Skip to main content
Erschienen in: CNS Drugs 1/2007

01.01.2007 | Original Research Article

Use of the Sustained Pain-Free Plus No Adverse Events Endpoint in Clinical Trials of Triptans in Acute Migraine

verfasst von: Dr David W. Dodick, Giorgio Sandrini, Paul Williams

Erschienen in: CNS Drugs | Ausgabe 1/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective: To assess the relationship between the sustained pain free (SPF) and adverse event (AE) rates associated with six oral serotonin 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists (triptans) used for the treatment of acute migraine, employing data from a previous meta-analysis (that included almotriptan, eletriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan and zolmitriptan, but not frovatriptan) in order to provide a rationale for the use of the rate of patients who are SPF plus no AE (SNAE) as an endpoint in trials of medications for acute migraine.
Background: The attributes of drug treatment for acute migraine that are most important to people who experience them are complete pain relief, lack of recurrence, rapid onset and lack of AEs. The endpoints used to assess therapy for acute migraine do not always address these elements.
Methods: The relationship between SPF and AE rates was explored using nonparametric regression techniques, and the box-plot method was used to identify outliers. The estimated SNAE rate for each triptan was calculated with and without assuming independence between efficacy and tolerability.
Results: At the level of the individual agent, there was a significant relationship between the efficacy and tolerability of each triptan, with the exception of almotriptan 12.5mg, which had an AE rate approximately 30% lower than would be expected, and eletriptan 20mg, which had an AE rate approximately 20% higher than would be expected, on the basis of their efficacy. Almotriptan 12.5mg and eletriptan 20mg had the highest and lowest base-case values for SNAE, respectively, and both qualified statistically as outliers to the distribution of SNAE values obtained with the other triptans. The probability that each triptan was superior to the reference agent (sumatriptan 100mg) in terms of SNAE was calculated across all possible values (at the level of the individual patient) for the relationship between efficacy and tolerability. Again, almotriptan 12.5mg and eletriptan 20mg had the highest and lowest values for their SNAE rates, respectively, and almotriptan 12.5mg qualified statistically as an outlier from the distribution of the probabilities obtained for the other triptans.
Conclusion: This analysis determined that higher SPF rates were strongly associated with higher AE rates, with the notable exception of almotriptan 12.5mg, which had a lower than expected AE rate, resulting in the highest SNAE rate of the included triptans and doses. SNAE is a useful measure that can be used to discriminate between therapies and this endpoint incorporates the attributes that are most relevant to patient satisfaction with treatment. We recommend calculation of the SNAE rate at the level of the individual patient in future clinical trials of medication for the treatment of acute migraine to facilitate selection of a treatment for acute migraine that offers the best chance for effective management.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Von Korff M. The burden of migraine: a review of cost to society. Pharmacoeconomics 1994; 6(3): 215–21CrossRef Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Von Korff M. The burden of migraine: a review of cost to society. Pharmacoeconomics 1994; 6(3): 215–21CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahlöf CG, Solomon GD. The burden of migraine to the individual sufferer: a review. Eur J Neurol 1998; 5(6): 525–33CrossRef Dahlöf CG, Solomon GD. The burden of migraine to the individual sufferer: a review. Eur J Neurol 1998; 5(6): 525–33CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Solomon GD, Skobieranda FG, Genzen JR. Quality of life assessment among migraine patients treated with sumatriptan. Headache 1995; 35: 449–54CrossRef Solomon GD, Skobieranda FG, Genzen JR. Quality of life assessment among migraine patients treated with sumatriptan. Headache 1995; 35: 449–54CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen JA, Beall D, Beck A, et al. Sumatriptan treatment for migraine in a health maintenance organization: economic, humanistic, and clinical outcomes. Clin Ther 1999; 21(1): 190–204CrossRef Cohen JA, Beall D, Beck A, et al. Sumatriptan treatment for migraine in a health maintenance organization: economic, humanistic, and clinical outcomes. Clin Ther 1999; 21(1): 190–204CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lofland JH, Johnson NE, Batenhorst AS, et al. Changes in resource use and outcomes for patients with migraine treated with sumatriptan: a managed care perspective. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159(8): 857–63CrossRef Lofland JH, Johnson NE, Batenhorst AS, et al. Changes in resource use and outcomes for patients with migraine treated with sumatriptan: a managed care perspective. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159(8): 857–63CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lipton RB, Scher AI, Kolodner K, et al. Migraine in the United States: epidemiology and patterns of health care use. Neurology 2002; 58(6): 885–94CrossRef Lipton RB, Scher AI, Kolodner K, et al. Migraine in the United States: epidemiology and patterns of health care use. Neurology 2002; 58(6): 885–94CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gibbs TS, Fleischer AB, Feldman SR, et al. Health care utilization in patients with migraine: demographics and patterns of care in the ambulatory setting. Headache 2003; 43(4): 330–5CrossRef Gibbs TS, Fleischer AB, Feldman SR, et al. Health care utilization in patients with migraine: demographics and patterns of care in the ambulatory setting. Headache 2003; 43(4): 330–5CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Goadsby PJ. The pharmacology of headache. Prog Neurobiol 2000; 62: 509–25CrossRef Goadsby PJ. The pharmacology of headache. Prog Neurobiol 2000; 62: 509–25CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Goadsby PJ, Lipton RB, Ferrari MD. Migraine: current understanding and treatment. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(4): 257–70CrossRef Goadsby PJ, Lipton RB, Ferrari MD. Migraine: current understanding and treatment. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(4): 257–70CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lipton RB, Stewart WF. Acute migraine therapy: do doctors understand what patients with migraine want from therapy? Headache 1999; 39Suppl. 2: S20–6CrossRef Lipton RB, Stewart WF. Acute migraine therapy: do doctors understand what patients with migraine want from therapy? Headache 1999; 39Suppl. 2: S20–6CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gallagher RM, Kunkel R. Migraine medication attributes important for patient compliance: concerns about side effects may delay treatment. Headache 2003; 43(1): 36–44CrossRef Gallagher RM, Kunkel R. Migraine medication attributes important for patient compliance: concerns about side effects may delay treatment. Headache 2003; 43(1): 36–44CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Burstein R, Collins B, Jakubowski M. Defeating migraine pain with triptans: a race against the development of cutaneous allodynia. Ann Neurol 2004; 55(1): 19–26CrossRef Burstein R, Collins B, Jakubowski M. Defeating migraine pain with triptans: a race against the development of cutaneous allodynia. Ann Neurol 2004; 55(1): 19–26CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Silberstein SD. Migraine symptoms: results of a survey of self-reported migraineurs. Headache 1995; 35(7): 387–96CrossRef Silberstein SD. Migraine symptoms: results of a survey of self-reported migraineurs. Headache 1995; 35(7): 387–96CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Caro G, Caro JJ, O’Brien JA, et al. Migraine therapy: development and testing of a patient preference questionnaire. Headache 1998; 38(8): 602–7CrossRef Caro G, Caro JJ, O’Brien JA, et al. Migraine therapy: development and testing of a patient preference questionnaire. Headache 1998; 38(8): 602–7CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lipton RB, Hamelsky SW, Dayno JM. What do patients with migraine want from acute migraine treatment? Headache 2002; 42Suppl. 1: S3–9CrossRef Lipton RB, Hamelsky SW, Dayno JM. What do patients with migraine want from acute migraine treatment? Headache 2002; 42Suppl. 1: S3–9CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Davies GM, Santanello N, Lipton R. Determinants of patient satisfaction with migraine therapy. Cephalalgia 2000; 20(6): 554–60CrossRef Davies GM, Santanello N, Lipton R. Determinants of patient satisfaction with migraine therapy. Cephalalgia 2000; 20(6): 554–60CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Santanello NC, Davies G, Allen C, et al. Determinants of migraine-specific quality of life. Cephalalgia 2002; 22(8): 680–5CrossRef Santanello NC, Davies G, Allen C, et al. Determinants of migraine-specific quality of life. Cephalalgia 2002; 22(8): 680–5CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Loder E, Brandes JL, Silberstein S, et al. Preference comparison of rizatriptan odt 10-mg and sumatriptan 50-mg tablet in migraine. Headache 2001; 41(8): 745–53CrossRef Loder E, Brandes JL, Silberstein S, et al. Preference comparison of rizatriptan odt 10-mg and sumatriptan 50-mg tablet in migraine. Headache 2001; 41(8): 745–53CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Pilgrim AJ. Methodology of clinical trials of sumatriptan in migraine and cluster headache. Eur Neurol 1991; 31(5): 295–9CrossRef Pilgrim AJ. Methodology of clinical trials of sumatriptan in migraine and cluster headache. Eur Neurol 1991; 31(5): 295–9CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Tfelt-Hansen P, Block G, Dahlöf C, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: second edition. Cephalalgia 2000; 20(9): 765–86CrossRef Tfelt-Hansen P, Block G, Dahlöf C, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: second edition. Cephalalgia 2000; 20(9): 765–86CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrari MD, Goadsby PJ, Roon Kl, et al. Triptans (serotonin, 5-HT1b/1d agonists) in migraine: detailed results and methods of a meta-analysis of 53 trials. Cephalalgia 2002; 22: 633–58CrossRef Ferrari MD, Goadsby PJ, Roon Kl, et al. Triptans (serotonin, 5-HT1b/1d agonists) in migraine: detailed results and methods of a meta-analysis of 53 trials. Cephalalgia 2002; 22: 633–58CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams P, Reeder CE. Cost-effectiveness of almotriptan and rizatriptan in the treatment of acute migraine. Clin Ther 2003; 25(11): 2903–19CrossRef Williams P, Reeder CE. Cost-effectiveness of almotriptan and rizatriptan in the treatment of acute migraine. Clin Ther 2003; 25(11): 2903–19CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams P, Reeder CE. A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of almotriptan and sumatriptan in the treatment of acute migraine using a composite efficacy/tolerability end point. J Manag Care Pharm 2004; 10(3): 259–65PubMed Williams P, Reeder CE. A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of almotriptan and sumatriptan in the treatment of acute migraine using a composite efficacy/tolerability end point. J Manag Care Pharm 2004; 10(3): 259–65PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandrini G, Dahlof CG, Mathew N, et al. Focus on trial endpoints of clinical relevance and the use of almotriptan for the acute treatment of migraine. Int J Clin Pract 2005; 59(11): 1356–65CrossRef Sandrini G, Dahlof CG, Mathew N, et al. Focus on trial endpoints of clinical relevance and the use of almotriptan for the acute treatment of migraine. Int J Clin Pract 2005; 59(11): 1356–65CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Dodick D, Martin V. Triptans and CNS side-effects: pharmacokinetic and metabolic mechanisms. Cephalalgia 2004; 24(6): 417–24CrossRef Dodick D, Martin V. Triptans and CNS side-effects: pharmacokinetic and metabolic mechanisms. Cephalalgia 2004; 24(6): 417–24CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Pascual J, Munoz P. Correlation between lipophilicity and triptan outcomes. Headache 2005; 45(1): 3–6CrossRef Pascual J, Munoz P. Correlation between lipophilicity and triptan outcomes. Headache 2005; 45(1): 3–6CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Nappi G, Sandrini G, Sances G. Tolerability of the triptans: clinical implications. Drug Saf 2003; 26(2): 93–107CrossRef Nappi G, Sandrini G, Sances G. Tolerability of the triptans: clinical implications. Drug Saf 2003; 26(2): 93–107CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheftell FD, Feleppa M, Tepper SJ, et al. Assessment of adverse events associated with triptans—methods of assessment influence the results. Headache 2004; 44(10): 978–82CrossRef Sheftell FD, Feleppa M, Tepper SJ, et al. Assessment of adverse events associated with triptans—methods of assessment influence the results. Headache 2004; 44(10): 978–82CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Mathew N. A long-term open-label study of oral almotriptan 12.5mg for the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Headache 2002; 42: 32–40PubMed Mathew N. A long-term open-label study of oral almotriptan 12.5mg for the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Headache 2002; 42: 32–40PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Pascual J, Falk R, Docekal R, et al. Tolerability and efficacy of almotriptan in the long-term treatment of migraine. Eur Neurol 2001; 45(4): 206–13CrossRef Pascual J, Falk R, Docekal R, et al. Tolerability and efficacy of almotriptan in the long-term treatment of migraine. Eur Neurol 2001; 45(4): 206–13CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Spierings EL, Gomez-Mancilla B, Grosz DE, et al. Oral almotriptan vs oral sumatriptan in the abortive treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, optimum-dose comparison. Arch Neurol 2001; 58(6): 944–50CrossRef Spierings EL, Gomez-Mancilla B, Grosz DE, et al. Oral almotriptan vs oral sumatriptan in the abortive treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, optimum-dose comparison. Arch Neurol 2001; 58(6): 944–50CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Dodick DW, Sandrini G. Relationship between sustained pain-free and adverse events: a comparison of almotriptan 12.5mg and other oral triptans in acute migraine. Headache 2004; 44: 468–9CrossRef Dodick DW, Sandrini G. Relationship between sustained pain-free and adverse events: a comparison of almotriptan 12.5mg and other oral triptans in acute migraine. Headache 2004; 44: 468–9CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Mancini GB, Schulzer M. Reporting risks and benefits of therapy by use of the concepts of unqualified success and unmitigated failure: applications to highly cited trials in cardiovascular medicine. Circulation 1999; 99(3): 377–83CrossRef Mancini GB, Schulzer M. Reporting risks and benefits of therapy by use of the concepts of unqualified success and unmitigated failure: applications to highly cited trials in cardiovascular medicine. Circulation 1999; 99(3): 377–83CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulzer M, Mancini GB. ‘Unqualified success’ and ‘unmitigated failure’: number-needed-to-treat-related concepts for assessing treatment efficacy in the presence of treatment-induced adverse events. Int J Epidemiol 1996; 25(4): 704–12CrossRef Schulzer M, Mancini GB. ‘Unqualified success’ and ‘unmitigated failure’: number-needed-to-treat-related concepts for assessing treatment efficacy in the presence of treatment-induced adverse events. Int J Epidemiol 1996; 25(4): 704–12CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Dowson AJ, Mathew NT, Pascual J. Review of clinical trials using early acute intervention with oral triptans for migraine management. Int J Clin Pract 2006; 60(6): 698–706CrossRef Dowson AJ, Mathew NT, Pascual J. Review of clinical trials using early acute intervention with oral triptans for migraine management. Int J Clin Pract 2006; 60(6): 698–706CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Use of the Sustained Pain-Free Plus No Adverse Events Endpoint in Clinical Trials of Triptans in Acute Migraine
verfasst von
Dr David W. Dodick
Giorgio Sandrini
Paul Williams
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2007
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
CNS Drugs / Ausgabe 1/2007
Print ISSN: 1172-7047
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1934
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-200721010-00006

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2007

CNS Drugs 1/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Leading Article

Neurotensin Agonists

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

Demenz Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Antipsychotika gegen psychische und Verhaltenssymptome in Zusammenhang mit Demenzerkrankungen erfordert eine sorgfältige Nutzen-Risiken-Abwägung. Neuen Erkenntnissen zufolge sind auf der Risikoseite weitere schwerwiegende Ereignisse zu berücksichtigen.

Nicht Creutzfeldt Jakob, sondern Abführtee-Vergiftung

29.05.2024 Hyponatriämie Nachrichten

Eine ältere Frau trinkt regelmäßig Sennesblättertee gegen ihre Verstopfung. Der scheint plötzlich gut zu wirken. Auf Durchfall und Erbrechen folgt allerdings eine Hyponatriämie. Nach deren Korrektur kommt es plötzlich zu progredienten Kognitions- und Verhaltensstörungen.

Schutz der Synapsen bei Alzheimer

29.05.2024 Morbus Alzheimer Nachrichten

Mit einem Neurotrophin-Rezeptor-Modulator lässt sich möglicherweise eine bestehende Alzheimerdemenz etwas abschwächen: Erste Phase-2-Daten deuten auf einen verbesserten Synapsenschutz.

Sozialer Aufstieg verringert Demenzgefahr

24.05.2024 Demenz Nachrichten

Ein hohes soziales Niveau ist mit die beste Versicherung gegen eine Demenz. Noch geringer ist das Demenzrisiko für Menschen, die sozial aufsteigen: Sie gewinnen fast zwei demenzfreie Lebensjahre. Umgekehrt steigt die Demenzgefahr beim sozialen Abstieg.

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.