Introduction
- ❖ QoL: defined as an ‘individual’s perception of their position in life, in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns. It is a broad ranging concept affected in a complex way by the person’s physical health, psychological state, level of independence, social relationships, personal beliefs and their relationship to salient features of their environment’ [19].
- ❖ Coping: defined as ‘thoughts and behaviours that people use to respond to internal or external stressful demands’ [20].
- ❖ Well-being: defined as the ‘balance point between an individual’s resource pool and the challenges faced’ [21].
Objectives of the CPG
-
❖ Provide guidance on the psychosocial needs of people with EB, their families and those who care for them.
-
❖ Outline the current state of the science on the psychosocial implications of EB on patients and their family members.
-
❖ Include recommendations for care.
-
❖ Identify gaps in knowledge to encourage future research.
Target groups
-
❖ Professionals caring for EB patients and their families.
-
❖ EB patients of all ages and diagnosed with any of the four major types of EB: EB Simplex, Junctional EB, Dystrophic EB and Kindler Syndrome.
-
❖ Families of people with EB.
Methods
Literature search process
Research appraisal
Results
Recommendations
Recommendation Summary | Grade strength | Quality of evidence (Average) | Key references |
---|---|---|---|
A. Psychosocial care for individuals living with EB | |||
We strongly recommend easy access to psychosocial support to improve QoL | B✓ | 2++ | |
We strongly recommend psychosocial support to improve well-being | C | 2+ | |
We strongly recommend gaining access to psychosocial support for the whole family | C✓ | 2- | |
We recommend psychosocial support to help with pain | C | 2- | |
We strongly recommend psychosocial support to help coping with EB | C✓ | 2- | |
We strongly recommend psychosocial support from a multidisciplinary Health Care Team | C✓ | 2- | |
B. Psychosocial care for family and care givers of people with EB | |||
We strongly recommend access to psychosocial family support to improve the family QoL | B | 2+ | |
We strongly recommend psychosocial support to improve family well-being | C | 2- | |
We strongly recommend family counselling in order to prevent family breakdown | C✓ | 2- | |
We strongly recommend psychosocial support to help the whole family to cope with living with EB | C | 2- | |
We recommend psychosocial support to reduce emotional burden during daily painful procedures | C | 2- | |
We strongly recommend easy access to a multidisciplinary expert team for the whole family | C | 2- | |
C. Self-care for professionals working with those affected by EB | |||
We strongly recommend psychosocial expertise to help people to cope with living with EB | C | 2- | |
We strongly recommend a collaborative patient-professional relationship | C | 2- | |
We strongly recommend offering support for professionals working in EB | C | 2- | |
KEY: EB: Epidermolysis Bullosa; QoL: quality of life; n: number of participants; α gray literature | |||
Grades | Descriptions in accordance to SIGN [22] | ||
B | A body of evidence including studies rated as 2++, directly applicable to the target population, and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 1++ or 1+ | ||
C | A body of evidence including studies rated as 2+, directly applicable to the target population and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2++ | ||
Ratings | Descriptions in accordance to SIGN [22] | ||
2++ | High quality case control or cohort studies with a very low risk of confounding or bias and a high probability that the relationship is causal | ||
2+ | Well conducted case control or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding or bias and a moderate probability that the relationship is causal | ||
2- | Case control or cohort studies with a high risk of confounding or bias and a significant risk | ||
✔ Recommended best practice based on the clinical experience of the guideline development group [22] |
Recommendations | Population | Grade strength | Quality of evidence (Average) | Quality of evidence | Key references |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
i. We strongly recommend easy access to psychosocial support to improve Quality of life (QoL) | |||||
A multidisciplinary approach in treating EB improves QoL for individuals with EB • Psychological support and close monitoring of EB improves QoL. • They facilitate participation in social activities. • Patients with all types of EB including EBS report a great impairment in QoL due to restrictions in physical and social activities. | ✓ Adults, children (n = 12/185) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB; KS Unclear if adults, children or both (n = 43/134) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB; Adults, children (n = 120/248) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Review of inherited & autoimmune blistering diseases | B | 2++ | 1- 2+ 2+ 2- 1- | [29] [30] [31] [28] [32] |
ii. We strongly recommend psychosocial support to improve well-being | |||||
To promote self-efficacy and support around body image to aid psychological well-being • Having access to knowledge and resources about EB can help people have a greater role in managing their EB. This self-management can help improve well-being. • Improved self-efficacy and locus of control, as well as support around body-image could help to develop a more positive sense of well-being. For support during transition periods in life (school transitions, transition into adulthood) • Communication and education about EB to improve people’s understanding. • Support from families, EB healthcare professionals and DEBRA. | Review of inherited &autoimmune blistering diseases Adults (n = 87) RDEB, DEB, EBS Children 10–14 years old (n = 11) EBS (autosomal recessive) Young male adults (aged 21–35 years) with RDEB (n = 5) and EBS (n = 2) Observational report | C | 2+ | 1- 2+ 2+ 4 4 | [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] |
iii. We strongly recommend gaining access to psychosocial support for the whole family | |||||
People diagnosed with EB should be referred for psychosocial support as early as possible in childhood or in adulthood, if the person with EB wishes • To support the family unit. Encourage supportive network for the family, for example: • Education about EB for others • Provide access to DEBRA (or other EB support groups) | ✓ Children (n = 11/82) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Children (n = 16) JEB Adult (n = 1) RDEB | C | 2- | 2- 2- 4 | [37] [38] [39]α |
iv. We recommend psychosocial support to help with pain | |||||
Pain is present for most children and adults with EB (all types) with profound psychosocial impact: • Activity related pain can significantly affect psychosocial well-being and QoL (e.g. fear of/actual pain restricting social activities, affecting relationships with family and friends). • Treatment related pain can make managing EB harder and link to procedural anxiety. Adequate holistic pain management is essential as a focus for helping people with EB: • Following pain guidelines. • Offering approaches to help people with EB cope emotionally. • Help with managing the impact of pain and the interlinked cycle of pain and psychosocial challenges. | Adults, children(n = 374) EBS, JEB, DDEB, RDEB Adults (n = 6) JEB, DDEB Children; (n = 11) EBS, JEB, DDEB, RDEB, Adults (n = 30) children (n = 27) EBS Children/families (n = 70) type of EB unclear Adults (n = 43) EBS, JEB, DDED, RDEB Unclear if adult/child (n = 40) EBS, JEB, DDEB, RDEB Best practice guideline Children (n = 11) EBS, JEB, DDEB, RDEB Adult (n = 1) RDEB | C | 2- | 2+ 2- 2- 2- 2- 2+ 2+ ⇒ 2+ 3 | [3] [40] [37] [42] [41] [30] [44] [7]α [17] [43] |
v. We strongly recommend psychosocial support to help cope with living with EB | |||||
People with EB need support to cope with EB, and their ways of coping need to be supported by others: participation in social life needs to be supported • Such as at school, the community, friendships, employment. • Aid access to supportive networks. • Public education campaigns to help those around them to understand EB and their needs. Promote a sense of self-management of their EB • This can help bring a sense of control over certain aspects of the disease/treatment and pain. Build social skills and communication • Help in learning how to communicate about EB to others and within the family unit. | ✓ Children (n = 27) DDEB; (n = 28) RDEB Children 10–14 years old (n = 11) EBS (autosomal recessive) Children (n = 11/82) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Children (n = 24) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB | C | 2- | 2+ 2+ 2- 2- | [45] [34] [37] [46] |
vi. We strongly recommend psychosocial support from a multidisciplinary Health Care Team | |||||
Encourage access to, and a collaborative ‘working together’ relationship with, an expert multi-disciplinary team of professionals. • Facilitate access to multidisciplinary professional support for medical and psychosocial care across the lifespan. • At both specialist centres and community services | ✓ Adults, children (n = 15) RDEB Children (n = 21) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Children (n = 11/82) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB HCPs (n = 33) 30 stakeholders (HCPs, and 9 with EB RDEB, DDEB, EBS) Adults (n = 6) JEB, DDEB Children and Adults (n = 20) EBS, JEB, DEB Children (n = 16) JEB Children (n = 20) EBS, JEB, RDEB | C | 2- | 1- 2+ 2+ 2+ 2- 2- 2- 2- 2- 2+ | [29] [48] [51] [17] [46] [49] [40] [38] [48] [47] |
Key: EB: Epidermolysis Bullosa; RDEB: Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa; JEB: Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa; DDEB: Dominant Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa; EBS: Epidermolysis Bullosa Simplex EBS-I: Localised form of EBS; KS Kindler Syndrome; QoL: quality of life; n: number of; α: gray literature; ⇒this is an EB guideline | |||||
Grades | Descriptions in accordance to SIGN [22] | ||||
B | A body of evidence including studies rated as 2++, directly applicable to the target population, and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 1++ or 1+ | ||||
C | A body of evidence including studies rated as 2+, directly applicable to the target population and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2++ | ||||
Ratings Descriptions in accordance to SIGN [22] | |||||
1- | Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or RCTs with a high risk of bias | ||||
2++ | High quality case control or cohort studies with a very low risk of confounding or bias and a high probability that the relationship is causal | ||||
2+ | Well conducted case control or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding or bias and a moderate probability that the relationship is causal | ||||
2- | Case control or cohort studies with a high risk of confounding or bias and a significant risk | ||||
3 | Non-analytic studies, e.g. case reports, case series | ||||
4 | Expert opinion | ||||
✔ Recommended best practice based on the clinical experience of the guideline development group [22] |
Recommendations | Population | Grade strength | Quality of evidence (Average) | Quality of evidence | Key references |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
i. We strongly recommend access to psychosocial family support to improve the family QoL | |||||
Early psychosocial support to improve QoL of the family unit for all subtypes EB and children with high infantile mortality: • As caregivers QoL may also be impacted. • Psychological support and close monitoring helps. • Support is essential for family of palliative patients with EB. | Adults, children; 11 studies EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Adults, children (n = 125/185) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB; KS Children (n = 16) JEB | B | 2+ | 1- 2+ 2- | [29] [30] [38] |
ii. We strongly recommend psychosocial support to improve the family well-being | |||||
Support for the family to reduce emotional burden of caring for someone with EB and improve well-being for the family unit: • Home nursing can provide much needed relief and support for primary caregivers and could reduce the need for hospital admission. • Actively assist in seeking counselling before the family unit is irreparably destroyed. • Provide information about the nature, course and outcome of EB. • Provide training in the management of patient symptoms. • Access to Social media and face to face EB support groups might be beneficial for families. Promoting family well-being can help the family enhance their strong and positive influence for those living with EB • The way the family reacts to EB can be psychologically assimilated by the person with EB, particularly children. • Acceptance of the EB by the family is important and can make it more bearable for the patient. | Adults, children (n = 15) RDEB Children, Adults (n = 374/ 425) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Adults, children (n = 125/185) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB; KS Adults, children (n = 25, 14 children, 11 adults) RDEB, EBS Adult – personal experience | C | 2- | 2+ 2+ 2- 4 2+ 4 | [50] [52] [30] [36] [53] [54] |
iii. We strongly recommend family counselling in order to prevent family breakdown | |||||
To help prevent the family unit breakdown, for the family of all EB subtypes: • Strengthen family relationships. To prevent family emotional breakdown or distress • Support in managing life with EB. To prevent parents’ emotional breakdown or distress • Specially provide support for single parents with a child living with EB. | Children, Adults (n = 374/ 425) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Adults, children (n = 15) RDEB Children (n = 11/82) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB | C | 2- | 2+ 2+ 2- | [52] [50] [17] |
Adults, children (n = 28/42) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Children (n = 16) JEB Children, Young Adults; (n = 63/138) EBS; DDEB; RDEB+ | 2- 2- 2- | [16] [38] [55] | |||
Adults, children (n = 125/185) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB; KS | 2- | [30] | |||
iv. We strongly recommend psychosocial support to help the whole family to cope with living with EB | |||||
Specialist home based psychosocial support for the family of all EB subtypes can help promote strategies to cope: • Help access counselling to promote the intra-family communication. • Access help to manage EB and economic burden. • Promote good relationships between the family • Provide a home care program for respite, or support handing over physical care to others. | Children (n = 21) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Adults, children (n = 125/185) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB; KS Adults, children (n = 28/42) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Children (n = 11/82) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB | C | 2- | 2+ 2- 2- 2- | [51] [30] [16] [17] |
v. We recommend psychosocial support to reduce emotional burden during daily painful procedures | |||||
Psychosocial support needs for parents and family to reduce the emotional burden of caring for someone living with EB who has severe pain: • Offer psychological support for caregivers. Parents/care givers can struggle with ‘causing pain’ due to dressing changes and wanting to protect their child from pain. This is very difficult emotionally for parents. • Pain can negatively affect relationships within the family and with friends. Help optimise pain management techniques. • Parents/carers can find it difficult to see people in severe pain. Aid access to respite, independent carers and promote independence with dressings. | ✓ Children (n = 11/82) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Adults, children; (n = 57) EBS-I Adult (n = 6/20) JEB, DDEB | C | 2- | 2+ 2- 2- | [17] [42] [40] |
vi. We strongly recommend easy access to a multidisciplinary expert team for the whole family | |||||
Provide access to recognised expert support and training for the whole family • Provide appropriate treatment and training or refer to national EB experts. • Referring to with the DEBRA or EB support network may help. | Adults, children; 11 studies EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Adults, children (n = 15) RDEB Children (n = 21) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Children (n = 11/82) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Adult (n = 1) RDEB | C | 2- | 1- 2+ 2+ 2+ 4 | [29] [50] [51] [17] [39]α |
Key: EB: Epidermolysis Bullosa; RDEB: Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa; JEB: Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa; DDEB: Dominant Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa; EBS: Epidermolysis Bullosa Simplex EBS-I: Localised form of EBS; KS Kindler Syndrome; QoL: quality of life; n: number of; α: gray literature; ⇒this is an EB guideline | |||||
Grades | Descriptions in accordance to SIGN [22] | ||||
B | A body of evidence including studies rated as 2++, directly applicable to the target population, and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 1++ or 1+ | ||||
C | A body of evidence including studies rated as 2+, directly applicable to the target population and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2++ | ||||
Ratings Descriptions in accordance to SIGN [22] | |||||
1- | Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or RCTs with a high risk of bias | ||||
2+ | Well conducted case control or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding or bias and a moderate probability that the relationship is causal | ||||
2- | Case control or cohort studies with a high risk of confounding or bias and a significant risk | ||||
4- | Expert opinion | ||||
✔ Recommended best practice based on the clinical experience of the guideline development group [22] |
Recommendations | Population | Grade strength | Quality of evidence (Average) | Quality of evidence | Key references |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
i. We strongly recommend psychosocial expertise to help people to cope with living with EB | |||||
Access to EB specialised care • Nurturing a good relationship between professionals, family and person with EB • Training for non-EB professionals | Children 10–14 years old (n = 11) EBS (autosomal recessive) Children (n = 11/82) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Children (n = 24) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB | C | 2- | 2+ 2- 2- | [34] [17] [46] |
ii. We strongly recommend a collaborative patient-professional relationship | |||||
• Training for professionals in working collaboratively with patients. | HCPs (N = 33) | C | 2- | 2- | [56] |
iii. We strongly recommend offering support for professionals working in EB | |||||
• To promote well-being for the healthcare professional • Emotional support is necessary: Personal support but also on an organisational level. • Importance of Professionals self-care: awareness, support to do this and access to clinical supervision. • Important to not work in isolation: the need to link in with an MDT and to feel equipped through information and education to help with psychosocial needs. | Key Stakeholders (N = 30) Key Stakeholders (N = 30) Adults (N = 6) JEB, DDEB | C | 2- | 2- 2- 2- | [56] [49] [40] |
Key: EB: Epidermolysis Bullosa; RDEB: Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa; JEB: Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa; DDEB: Dominant Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa; EBS: Epidermolysis Bullosa Simplex EBS-I: Localised form of EBS; KS Kindler Syndrome; HCPs: Health care professionals; MDT: multidisciplinary team; n: number of; α: gray literature; ⇒this is an EB guideline | |||||
Grades | Descriptions in accordance to SIGN [22] | ||||
C | A body of evidence including studies rated as 2+, directly applicable to the target population and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2++ | ||||
Ratings | Descriptions in accordance to SIGN [22] | ||||
2- | Case control or cohort studies with a high risk of confounding or bias and a significant risk |