, the sensitivity of commercial IGRAs for diagnosing active TB has ranged from 85-93%. [7‐10] However, none of these studies were conducted in high TB prevalence settings or in patients with advanced HIV-related immunosuppression. In addition, the clinical utility of IGRAs in smear-negative TB suspects has not been assessed adequately. In smear-negative patients, a negative IGRA result might decrease the probability of TB sufficiently to allow clinicians to withhold empiric TB therapy and/or pursue alternative diagnoses.

To address our hypothesis, we conducted a prospective, blinded evaluation of T-SPOT.TB ^® (Oxford Immunotec, Oxford, UK), an FDA-approved, enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT)-based IGRA, for the diagnosis of pulmonary TB in HIV-infected TB suspects admitted to Mulago Hospital in Kampala, Uganda. We chose to evaluate an ELISPOT-based IGRA due to higher sensitivity compared with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based tests. [11‐13]

Methods

Study population

We screened consecutive patients admitted to the medical wards of Mulago Hospital in Kampala, Uganda to identify those persons presenting with cough ≥ 2 weeks duration (defined as pulmonary TB suspects). We enrolled all pulmonary TB suspects who were HIV-infected, not on anti-TB treatment, and provided informed consent. We excluded patients from this analysis if sputum acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear results were unavailable or TB status could not be established due to mycobacterial culture contamination (at least two negative cultures were required to exclude TB). Institutional review boards at Makerere University, Mulago Hospital, the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology, and the University of California, San Francisco approved the study protocol.

Patient evaluation

All patients underwent standard medical evaluation. We collected sputum specimens at enrollment (on the morning after hospital admission) and on the subsequent morning for AFB smear examination (direct Ziehl-Neelsen microscopy) and Lowenstein-Jensen culture, as previously described [14]. All patients with negative AFB microscopy results underwent bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) if referred by the treating ward physician. Trained laboratory technicians examined BAL samples for the presence of mycobacteria (AFB smear examination and Lowenstein-Jensen culture), Pneumocystis jirovecii, and other fungi [15]. We determined CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts in all enrolled patients.

T-SPOT.TB assays

We performed and interpreted all assays according to the manufacturer's recommendations. At the time of enrollment, a study officer collected approximately 16 mL of blood for the T-SPOT.TB assay in anticoagulant-citrate-dextrose tubes. Trained laboratory technicians at the Joint Clinical Research Centre (JCRC) who were blinded to patients' clinical status processed all blood samples within 6 hours of collection. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated using ficoll-hypaque gradient centrifugation and cell count and viability were determined using a Guava automated counter (Guava Technologies, Hayward, CA). IGRAs were performed only when PBMC viability was greater than 80%. Spots were counted using an automated ELISPOT reader (Immunospot Analyzer, Cellular Technologies, Ltd. Cleveland, OH). We considered IGRA results to be positive if: 1) the negative control had < 5 spots and wells stimulated with test Panel A (containing ESAT-6 antigen) or Panel B (containing CFP-10 antigen) had 6 or more spots or 2) the negative control had 5-10 spots and wells stimulated with test Panel A or Panel B had at least twice the number of spots in the negative control. We considered IGRA results to be indeterminate if the negative control spot count was > 10 (high background) or if the positive mitogen control spot count was < 20.

Outcome classification

We defined the reference standard for active TB as a positive mycobacterial culture result on any sputum or BAL fluid specimen (culture-positive TB). Cultures were interpreted without knowledge of IGRA results.

Quality control

The JCRC laboratory is the central laboratory for the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded HIV Vaccine Prevention Trials Network, and the technicians have over 10 years of experience performing ELISPOT assays. Study investigators (AC and HC) received on-site training in the performance of the T-SPOT.TB assay from the manufacturer. These investigators conducted T-SPOT.TB training of JCRC technicians and supervised the T-SPOT.TB assays for the study.

Statistical analysis

We performed bivariate analyses using the chi-squared test for dichotomous variables and the Mann-Whitney rank-sum test for continuous variables. We calculated sensitivity and specificity of all diagnostic tests using mycobacterial culture results as a reference standard. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of sputum AFB smear and IGRA using McNemar's test. To determine the clinical utility of IGRAs for the diagnosis of active pulmonary TB, we determined the post-test probability of TB. In this analysis, we considered the pre-test probability of TB to be equal to the TB prevalence in the study population. We then calculated likelihood ratios for positive and negative IGRA results as the proportion of patients with a given result in those with disease over the proportion of patients with the result in those without disease. Finally, we determined the post-test probability of TB by converting the pre-test probability of TB to odds, multiplying by the likelihood ratio, and converting the resulting post-test odds back to probability. We performed all analyses using STATA 10.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas), with the level of significance specified in reference to a two-tailed, type I error (p-value) less than 0.05.

Results

Study population

Of 244 eligible patients enrolled, 8 (3%) were excluded from the analysis because either AFB smear results were unavailable (n = 4) or mycobacterial cultures were contaminated (n = 4) (Figure 1). Baseline characteristics (gender, age, antiretroviral use, CD4+ T-lymphocyte count were not significantly different between excluded and included patients (p > 0.2 for all comparisons).

The reference standard outcome of culture-positive TB was confirmed in 126 of 236 (53%) patients (Table 1). The diagnosis was confirmed by sputum culture in 123 patients and BAL fluid culture in 3 patients. CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts were below 200 cells/μl in greater than 75% of patients overall. However, median CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts were approximately twice as high in patients without TB compared to those with TB (75 cells/μl vs. 39 cells/μl, p = 0.01). Baseline characteristics were otherwise similar between the two groups.

Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics.

Characteristic	Overall (N = 236)	Tuberculosis (N = 126)	No Tuberculosis (N = 110)	p-value
Male, N (%)	112 (47)	61 (48)	51 (46)	0.80
Median age (IQR)	33 (27-40)	32 (27-39)	34 (27-41)	0.25
Median CD4+ T-lymphocyte count (IQR)	49 (16-160)	39 (15-107)	75 (19-215)	0.01
Anti-retroviral use, N (%)	40 (17)	17 (13)	23 (21)	0.16
In-hospital mortality, N (%)	24 (10)	13 (10)	11 (10)	1.0

Abbreviations: IQR, inter-quartile range

IGRA results

IGRAs were not performed in 24 (10%) patients with an inadequate number of PBMCs. IGRA results were indeterminate in 54 patients (25%) either due to a low mitogen response (n = 7) or high background response (n = 47). The proportion of indeterminate test results declined significantly when comparing patients with a CD4+ T-lymphocyte count ≤ 50 cells/μl (33/109, 30%), 51-200 cells/μl (15/60, 25%), and > 200 cells/μl (6/43, 14%) (p = 0.03). Other demographic and clinical characteristics (gender, age, antiretroviral use, TB status) were also similar in patients with and without indeterminate IGRA results (p > 0.2 for all comparisons). Patients with indeterminate results had higher in-hospital mortality (17% vs. 8%, p = 0.05).

IGRAs were positive in 95 of 158 (60%) patients with interpretable results. There was no difference in the proportion of positive test results among patients with a CD4+ T-lymphocyte count ≤ 50 cells/μl (44/76, 58%), 51-200 cells/μl (30/45, 67%), and > 200 cells/μl (21/37, 57%) (p = 0.57). Median spot counts were significantly higher in patients with active TB compared to those without active TB after both ESAT-6 (42 vs. 2, p < 0.001) and CFP-10 stimulation (11 vs. 3, p = 0.03) (Figure 2).

Diagnostic performance

For diagnosing active pulmonary TB, IGRA sensitivity was 73% (95% CI 62-82%) and specificity 54% (42-66%) (Table 2). Sensitivity (78% vs. 67%, difference 11%, 95% CI -8% to +29%, p = 0.27) was higher among AFB smear-positive compared to smear-negative patients, but this difference was not statistically significant. Specificity was similar between the two groups. Controlling for the degree of HIV-related immunosuppression by dividing spot counts by CD4+ T-lymphocyte count [9] did not improve diagnostic accuracy compared to classifying results based on spot counts alone (for ESAT-6, CFP-10, or combined ESAT-6 and CFP-10 results; p > 0.2 for all comparisons).

Table 2

Sensitivity and specificity of T-SPOT.TB

	Overall (N = 158)	AFB Smear-Positive (N = 45)	AFB Smear-Negative (N = 113)	p-value
% Sensitivity (95% CI)	73 (62-82)	78 (62-89)	67 (52-81)	0.27
% Specificity (95% CI)	54 (42-66)	50 (7-93)	54 (42-66)	0.87

Abbreviations: AFB, acid-fast bacilli.

We next assessed the diagnostic utility of IGRAs according to AFB smear status by calculating the post-test probability of TB in patients with positive and negative IGRA results (Table 3). In this analysis, we defined pre-test probability as the TB prevalence in the study population: 94% for AFB smear-positive patients and 37% for AFB smear-negative patients. As expected, IGRA results did not meaningfully alter the probability of disease among AFB-smear positive patients. A positive IGRA result increased the probability of TB from 94% to 96% while a negative IGRA result decreased the probability of TB from 94% to 87%. More importantly, IGRA results did not contribute to a clinically meaningful change in the post-test probability of TB in AFB smear-negative patients. A positive IGRA result increased the probability of TB from 37% to 47% while a negative IGRA result decreased the probability of TB from 37% to 26%.

Table 3

Clinical utility of T-SPOT.TB in addition to AFB smear microscopy

Test Result	Likelihood Ratio	Post-test Probability of Tuberculosis
AFB Smear Positive Patients*
T-SPOT.TB +	1.56	96%
T-SPOT.TB -	0.44	87%
AFB Smear Negative Patients^†
T-SPOT.TB +	1.48	47%
T-SPOT.TB -	0.6	26%

Abbreviations: AFB, acid-fast bacilli.

* Pre-test probability of tuberculosis = 94% (tuberculosis prevalence in AFB smear positive patients)

† Pre-test probability of tuberculosis = 37% (tuberculosis prevalence in AFB smear negative patients)

Discussion

In this study, we found that an ELISPOT-based IGRA was positive in 60% of patients in a Ugandan sample of hospitalized, HIV-infected patients, indicating a high prevalence of M. TB infection. IGRA positivity was not affected by CD4+ T-lymphocyte count in our population with advanced immunosuppression. The test had moderate to high sensitivity but poor specificity in the diagnosis of active pulmonary TB. In AFB smear-negative patients, negative IGRA results did not lead to a clinically meaningful decrease in the probability of active disease. In low-income countries with high HIV prevalence, these findings suggest a role for IGRAs in LTBI screening programs but not as a rule-out test for active TB in symptomatic patients.

Numerous studies have evaluated the sensitivity of T-SPOT.TB - the only commercially available ELISPOT-based IGRA - for diagnosis of active pulmonary TB and results have been similar in immunocompetent (83-100%) and HIV-infected patients (85-93%) [7, 8, 10, 12, 16‐19]. There are at least two potential explanations for the slightly lower sensitivity (73%) seen in our study. The spectrum of diseased and non-diseased patients enrolled in many studies differed from that seen in clinical practice, a factor known to inflate sensitivity estimates [20, 21]. In addition, our HIV-infected study population was hospitalized and severely immunosuppressed, with more than 75% patients having a CD4+ T-lymphocyte count < 200 cells/μl. Of note, sensitivity was not increased by forming a ratio between ESAT-6 or CFP-10 spot counts and CD4+ T-lymphocyte count, an area of contention in the literature [8, 9].

The specificity of T-SPOT.TB for active pulmonary TB has ranged from 45-95%, with studies in both low burden[8, 10, 17, 18] and high burden[22] countries reporting values below 65%. The low specificity (54%) for active TB in our setting is not surprising given the known high prevalence of LTBI in Kampala. Current generation interferon-gamma release assays cannot distinguish immune responses among patients with latent infection, prior active disease, and current active disease when performed using peripheral blood specimens [2]. Further studies are needed to determine whether local immune responses can better distinguish active from latent infection[18, 23‐25] and to identify antigens that elicit immune responses more specific for current active disease [23].

A diagnostic test should substantially change the pre-test probability of disease and influence treatment decisions in order to have clinical utility. When evaluating TB suspects with negative AFB smears, clinicians are faced with a decision to either initiate or withhold empiric therapy. IGRAs could be useful in this situation if a negative result decreased the probability of TB below a threshold at which most clinicians would be comfortable withholding treatment. Based on the test characteristics reported in our study, a negative IGRA result would decrease the probability of TB below 10% only when the prevalence of TB among smear-negative patients is already at or below 15%. Moreover, a high proportion of indeterminate results further limited the clinical utility of IGRAs in our setting.

Our study has several potential limitations. First, the proportion of indeterminate results is higher than in previous studies despite stringent quality control procedures. Higher background levels of non-specific immune activation have been observed in Uganda compared to North American cohorts (David M. Lewinsohn, personal communication). It is also possible that non-specific immune activation was more common in our hospitalized population with advanced illness. Second, mycobacterial culture on Lowenstein-Jensen media is an imperfect reference standard. A more sensitive culture technique (such as liquid culture) may have decreased the number of false positive IGRA results and increased the number of true positive results, resulting in higher sensitivity and specificity [26]. In addition, we did not perform speciation tests to exclude the possibility of isolating non-tuberculous mycobacteria. Finally, our study population consisted of hospitalized patients with advanced HIV infection. The point estimates of sensitivity and specificity reported here may not generalize to ambulatory or predominantly HIV-uninfected populations. Nevertheless, our findings are consistent with previous studies.

Conclusions

An ELISPOT-based IGRA detected a high prevalence of M. TB infection in a population of TB suspects with advanced HIV infection in Uganda. These assays should be considered in sub-Saharan Africa when screening HIV-infected patients for latent tuberculosis infection. However, current ELISPOT-based IGRAs are unlikely to have clinical utility when evaluating active TB suspects. Further research and innovation is needed to identify M. tuberculosis antigens and host markers that are more sensitive and specific for active tuberculosis.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the patients and staff of Mulago Hospital, the Uganda NTRL technicians for performing smear microscopy and mycobacterial culture, the Joint Clinical Research Centre CTL staff for performing T-SPOT.TB assays, and Norman Jones and Stephanie Bousheri for their valuable technical assistance. The study was funded by grant numbers K23 HL094141 (AC), K24 HL087713 (LH), R01 HL090335 (LH), and K23AI080147 (JLD) from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and P30AI27763 from the NIH, University of California San Francisco-Gladstone Institute of Virology & Immunology Center for AIDS Research, and the University of California, Berkeley Fogarty International AIDS Training Program. T-SPOT.TB kits were kindly provided by Oxford Immunotec. Oxford Immunotec had no role in study design, data analysis, or manuscript preparation.

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Pai M, Zwerling A, Menzies D: Systematic review: T-cell-based assays for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: an update. Ann Intern Med. 2008, 149 (3): 177-184.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Menzies D: Using tests for latent tuberculous infection to diagnose active tuberculosis: can we eat our cake and have it too?. Ann Intern Med. 2008, 148 (5): 398-399.CrossRefPubMed

Perkins MD, Kritski AL: Diagnostic testing in the control of tuberculosis. Bull World Health Organ. 2002, 80 (6): 512-513.PubMedPubMedCentral

Sarmiento OL, Weigle KA, Alexander J, Weber DJ, Miller WC: Assessment by meta-analysis of PCR for diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41 (7): 3233-3240. 10.1128/JCM.41.7.3233-3240.2003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Perkins MD, Cunningham J: Facing the crisis: improving the diagnosis of tuberculosis in the HIV era. J Infect Dis. 2007, 196 (Suppl 1): S15-27. 10.1086/518656.CrossRefPubMed

Srikantiah P, Charlebois E, Havlir DV: Rapid increase in tuberculosis incidence soon after infection with HIV--a new twist in the twin epidemics. J Infect Dis. 2005, 191 (2): 147-149. 10.1086/426832.CrossRefPubMed

Clark SA, Martin SL, Pozniak A, Steel A, Ward B, Dunning J, Henderson DC, Nelson M, Gazzard B, Kelleher P: Tuberculosis antigen-specific immune responses can be detected using enzyme-linked immunospot technology in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 patients with advanced disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 2007, 150 (2): 238-244.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Goletti D, Carrara S, Vincenti D, Girardi E: T cell responses to commercial mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antigens in HIV-infected patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2007, 45 (12): 1652-1654. 10.1086/523012.CrossRefPubMed

Rangaka MX, Wilkinson KA, Seldon R, Van Cutsem G, Meintjes GA, Morroni C, Mouton P, Diwakar L, Connell TG, Maartens G, et al: Effect of HIV-1 infection on T-Cell-based and skin test detection of tuberculosis infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007, 175 (5): 514-520. 10.1164/rccm.200610-1439OC.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Vincenti D, Carrara S, Butera O, Bizzoni F, Casetti R, Girardi E, Goletti D: Response to region of difference 1 (RD1) epitopes in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals enrolled with suspected active tuberculosis: a pilot study. Clin Exp Immunol. 2007, 150 (1): 91-98.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Adetifa IM, Lugos MD, Hammond A, Jeffries D, Donkor S, Adegbola RA, Hill PC: Comparison of two interferon gamma release assays in the diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and disease in The Gambia. BMC Infect Dis. 2007, 7: 122-10.1186/1471-2334-7-122.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Chee CB, Gan SH, Khinmar KW, Barkham TM, Koh CK, Liang S, Wang YT: Comparison of sensitivities of two commercial gamma interferon release assays for pulmonary tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2008, 46 (6): 1935-1940. 10.1128/JCM.02403-07.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Soysal A, Torun T, Efe S, Gencer H, Tahaoglu K, Bakir M: Evaluation of cut-off values of interferon-gamma-based assays in the diagnosis of M. tuberculosis infection. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008, 12 (1): 50-56.PubMed

14.

Cattamanchi A, Dowdy DW, Davis JL, Worodria W, Yoo S, Joloba M, Matovu J, Hopewell PC, Huang L: Sensitivity of direct versus concentrated sputum smear microscopy in HIV-infected patients suspected of having pulmonary tuberculosis. BMC Infect Dis. 2009, 9: 53-10.1186/1471-2334-9-53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Cattamanchi A, Davis JL, Worodria W, Yoo S, Matovu J, Kiidha J, Nankya F, Kyeyune R, Andama A, Joloba M, et al: Poor performance of universal sample processing method for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis by smear microscopy and culture in Uganda. J Clin Microbiol. 2008, 46 (10): 3325-3329. 10.1128/JCM.01175-08.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Dominguez J, De Souza-Galvao M, Ruiz-Manzano J, Latorre I, Prat C, Lacoma A, Mila C, Jimenez MA, Blanco S, Maldonado J, et al: T-cell responses to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antigens in active tuberculosis patients at the beginning, during, and after antituberculosis treatment. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009, 63 (1): 43-51. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.09.010.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Jafari C, Ernst M, Kalsdorf B, Greinert U, Diel R, Kirsten D, Marienfeld K, Lalvani A, Lange C: Rapid diagnosis of smear-negative tuberculosis by bronchoalveolar lavage enzyme-linked immunospot. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006, 174 (9): 1048-1054. 10.1164/rccm.200604-465OC.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Jafari C, Thijsen S, Sotgiu G, Goletti D, Dominguez Benitez JA, Losi M, Eberhardt R, Kirsten D, Kalsdorf B, Bossink A, et al: Bronchoalveolar Lavage Enzyme-linked Immunospot for a Rapid Diagnosis of Tuberculosis: A TBNET Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009, 180 (7): 666-73. 10.1164/rccm.200904-0557OC.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Meier T, Eulenbruch HP, Wrighton-Smith P, Enders G, Regnath T: Sensitivity of a new commercial enzyme-linked immunospot assay (T SPOT-TB) for diagnosis of tuberculosis in clinical practice. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005, 24 (8): 529-536. 10.1007/s10096-005-1377-8.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Mol BW, Lijmer JG, Evers JL, Bossuyt PM: Characteristics of good diagnostic studies. Semin Reprod Med. 2003, 21 (1): 17-25. 10.1055/s-2003-39991.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, Meulen van der JH, Bossuyt PM: Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA. 1999, 282 (11): 1061-1066. 10.1001/jama.282.11.1061.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Dheda K, Smit RZ, Badri M, Pai M: T-cell interferon-gamma release assays for the rapid immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis: clinical utility in high-burden vs. low-burden settings. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2009, 15 (3): 188-200. 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32832a0adc.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Ernst JD, Lewinsohn DM, Behar S, Blythe M, Schlesinger LS, Kornfeld H, Sette A: Meeting Report: NIH Workshop on the Tuberculosis Immune Epitope Database. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2008, 88 (4): 366-370. 10.1016/j.tube.2007.11.002.CrossRef

24.

Jafari C, Ernst M, Strassburg A, Greinert U, Kalsdorf B, Kirsten D, Lange C: Local immunodiagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis by enzyme-linked immunospot. Eur Respir J. 2008, 31 (2): 261-265. 10.1183/09031936.00096707.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Losi M, Bossink A, Codecasa L, Jafari C, Ernst M, Thijsen S, Cirillo D, Ferrarese M, Greinert U, Fabbri LM, et al: Use of a T-cell interferon-gamma release assay for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy. Eur Respir J. 2007, 30 (6): 1173-1179. 10.1183/09031936.00067307.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Chien HP, Yu MC, Wu MH, Lin TP, Luh KT: Comparison of the BACTEC MGIT 960 with Lowenstein-Jensen medium for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2000, 4 (9): 866-870.PubMed

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/10/75/prepub

Titel: Role of interferon-gamma release assays in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in patients with advanced HIV infection
verfasst von: Adithya Cattamanchi
Isaac Ssewenyana
J Lucian Davis
Laurence Huang
William Worodria
Saskia den Boon
Samuel Yoo
Alfred Andama
Philip C Hopewell
Huyen Cao
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2010
Verlag: BioMed Central
Erschienen in: BMC Infectious Diseases / Ausgabe 1/2010
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2334
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-75

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Role of interferon-gamma release assays in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in patients with advanced HIV infection