Background
Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are rare lysosomal storage disorders caused by deficiencies in activities of several different lysosomal hydrolases. Mutations in genes coding for these enzymes lead to defects in degradation of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) [
1,
2]. Excessive accumulation of undegraded GAGs in lysosomes causes severe problems in most tissues and organs and usually leads to death in childhood [
2]. Currently, only two therapeutic procedures are available for treatment of some of MPS types: bone marrow (or hematopoietic cell) transplantation and enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) [
3]. The former procedure is the therapy of choice in MPS I, as it can halt neurocognitive decline when performed early, preferably before the age of 2.5 years [
4]. However, efficacy has only been demonstrated in MPS I and MPS VI, and not in MPS III [
3,
4]. The latter treatment is based on administration of the lacking enzyme, and it is currently available for MPS I, MPS II and MPS VI [
5]. Although this treatment is to some extent effective in management of somatic symptoms of the disease, in many MPS types (MPS IH, MPS II, all MPS III subtypes, MPS VII) central nervous system (CNS) is also affected, and ERT seems to be of low efficacy in treatment of neurological symptoms because of the poor delivery of enzyme molecules to CNS across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) [
4,
6].
Substrate reduction therapy (SRT) is one of putative alternative methods for MPS treatment [
6]. A specific kind of SRT for MPS, based on administration of genistein (5, 7-dihydroxy-3- (4-hydroxyphenyl)-4
H-1-benzopyran-4-one also known as 4', 5, 7-trihydroxyisoflavone), has been proposed [
7].
In vitro, genistein significantly inhibits GAG synthesis and results in a decrease in lysosomal storage in MPS cells [
7]. Expression of genes coding for enzymes involved in GAG synthesis might be controlled by signalling pathways dependent on a tyrosine kinase activity of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [
8,
9], and genistein has been reported to inhibit this enzymatic activity [
10]. In fact, genistein-mediated SRT was reported to act due to inhibition of phosphorylation of EGFR [
11] and subsequent putative modulation of gene expression. Therefore, this specific kind of SRT has been named ‘gene expression-targeted isoflavone therapy’ or GET IT [
12‐
14].
Since genistein was reported to cross the BBB to some extent [
15], it has been suggested that GET IT might be effective in treatment of neurological symptoms of MPS. In fact,
in vivo studies performed with MPS IIIB mouse model revealed a significant reduction of lysosomal storage in liver of MPS IIIB mice treated with genistein for 8 weeks [
16], and correction of the abnormal behavior in a long-term (9 month) experiment with high genistein dose (160 mg/kg/day) [
17]. Additionally, in both open label and placebo-controlled studies with MPS III patients treated with a genistein-rich soy extract at relatively low doses (5–15 mg/kg/day), some – though only limited – positive effects on urinary and plasma GAG levels, hair morphology, cognitive functions and behavior were reported [
18‐
22]. This low efficacy of GET IT in clinical trials, which is in contrast to promising results of experiments performed
in vitro and with mice, has recently been suggested to be due to low genistein doses in former studies (5–15 mg/kg/day in clinical studies vs. 160 mg/kg/day in animal-based experiments) [
14]. Nevertheless, other mechanisms, like limited effects of genistein in human body and/or low efficiency of crossing BBB by this isoflavone (this efficiency was estimated to be below 10% in rats [
15]), could not be excluded.
Simultaneously to clinical trials, further laboratory experiments on GET IT have been performed and it was demonstrated that some other natural isoflavones, or even flavonoids, may also cause an inhibition of GAG synthesis and reduction of their accumulation in MPS cells [
23,
24]. Therefore, one might speculate that chemical modification(s) of genistein might improve either its efficiency in GAG synthesis inhibition or efficiency in crossing BBB. If so, GET IT could be of higher efficacy in MPS patients. In this study, we aimed to test a series of synthetic derivatives of genistein in terms of efficiency of GAG synthesis inhibition and potential ability to cross BBB.
Methods
Chemicals
Genistein was obtained at the Pharmaceutical Research Institute (Warsaw, Poland) on the pilot plant scale, according to proprietory method [
25]. A method for regioselective derivatization of its phenolic groups was designed, based on unique, stable tetrabutylammonium salt [
26]. Preparations of its synthetic derivatives were already described in connection with study of antiproliferative activity [
27]. The derivatives listed in Table
1 have also been claimed as modulators of GAG storage in CNS (United States Patent no. US 8,178,609 B2; date of patent: May 15, 2012; inventors: Grynkiewicz G., Wegrzyn G., Szechner B., Tylki-Szymanska A., Wegrzyn A., Jakobkiewicz-Banecka J., Baranska S., Czartoryska B., Piotrowska E., title: Isoflavones for treating mucopolysaccharidoses). Stock solutions were prepared in dimethylformamide (DMF). MTT reagent (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5- diphenyltetrazolium bromide), purchased from Sigma (Germany), was dissolved in RPMI-1640 medium without phenol red (Sigma, Germany). Phosphate Bufered Saline (PBS), dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and dimethylformamide (DMF) were from Sigma (Germany).
Table 1
Synthetic derivatives of genistein
IFG-001 | 4-(5,7-dihydroxy-4-oxo-4 H-chromen-3-yl)phenyl 2-aminobenzoate | C22H15NO6 | 389.367 |
IFG-018 | 5-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-oxo-4 H-chromen-7-yl heptadecanoate | C31H40O6 | 508.65 |
IFG-021 | 7-O-[(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-β-D-galactopyranosyl)-1,4-(6-O-acetyl-hex-2-ene-α-D- erythropyranosyl)]-5-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-H-chromen-4-one | C37H38O18 | 770.689 |
IFG-027 | 5-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-7-(prop-2-en-1- yloxy)-4 H-chromen-4-one | C18H14O5 | 310.30 |
IFG-032 | 4-[5,7-bis(acetyloxy)-4-oxo-4 H-chromen-3-yl]phenyl acetate | C21H16O8 | 396.35 |
IFG-034 | 5-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-oxo-4 H-chromen-7-yl)-2-acetyloxybenzoate | C24H16O8 | 432.39 |
IFG-035 | 5,7-bis(prop-2-en-1-yloxy)-3-[4-(prop-2-en-1- yloxy)phenyl]-4 H-chromen-4-one | C22H22O5 | 390.43 |
IFG-036 | ethyl 2-((5-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-oxo-4 H-chromen-7-yl)oxy)acetate | C19H16O7 | 356.33 |
IFG-037 | tert-butyl-2-((5-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-oxo-4 H-chromen-7-yl)oxy)acetate | C21H20O7 | 384.382 |
IFG-038 | tetrabutylamonium 5-{[5-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-oxo-4 H-chromen-7-yl]oxy}-5-oxopentanoate | C36H51NO8 | 625.1 |
IFG-042 | tert-butyl 2-[(3-{4-[2-(tert-butoxy)-2- oxoethoxy]phenyl}-5-hydroxy-4-oxo-4 H-chromen-7-yl)oxy]acetate | C27H30O9 | 498.52 |
IFG-043 | tert-butyl 2-[(3-{4-[2-(tert-butoxy)-2-oxoethoxy]phenyl}-5-hydroxy-4-oxo-4 H-chromen-7-yl)oxy]acetate | C22H16O5 | 360.36 |
IFG-046 | 2(2(2-((4-oxo-4 H-chromen-7-yl)oxy)ethoxy)ethoxy)ethyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonate | C28H28O10S | 556.14 |
IFG-048 | tert-butyl 2-[4-(5,7-dihydroxy-4-oxo-4 H-chromen-3-yl)phenoxy]acetate | C21H20O7 | 384.382 |
IFG-050 | 5-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)- 7-O-(epoxymethyl)- 4-H-chromen-4-one | C18H14O6 | 326.30 |
IFG-051 | 7-(benzyloxy)-5-hydroxy-3-[4-(prop-2-en-1- yloxy)phenyl]-4 H-chromen-4-one | C25H20O5 | 400.42 |
IFG-052 | 4-[5-hydroxy-4-oxo-7-(prop-2-en-1-yloxy)-4 H- chromen-3-yl]phenyl 2-(acetyloxy)benzoate | C27H20O8 | 472.44 |
IFG-053 | 2-(3-{4-[7-(benzyloxy)-5-hydroxy-4-oxo-4 H-chromen-3-yl]phenoxymethyl}-5-(1-cyano-1-methylethyl)phenyl)-2-methylpropanenitrile | C37H32N2O5 | 584.66 |
IFG-054 | 2-{[5-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-oxo-4 H-chromen-7-yl]oxy}acetic acid | C17H12O7 | 328.27 |
IFG-060 | 5-{4-[7-(benzyloxy)-5-hydroxy-4-oxo-4 H-chromen-3-yl]phenoxy}-5-oxopentanoic acid | C27H22O8 | 474.47 |
IFG-061 | 4-[7-(benzyloxy)-5-hydroxy-4-oxo-4 H-chromen-3-yl]phenyl 1-sodium pentanedioate | C27H21O8Na | 480.45 |
IFG-062 | 5-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-7-[(4- methoxyphenyl)methoxy]-4 H-chromen-4-one | C23H18O6 | 390.39 |
IFG-063 | [5-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-oxo-4 H-chromen-7-yl] prop-2-en-1-yl carbonate | C19H14O7 | 354.31 |
IFG-064 | 7-(benzyloxy)-5-hydroxy-3-[4-(propan-2- yloxy)phenyl]-4 H-chromen-4-one | C25H22O5 | 402.44 |
IFG-065 | 7-(benzyloxy)-5-(propan-2-yloxy)-3-[4-(propan-2-yloxy)phenyl]-4 H-chromen-4-one | C28H28O5 | 444.52 |
IFG-066 | 5,7-dihydroxy-3-[4-(propan-2-yloxy)phenyl]-4 H- chromen-4-one | C18H16O5 | 312.32 |
IFG-067 | 4-[7-(benzyloxy)-5-hydroxy-4-oxo-4 H-chromen-3-yl]phenyl acetate | C24H18O6 | 402.4 |
IFG-070 | methyl 2-{[5-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-oxo-4 H-chromen-7-yl]oxy}acetate | C18H14O7 | 342.16 |
IFG-071 | 5-{[5-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-oxo-4 H-chromen-7-yl]oxy}pentyl acetate | C22H22O7 | 398.40 |
IFG-072 | 5-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-7-(3-hydroxypropoxy)-4 H-chromen-4-one | C18H16O6 | 328.31 |
IFG-073 | 5-hydroxy-7-(2-hydroxyethoxy)-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4 H-chromen-4-one | C17H14O6 | 314.22 |
IFG-074 | tetrabutylamonium 2-{[5-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-oxo-4 H-chromen-7-yl]oxy}acetate | C33H47O7N | 569.73 |
Cell lines and culture conditions
Fibroblast cell lines obtained from MPS IIIA and MPS IIIB patients were used in all experiments. Human Dermal Fibroblast adult line (HDFa; Cascade Biologics, Portland, OR, USA) was used as a healthy control line. Cells were grown in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) and 1 x Antibiotic and Antimycotic Solution (all purchased from Sigma, Germany) at 37 °C in humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. GAG synthesis experiments were performed using Minimal Essential Medium without inorganic sulfates (MEM, Joklik’s modified; Sigma, Germany).
Cytotoxicity and proliferation assay
Cytotoxicity and cell proliferation was assessed using MTT assay. Cells were seed in 96-well plates in a number of 6 x 103 cells per well (cytotoxicity assay) or 103 cells per well (proliferation assay). After an overnight incubation, growth medium was substituted with medium supplemented with appropriate concentrations of genistein synthetic derivatives or 0.05% DMF as a control and cells were incubated for 24- or 48-hours (cytotoxicity assay) or for 7-days (proliferation assay). Then, medium was substituted with MTT solution (1 mg/ml in RPMI-1640 medium) and following 2-hour incubation at 37°C the amount of a purple formazan product dissolved in DMSO was quantified by measuring the absorbance at 550 nm. LC50 (cytotoxicity assay) or IC50 (proliferation assay) index values were determined relative to nontreated cultures (incubated with DMF only).
Measurement of kinetics of GAG synthesis
Cells seed in a number of 2 x 104 cells per well (48-well plate) were incubated in growth medium overnight. Then, the medium was substituted with another one, containing appropriate concentrations of genistein synthetic derivatives or 0.05% DMF as a control, and cells were grown for 48 hours. In the next step, the medium was substituted with growth medium without inorganic sulfates (MEM, Joklik’s modified) mixed with standard DMEM medium (1:1) supplemented with FBS. GAGs were labeled with 20 μCi/ml of H2[35 S]O4 (Hartmann Analytic) for 24 hours. Cells washed with PBS were digested for 3 hours with 0.03% papain (prepared in 100 mM sodium acetate with 5 mM L-cysteine, pH 7.0) (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). 35 S incorporation was measured in a scintillation counter and calculated per DNA amount, which was determined in samples with Quant-iT™ PicoGreen® dsDNA Reagent (Molecular Probes, Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Measurement of tyrosine kinase activity of EGF receptor
Cells were seed in a number of 104 cells per well of 96-well plate. Following an overnight incubation, standard growth medium was substituted with the medium supplemented with appropriate concentrations of genistein synthetic derivatives or a potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor PD168390 (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), and cells were incubated for 2 hours. Then, Epidermal Growth Factor (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ USA) was added to 100 ng/ml to induce EGF receptor autophosphorylation. After 15 min the medium was removed, and cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde. Tyrosine kinase activity of EGF receptor was assessed using commercially available Cell-Based ELISA, Human Phospho-EGFR (Y1068) Immunoassay (R&D Systems, Inc) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Electron microscopic studies
Cells were incubated in growth medium supplemented with appropriate concentrations of tested compounds for 6 days. Following PBS washing, cells were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde, and then with 1% osmium tetroxide and 1% potassium hexacyanoferrate (III) followed by ethanol dehydration. Sections of Epon 812 resin (Fluka, Germany) embedded cells were stained in lead citrate and uranyl acetate and examined under transmission electron microscope (Philips CM100). The number of different lysosomal structures was determined.
Computational prediction of BBB penetration
Following physicochemical parameters were determined for each synthetic derivative of genistein: molecular weight (MW), octanol/water partition coefficient (cLogP), topological polar surface area (tPSA), the number of hydrogen bond donors (HBD) and hydrogen bond acceptors (HBA). Calculation of cLogP was performed on the basis of the chemical structure of compounds using ALOGPS 2.1 Program (VCCLAB) accessible via Internet (
http://www.vcclab.org) and assessment of tPSA was performed with MarvinSketch 5.2.6 (ChemAxon Ltd.) accessible via Internet (
http://intro.bio.umb.edu/111-112/OLLM/111F98/newclogp.html). Predicted logBB was assessed as proposed previously [
28].
Statistical analysis
Effects of different concentrations of genistein synthetic derivatives on the number of lysosomal structures was tested by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisions as a post-hoc test. Statistical tests were performed using Statistica 8.0 [StatSoft, Poland] software with significance at p < 0.05.
Discussion
An important issue in development of therapeutic approaches for MPS types with neurological symptoms is the ability of potential therapeutic agents to cross BBB. Enzyme replacement therapy, a treatment based on systematic, intravenous administration of the lacking enzyme, although effective - to some extent - in treatment of visceral organs, is of low efficacy in treatment of cases where the central nervous system is affected [
1,
6]. Alternative therapeutic approaches, such as substrate reduction therapies, are based on assumptions that low-molecular-weight molecules might be able to cross BBB and penetrate the brain readily [
29].
The results presented in this report indicate that some synthetic derivatives of genistein, particularly, IFG-060 and IFG-066, are potent inhibitors of GAG synthesis. Impairment of GAG synthesis by IFG-032, IFG-034, IFG-036, IFG-038, IFG-066, IFG-071 and IFG-072 was also an effective method for reduction of lysosomal storage in MPS IIIA and/or MPS IIIB cell cultures, as it was previously reported for genistein [
7]. Studies on MPS IIIB mice suggested that GET IT may be a promising treatment [
16,
17]. Thus, according to results obtained in this study, we suggest that artificial genistein derivatives listed in Table
3 might be considered as potential drugs to be used in treatment of MPS.
In the development of new therapies, it is crucial for a potential drug to be safe for humans. In this study, some synthetic derivatives of genistein (including the efficient reducers of GAG storage, listed in Table
3) revealed low cytotoxicity and minor effects on cell proliferation. This appears important in the light of safety problems with another effective inhibitor of GAG synthesis, rhodamine B [
30,
31]. Therefore, it seems that some derivatives of genistein (e.g. IFG-032, IFG-034, IFG-036, IFG-038, IFG-066, IFG-071, IFG-072) possess desirable biological properties for a potentially safe and effective drug. Moreover, predicted changes of physicochemical properties of some synthetic derivatives, relative to genistein (as assessed
in silico), might result in improvement of ability to cross BBB (see Table
4). On the other hand, it is necessary to stress that such an improved crossing of BBB was only calculated
in silico by using algorithms based on putative physicochemical properties of compounds, predicted from their formulas, according to previously described models [
28]. One has to consider that such an approach, although based on solid physical and chemical assumptions, cannot reflect all biological processes, among which a possible active transport of tested compounds may be especially important. Therefore, it should be noted that for determination of actual abilities of penetration of BBB by all compounds described in this report, it will be necessary to perform experiments with either BBB models or (preferably) laboratory animals. Synthesis of labeled isoflavones should be the first step in the way to assess the real (not only calculated or predicted) efficiency of BBB penetration by tested genistein derivatives.
Interestingly, the mechanism of action by which selected synthetic derivatives of genistein inhibit GAG production seems to be different from that described previously for genistein. Namely, contrary to this natural isoflavone, its artificial derivatives did not affect the EGF-dependent pathway, as they were not able to inhibit the EGFR kinase activity. It is worth noting that similar phenomenon was observed for various natural flavonoids causing GAG synthesis inhibition [
24]. It is, therefore, tempting to speculate that various chemical modifications of the genistein molecule destroy its activity of the EGFR kinase inhibitor, while either retaining/enhancing or gaining a new function of GAG synthesis inhibitor by influencing another, as yet unidentified, biochemical pathway.
Finally, one should note that apart from genistein derivatives that decreased GAG synthesis, there were also compounds significantly enhancing the efficiency of this process, like IFG-062. Therefore, we assume that the set of artificial genistein derivatives described in this report might be a useful tool in further studies on molecular mechanisms of regulation of GAG synthesis.
Competing interest
Genistein and its derivatives listed in Table
1 have been claimed as isoflavones for treating MPS in the United States Patent no. US 8,178,609 B2 (date of patent: May 15, 2012; inventors: Grynkiewicz G., Wegrzyn G., Szechner B., Tylki-Szymanska A., Wegrzyn A., Jakobkiewicz-Banecka J., Baranska S., Czartoryska B., Piotrowska E.; title: Isoflavones for treating mucopolysaccharidoses). The authors declare no other competing interest.
Authors’ contributions
AK performed all experiments but electron microscopic studies, and performed both in silico and statistical analyses; MN designed electron microscopic experiments, executed them, analyzed their results and interpreted them; JJB designed other experiments, interpreted their results and participated in drafting the manuscript; GG and WS designed and performed syntheses of genistein derivatives; MGC analyzed the results and participated in drafting the manuscript; GW planned the study, coordinated the project, drafted the first version of the manuscript and prepared its final version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.