Discussion
The current study provides an in-depth characterization of the human MOG Ab response in a large cohort of paediatric and adult demyelinating disorders. The typical human MOG Ab is of low affinity and targets an extracellular epitope at Proline42. Ab binding requires native MOG conformation for many patients. High titers of MOG Ab are associated with more severe phenotypes of adult ON as defined by bilaterality of symptoms, and MOG Ab titers fluctuate over the progression of disease, with higher levels during active disease. The human MOG Ab response is highly confined to Proline42 with stable immunoreactivity over time and across peripheral and intrathecal compartments. Relapsing disorders present with a more diverse Ab repertoire, a feature that could be harnessed for patient management. MOG Ab are highly sensitive to conformational changes of MOG, which affect the detection of a substantial number of relapsing phenotypes, largely considered as more severe.
MOG Ab-associated disorders have a slight female predominance and appear between 1 and 80 years of age with seropositivity rates highest among children and young- and middle-aged adults. The clinical distribution in our cohort was similar to previous reports [
6,
10,
19,
24‐
26,
47] with predominant presentation of ADEM among children, and ON across all ages. Consistent with previous studies [
20,
26], most children presented with a monophasic disease course, whereas most adult patients exhibited a relapsing course. We found monophasic and relapsing ADEM and ADEM/ON to be more common in children [
73], whereas monophasic and relapsing ON and ON/TM were dominant in adults. Clinical ADEM was rarely observed in adults. These differences in disease course and phenotype suggest a dichotomy in paediatric and adult MOG Ab-associated disorders, although we did not observe any significant difference in MOG Ab characteristics between these two groups. A recent study observed higher MOG Ab titers associated with increased visual and motor disability but did not correlate this data to a specific clinical phenotype [
9]. By stratifying unilateral and bilateral ON patients, we showed that patients with the more severe phenotype of bilateral ON had higher MOG Ab titers and a greater binding to conformationally altered MOG, regardless of monophasic or relapsing disease course and disease duration. An association between high titers and ADEM in children [
20,
23,
42] was not observed, possibly due to the preponderance of ON patients with high titers among our paediatric cohort. Furthermore, we showed elevated MOG Ab titers during active disease compared to disease remission, as previously reported [
8,
20,
25]. Observations of high titers in more severe phenotypes and active disease directly support the pathogenic potential of MOG Ab in human demyelination.
Failure of the autoantibody to bind to its fixed antigen was influenced by lower native-MOG concentration and by a high sensitivity to conformational change. MOG Ab positivity from the fixed assays had high specificity, with no false-positivity, unlike a recent report in a larger control cohort [
70]. However, the fixed flow and commercial assays had lower detection sensitivity and higher intra-assay variability compared to the live flow assay, with loss of seropositivity observed among monophasic but more so in relapsing patients. Furthermore, the patients undetected by fixed assays, presented clinical and radiological features typical of previously reported MOG Ab-associated disorders [
5,
13,
20,
26,
27,
43,
47,
53], with many responding well to immunotherapy and relapsing upon steroid cessation. We therefore conclude that these patients were not false-positive patients in the live flow assay but were highly typical for MOG Ab-associated disorders. Formaldehyde has been known to alter protein structure and affect antibody recognition [
37,
59,
61], but this caveat remains frequently overlooked in the context of the commercialisation of autoantibody detection, mostly due to pragmatic considerations including ease of performance. The crux in advancing our understanding of this disease entity relies entirely on accurate detection of seropositive MOG Ab patients. Given its clinical utility and the apparent higher incidence and prevalence of MOG Ab-associated demyelination compared to aquaporin-4 (AQP4) Ab-associated neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), requests for MOG Ab screening has dramatically risen. As the need for clinical distinction from other demyelinating disorders such as multiple sclerosis or NMOSD is essential due to therapeutic and prognostic implications [
11,
45], the failure to detect these patients accurately is of significant concern.
Our data raises the question as to why human MOG Ab binding is so sensitive to antigen conformation. As the MOG extracellular domain contains five lysine residues, which are major reactive sites of cross-linking modifications [
61,
63,
66], formaldehyde fixation is likely to distort individual β-strands to disrupt the antigen-antibody interaction of MOG Ab. In principle, fixation rigidifies protein structure, which will restrict protein flexibility to form appropriate epitope contact residues and also limit antigen reconfiguration which occurs to strengthen antibody-antigen contact [
76]. Therefore, as the human MOG Ab response is highly dependent on an immunodominant region at Proline42, conformational change
s to MOG will significantly affect MOG Ab binding. The Ab affinity, concentration, or recognized epitope did not define whether a patient was insensitive or sensitive to conformational changes to MOG. Upon formaldehyde fixation, the co-occurrence of buried epitope recognition sites, and exposure of natively-hidden or intracellular neoepitopes due to permeabilization, may play a role. Although the extent of antigen masking by fixation varies between proteins [
54,
63], the caveats of formaldehyde fixation should still be carefully addressed in the context of other human autoantibodies in future diagnostic and functional assays. It is recommended that detection methods retain live and conformationally-correct MOG to maximise assay sensitivity and to ensure accurate detection of MOG Ab. Whether these conformation-insensitive MOG Abs have greater pathogenic potential than those sensitive to structural changes could be addressed in future.
Most children in our cohort recognized a conformational epitope at Proline42 within the extracellular CC’ loop, concurrent with a previous report [
34]. In rodents, Proline42 is replaced by Serine42. A study on five MOG Ab seropositive adult patients with multiple sclerosis demonstrated the recognition of varying epitopes between all patients [
57]. In this study, which is the largest to date, the majority of adult MOG Ab exhibited an immunoreactivity to Proline42, similar to children. Previous studies have observed that 49–60% of human MOG Ab sera were reactive to rodent brain tissue using immunohistochemistry, however, these studies demonstrated a broad reactivity against rodent brain antigens, and not specifically to rodent MOG [
40,
55]. Our data in a mutant-expressing cell-based assay show a small percentage were able to bind P42S in which human Proline42 was replaced by rodent Serine42. Mayer et al. (2013) reported limited paediatric MOG Ab reactivity to mouse MOG-expressing cells which is concordant with our findings, as antibodies targeting Proline42 epitope represented a major antibody species among the total human MOG Ab response. Relapsing adults with ON were less reactive to Proline42 and more likely to recognise other epitopes than monophasic patients, suggesting a more diverse repertoire of the MOG Ab response. Instead, adults with relapsing ON were highly reactive to the generated rodent neo-epitope, Serine42, in the P42S mutant MOG. As relapses have been associated with increased disability over time [
18,
47], early biomarkers of relapses are clinically useful and could alleviate the key challenge of predicting disease severity at onset. Among patients with an epitope outside Proline42, 75% had a relapsing course. Therefore, as P42S immunoreactivity remains stable over time, high binding to the P42S MOG mutant could be utilised to predict a relapsing course in adults at any stage of their disease. Interestingly, at an individual level, the proportion of Proline42 MOG Ab were slightly elevated during active disease compared to remission, which suggest Proline42 MOG Ab may contribute to disease pathology. Indeed, assessment of MOG Ab pathogenicity in rodent models will be important to understand disease pathogenesis. EAE, the classical rodent model for multiple sclerosis, could better reflect the neuropathology of human MOG Ab-associated disorders [
32], however consideration of the major human epitope of MOG Ab should be prioritised in future in vivo studies.
The concept of epitope spreading has been reported in multiple sclerosis [
44,
65], AQP4 Ab in NMO [
64], but not in MuSK Ab-associated myasthenia gravis [
21], nor in 11 paediatric MOG Ab responses [
34]. At a cohort level, the proportion of Proline42 MOG Ab did not differ between adults and children. Furthermore, despite fluctuation of MOG Ab titers over time and baseline Proline42 Ab titers, the proportion of response toward Proline42 remained unchanged, even after 9 years, strengthening the assertion of stable epitope immunoreactivity of MOG Ab across child- and adult-hood. Additionally, the antibody specificity did not vary between peripheral blood and CSF which could be due to antibody diffusion after blood brain barrier impairment [
38], which is also supported by the lack of an intrathecal synthesis of MOG Ab in our patients. Although the current study is limited to one epitope, Proline42 reactivity involved a large proportion of the MOG Ab response and remained unchanged, indicating little evidence of intramolecular spreading throughout a patient’s disease course, which is promising for epitope directed therapy.
The use of ELISAs to diagnose MOG Ab seropositive patients has been extensively discussed [
15,
52,
71]. Although our results suggest that ELISAs are not useful to diagnose MOG Ab seropositivity compared to a live cell-based assay, however, once an intact extracellular MOG domain is utilized, quantification of antibody binding by ELISA remains appropriate, for example, to identify MOG Ab that are highly reactive to MOG. Likewise, in myasthenia gravis, ELISAs have been shown to detect high affinity Ab to the acetylcholine receptor [
33,
76]. Indeed, conformational MOG epitopes remain available for binding in solid-phase assays such as ELISAs [
36], and a recent study reported ELISA-positive patient MOG Ab targeting the extracellular MOG domain and binding to the same extent to the high affinity monoclonal 818C5 Ab [
58]. We observed intact β-sheets of the MOG extracellular domain and detected presence of high affinity MOG Ab in a small population of MOG Ab-seropositive patients, a low incidence parallel to Spadaro et al. (2018). Furthermore, presence of high affinity MOG Ab did not determine whether a patient could bind fixed MOG or their MOG Ab titer, suggesting these antibodies comprise a small proportion of the total MOG Ab response. Although, both high [
16] and low [
33] affinity autoantibodies have been shown to induce pathogenicity, interestingly, in the case of MOG Ab, only high affinity human Ab, purified with a construct similar to ours, have been pathogenic in animal models so far [
58]. Although we used the immunoreactivity to the immobilized MOG extracellular Ig-like domain to determine Ab affinity, direct evidence of affinity in human serum cannot be assessed due to unknown titers of peripheral MOG-specific antibody and probable polyclonality. As individual effects of high and low affinity antibodies cannot be distinguished in polyclonal serum, studies using patient-derived recombinant monoclonal MOG Ab are necessary to discriminate the pathogenic potential of high and low affinity MOG Ab. A relatively small percentage of patients had high affinity MOG Ab that persisted over time, even after 1.6 and 4.9 years in children and adults, respectively. Two patients with high affinity serum MOG Ab presented with intrathecal MOG Ab. These Ab may originate from peripheral antibody-secreting cells after post-germinal centre affinity maturation which then transit into the CNS as seen in AQP4 Ab-associated NMOSD and MuSK Ab-associated myasthenia gravis [
2,
29,
60]. On the other hand, lower affinity MOG Ab were observed in many patients, and these patients could not develop high affinity MOG Ab. Parallel to findings in an autoimmune lupus murine model [
22], our results may suggest that limited changes to antibody affinity occur across MOG-specific B cell clones despite some hallmarks of affinity maturation, such as isotype-switching to IgG.
Limitations of the present study include the potential referral bias of the cohort as relapsing patients may be more likely to be referred for testing, and the unconfirmed disease onset among some patients of our longitudinal cohort in whom baseline samples may therefore not reflect the first acute episode of disease onset. We also observed fluctuating MOG Ab titers over time, but were unable to determine whether these changes were influenced by immunotherapy, which has been observed in previous reports [
12,
25]. Furthermore, a single epitope was studied in this cohort. However, the MOG Ab response was largely dominated by Proline42 reactivity, and responses against additional epitopes comprise a smaller proportion of patients as reported in children [
34]. Prospective data to assess the predictive value of antibody titre and epitope may be needed in the future.
The current study demonstrates the binding sensitivity of the human MOG Ab response, which sheds critical light on the importance of antigen conformation and highlights the caveats in the routine detection of human autoantibody. The characterisation of the human MOG Ab by affinity and epitope immunoreactivity provides a foundation for future pathogenic studies in animal models, B cells studies in human, and new avenues to improve patient diagnoses and management.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia), Multiple Sclerosis Research Australia, and the Sydney Research Excellence Initiative 2020 (The University of Sydney, Australia).
We thank all the patients and family members who participated in this study. We thank Dr. Maggie Wang and Dr. Suat Dervish for our use of the Flow Cytometry Core Facility of the Westmead Research Hub (Australia) supported by the Cancer Institute New South Wales, the National Health and Medical Research Council, and the Ian Potter Foundation. We thank David Campbell and Sue Culican at the ICPMR, Westmead Hospital, for their contribution to the fixed biochip assay, and Ms. Liz Barnes for her assistance with statistical analyses. We thank Dr. Yves Dieffenbach for her expertise in the purification of native-MOG1-117.
Complete list of authors in the Australasian and New Zealand MOG Study Group.
Adriane Sinclair, Neurosciences Unit, Queensland Children’s Hospital/University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Allan G. Kermode, Perron Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Andrew Kornberg, Department of Neurology, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Annie Bye, Department of Neurology, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Benjamin McGettigan, Department of Immunology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Benjamin Trewin, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Bruce Brew, Department of Neurology, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Bruce Taylor, Department of Neurology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia.
Chris Bundell, Department of Immunology, PathWest, Perth, Australia.
Christina Miteff, Department of Neurology, John Hunter Children’s Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.
Christopher Troedson, TY Nelson Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
Clair Pridmore, Women and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Claire Spooner, Paediatric Neuroservices, Starship Children’s Health, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.
Con Yiannikas, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Cullen O’Gorman, Princess Alexandra Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Damian Clark, Women and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Dan Suan, Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney and Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
Dean Jones, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania and Department of Neurology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia.
Dean Kilfoyle, Department of Neurology, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Deepak Gill, TY Nelson Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
Denis Wakefield, Department of Immunology, St George Hospital and the University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia.
Dirk Hofmann, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Emily Mathey, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Gina O’Grady, Paediatric Neuroservices, Starship Children’s Health, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.
Hannah F. Jones, TY Nelson Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
Heidi Beadnall, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Helmut Butzkueven, Department of Neurosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Himanshu Joshi, Kids Neuroscience Centre, Kids Research at the Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
Ian Andrews, Department of Neurology, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Ian Sutton, Department of Neurology, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Jennifer MacIntyre, Department of Neurology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia.
Jennifer M. Sandbach, Department of Ophthalmology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Jeremy Freeman, Department of Neurology, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
John King, Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
John H. O’Neill, Department of Neurology, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
John Parratt, Department of Neurology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Joshua Barton, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Justin Garber, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Kate Ahmad, Department of Neurology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Kate Riney, Neurosciences Unit, Queensland Children’s Hospital/University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Katherine Buzzard, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Kavitha Kothur, TY Nelson Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
Laurence C. Cantrill, Kids Research at the Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
Manoj. P. Menezes, TY Nelson Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Children’s Hospital at Westmead, and Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Mark A. Paine, Department of Neurology, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Mark Marriot, Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia.
Mahtab Ghadiri, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Michael Boggild, Department of Neurology, Townsville Hospital, North Queensland.
Mitchell Lawlor, Save Sight Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Monica Badve, Department of Neurology, St George Hopsital, Sydney, Australia.
Monique Ryan, Department of Neurology, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Muhammed Aaqib, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Neil Shuey, Neuro-ophthalmology clinic, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital and Department of Clinical Neurosciences, St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Nerissa Jordan, Department of Neurology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Nicholas Urriola, Department of Neurology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Nicholas Lawn, Department of Neurology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Owen White, Department of Neurosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Pamela McCombe, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Rakesh Patel, Paediatric Neuroservices, Starship Children’s Health, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.
Richard Leventer, Department of Neurology, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Richard Webster, TY Nelson Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
Robert Smith, Department of Neurology, John Hunter Children’s Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.
Sachin Gupta, TY Nelson Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
Shekeeb S. Mohammad, TY Nelson Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
Sekhar Pillai, Department of Neurology, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Simon Hawke, Simon Hawke, Central West Neurology and Neurosurgery, Orange, and the Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sumu Simon, Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Sophie Calvert, Department of Neurosciences, Queensland Children’s Hospital, South Brisbane, Australia
Stefan Blum, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Stephen Malone, Department of Neurosciences, Queensland Children’s Hospital, South Brisbane, Australia
Suzanne Hodgkinson, Department of Neurology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Tina K. Nguyen, Garvan Institute of Medical Research and St Vincent’s Clinical School, the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Todd A. Hardy, Department of Neurology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, University of Sydney, Australia.
Tomas Kalincik, CORe, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, and Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Tyson Ware, Department of Pediatrics, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia.
Victor S. C. Fung, Department of Neurology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
William Huynh, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney and Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.