Background
It is widely accepted that tumor development depends on a complex interaction between malignant cells and their microenvironment [
1]. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), as a major cellular component of the tumor stroma, coevolve with cancer cells and contribute to cancer cell growth, survival, and metastasis [
2,
3]. Often marked by smooth muscle actin (SMA), vimentin and N-cadherin, CAFs acquire a phenotype similar to that of myofibroblasts, which are activated in wound healing and fibrosis, with a morphology and function that differ from those of normal fibroblasts (NFs) [
4]. In oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), CAFs have been recognized as a poor prognostic factor, promoting invasion, metastasis, and recurrence of OSCC [
5‐
8]. There are 5 cellular origins of CAFs, among which NFs are a major source [
9,
10]. Despite the overwhelming consensus on the tumor-supportive role of CAFs, the molecular mechanisms underlying the transition from NFs to CAFs remain largely unclear. Further clarification of the mechanism underlying the transition from NFs to CAFs is important for cancer diagnosis and therapy.
Epiregulin (EREG), which is mainly secreted by fibroblasts, is a member of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) family of peptide growth factors and promotes tumor development, migration and invasion [
11‐
14]. It has been reported that EREG expression is increased in healing wounds [
13,
15]. However, whether EREG is involved in the NF-CAF transition remains unknown. As CAFs function similarly to myofibroblasts in wound healing, we hypothesized that EREG might participate in the transition of NFs to the CAF phenotype from the very start of NF activation, thus promoting tumor progression.
This study aimed to determine the role of EREG in the NF-CAF transition in the progression of OSCC and to identify the underlying mechanism. By understanding the NF-CAF transition, we can improve our knowledge of the supportive role of the tumor stroma, thus providing new insights into cancer treatment.
Material & Methods
Primary NFs/CAFs separation, cultivation and RNA-sequence
OSCCs, and matching normal oral biopsies were collected following ethical approval (2017NL-013(KS)) and written informed consent. 11 matching CAFs, and NFs were isolated according to a method previously described [
16] and forwarded for morphologic examination. After appropriate NFs/CAFs were isolated and chosen, 5 pairs of matched NFs and CAFs were sent for library construction, and RNA sequencing was performed.
We performed the RNA-seq with the help of Novel Bioinformatics Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Firstly, total RNA was extracted by Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) separately. The RNA quality was checked by Bioanalyzer 2200 (Aligent) and kept at − 80 °C.The RNA with RIN > 8.0 is right for cDNA library construction. Secondly, the complementary DNA (cDNA) libraries for single-end sequencing were prepared using Ion Total RNA-Seq Kit v2.0 (Life Technologies). The cDNA libraries were then processed for the Proton Sequencing process according to the commercially available protocols. Thirdly, Mapping of single-end reads. The clean reads were then aligned to human genome (version: GRCh38.p1) using the MapSplice program (v2.2.0). Finally, pathway analysis was performed and we also applied EBseq algorithm to filter the differentially expressed genes, the significant analysis and FDR analysis were performed. Besides, we presented gene co-expression Networks to find the relations among different mRNA and LncRNA. Results of LncRNA have been reported in a previous publication [
17]. Results of mRNAs with the most significant changes are listed in Additional file
1: Table S1. The data in the list are the mean value of the 5 pairs of samples.
Patients and tissue samples
For the analysis of expression of EREG, 104 consecutive unselected T
1-4N
0M
0 OSCC patients treated in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Nanjing Stomatology Hospital from 1 January, 2009 to 31 December, 2010 were included into the study. Including criteria: (1) diagnosed with primary OSCC by hematoxylin and eosin staining, and staged as T
1-4N
0M
0 according to the 8th version of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system [
18] by experienced pathologists from the Department of Pathology at Nanjing Stomatology Hospital; (2) underwent primary surgical treatments in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Nanjing Stomatology Hospital; (4) paraffin-fixed sample available; (3) with complete clinical-pathological information and follow-up data. Excluding criteria: (1) diagnosed with autoimmune or other malignant diseases and pregnant; (2) had adjuvant treatment before or after surgery. The ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of Nanjing Stomatology Hospital (approval number: 2017NL-013(KS)). The clinical pathologic characteristics of the 104 OSCC patients are listed in Table
1.
Table 1
Clinical pathologic characteristics and chi-square analysis of OSCC patients
Total | 104 (100) | 61 (100) | 43 (100) | – | – | – | – |
Sex |
Male | 51 (49.0) | 20 (32.8) | 31 (72.1) | 15.59 | < 0.0001*** | 0.1888 | 0.08035 to 0.4438 |
Female | 53 (51.0) | 41 (67.2) | 12 (27.9) | | | | |
Age |
<60 | 44 (42.3) | 21 (34.4) | 23 (53.5) | 3.755 | 0.0527 | 0.4565 | 0.2053 to 1.015 |
≥60 | 60 (57.7) | 40 (65.6) | 20 (46.5) | | | | |
TNM stage |
T1-2N0M0 | 80 (76.9) | 53 (86.9) | 27 (62.8) | 8.248 | 0.0041** | 3.926 | 1.492 to 10.33 |
T3-4N0M0 | 24 (23.1) | 8 (13.1) | 16 (36.2) | | | | |
Differentiation |
Well | 67 (64.4) | 43 (70.5) | 24 (55.8) | 2.371 | 0.1236 | 1.891 | 0.8366 to 4.275 |
Medium to poor | 37 (35.6) | 18 (29.5) | 19 (44.2) | | | | |
Perineural Infiltration |
No | 88 (84.6) | 55 (90.2) | 33 (76.7) | 3.489 | 0.0618 | 2.778 | 0.9241 to 8.350 |
Yes | 16 (15.4) | 6 (9.8) | 10 (23.3) | | | | |
DOI |
<5 mm | 62 (59.6) | 48 (78.7) | 14 (32.6) | 22.29 | < 0.0001*** | 7.648 | 3.157 to 18.53 |
≥5 mm | 42 (40.4) | 13 (21.3) | 29 (67.4) | | | | |
WPOI |
1–3 | 59 (56.7) | 46 (75.4) | 13 (30.2) | 20.97 | < 0.0001*** | 7.077 | 2.954 to 16.96 |
4–5 | 45 (43.3) | 15 (24.6) | 30 (69.8) | | | | |
Immunohistochemistry staining and evaluation
Immunofluorescence of cryosections or immunohistochemistry of paraffin-embedded tissue was done as previously described [
19]. Primary antibodies were rabbit anti-human EREG (Abcam), phospho-JAK2 (Proteintech), phospho-STAT3 (CST), SMA (Abcam).
EREG expression in CAFs was identified on the basis of SMA staining. CAFs were defined as SMA positive, spindled-shaped cells in the stroma (data of SMA staining not shown). EREG staining was assessed only in fibroblasts in tumor stroma by the evaluation of staining intensity and the percentage of EREG positive fibroblasts according to criteria modified from Zhang J et al. (Fig.
2a). Briefly, EREG expression was scored by a combination of staining intensity (score: 0 = no staining, 1 = weak staining, 2 = medium staining, 3 = strong staining) and percentage of EREG positive cells (score 0 = 0%~ 5% positive cells, 1 = 6%~ 33% positive cells, 2 = 34%~ 66% positive cells and 3 = 67%~ 100% positive cells) by a method modified from Zhang J, et al. (Fig.
2a) [
1]. EREG staining index was taken as the product of staining intensity and percentage. The staining index was further divided into low and high: score 0–4 (negative to medium) was defined as EREG low, score 6 and 9 (strong) was defined as high EREG expression. Two observers examined the images independently without the knowledge of patients’ information.
Construction of plasmid and siRNA
EREG over expression plasmid was purchased from Genechem Co.,Ltd. (Shanhai, China). The plasmid served as vector was pcDNA3.1+ (Amp). Amplified DNA fragments were inserted into the EcoR I/Xhol sites of pcDNA3.1+ vector. The amplification sequences were: EREG-F: GAATTCatgaccgcggggaggaggatggag; EREG-R: CTCGAGtcagacttgcggcaactctggatc. Empty plasmid was used as control.
The siRNAs were synthesized by Ribobio Co. Ltd. (Guangzhou, China) with following sequences: siNC: 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUdTdT-3′, siEREG-1: 5′-CCAGGAGAGUCCAGUGAUAdTdT-3′, siEREG-2: 5′-CCACCAACCUUUAAGCAAAdTdT-3′, siEREG-3: 5′-UACACUUUGUUAUUGACACUUdTdT-3′.
Transient transfection
Plasmid-mediated overexpression of EREG in NFs, and siRNA-mediated interference of EREG in CAFs, were carried out using Lipofectamine® 2000 Transfection Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Transient transfection was applied in all in vitro experiments.
Quantitative reverse transcription PCR
Cells were lysed with TRIzol® reagent (Life Technologies), total RNA was extracted following the manufacturer’s instructions, and cDNA synthesis was conducted using High-Capacity cDNA Archive Kit system (Applied Biosystems). Quantitative PCR (q-PCR) was then conducted using iTaq™ Universal SYBR® Green Supermix (BIO-RAD). Comparative 2-△Ct or 2-△△Ct method was used to quantify the relative mRNA expression as indicated.
Western blotting
Western blots were performed using an SDS–PAGE electrophoresis system as described previously [
19], employing rabbit anti-human EREG (Abcam), rabbit anti-human SMA (Abcam), rabbit anti-human E-cadherin (CST), rabbit anti-human N-cadherin (CST), rabbit anti-human vimentin (Proteintech), rabbit anti-human p-JAK2 (CST), rabbit anti-human JAK2 (CST), rabbit anti-human p-STAT3 (CST), mouse anti-human STAT3 (CST), rabbit anti-human p-NF-kB (CST), rabbit anti-human NF-kB (CST), rabbit anti-human p-p38 (CST), rabbit anti-human p38 (CST), rabbit anti-human p-akt (CST), rabbit anti-human akt (CST), rabbit anti-human p-erk1/2 (CST), rabbit anti-human erk1/2 (CST), rabbit anti-human snail (CST), antibodies. The blots were re-probed for rabbit anti-human GAPDH (Bioworld) to control for protein loading and transfer.
Immunofluorescence
Immunofluorescence analyses were carried out as previously described [
20]: primary antibodies, goat anti-human EREG (R&D), rabbit anti-human SMA (Abcam) and mouse anti-human CK (Abcam); secondary antibodies, AlexaFluor 647 donkey anti-goat IgG and AlexaFluor 488 goat anti-rabbit 594 goat anti-mouse IgG (Life Technologies).
Conditioned medium (CM) collection
NFs and CAFs were seeded into 12-well plates at identical density. NFs were transfected with control plasmid (pcDNA3.1) or EREG-overexpression plasmid (pcDNA3.1 EREG), and CAFs were transfected with control siRNA (siNC) or EREG siRNA (siEREG). The culture medium were collected 48 h after transfection, centrifuged at 3000RPM for 10 min to remove suspended cells, and stored in − 80 °C until Use.
Elisa
Cells were transfected with over-expression plasmid or siRNA for EREG, followed with or without treatment of AG490 or rIL6 as indicated. After 48 h, the supernatants were collected for the measurement of IL6 with an ELISA kit (Dakewei, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
CCK8 assay
Primary NFs and CAFs were transfected with pcDNA3.1-control, pcDNA3.1-EREG siNC or siEREG as indicated. The treated cells were either seeded in 96-well, or their culture medium was used to treat HSC3 cells seeded in 96-well. Cell viabilities were determined at 0, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h after transfection (in case of primary NFs/CAFs) or CM treatment (in case of HSC3 cells).
30/ml HSC3 cells were seeded in 12 well plates. Conditioned-medium from NFs + pcDNA3.1/pcDNA3.1-EREG, or CAFs+siNC/siEREG 24 h after transfection were used to treat HSC3 cells. The CM was changed every 3 days. After 1 to 2 weeks of cultivation, when visible colonies were formed, the medium was removed. Cells were 5% formalin-fixed after washed with PBS for 3 times, then stained with crystal violet.
Wound healing assays
HSC3 cells were seeded in 12-well plates until 100% fusion. After overnight starvation with serum-free DF12 medium, a scratch was made using a micropipette tip and cells were washed to remove detached cells and debris. Photographs of the same area of the wound were taken at 0 and 18 h for measuring the closure of the wound after the treatment of the indicated serum-free CM from NFs/CAFs.
Invasion and migration assays
The invasion and migration ability of HSC3 cells were tested in Transwell (boyden chamber) with an 8-um pore size of the polycarbonate membranes. Primary NFs and CAFs were placed in the lower chamber at a concentration of 3 × 10^4 cells/ml (0.6 ml/well). The NFs were then transfected with or without EREG-overexpression plasmids, and CAFs transfected with or without siEREG RNA. AG490 and recombinant human IL6 (Abcam) were added as indicated. After 5 h of incubation, the transfection mix was replaced by 0.5% FBS. Simultaneously, HSC3 cells, which had been previously starved overnight, were re-suspended with serum-free DF12 culture medium at a concentration of 10^6 cells/ml and then added to the upper chamber (200ul/well). For invasion assay, 40ul matrigel mix (matrigel: DMEM = 1: 2) was seeded at the bottom of Transwell chamber 1 h prior to the re-suspension of HSC3 cells to let the gel solidify. The number of migrated and invaded cells were qualified by blinded counting of migrated/invaded cells on the lower surface of the membrane, with five fields per chamber, at 24 h and 48 h, respectively.
3D culture invasion model and evaluation of carcinoma cell invasion
3D culture invasion model was constructed and based on a method previously described by Igarashi et al. [
21,
22]. Matrices containing fibroblasts were prepared by the addition of 1.4 parts of DF12 and 0.6 parts of FBS to 1 part of collagen type I solution (Thermo Fisher, 3 mg/ml), and neutralized with 1 M NaOH solution. Fibroblasts were then embedded into this solution to the final cell density of 5*10^5/ml, and seeded on top with HSC3 at the density of 4.5*10^5/cm
2 in triplicates. After 5 days of cultivation, 3D constructs were harvested, formalin-fixed, and paraffin-embedded, and sent for slide generation and HE staining.
Tumor model
To investigate the role of EREG in fibroblasts in vivo, stable EREG over-expression in NFs and EREG knockdown in CAFs were realized by lentivirus vector as previously decribed [
17,
23]. Then 10
6 conditional NFs/CAFs were subcutaneously co-injected with 10
6 HSC3 in rear flank of four-week old male BALB/c-nu/nu T cells-deficient mice (Cavens, Changzhou, China). Tumor volumes (mm
3) were measured at various time points until termination of the experiments. Tumors were collected for further experiments. Sixteen mice were used to construct xenografts with HSC3 and fibroblasts (four in each group). At the end of the study, mice were sacrificed and xenografted tumors were harvested. The experiments were executed in compliance with institutional guidelines and regulations.
Statistic analysis
All images represent at least three independent experiments. The results are presented as the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS® v 19 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Survival of patients was plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method and analyzed using the log-rank test, with patients censored at last follow-up. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann– Whitney U- and t-tests were used to compare groups, as appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all tests (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.0001).
Discussion
Available evidence suggests that CAFs, as an irreversible active form of NFs, promote the progression of OSCC [
6]. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the NF-CAF transition remain largely unclear.
The activation of NFs occurs through a multistep process. During wound healing, spindle-shaped quiescent resting fibroblasts (NFs) are reversibly activated to facilitate repair and regeneration. Normal activated fibroblasts (NAFs) gain smooth muscle actin (SMA) and vimentin and became stellate in shape. Activated fibroblasts can be further activated until there is “no way back” and they finally transit to CAFs. Such CAFs gain enhanced proliferative properties and are a functionally diverse population, adding to the dynamic complexity of the tumor microenvironment milieu [
28].
To identify key participants in NF-CAF reprogramming, 5 pairs of matching NFs and CAFs were sent for genomic analysis. We reviewed genes with the most significant changes and identified epiregulin (EREG) as a strong candidate. From its initial discovery, EREG has been closely linked with fibroblasts [
29]. It has been reported as the most significantly altered gene between NFs and CAFs in other studies [
6,
13]. It is overexpressed not only in CAFs but also in the stroma during wound healing [
13,
15], indicating that it could take part in NF activation from the very start, activating even the most quiescent NFs.
In a cohort consisting of 104 OSCC patients, we found that high levels of EREG expression in fibroblasts were significantly correlated with poorer OS and DFS, deeper DOI and higher levels of WPOI in OSCC patients. DOI and WPOI are prominent indicators for tumor invasion and are closely related to OSCC prognosis [
30,
31]. These results indicate that EREG secreted by CAFs is related to inferior OSCC prognosis and promotes OSCC invasion.
Next, we identified the causal relationship between EREG expression in fibroblasts and their CAF-like phenotype. Overexpression of EREG led to the activation of NFs, resulting in augmented expression of CAF markers (SMA, N-cadherin, and vimentin) and upregulated cell viability. Moreover, CAFs, a naturally irreversible activated form of NFs, were deprived of their CAF phenotype by EREG knockdown.
Through years of study, the tumor-promoting functions of the JAK2-STAT3 pathway have been well recognized in various malignancies [
32]. It has been reported that JAK-STAT can promote the proliferation [
33] and activation of fibroblasts [
34]. IL-1 induces the JAK-STAT pathway to shape CAF heterogeneity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [
35]. CAFs promote bladder cancer EMT via paracrine IL-6 [
36]. However, further evidence is needed regarding JAK-STAT-mediated fibroblast activation in oral cancer. Our study revealed that, in the abovementioned EREG-mediated NF activation, the JAK2-STAT3 pathway is the most significantly activated pathway. EREG could activate fibroblasts in a JAK2-STAT3-dependent way.
In addition to protein marker alteration, a widely recognized functional characteristic of CAFs is their supportive role in tumor progression. Existing evidence supports the idea that EREG is involved in carcinogenesis [
12,
13] and metastasis [
37] and correlates with poor prognosis [
38,
39]. Fibroblast-derived EREG promotes epithelial cell proliferation in cholesteatoma [
11]. In our study, even though the EREG level was positively correlated with fibroblast proliferation ability, colony formation and CCK8 assays revealed that modulating EREG in NFs/CAFs did not significantly alter their effects on oral cancer cell proliferation. On the other hand, wound-healing assays, transwell assays and 3D invasion models demonstrated that altered EREG expression in fibroblasts significantly influences their supportive role in cancer cell migration and invasion, with more significant effects on invasion. High EREG levels in fibroblasts could promote their invasion-supportive abilities by encouraging OSCC EMT in a JAK2-STAT3 pathway-dependent way.
Last, we confirmed our results in vivo. In a xenograft tumor model, EREG expression in fibroblasts had a tumor-supportive function in an EREG-related pattern. Phospho-JAK2 and phospho-STAT3 levels were related to EREG expression.
In recent years, CAFs have become a novel target in cancer treatment [
40‐
42]. The identification of EREG as a pivotal participant in the NF-CAF transition highlights critical pathways that could be targeted for novel therapeutic interventions.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Rie Yamada, Dr. Kayoko Kitajima, Dr. Kyoko Arai and Professor Masaru Igarashi (Department of Endodontics, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Niigata, Japan) for their generous help and precious advice in the construction of 3D invasion model.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.