Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Introduction
Severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring intensive care unit (ICU) support can be complicated by secondary bacterial or fungal infections. The incidence and impact of secondary pneumonias in COVID-19 are not well-defined because clinical distinction from isolated SARS-CoV-2 infection is challenging and diagnostic practices have been highly variable [1]. Early administration of empiric antibiotics limits the sensitivity of subsequent microbiologic studies, whereas standard invasive workup with bronchoscopy is often avoided due to the risks of healthcare personnel exposure to aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 [2]. To overcome such limitations and comprehensively identify secondary pneumonias in COVID-19, we performed microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) metagenomic sequencing (mcfDNA-Seq) in plasma samples in addition to conventional microbiologic workup.
Methods
We enrolled 15 critically-ill patients with COVID-19 (confirmed by nasopharyngeal qPCR for SARS-CoV-2) in a prospective ICU cohort study [3]. Following informed consent, we obtained plasma samples for conducting mcfDNA-Seq with the Karius Test (Karius, Inc. Redwood City, CA)[4]. We evaluated detection of mcfDNA in the context of clinical diagnoses and prescribed antimicrobial therapies by the treating physicians, and examined for associations with clinical outcomes.
Anzeige
Results
Of 15 patients analyzed (median age 63, 53% females, 73% mechanically-ventilated), six (40%) died within 30 days from enrollment. Samples were obtained at a median (interquartile range-IQR) of 10 (4–12) days from COVID-19 symptoms onset, and each sample contained a median of 837 (111–4638) total mcfDNA molecules per microliter (MPMs) and 2 (1–4) identified organisms. Of the total 92,791 MPMs reported across 15 samples, 90% belonged to typical pathogenic bacteria (e.g. E.coli and K. Pneumoniae), with the remainder MPMs aligned to commensal bacteria (5%, e.g. oral Streptococcus species), fungi (4%, Candida species) and DNA viruses (1%). Compared to survivors, non-survivors had higher total mcfDNA (p = 0.04), higher pathogenic bacteria MPMs (p = 0.02) and a trend for a higher number of identified organisms per sample (p = 0.06). (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Non-survivors of severe COVID-19 infection had higher microbial cell-free DNA molecules per microliter of plasma by metagenomic sequencing compared to survivors (median [interquartile range]: 11,125 [650–26,436] vs. 661 [1], Wilcoxon test p-value = 0.04) and a trend for higher number of identified microbes per sample (3.5 [1.8–4.3] vs. 1.0 [0–2.5], Wilcoxon test p-value = 0.06)
×
Secondary pneumonia was clinically suspected or diagnosed by the treating physicians in 11/15 (73%) patients (Group A, Fig. 2), with microbiologic confirmation by positive respiratory cultures in 3/11 subjects (27%); these three patients had high plasma mcfDNA MPMs for common bacterial pathogens, such as E.coli and Ps. aeruginosa. Among the remaining eight patients with clinically-suspected infections and empiric antibiotic treatments, high mcfDNA MPMs of probable bacterial pathogens were detected in 2/8 patients (co-infecting Ps. aeruginosa and K. Pneumoniae; Raoultella ornithinolytica, respectively). In the additional six patients, no evidence of co-infecting bacterial pathogens was present, whereas in one patient (subject 7, Fig. 2) there was high signal for Candida tropicalis (2,490 MPMs) concerning for undiagnosed invasive Candidiasis.
Fig. 2
Case-based analysis of 15 critically ill patients with COVID-19 with depicted clinical diagnoses, plasma microbial cell-free DNA metagenomics and survival outcomes. The Y-axis margin indicates two groups of clinical diagnoses: Group A includes 11 patients who received antibiotics for either microbiologically-confirmed (n = 3) or clinically-suspected infections despite negative microbiologic workup (n = 8), whereas Group B includes four patients with low clinical suspicion for secondary infection and no antibiotic therapies at time of sampling. The Y-axis ticks denote each patient sample and the x-height of each stacked bar represents the number of microbial cell-free DNA molecules per plasma microliter (MPMs) by metagenomic sequencing, with different colors for the top 10 microbes by ranked abundance. The “other” category (shown in grey) represents the sum of lower abundance taxa of commensal origin. Five out of 11 subjects of Group A (45%, Subjects 1–5) had high MPM signal for probable respiratory pathogens, whereas in the remaining 6/11 subjects there was no evidence of co-infecting bacterial pathogens. Subject 7 was clinically-diagnosed with culture-negative sepsis and treated with prolonged course of empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for refractory hypoxemic respiratory failure from COVID-19; the high mcfDNA signal for C.tropicalis (2,490 MPMs) is concerning for undiagnosed invasive Candidiasis, corroborated by persistent growth of yeast organisms (not further speciated) from clinical bronchoalveolar lavage samples obtained on days 5, 9 and 14 after the research sample acquisition. Two out of four patients of Group B (subjects 12 and 13) who did not survive and had not received empiric antimicrobials were found to have high mcfDNA signal (> 4000 total MPMs) of probable respiratory pathogens, indicative of undiagnosed (and untreated) secondary infections
×
We detected respiratory pathogen MPMs (S. aureus, Ps. aeruginosa and K. Pneumoniae) in 3/4 subjects with low suspicion for secondary infection (Group B, Fig. 2). In these patients, no respiratory specimen cultures were obtained, and antibiotics had not been initiated or had been discontinued based on negative blood cultures by the time of research sampling. Notably, two of these individuals experienced sustained vasodilatory shock and died from multiorgan dysfunction attributed to isolated SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Discussion
McfDNA-Seq in patients with COVID-19 indicates a higher incidence of probable secondary infections than previously recognized. Despite our small sample size, the significant association between mcfDNA and 30-day mortality suggests that COVID-19 severity may be influenced by circulating bacterial fragments, either from secondary pneumonias or from possible translocation of colonizing microbiota along the disrupted alveolar/epithelial surface of lungs injured by COVID-19 [5]. Integration of mcfDNA detection with clinical data demonstrates opportunity for antibiotic stewardship in patients with suspected infection. On the other hand, the signal for undiagnosed and untreated secondary infections should serve as a call for vigilance and thorough diagnostic workup in patients with severe COVID-19 [6].
Anzeige
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the multiple investigators that contributed to our clinical research efforts for COVID-19, including investigators from the Acute Lung Injury Center of Excellence and the Center for Medicine and the Microbiome at the University of Pittsburgh, and the collaborators from Karius, Inc.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board (Protocol STUDY19050099). Written informed consent was provided by all participants or their surrogates in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Competing interests
Dr. Bryan J. McVerry has been a consultant for Vapotherm, Inc. and receives research funding from Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Georgios Kitsios has received research funding from Karius, Inc. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.
Immunchemischer Stuhltest positiv, Koloskopie negativ – in solchen Fällen kann die Blutungsquelle auch weiter proximal sitzen. Ein Forschungsteam hat nachgesehen, wie häufig und in welchen Lokalisationen das der Fall ist.
Möglicherweise hängt es von der Art der Diabetesmedikamente ab, wie hoch das Risiko der Betroffenen ist, dass sich sehkraftgefährdende Komplikationen verschlimmern.
In der MONARCHE-3-Studie lebten Frauen mit fortgeschrittenem Hormonrezeptor-positivem, HER2-negativem Brustkrebs länger, wenn sie zusätzlich zu einem nicht steroidalen Aromatasehemmer mit Abemaciclib behandelt wurden; allerdings verfehlte der numerische Zugewinn die statistische Signifikanz.
Update Innere Medizin
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.
