Visualisation of aortic flow disturbance in Marfan syndrome by 4D phase-contrast CMR
verfasst von:
Alex Pitcher, Tom E Cassar, Joseph Suttie, Jane M Francis, Paul Leeson, Edward Blair, B Paul Wordsworth, J Colin Forfar, Saul G Myerson, Michael Markl, Stefan Neubauer, Steffen E Petersen
To characterise the distribution, extent and severity of aortic flow disturbance in the aorta in Marfan syndrome.
Background
Marfan syndrome commonly leads to progressive aortic dilation and aortic dissection, particularly at the aortic sinuses and descending thoracic aorta. Abnormal blood flow patterns may contribute to the enlargement and dissection of an inherently weak aorta.
Anzeige
Methods
15 patients with Marfan syndrome and no history of prior aortic dissection or surgery, and 18 healthy volunteer controls matched for age, sex and height underwent CMR at 3T (Siemens, Erlangen). Time-resolved, 3D velocity-encoded and magnitude data were acquired using a phase contrast CMR sequence (Figure 2). Each dataset was evaluated for flow disturbance by two independent observers, experienced in aortic flow visualisation, and blinded to patient identity.
Figure 1
3D Phase-contrast image, with clip-planes dividing the aorta into six anatomical segments.
Figure 2
Still frames from a movie showing 4D flow images of the aorta of a patient with Marfan syndrome (top row, A-C), and a healthy volunteer (bottom row, D-F). Arrows highlight turbulent, complex vortex formation.
×
×
Results
Significant vortical flow in any segment (defined as flow disturbance occupying more than one half of the aortic lumen) was present in all patients with Marfan syndrome but in only 7/18 controls (P<0.0005). Severity of flow disturbance was greater in Marfan patients than controls (median severity score 3 for Marfan patients compared to 1 for controls, P<0.0005). There was marked regional variation in the prevalence of major flow disturbance (Figure 3), with the sinuses of Valsalva and proximal descending aorta being most frequently affected. Marfan subjects with more extensive flow disturbance tended to have larger and more angulated aortic diameters at that segment, but flow abnormalities were still frequent in those with only modestly enlarged segments.
Figure 3
Prevalence of vortical flow disturbance by region for Marfan patients and controls.
×
We propose a classification of aortic flow disturbance in Marfan syndrome. Type A: flow disturbance confined to the sinuses of Valsalva, Type B: flow disturbance confined to the proximal descending aorta, Type C: flow disturbance in both the sinuses of Valsalva and the proximal descending aorta.
Conclusion
Patients with Marfan syndrome commonly show aortic flow disturbance. The sinuses of Valsalva and proximal descending aorta are most frequently affected and these may contribute to aortic dilation and dissection seen at these regions in these patients.
Anzeige
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Visualisation of aortic flow disturbance in Marfan syndrome by 4D phase-contrast CMR
verfasst von
Alex Pitcher Tom E Cassar Joseph Suttie Jane M Francis Paul Leeson Edward Blair B Paul Wordsworth J Colin Forfar Saul G Myerson Michael Markl Stefan Neubauer Steffen E Petersen
Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.
Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.
Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.
Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.
Update Radiologie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletterund bleiben Sie gut informiert.
