Malignancy in the blind painful eye – report of two cases and literature review
verfasst von:
Patrícia Rusa Pereira, Alexandre Nakao Odashiro, João Pessoa Souza Filho, Vinicius S Saraiva, David Gerardo Camoriano, Miguel N Burnier Jr
Few cases of malignant tumors arising in a blind painful eye have previously been described. We described two cases of a blind painful eye containing an unsuspected tumor, which were enucleated to relieve the pain.
Case presentations
Case 1: A 57 year-old Caucasian man presented with recurrent orbital cellulitis and endophthalmitis in the left eye (OS). The OS was blind and painful and an enucleation was performed showing a uveal melanoma by histopathological exam. Case 2: A 54 year-old Caucasian man with previous history of a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in his left eye presented a blind painful eye. Enucleation was performed revealing a well-differentiated B-cell lymphoma of uveal tract with extra ocular extension.
Conclusion
In the management of a blind painful eye, it is extremely important to rule out an intraocular malignancy particularly in those patients who have not been followed by an ophthalmologist.
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1746-1596-1-45) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Competing interests
The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
PRP wrote the manuscript
ANO, JPSP and VS revised the histopathology of the cases and the manuscript
DGC prepared the pictures and revised the manuscript
MNB revised the entire manuscript
Background
A blind eye may be associated with pain, which is a challenge for the ophthalmologist. The most common conditions leading to the development of a blind painful eye (BPE) are trauma, miscellaneous retinal disorders and retinal detachment, and the majority of these eyes are enucleated to relieve the pain.[1]
Few cases of malignant tumors arising from BPE have previously been described. [2‐7] From literature review, the frequency of unsuspected intraocular tumors in blind painful eyes has declined over the past twenty years mainly due to ocular ultrasound (US) examination. We described two cases of BPE containing unsuspected tumor, which were enucleated to relieve the pain.
Anzeige
Case presentation
Case 1: A 57 year-old Caucasian man had a previous history of cataract surgery, left eye (OS), in 1984. In 2000, the patient presented with recurrent orbital cellulitis and endophthalmitis OS. The OS was blind and painful and an enucleation was performed (Figure 1A). Histopathology revealed a malignant uveal melanoma, epithelioid cell type (Figure 1B), invading the sclera and orbital tissues. No signs of metastatic disease were detected after four years of follow-up.
Figure 1
A: Gross examination discloses a pupil-optic nerve section presenting a pigmented mass on the choroid with extra-ocular extension. B: Photomicrograph of immunohistochemistry stained with HMB-45 showing strong reaction in almost all cells. The tumor is composed by epithelioid cells with large nuclei and conspicuous nucleoli. (Original magnification 200×). C: Gross examination of pupil-optic nerve section showing a whitish mass committing all uveal tract with extra-ocular extension. D: Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) preparation showing tumor in the uveal tract with extra-ocular extension.
×
Case 2: A 54 year-old Caucasian man suffering from Steinert's syndrome had a blind, atrophic OS since 1980. Past medical history includes systemic hypertension and several ophthalmic procedures OS, including a cataract surgery (1971) and a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (1978). In 1992, the patient presented with pain in the OS and an uneventful enucleation was performed (Figure 1C). Histopathologic examination disclosed a monotonous and diffuse proliferation of small lymphocytes in the uveal tract with extra ocular extension. Immunohistochemical study was strongly positive for CD20 (B lymphocytes) and negative for CD45RO (T lymphocytes), consistent with a well-differentiated B-cell lymphoma (Figure 1D). No signs of systemic involvement were detected. The patient was lost to follow-up six years after surgery.
Severe pain may develop in blind eyes for various reasons including surgical and non-surgical trauma, and retinal detachment. Management of a blind painful eye represents a challenge for the ophthalmologist and is limited to topical medications, retrobulbar alcohol injection, evisceration or enucleation.[1]
Relief of ocular pain is the most common reason that enucleation is performed in BPE.[1] In the past, ocular melanomas arising in a BPE could account for more than 10% of all diagnosed uveal melanomas.[8] Volcker and Naumann[9] in 1976 described 36 cases of unsuspected ocular melanoma that were diagnosed after enucleation. The clinical diagnoses in those cases were secondary glaucoma (30), retinal detachment (2), iritis (2), and end/panophthalmitis (2). Review of the literature today shows that the clinical suspicion rate of an intraocular malignancy in BPE is not well established. Previous studies of enucleated globes do not correlate blindness with unsuspected intraocular tumors.[10]
Anzeige
In this particular report, the unsuspected melanoma was present in a blind painful eye of a mentally handicapped patient. Intraocular lymphomas of the uveal tract have been discovered in functional eyes with symptoms of retinal detachment and increased intraocular pressure.
Intraocular tumors arising in blind painful eyes are probably under diagnosed and underreported. Several uveal melanomas, [4, 5, 7] two adenocarcinomas of the retinal pigment epithelium [2, 3] and an unspecified sarcoma [6] have been described (Table 1). In two of those cases, enucleation was performed to relieve the pain and an early stage malignant tumor was found,[2, 7] leading to a good prognosis. However, in cases with advanced disease and extra-ocular involvement, an enucleation was performed due to a high index of suspicion of an intraocular malignancy.[4‐6] In those cases the prognosis was poor.
Table 1
Malignant tumor in previous blind eyes
Authors
Patient
Eye
Signs/Symptoms
Suspicious malignancy
Treatment
Pathologic diagnosis
Follow-up
Ten Thije6
66-year-old, man
RE
Exophthalmos
Yes
Exenteration
Large-cell sarcoma
Death few months after diagnostic
Sarmaet al5
62-year-old, man
LE
Progressive proptosis, eye pain, left orbit mass
Yes
Exenteration
Extrascleral Uveal melanoma
No follow-up reported
Nelson & Kincaid4
70-year-old, man
LE
dark inferonasal and superiorly conjunctival mass, mass in the anterior chamber
Yes
Exenteration
Extrascleral Uveal melanoma (ciliary body)
Pulmonary and bone metastasis, death 1 year after diagnostic
Nelson & Kincaid4
79-year-old, man
RE
eye pain, black exophytic subconjunctival mass
Yes
Exenteration
Extrascleral Uveal melanoma
Liver metastasis 8 months later, death 14 months after diagnostic
Loeffleret al3
66-year-old, man
RE
eye pain
No
Enucleation
Malignant tumor of the retinal pigment epithelium
No death or metastasis 1 year after enucleation
Edelsteinet al2
79-year-old, woman
RE
eye pain, exophthalmos
No
Enucleation
Presumed Adenocarcinoma of the retinal pigment epithelium with staphyloma
No follow-up reported
Tripathiet al7
45-year-old
RE
Eye pain
No
Enucleation
Uveal melanoma
No follow-up reported
Pereiraet al
57-year-old, man
LE
eye pain, endophthalmitis, orbital cellulites
No
Enucleation
Extrascleral Uveal melanoma
No signs of metastatic disease after four years of follow-up
Pereiraet al
54-year-old, man
LE
eye pain
No
Enucleation
Extranodal lymphoma of uveal tract with extra ocular extension
Lost to follow-up after six years
Several authors emphasized the importance of ultrasonographic studies to diagnose intraocular tumors in blind painful eyes.[5, 11]
Conclusion
In the management of a blind painful eye, it is extremely important to rule out an intraocular malignancy particularly in those patients who have not been followed by an ophthalmologist. In these cases, it is the duty of the attending physician to emphasize to the patient the importance of regular examination of the blind eye because, like in all malignancies, advanced disease leads to a worse prognosis.[4] The present report also emphasizes the importance of subjecting enucleated globes to a histopathological examination, since an unsuspected intraocular malignancy may be hidden in a blind painful eye.
Open Access
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0
), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Competing interests
The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
PRP wrote the manuscript
ANO, JPSP and VS revised the histopathology of the cases and the manuscript
DGC prepared the pictures and revised the manuscript
Um auch an kleinen Gewebeproben zuverlässige und reproduzierbare Ergebnisse zu gewährleisten ist eine strenge Qualitätskontrolle in jedem Schritt des Arbeitsablaufs erforderlich. Eine nicht ordnungsgemäße Prüfung oder Behandlung des …
Die vergleichende experimentelle Pathologie („comparative experimental pathology“) ist ein Fachbereich an der Schnittstelle von Human- und Veterinärmedizin. Sie widmet sich der vergleichenden Erforschung von Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschieden von …
Gastrointestinale Stromatumoren (GIST) stellen seit über 20 Jahren ein Paradigma für die zielgerichtete Therapie mit Tyrosinkinaseinhibitoren dar. Eine elementare Voraussetzung für eine mögliche neoadjuvante oder adjuvante Behandlung bei …
Aufgrund des erheblichen technologischen Fortschritts in der molekularen und genetischen Diagnostik sowie zunehmender Erkenntnisse über die molekulare Pathogenese von Krankheiten hat in den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten ein grundlegender …
