Background
Malaria vector control programmes in sub-Saharan Africa continue to rely heavily on indoor residual spraying (IRS) or insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), both of which depend on vector susceptibility to the insecticides used. ITNs are a common component of malaria control programs, largely due to their ease of implementation, cost effectiveness [
1‐
3], and record of success across transmission settings [
4]. As a consequence, ITNs have been heavily promoted by the public-health community; and as of 2010, it was estimated that 42% of households owned at least one ITN across 44 countries in sub-Saharan Africa [
5]. These advances in vector control, combined with effective new anti-malarial drugs, have renewed optimism for regional elimination [
6,
7].
Few insecticides are available for use in malaria vector control and only pyrethroid compounds are considered safe for the treatment of ITNs [
8]. Therefore, the continued success of ITNs and essentially the current vector-control paradigm depend on continued mosquito susceptibility to a single class of insecticides. Two mechanisms of insecticide resistance, which may co-occur, are commonly measured: (1) metabolic resistance and (2) target-site insensitivity [
9]. The former results from the over expression or amplification of genes coding for enzymes that either biochemically alter the insecticidal compound making it less toxic to the mosquito (e.g. P450 monooxygenases), or sequester the compound preventing reactions detrimental to normal physiology (e.g. esterases) [
9,
10]. In contrast, target-site insensitivity involves one or more mutations that make the physiologic target of an insecticide less reactive to the chemical [
11]. Target-site insensitivity in the malaria vector
Anopheles gambiae s.s. (hereafter referred to as
A. gambiae) includes two
kdr mutations (for knock-down resistance) which result in an amino acid substitution in the S6 hydrophobic segment of domain II in the voltage-gated sodium channel of neuronal membranes [
9,
11]. Both mutations reduce susceptibility to DDT and to the pyrethroid class of insecticides and occur at different nucleotides of the same amino acid (residue 1014). In wild-type mosquitoes, this residue codes for leucine (TTA), while in mutant mosquitoes single nucleotide changes result in either a phenylalanine (TTT) or serine (TCA) substitution [
12,
13]. The former is commonly referred to as West African
kdr, or L1014F; while the latter is called East African
kdr, or L1014S. Molecular data suggest that each mutation has risen independently at least twice in
A. gambiae[
14], and, although the names of each allele suggest distinct geographic distributions, co-occurrence has been reported in multiple countries including Uganda, Gabon, Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, and Angola [
15]. L1014F is thought to confer a greater degree of insensitivity to pyrethroid insecticides than L1014S [
11], although bioassay data comparing each mutation within the same genetic background do not exist. Nevertheless, it has been speculated that selection for L1014F should be stronger than for L1014S, a hypothesis supported by recent molecular data showing that signatures of selective sweeps (i.e. reduced nucleotide variability) are more extensive around L1014F than L1014S mutations in the genomes of wild-caught mosquitoes [
16]. A third mechanism of resistance--behavioural--is poorly understood and difficult to measure, although the excitatory effects of DDT in IRS and permethrin in certain ITN formulations suggest that a primary mode of action of these two chemicals is on vector behaviour and not survival [
17‐
20].
When monitoring or investigating insecticide resistance in vector populations, at least three approaches can be taken, each with advantages and disadvantages: (1) measures of phenotypic resistance provide a direct indication of how resistance mechanisms impact vector control activities but require access to testing kits, insecticide impregnated papers, rearing facilities, and large numbers of mosquitoes, any of which may be limiting; (2) frequencies of target site mutations (e.g. kdr) are easier to measure, but it is unclear how much this mechanism contributes to resistant phenotypes; (3) measures of metabolic resistance (e.g. biochemical assays or gene expression arrays) are likely to be strong indicators of phenotypic resistance but are technically challenging.
Malaria vectors in western Kenya, where the present study was conducted, include two sibling species of the
A. gambiae species complex,
A. gambiae and
Anopheles arabiensis, as well as
Anopheles funestus s.s. Historically,
A. gambiae has been the primary vector in the study area, but this species has declined proportionately to
A. arabiensis (a secondary vector), possibly due to greater effectiveness of ITNs against the former, more anthropophilic species [
21]. Development of insecticide resistance in the local
A. gambiae population could reverse this trend and might reduce effectiveness of the malaria control program in the region.
Two of the study sites included in the present study are within or adjacent to areas included in a small ITN trial conducted in 1990 and a large-scale trial conducted from 1996 to 1999. The former involved just six villages [
22], while the latter covered a 500 km
2 area that encompassed 221 villages [
23]. In the smaller trial,
A. gambiae mosquitoes collected from villages with permethrin-treated nets and curtains showed increased tolerance to permethrin after one year, leading to establishment of a laboratory strain with reduced sensitivity to permethrin [
24]. However, this tolerance did not persist in field populations, and required constant selection in the laboratory to maintain the phenotype [
25]. The tolerant field population had increased activity of metabolic enzymes as well as a novel mutation in the sodium channel gene (i.e.
kdr L1014S) [
13,
26]. Studies of insecticide resistance following the larger ITN trial have varied with respect to both levels of phenotypic resistance and frequency of the
kdr L1014S mutation. In 2004, Stump et al. [
27] reported that
kdr frequency was 8.0% in
A. gambiae and had only risen slightly since 1987. A more recent study reported a range of 0.5% to 15.0% among sites in western Kenya for
A. gambiae and 0.9% for
A. arabiensis, but "conservative" population estimates for the former were given as 1.0% or less when accounting for relatedness of the specimens [
28]. That study also reported an increase in monooxygenase activity in field-collected specimens. Another recent study reported a
kdr L1014S frequency of 25.4% in a sub-population of
A. gambiae from western Kenya [
29]. WHO bioassays, however, provided no evidence of phenotypic resistance. Whether genotypic or phenotypic insecticide resistance is evolving in the
A. gambiae population in direct response to the rapid rise in use of ITNs in western Kenya, in parallel with the profound changes in species composition of the
A. gambiae complex there [
21], is currently unknown. Therefore, the objective of this study was to quantify temporal variation in
kdr L1014S frequency in populations of
A. gambiae (1996 - 2010) from two areas of western Kenya having markedly different histories of ITN distribution and use; and to assess the spatial variation in frequency of the
kdr L1014S allele, species composition, and phenotypic resistance among populations of
A. gambiae s.l. sampled from multiple sites in western Kenya.
Discussion
Three processes have marked the dynamics of the
Anopheles gambiae species complex in western Kenya during the course of national scale-up of ITNs: (1) a decline in density of indoor resting mosquitoes [
31,
43], (2) a shift from a predominance of
A. gambiae to
A. arabiensis in adult and larval stages [
21], and (3) a decrease in longevity of adult females, but no change in host preference patterns [
21]. These changes correlate with a sustained reduction in the malaria burden in the human population [
30]. The rapid rise in the frequency of the
kdr L1014S allele to near fixation in
A. gambiae as reported here, could herald a reversal of these positive outcomes. The marked rise in frequency of the
kdr L1014S allele over 13 years in Asembo and Seme suggests that
A. gambiae has been undergoing strong selection for resistance to the pyrethroid insecticides used in ITNs distributed there. Allele frequencies ranged from 2.5% to 3.8% in
A. gambiae in western Kenya in 1987 [
27]. The
kdr allele frequency we report from Asembo for 1996 (5.3%, n = 95) is nearly identical to that of Stump
et al[
27] for the same year. Therefore, when ITNs were distributed in Asembo for the intervention trial in 1996, alleles for
kdr-mediated resistance were already present in the
A. gambiae population. Although direct comparisons with other populations are confounded by many factors, the rise in the L1014S allele observed in western Kenya was nearly as rapid as that observed for the L1014F allele in Ghana [
16].
The rise in the mutation's frequency followed similar trajectories in Asembo and Seme despite substantial differences in net coverage between the areas for a decade (Figure
2). Net ownership rose modestly in Seme from 2000 to 2003 and then substantially increased with subsidized distribution of ITNs to pregnant women and children <5 years of age from government health facilities beginning in 2004, followed by a mass campaign in 2006 [
21,
33]. The similar patterns of emergence of resistance likely reflect details of migration and selection pressure not measured in our study. While
A. gambiae came into ever increasing contact with pyrethroids in Asembo over the past 13 years, selection pressures outside of Asembo due to either malaria control or agricultural pesticide use are unknown.
Other studies have also reported increases in frequency of the
kdr L1014S allele in
A. gambiae from Burundi [
44] and Uganda [
45] associated with vector control using pyrethroid insecticides; while studies in Niger [
46] and Equatorial Guinea [
47] have observed sharp rises in the
kdr L1014F allele in response to ITNs and IRS, respectively. In Burundi and Rwanda, the rise in the
kdr L1014S allele was ascribed to use of insecticides as indoor residual sprays to control adult stages of malaria vectors. However, in Burundi, the allele frequency actually increased in an unsprayed control area as well as in the sprayed area. In Uganda, there were marked regional variations in allele frequency without clear correlation with intensity of use of IRS or ITNs, and allele frequency and phenotypic resistance were noted particularly in areas with a history of cotton agriculture where insecticide use is often intense [
45].
In other settings, agricultural use of insecticides has been cited as the primary cause of the emergence of insecticide resistance in
A. gambiae s.l. populations in sub-Saharan Africa [
48‐
50].
Anopheles gambiae s.l. larvae may face strong selection pressure for resistance to insecticides if exposed in breeding sites located near cultivated fields where insecticides are applied to control agricultural pests. In a cotton-growing region of northern Cameroon, investigators sampled mosquito larvae from breeding sites within cotton fields at different times during the rainy season [
51]. Bioassays of emerged adults revealed that vector susceptibility to DDT and permethrin decreased over time in accordance with a spraying schedule in the cotton fields that included two applications of an organochlorine compound (endosulfan) followed by a pyrethroid/organophosphate mixture (cypermethrin/profenofos). In Burkina Faso, the spatial heterogeneity of
kdr L1014F was associated with cotton agriculture; the mutation was present at 16 of 21 sites and ranged in frequency from 4.7% to 97.0% with the highest frequencies occurring in the so-called "cotton belt" [
52]. Although data are lacking, current agricultural use of pesticides in western Kenya is likely low owing to the prevalence of subsistence agriculture. However, use of permethrin for cattle dips is common, and the region produces some cash crops (sugar cane and cotton) that may require insecticide use. In addition, the low level of resistance to bendiocarb implies that agricultural use of insecticides may play a role in the evolution of resistance in malaria vectors in western Kenya. However, the strong temporal association reported here between net ownership and
kdr L1014S frequency (Figure
2) suggests that ITNs have been the most important selection pressure in this study population.
Given the trends in net ownership and
kdr L1014S frequency in Seme, it is not surprising that similarly high homozygote frequencies were found in samples of
A. gambiae throughout western Kenya in 2009 and 2010. One unexpected finding is the apparently greater magnitude of phenotypic resistance near the Ugandan border, as well as the dramatic differences in species composition near Lake Victoria compared to sites further north. Due to the decline in
A. gambiae along the lakeshore, inadequate numbers of this species were available for testing in phenotypic assays. It is, therefore, possible that phenotypic resistance in
A. gambiae along the lakeshore is similar to that of sites further away and the few mosquitoes that were tested (<5 per insecticide) suggest that this is the case. Therefore, the question is why
A. gambiae remains the predominant species in sites located further from the lakeshore. The current hypothesis is that ITNs have not been in place sufficiently long in Busia, Malaba, Bungoma, and Kakamega to drive down local abundance of
A. gambiae. Qualitative comparisons of the ratio of
A. arabiensis to
A. gambiae amongst all these sites suggests that the former species is rising in frequency in the sites away from the lake shore as it has at sites near the lake [
21]. Indeed, the presence of
A. arabiensis at Bungoma and Kakamega, both sites at relatively high altitudes where
A. gambiae has traditionally been the only species in the complex present, is particularly striking [
53]. However, because historical data on net ownership in these areas are lacking, baseline levels prior to the national scale-up of ITN are unknown. In Asembo and Seme, the change from sub-populations dominated by
A. gambiae to those dominated by
A. arabiensis took about a decade and occurred in Asembo first, as would be expected if ITNs were the primary cause [
21]. This hypothesis is one that could be tested by monitoring both ITN coverage and species composition over the next several years in the region.
One trend that was consistent throughout all populations examined was the high degree of susceptibility of
A. arabiensis to all insecticides but moderate to high resistance to pyrethroids in
A. gambiae. The persistence of a species with little to no pyrethroid resistance (
A. arabiensis) compared to a species with moderate to high levels of pyrethroid resistance (
A. gambiae) in an area with high ITN coverage is somewhat counterintuitive. However, it is likely explained by the behaviour of
A. arabiensis which often feeds outdoors and on cattle and may avoid the insecticide on nets.
Anopheles arabiensis populations are therefore able to persist, apparently with little to no selection from the pyrethroid insecticides on nets [
21].
Anopheles gambiae populations, despite having some resistance to pyrethroid insecticides, are still in decline possibly due to irritancy of the insecticide on the nets or the physical barrier imposed by the nets. These observations also suggest there is a limit to the degree of resistance conferred by the molecular and biochemical mechanisms currently present in western Kenya. Similar observations were made in the early 1990s during a small scale study of permethrin-treated nets where resistance was detected within a year of implementation [
24], but reached a plateau and even regressed after three years [
25]. However, other resistance mechanisms, possibly coupled with secondary compensatory mutations, may lead to further increases in pyrethroid resistance which could lead to a resurgence of
A. gambiae. Despite the rapid decline in
A. gambiae along the lakeshore, malaria transmission-presumably maintained by
A. arabiensis--remains high with parasite prevalence in children over 45% (M. Hamel, unpublished data). As ITNs and IRS are increasingly scaled up throughout Africa, behavioural avoidance of these interventions may become increasingly important and tools to address species or populations exhibiting these traits are urgently needed.
Although pyrethroid resistance has been reported locally or regionally in many parts of sub-Saharan Africa, the impact of resistance on vector control is not always consistent between locations. In West Africa, for example, ITNs treated with the pyrethroid lambdacyhalothrin remained effective in reducing malaria prevalence in the face of
kdr L1014F resistance in Cote d'Ivoire [
54]. In contrast, the failure of IRS using pyrethroids in Bioko Island was associated with a high frequency of the
kdr L1014F allele [
47], while in Benin, N'Guessan
et al[
55] reported significantly reduced effectiveness of both ITNs and IRS in a region where
kdr 1014F frequency was 83%. Data from western Kenya suggest that the rise of the
kdr allele has had limited impact on the effectiveness of ITNs at least at sites along the lakeshore. Annual malaria surveys in Asembo indicated a decline in the prevalence of malaria until 2008. However, prevalence rose in 2009 and remained high in 2010 (M. Hamel, unpublished data). While the rise in malaria coincided with the period when the
kdr allele was peaking in
A. gambiae, entomologic data suggest that increasing pyrethroid resistance in this species is not the reason for increasing malaria in Asembo. The shift from a population dominated by
A. gambiae to
A. arabiensis along with the analysis of sporozoite rates by
kdr genotype indicates that the rise of the
kdr L1014S allele has not compromised the efficacy of ITNs along the Lake Victoria basin. On the other hand, the persistence of
A. gambiae in sites further from the lakeshore where detectable levels of phenotypic resistance were observed is more worrisome. Nevertheless, the decline in
A. gambiae relative to
A. arabiensis from 2009 to 2010 in these sites where
A. arabiensis has traditionally been rare or absent suggests that the hypothesis that these areas are more recent recipients of ITNs is correct and further increases in ITN coverage may continue to suppress
A. gambiae populations to the levels observed along the lakeshore. However, the possibility that further increases in insecticide resistance, possibly attributable to changes in metabolic enzymes associated with pyrethroid resistance, are spreading east cannot be discounted. Continued surveillance of these populations is needed to monitor for additional changes in insecticide resistance and to assess its impact on the effectiveness of ITNs.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
DKM, MNB, JMV, MJH, WAH, EDW and JEG designed the study and wrote the manuscript. DKM, EO, DM, LK performed species identification and RT-PCR analysis of A. gambiae kdr genotypes. EO, FA, MO and GO conducted and analysed the phenotypic bioassay data. DKM, EO, EDW and JEG analysed the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.