Introduction
Evidence quality | Preponderance of benefit over harm | Balance of benefit and harm | Preponderance of harm over benefit |
---|---|---|---|
A. Well-designed RCTs | Strong recommendation | Option | Strong recommendation against |
B. RCT’s with minor limitations; overwhelming consistent evidence from observational studies | Recommendation | ||
C. Observational studies (case–control and cohort design) | Recommendation against | ||
D. Expert opinion; case reports; reasoning from first principles | Option | No recommendation |
Mechanisms and actions of GCS
Evidence for efficacy of systemic GCS in different inflammatory upper airway diseases
1. Allergic rhinitis
Study | Year | LOE (1a to 5) | Study design | Study groups | Clinical end-point efficacy | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Borum et al. | 1987 | 1b | RCT | 1. 80 mg MP (n = 12 adults with AR) vs. placebo early in the season (n = 12 adults with AR) 2. 80 mg MP (n = 12) vs. placebo late in the season (n = 12) | 1. Nasal and ocular symptoms 2. Number of sneezings and nose blowing/day | The effect of MP on nasal blockage is marked and last for 4 weeks MP administration before the pollen season is effective but not recommended in clinical practice to avoid too widespread use |
Laursen et al. | 1987 | 1b | RCT | 1. 10 mg betamethasone dipropionate IM single dose and oral placebo (n = 17 adults with AR) × 3 weeks 2. 7.5 mg oral prednisolone × 3 weeks and IM placebo (n = 19 adults with AR) | 1. Nasal and ocular symptoms 2. Blood eosinophils | Both treatments equally controlled hay fever symptoms Reduction of blood eosinophils with both drugs |
Brooks et al. | 1993 | 1b | RCT | 1. Placebo (n = 7 adults with AR) 2. 6 mg MP (n = 8 adults with AR) 3. 12 mg MP (n = 8 adults with AR) 4. 24 mg MP (n = 8 adults with AR) | 1. Nasal and ocular symptoms 2. Dose–response effect 3. Minimal effective dose 4. Relative effectiveness against various symptoms | MP produced dose-related reduction in all symptoms 24 mg MP reduced significantly all symptoms except nasal itching 6 mg MP reduced significantly nasal congestion, drainage, and eye symptoms Not all rhinitis symptoms responded equally to corticoid treatment. Those that responded least could reflect histamine effect, which was not effectively suppressed by low-dose, short-term corticoid treatment |
-
Evidence level: B.
-
Benefits–harm assessment: AE’s of systemic GCS outweigh advantages of therapeutic value, except for patients suffering from very severe and therapy-resistant symptoms.
-
Recommendation: Strong recommendation against. Option in patients suffering from very severe and therapy-resistant symptoms.
2. Non-allergic rhinitis
-
Evidence level: D.
-
Benefits–harm assessment: AE’s of systemic GCS outweigh advantages of therapeutic value.
-
Recommendation: Recommendation against.
3. Acute rhinosinusitis
Study | Year | LOE (1a to 5) | Study design | Study groups | Clinical end-point efficacy | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cannoni et al. | 1990 | 1b | RCT | 1. Adults with (sub)acute, non-allergic sinusitis with antibiotics and prednisolone 40–60 mg/day for 7 days 2. Adults with (sub)acute, non-allergic sinusitis with antibiotics and NSAID for 7 days | 1. Therapeutic success defined as combination of resolution of pain and absence of nasal discharge clinically and endoscopically at day 7 | Beneficial effect of prednisolone in combination with antibiotics |
Gehanno et al. | 2000 | 1b | RCT | 1. Adults with acute sinusitis treated with antibiotics and methylprednisolone 8 mg; 3×/day for 5 day 2. Adults with acute sinusitis treated with antibiotics and placebo for 5 days | 1. Clinical recovery on d 14 2. Course of symptoms on day 4 3. Symptoms and radiological signs on day 30 | Significant pain relief in combination with antibiotics compared to antibiotics in monotherapy, no additional effect on nasal discharge |
Klossek et al. | 2004 | 1b | RCT | 1. Adults with acute maxillary sinusitis treated with antibiotics and prednisone 0.8–1.2 mg/kg/day for 3 days 2. Adults with acute maxillary sinusitis treated with antibiotics and placebo for 3 days | 1. Difference in VAS for pain at baseline and day 3 2. Differences in VAS for nasal obstruction 3. Time to pain relief 4. Administration of paracetamol 5. Global subjective effect of treatment on day 3 6. Global subjective effect of treatment on days 10–12 | Benefit of short course treatment of prednisone in combination with antibiotics vs. antibiotics with placebo |
Ratau et al. | 2004 | 1b | RCT | 1. Adults with acute sinusitis treated with antibiotics and betamethasone 1 mg/day for 5 days 2. Adults with acute sinusitis treated with antibiotics and placebo for 5 days | 1. Improvement of symptoms between day 0 and day 6 2. Percentage of participants with physical signs present or absent on day 0 and day 6 3. Number of paracetamol tablets taken | Benefit of steroids treatment in combination with antibiotics vs. antibiotics with placebo |
Venekamp et al. | 2012 | 1b | RCT | 1. Adults with acute sinusitis treated with prednisolone 30 mg/day for 7 days 2. Adults with acute sinusitis treated with placebo for 7 days | 1. Resolution of facial pain/pressure at day 7 2. Resolution of other clinically relevant symptoms on day 7 3. Time to resolution of total symptoms 4. Median duration of symptoms 5. Quality of life 6. Resumption of daily activities | No clinically beneficial effects of systemic corticosteroid monotherapy |
-
Evidence level: B.
-
Benefits–harm assessment: AE’s of systemic GCS outweigh advantages of therapeutic value in mild and moderate disease.
-
Recommendation: Strong recommendation against when only mild to moderate symptoms. Option in patients suffering from severe headaches/symptoms when combined with antibiotics.
4. Chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps
Study | Year | LOE (1a to 5) | Study design | Study groups | Clinical end-point efficacy | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subramanian et al. | 2002 | 4 | Retrospective | CRS patients (23 CRSsNP and 17 CRSwNP) treated with 1 month antibiotics + intranasal steroids + prednisone tapered over 10 days (20 mg 2×/day for 5 days, 20 mg 1×/day for 5 days). Mostly adult patients (2 patients under 18) | Change in CT scores, symptom scores post-treatment. Time to relapse | Beneficial effect of multimodal therapy on scoring of CT, symptoms or both in 90% of all CRS patients, no specific subanalysis for CRSsNP. Beneficial effect continued beyond 8 weeks in 60% of patients. No subanalysis made for CRSsNP |
Lal et al. | 2009 | 4 | Retrospective | Adult CRS patients (23 CRSsNP and 17 CRSwNP) treated with antibiotics + intranasal steroids + intranasal decongestants + prednisone tapered over 12 days (60, 40, 20, 10 mg for 3 days each) | Complete endoscopic and symptomatic resolution of symptoms 2 months after start of treatment | Beneficial effect of treatment in 54.9% of CRSsNP |
-
Evidence level: C.
-
Benefits–harm assessment: AE’s of systemic GCS outweigh advantages of therapeutic value.
-
Recommendation: Recommendation against.
5. Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
Study | Year | LOE (1a to 5) | Study design | Study groups | Clinical end-point efficacy | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alobid et al. | 2014 | 1b | Prospective non-blinded RCT | Adult CRSwNP patients treated with intranasal budesonide 800 μg daily for 2 weeks in combination with oral prednisone (30 mg daily for 4 days followed by a 2-day reduction of 5 mg) (n = 67) or nothing (n = 22) | 1. Polyp grade measured by CT 2. Nasal congestion 3. Loss of sense of smell 3. Polyp tissue eosinophils 4. Nasal nitric oxide | Combined oral and intranasal corticosteroids improve smell and nasal congestion, decrease tissue eosinophilia and increased detection of nNO |
Benitez et al. | 2006 | 1b | Prospective non-blinded RCT | Adult CRSwNP patients treated with oral prednisone, 30 mg for 4 days and a 2-day reduction of 5 mg for a total duration 14 days followed by intranasal budesonide for 12 weeks (n = 63) or no treatment (n = 21) | 1. Disease individual symptom scoring of nasal obstruction, loss of sense of smell, rhinorrhoea and sneezing 2. Polyp size measured by endoscopy 3. Nasal flow measurements | 14 days of oral steroids improved all nasal symptoms, polyp size, and nasal flow, which is maintained by intranasal steroid |
Ecevit et al. | 2015 | 1b | Prospective double-blind RCT | Adult CRSwNP patients treated with oral prednisolone, 60 mg/day (6 tablets per day) for 7 days, then reduced to 10 mg (1 tablet) taken every other day, stopping on day 17 (n = 11) or placebo (n = 10) | 1. Visual analogue scale for sense of smell, nasal discharge, nasal obstruction and pressure over the sinuses 2. Smell testing 3. Peak nasal inspiratory peak flow | The improvement in the corticosteroid group in the VAS scores, smell tests and PNIF values showed statistically significant differences compared to the placebo group |
Hissaria et al. | 2006 | 1b | Prospective double-blind RCT | Adult CRSwNP patiets treated with prednisolone, 50 mg/day for 14 days (n = 20) or placebo (n = 21) | 1. Health-related quality of life (RSOM-31) 2. Physician assessment of nasal symptoms (congestion, hyposmia, rhinorrhoea, sneezing, postnasal drip and itch) 3. Polyps size measured by endoscopy 4.MRI of the paranasal sinuses | The prednisolone-treated group showed significant improvement in nasal symptoms. The RSOM-31 improved in both groups, but the prednisolone-treated group had significantly greater improvement than the placebo group. There was significant reduction in polyp size, as noted with nasendoscopy (P < 0.001) and MRI (P < 0.001), only in the prednisolone-treated group |
Kapucu et al. | 2012 | 2b | Prospective unblinded RCT | Adult CRSwNP patients treated with oral methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg/day. The dose was applied for 3 days and tapered gradually, with a reduction rate of 8 mg/3 days (n = 12) or no medication (n = 12) | Apoptotic index | Statistically significant differences in apoptotic index were found between each steroid-medicated group and the control group |
Kirtsreesakul et al. | 2012 | 1b | Prospective double-blind RCT | Adult CRSwNP patients treated with oral prednisolone 50 mg daily for 14 days (n = 67) or placebo (n = 47) | 1. Symptom scoring for blocked nose, runny nose, sneezing, nasal itching, hyposmia, postnasal drip, cough and sinonasal pain 2. Nasal polyp size measured by endoscopy | The prednisolone-treated group showed significantly greater improvements in all nasal symptoms, nasal flow and polyp size than the placebo-treated group |
Vaidyanathan et al. | 2011 | 1b | Prospective double-blind RCT | Adult CRSwNP patients treated with prednisolone tablets, 25 mg/day, 2 weeks (n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) in patients on intranasal steroids | 1. Juniper mini rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire 2. Total nasal symptoms score 3. Sense of smell 4. Nasal polyp score by endoscopy 5. Peak nasal inspiratory flow rate 6. Serum eosinophil-derived neurotoxin 7. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels | Short oral steroid therapy followed by topical steroid therapy is significantly more effective over 6 months than topical steroid therapy alone in decreasing polyp size and improving olfaction in CRSwNP patients with at least moderate nasal polyps |
Van Zele et al. | 2010 | 1b | Prospective double-blind RCT | Adult CRSwNP patients treated with oral methylprednisolone (32 mg/day on days 1 to 5; 16 mg/day on days 6 to 10; 8 mg/day on days 11 to 20) (n = 14) or placebo (n = 19) | 1. Polyps size measured by endoscopy 2. Nasal peak inspiratory flow 3. Blood analysis for eosinophils, eosinophilic cationic protein and soluble IL-5 receptor 4. Nasal secretion analysis for eosinophilic cationic protein, IL-5, IgE, matrix metalloproteinase-9, myeloperoxidase 5. Need for rescue surgery and need for rescue nasal steroids | Methylprednisolone significantly decreased nasal polyp size compared with placebo. The effect was maximal at week 3 and lasted until week 8. Methylprednisolone significantly reduced levels of ECP, IL-5, and IgE in nasal secretions |
-
Evidence level: A.
-
Benefits–harm assessment: AE’s of systemic GCS outweigh advantages of therapeutic value in the long-term, except in patients with severe symptomatology.
-
Recommendation: Strong recommendation against. Option for a short-term course in patients with severe symptoms and therapy-resistance.
Study | Year | LOE (1a to 5) | Study design | Study groups | Clinical endpoints efficacy | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecevit et al. | 2015 | 1b | Prospective double-blind RCT | Adults with CRSwNP with surgical indication receiving either oral prednisolone, 60 mg/day for 7 day, then reduced to 10 mg (1 tablet) taken every other day, stopping on d 17 (n = 11) or placebo (n = 10) | 1. Perioperative bleeding 2. Visibility of the operative field 3. Operative time 4. Hospital stay | Perioperative bleeding, operative time and hospital stay were significantly reduced in patients who received oral steroids. Visibility of the operative field was significantly better after receiving steroids |
Wright et al. | 2007 | 1b | Prospective double-blind RCT | 26 adult CRSwNP patients with surgical indication receiving either 30 mg of prednisone for 5 days preoperatively or placebo | 1. Difficulty of surgery 2. Operative time 3. Peroperative blood loss | Surgeons rated the surgery in the placebo-treated group as more difficult than the steroid-treated group No differences were noted in operative duration and blood loss |
Günel et al. | 2015 | 1b | Prospective double-blind RCT | 65 adult CRSwNP patients with surgical indication receiving either oral prednisolone (1 mg/kg for 2 days and then tapered down, with treatment completed on the day 10) or placebo | 1. Intraoperative blood loss 2. Quality of surgical field | No difference in intraoperative blood loos when patients received oral steroids preoperatively Non-significant improvement of quality of surgical field after oral steroids |
Fraire et al. | 2013 | 3b | Prospective non-randomized CT | Adult CRS patients with surgical indication (CRSsNP and CSRwNP) receiving either 2×/day 30 mg methylprednisolone on 5 consecutive days prior to surgery (n = 27) vs. no treatment (n = 27) | 1. Intraoperative bleeding 2. Surgical time 3. Quality of surgical field | Operative bleeding was significantly reduced in CRSwNP patients who received oral steroids preoperatively. No significance obtained in quality of operating field. No difference in surgical time |
Sieskiewicz | 2006 | 1b | RCT | 36 adult CRSwNP patients with surgical indication receiving either prednisone (30 mg/day for 5 consecutive days directly before the surgery) or no preoperative treatment | 1. Intraoperative bleeding 2. Surgical time 3. Quality of surgical field | Quality of the operating field and surgical time were significantly improved in CRSwNP patients who received oral steroids preoperatively. No significance obtained in total blood loss |
-
Evidence level: B.
-
Benefits–harm assessment: AE’s of systemic GCS outweigh advantages of therapeutic value.
-
Recommendation: Strong recommendation against.
6. Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis
Study | Year | LOE (1a to 5) | Study design | Study groups | Clinical end-point efficacy | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Woodworth et al. | 2004 | 3b | Prospective case control study | Adults with CRSwNP from which 8 AFRS en 6 eosinophilic mucin rhinosinusitis were treated with oral prednisone (60 mg for 3 days, 40 mg for 3 days, 30 mg for 3 days, 20 mg for 12 days) | 1. SNOT-20 2. Nasal endoscopy score 3. Mucosal IL-5, IL-13, eotaxin, MCP-4 | Significant reduction in nasal endoscopy scores and inflammatory markers, non-significant reduction in SNOT-20 scores |
Landsberg et al. | 2007 | 3b | Prospective case control study | Adult AFRS and CRSwNP patients received 1 mg/kg prednisone for 10 days | 1. CT Lund Mackay scores 2. Nasal endoscopy score, but no scoring system used | CT score changes were significantly greater in AFRS patients compared to CRSwNP |
Kupferberg et al. | 1997 | 4 | Retrospective case control study | Adult and adolescent AFRS patients (13–69 years) that underwent surgery and receiving: (1) no treatment; (2) oral steroids (4 days 40 mg, then 4 days 30 mg, then 20 mg/day until 1 month postop); (3) oral steroids and oral antifungals; (4) oral antifungals | 1. Nasal endoscopy score 2. Symptom scoring | Postoperative treatment with oral steroids alone improved 90% of the patients, however, disease recurrence was seen after cessation of steroids |
Kuhn and Javer | 2000 | 4 | Case series | Postoperative steroids in adult AFRS patients (0.4 mg/kg/day for 4 days, then 0.3 mg/kg/day for 4 days, then 0.2 mg/kg/day maintenance dose) | Nasal endoscopy score | Endoscopic stage 0 maintained if oral steroid was maintained for an average of 4.5 months |
-
Evidence level: C.
-
Benefits–harm assessment: Balance of harm and benefit in patients with severe disease.
-
Recommendation: Option in patients with severe AFRS (severe symptoms and/or locally invasive disease) in conjunction with ESS.
7. Nasal manifestations of auto-immune disease
Auto-immune disease + study | Year | LOE | Study design | Study groups | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGPA Moosig et al. | 2013 | 3 | A retrospective cohort study at a vasculitis referral centre | 150 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of those, 104 had more than one follow-up visit severe organ manifestations: heart (46%), kidney (18%) and lungs (10%). Cyclophosphamide was used in 107 patients (71%). The prednisolone-doses of all patients were within the targeted range (i.e. ≤ 7.5 mg) in 69% of the total follow-up time; the median dose at end of follow-up was 5 mg/day | 10-year survival rate was 89%, mortality comparable to the general population (SMR 1.29). Patients with cardiac failure had increased mortality (SMR 3.06) |
GPA WGET Research Group | 2005 | 1b | 180-patient multicentre, placebo-controlled RCT examining the efficacy of etanercept in WGCT | Severe disease received cyclophosphamide and corticosteroids; limited disease received methotrexate and corticosteroids etanercept (25 mg twice weekly) or placebo was added to conventional therapy | Addition of etanercept did not lead to more sustained remissions; lower levels of disease activity; reduction in time to remission nor the number or relative risk of flares; nor fewer severe or life-threatening adverse events or deaths |
Relapsing polychondritis McAdam et al. | 1976 | 3 | Review | 159 reported cases, 23 those of the authors | Three-fourths of our patients required chronic corticosteroid therapy with an average dose of 25 mg per day of prednisone. Corticosteroids decrease the frequency, duration, and severity of flares, but do not stop disease progression in severe cases. Mortality rate 30 percent in our series and 22 percent in the other 136 reported cases |
EGPA Ribi et al. | 2008 | 2 | RCT | 72 patients with newly diagnosed EGPA (FFS of 0) treated with CS alone. At treatment failure or relapse, patients were randomized to receive 6 months of oral AZA or 6 pulses of CYC | 93% achieved remission with CS alone, 35% relapsed, mainly during the first year of treatment. Among the 19 patients randomized to additional immunosuppression, 5 of 10 receiving AZA and 7 of 9 receiving pulse CYC achieved remission, P = NS Survival rates in all patients at 1 and 5 years were 100% and 97%, respectively. At the end of followup, 79% of the patients whose disease was in remission required low-dose CS therapy, mainly to control respiratory disease. CS-related adverse events were observed in 31% of the 72 patients |
GPA Hoffman et al. | 1992 | 3 | An open-label pilot study of weekly low-dose methotrexate (MTX) plus glucocorticoids (GC) for treatment of patients with WG | Weekly administration of MTX (at a mean stable dosage of 20 mg) and GC in 29 WG patients | Marked improvement in 76%. Remission achieved in 69%. 7% improved but had intermittent smoldering disease that precluded total withdrawal of GC, and 17% had progressive disease within 2–6 months of starting the study treatment. Two patients who initially achieved remission later relapsed after GC discontinued. Of those who remain in remission (mean followup time 14.5 months), 72% have not required GC for a mean period of 10 months |
Sarcoidosis Aubart et al. | 2006 | 3 | Retrospective single-center study | Twenty patients with histologically proven SNS (men/women, 7/13; mean age, 32 ± 9 year) were compared with control patients with sarcoid but without sinonasal (SN) involvement. Each patient was matched with 2 controls for the date of admittance in our institution | SNS had significantly more frequent and severe involvement of vital organs than controls, had a longer history of sarcoidosis, and required systemic treatment more frequently (100% vs. 57.7%, P < 0.001) and for a longer time (78 ± 42 months vs. 29 ± 18 months, P < 0.0001). Corticosteroids maintenance dosage was high (10.5 ± 6 mg daily) and mainly depended on SN involvement |
GPA Guillevin et al. | 1997 | 2 | Prospective multi-centre RCT | 50 newly diagnosed WG patients every patient received a daily injection of methylprednisolone for 3 days, followed by daily oral prednisone (1 mg/kg/day) and a 0.7-g/m2 pulse of CYC. Patients were then randomly assigned to prednisone plus intravenous pulse CYC (group A), n = 27 or prednisone plus oral CYC (group B) n = 23 as first-line treatment | Pulse CYC was as effective as oral CYC in achieving initial remission of WG with fewer side effects and lower mortality. However, in the long term, treatment with pulse CYC does not maintain remission or prevent relapses as well as oral CYC |
-
Evidence level: D.
-
Benefits–harm assessment: Depending on other organ involvement and severity.
-
Recommendation: Following the recommendation for the management of the specific auto-immune disease.
8. Sino-nasal pathology and concomitant asthma
Study | LOE (1a to 5) | Study design | Study groups | Clinical endpoints efficacy | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ikeda et al. [99] | 3 | Prospective RCT | Adult CRSwNP and CRSsNP patients undergoing ESS | 1. Sinonasal and pulmonary symptoms 2. Systemic GCS need | 1. Improvement of FEV1 2. No significant changes in systemic GCS need |
-
Evidence level: D.
-
Benefits–harm assessment: AE’s of systemic GCS outweigh advantages of therapeutic value in the long-term, except in patients with severe symptomatology.
-
Recommendation: Recommendation against. Option in patients with severe symptoms and therapy-resistance.
Adverse effects of systemic GCS
1. Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal-axis (HPA) inhibition
2. Hyperglycemia and diabetes
3. Osteoporosis
4. Avascular necrosis
5. Gastrointestinal disturbances and peptic ulceration
6. Ocular adverse effects
7. Infections
8. Local adverse effects of steroid-injections
9. Cardiovascular adverse effects
10. Neuropsychiatric effects
11. Cushingoid features
Benefit and risk of use of GCS in pediatric populations
1. Efficacy of systemic GCS in pediatric CRS and ARS
Study | Year | LOE (1a to 5) | Study design | Study groups | Clinical end-point efficacy | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ozturk et al. | 2011 | 1b | RCT | 1. Children with CRSsNP (6–17 years) receiving antibiotics and methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg and reduced progressively over a 15-day treatment course 2. Children with CRSsNP receiving antibiotics and placebo | 1. Change in mean symptom and CT scores pre- and post-treatment 2. Change in individual symptom scores, relapse rate | Beneficial effect of MP in combination with antibiotics on mean symptoms, CT scores, VAS for cough, nasal obstruction and post-nasal drainage. No difference in relapse rate |
Scorpinski et al. | 2008 | 3b | Retro-spective uncontrolled | 1741 children with CRS treated with antibiotics, intranasal topical corticosteroids and oral corticosteroids (> 4 days) or combination | CT scores | Improvement of CT scores after oral corticosteroid treatment, in mono- or pluritherapy |
Tosca et al. | 2003 | 4 | Uncontrolled prospective cohort study | 30 asthmatic CRS children treated with antibiotics, intranasal steroids and a short course of deflazacort (1 mg/kg daily for 2 days, 0.5 mg/kg daily for 4 days and 0.25 mg/kg daily for 4 days) | Nasal endoscopy and cytokine patterns in nasal lavages | Resolving of purulent discharge after combination treatment and decrease of mean IL4-levels in nasal lavage |
2. Harm of GCS in children
-
Evidence level: B.
-
Benefits–harm assessment: AE’s of systemic GCS outweigh advantages of therapeutic value in mild and moderate disease.
-
Recommendation: Strong recommendation against. Option in patients suffering from very severe and therapy-resistant disease, in combination with antibiotics.