Background
Periodontal diseases are initiated by bacterial biofilms that induce a host inflammatory immune response, which could lead to tooth loss and contribute to systemic inflammation [
1]. Since the oral biofilm can be removed without surgical intervention, mechanical elimination such as brushing and flossing is fundamental for its control [
2‐
4]. A chemical approach is used as an alternative or adjunctive method when elimination using dental instruments proves difficult. It has been demonstrated that adjunctive antimicrobials improve clinical parameters including plaque and gingival indexes by interfering with metabolic activities [
2,
5,
6].
Chlorhexidine, a cationic bisbiguanide, is an antimicrobial agent with a broad spectrum of activity encompassing Gram-positive and Gram-negative yeasts, bacteria, dermatophytes, and some lipophilic viruses [
7]. One of the most widely used and thoroughly investigated antiseptics is chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), which is used in CHG oral rinse. This has been proven to be safe, stable, and effective in preventing plaque formation and inhibiting the development of gingivitis [
7,
8].
It is well known that CHG causes considerable side effects, such as extrinsic staining, an alteration in taste perception, and an increase in calculus formation [
9‐
12]. The calculus surface itself may not induce inflammation in the adjacent periodontal tissue [
13,
14]. However, calculus formation is known to be a factor in plaque retention as well as a reservoir for toxic bacterial products and antigens [
13]. In addition, a recent investigation has reported that treatment of
Porphyromonas gingivalis biofilms with CHG for 5 min did not degrade their external structure or reduce the volume of protein and carbohydrate constituents [
15]. The residual structure following CHG exposure may accelerate calculus formation and may serve as an ideal substrate to promote new microbial adhesion.
Although some clinical studies have demonstrated that CHG promotes calculus formation [
8‐
11], the mechanism for the uptake of calcium and phosphate is unclear. The purpose of the present study was to examine the influence of CHG on calculus formation using an in vitro saliva-related plaque mineralization model. In particular, we investigated whether exposing a biofilm mass to CHG for a short period of time promoted the uptake of calcium and phosphate.
Discussion
Numerous clinical studies for 6 months have demonstrated that the use of antimicrobial mouthwashes such as CHG as part of daily oral care can reduce plaque and gingivitis [
8,
11,
24]. However, rinsing with CHG for 4 weeks or longer causes considerable side effects, such as calculus build up, extrinsic tooth staining, transient taste disturbance, and effects on the oral mucosa [
11,
25].
In this study, we investigated whether mineral deposition preceding calculus formation would occur at an early stage using saliva-related biofilms. Our results showed that mineral uptake inside a CHG-treated biofilm significantly increased compared with the control after 48 h (four exposures) in the presence of calcifying solution (Fig.
3). In SEM and EPMA analyses, small apatite-like particles that contained more Ca than Pi were observed in CHG-treated biofilms at 48 h (Figs.
4g and
5).
Although plaque hardening caused by the precipitation of mineral salts usually begins between Day 1 and Day 14 of plaque formation, mineralization has been reported to occur as soon as 4–8 h [
7]. Eilberg et al. [
22] tested the mineralizing activities of plaque using samples from humans. When plaque samples were placed in calcifying solution for 24 h, the amounts of mineral they contained ranged from 0.37 to 50 μg for Ca/OD Unit, 0.11 to 21 μg for Pi/OD Unit, and 1.02 to 5.6 for Ca: Pi ratio. Previous and present findings suggest that dental plaque might absorb minerals from the oral environment, and CHG might promote its deposition.
Dental calculi are reported to contain the following four calcium phosphate compounds: hydroxyapatite, whitlockite, octacalcium phosphate, and brushite with Ca: Pi ratios of 1.67, 1.5, 1.33, and 1.0, respectively [
26]. When plaque mineralization begins, brushite develops into octacalcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite, and whitlockite [
27]. In this study, the ratios of Ca and Pi in the experimental group were relatively higher than those in control group (Figs.
3,
4 and
5). In addition, a Ca-rich component (Ca: Pi = 1.32) was detected on the surface of CHG-treated biofilms at 48 h (Fig.
5g). It is possible that CHG may favor its calcification.
This is the first report demonstrating the acceleration of mineral uptake into biofilms caused by in vitro CHG exposure. Although the mechanism remains unclear, there are two possible explanations. Firstly, CHG is a cationic compound, and it is rapidly attracted to negatively-charged bacterial cell surfaces. This alters the integrity of the bacterial cell membrane and binds to phospholipids in the inner membrane, and the leakage of low-molecular-weight components follows [
7]. However, the biofilm structure remains intact on an adhered site [
15]. It is possible that denatured components on the biofilm surface may become crystallized nuclei that enlarge and coalesce to form a calcified mass. In addition, since calcium binds to lipoteichoic acid, the compromised surface may promote the deposition [
28].
The other possibility is that pH in the biofilm may increase as a result of the antimicrobial effect of CHG. In this study, bacterial growth was not detected after 36 h, meaning that the microorganisms in the biofilm died. The fact that the pH was neutral between 24 and 48 h may have aided calcification. It has been reported that an alkaline pH in biofilms is critical for the promotion of plaque mineralization [
20,
29]. In fact, calcium uptake significantly increased after 48 h (four exposures) (Fig.
3).
Calculus formation is not the main etiological factor. Jepsen et al. stated that periodontal healing occurs even in the presence of calculi, as long as bacteria are removed or disinfected [
13]. For example, it has been reported that an autoclaved calculus does not cause pronounced inflammation or the formation of abscesses in connective tissues [
30]. However, calculus formation is a secondary etiological factor. A report of histological sections of a human tooth root showed that calculi were covered with viable bacterial plaque [
13]. Nichols et al. reported that the dihydroceramide lipids produced by
P. gingivalis were found in a subgingival calculus [
31]. Thus, it is critical to prevent calculus formation. Although CHG mouthrinse has been proven to be effective for inhibiting gingivitis, the management of patients is important, because mineral uptake into the biofilm occurs in the early stage.
Acknowledgements
We thank Masayoshi Kobayashi for providing technical assistance with SEM and EPMA analyses.