Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2020

03.09.2019

Local recurrence and its risk factors after cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyps

verfasst von: Takaaki Murakami, Naohisa Yoshida, Ritsu Yasuda, Ryohei Hirose, Ken Inoue, Osamu Dohi, Kazuhiro Kamada, Kazuhiko Uchiyama, Hideyuki Konishi, Yuji Naito, Yukiko Morinaga, Mitsuo Kishimoto, Eiichi Konishi, Kiyoshi Ogiso, Yutaka Inada, Yoshito Itoh

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 7/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Local recurrence after cold snare polypectomy (CSP) of colorectal polyps has not been well analyzed. In this study, we analyzed the characteristics of local recurrence.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive lesions resected by CSP from 2014 to 2016 and lesions that were followed up at ≥ 10 months after CSP, were analyzed. Our indication for CSP was a benign tumor of < 15 mm in size. We analyzed local recurrence and its risk factors using multivariate analyses. In addition, we compared lesions of ≥ 10 mm and < 10 mm. Moreover, therapeutic methods for recurrence were analyzed.

Results

Finally, we analyzed 554 cases out of 820 consecutive cases. The mean polyp size was 5.3 ± 2.8 mm and the en bloc resection and histopathological complete resection rates were 99.3% and 70.2%, respectively. The overall recurrence rate was 1.9% (mean follow-up period: 13.0 ± 4.0 months). Significant differences were observed between 11 recurrent lesions and 543 lesions without recurrence regarding polyp size (8.0 ± 3.7 mm vs. 5.2 ± 2.7 mm, p < 0.001), rate of sessile-serrated polyp (27.3% vs. 3.0%, p < 0.001), and histopathological positive margin (45.4% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.019). Multivariate analyses showed that a histopathological positive margin was the only significant risk factor for local recurrence (OR 16.600, 95% CI 3.707–74.331, p < 0.001). Regarding the comparison between 74 lesions of ≥ 10 mm and 480 lesions of < 10 mm, significant differences were observed in the en bloc resection rate (93.2% vs. 100%, p < 0.001), high-grade dysplasia rate (8.1% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.001), and histopathological complete resection rate (54.0% vs. 72.7%, p = 0.001). The recurrence rates of these two groups were 5.4% and 1.4%, respectively (p = 0.069). All recurrent cases could be resected with repeat CSP.

Conclusions

The local recurrence rate after CSP for lesions of < 10 mm was 1.4%. CSP was not recommended for lesions of ≥ 10 mm due to high rates of recurrence and malignancy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration, Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D et al (2015) The global burden of cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol 1:505–527CrossRef Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration, Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D et al (2015) The global burden of cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol 1:505–527CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Joseph DA, King JB, Miller JW et al (2012) Prevalence of colorectal cancer screening among adults—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2010. MMWR 61:51–56 Joseph DA, King JB, Miller JW et al (2012) Prevalence of colorectal cancer screening among adults—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2010. MMWR 61:51–56
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329:1977–1981CrossRef Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329:1977–1981CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ et al (1993) Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 328:901–906CrossRef Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ et al (1993) Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 328:901–906CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH et al (2006) Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 56:143–159; quiz 184–185 CrossRef Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH et al (2006) Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 56:143–159; quiz 184–185 CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ et al (2012) Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 366:687–696CrossRef Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ et al (2012) Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 366:687–696CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Uraoka T, Oka S, Ichihara S et al (2018) Endoscopic management of colorectal tumors less than 10 mm in size: current status and future perspectives in Japan from a questionnaire survey. Dig Endosc 30(Suppl 1):36–40CrossRef Uraoka T, Oka S, Ichihara S et al (2018) Endoscopic management of colorectal tumors less than 10 mm in size: current status and future perspectives in Japan from a questionnaire survey. Dig Endosc 30(Suppl 1):36–40CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M et al (2014) Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 79:417–423CrossRef Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M et al (2014) Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 79:417–423CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirose R, Yoshida N, Murakami T et al (2017) Histological analysis of cold snare polypectomy and its indication for colorectal polyps 10-14 mm in diameter. Dig Endosc 29:594–601CrossRef Hirose R, Yoshida N, Murakami T et al (2017) Histological analysis of cold snare polypectomy and its indication for colorectal polyps 10-14 mm in diameter. Dig Endosc 29:594–601CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawamura T, Takeuchi Y, Asai S et al (2018) A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study). Gut 67:1950–1957CrossRef Kawamura T, Takeuchi Y, Asai S et al (2018) A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study). Gut 67:1950–1957CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Repici A, Hassan C, Vitetta E et al (2012) Safety of cold polypectomy for < 10 mm polyps at colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 44:27–31CrossRef Repici A, Hassan C, Vitetta E et al (2012) Safety of cold polypectomy for < 10 mm polyps at colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 44:27–31CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka S, Hayashi N, Oka S et al (2013) Endoscopic assessment of colorectal cancer with superficial or deep submucosal invasion using magnifying colonoscopy. Clin Endosc 46:138–146CrossRef Tanaka S, Hayashi N, Oka S et al (2013) Endoscopic assessment of colorectal cancer with superficial or deep submucosal invasion using magnifying colonoscopy. Clin Endosc 46:138–146CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE et al (2016) Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Dig Endosc 28:526–533CrossRef Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE et al (2016) Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Dig Endosc 28:526–533CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wada Y, Kashida H, Kudo SE et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of pit pattern and vascular pattern analyses in colorectal lesions. Dig Endosc 22:192–199CrossRef Wada Y, Kashida H, Kudo SE et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of pit pattern and vascular pattern analyses in colorectal lesions. Dig Endosc 22:192–199CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshida N, Yagi N, Inada Y et al (2014) Ability of a novel blue laser imaging system for the diagnosis of colorectal polyps. Dig Endosc 26:250–258CrossRef Yoshida N, Yagi N, Inada Y et al (2014) Ability of a novel blue laser imaging system for the diagnosis of colorectal polyps. Dig Endosc 26:250–258CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Moss A, Nalankilli K (2017) Standardisation of polypectomy technique. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 31:447–453CrossRef Moss A, Nalankilli K (2017) Standardisation of polypectomy technique. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 31:447–453CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhan T, Hielscher T, Hahn F et al (2016) Risk factors for local recurrence of large, flat colorectal polyps after endoscopic mucosal resection. Digestion 93:311–317CrossRef Zhan T, Hielscher T, Hahn F et al (2016) Risk factors for local recurrence of large, flat colorectal polyps after endoscopic mucosal resection. Digestion 93:311–317CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Participants in the Paris Workshop (2013) The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon-November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 58(Suppl):S3–S43 Participants in the Paris Workshop (2013) The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon-November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 58(Suppl):S3–S43
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamashina T, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N et al (2015) Diagnostic features of sessile serrated adenoma/polyps on magnifying narrow band imaging: a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 30:117–123CrossRef Yamashina T, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N et al (2015) Diagnostic features of sessile serrated adenoma/polyps on magnifying narrow band imaging: a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 30:117–123CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshida N, Naito Y, Murakami T et al (2016) Safety and efficacy of a same-day low-volume 1 L PEG bowel preparation in colonoscopy for the elderly people and people with renal dysfunction. Dig Dis Sci 61:3229–3235CrossRef Yoshida N, Naito Y, Murakami T et al (2016) Safety and efficacy of a same-day low-volume 1 L PEG bowel preparation in colonoscopy for the elderly people and people with renal dysfunction. Dig Dis Sci 61:3229–3235CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2009) Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma, 8th edn. Kanehara, Tokyo Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2009) Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma, 8th edn. Kanehara, Tokyo
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee HS, Park HW, Lee JS et al (2017) Treatment outcomes and recurrence following standard cold forceps polypectomy for diminutive polyps. Surg Endosc 31:159–169CrossRef Lee HS, Park HW, Lee JS et al (2017) Treatment outcomes and recurrence following standard cold forceps polypectomy for diminutive polyps. Surg Endosc 31:159–169CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ichise Y, Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y et al (2011) Prospective randomized comparison of cold snare polypectomy and conventional polypectomy for small colorectal polyps. Digestion 84:78–81CrossRef Ichise Y, Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y et al (2011) Prospective randomized comparison of cold snare polypectomy and conventional polypectomy for small colorectal polyps. Digestion 84:78–81CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Din S, Ball AJ, Riley SA et al (2015) A randomized comparison of cold snare polypectomy versus a suction pseudopolyp technique. Endoscopy 47:1005–1010CrossRef Din S, Ball AJ, Riley SA et al (2015) A randomized comparison of cold snare polypectomy versus a suction pseudopolyp technique. Endoscopy 47:1005–1010CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee CK, Shim JJ, Jang JY (2013) Cold snare polypectomy vs. cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol 108:1593–1600CrossRef Lee CK, Shim JJ, Jang JY (2013) Cold snare polypectomy vs. cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol 108:1593–1600CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Horiuchi A, Hosoi K, Kajiyama M et al (2015) Prospective, randomized comparison of 2 methods of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 82:686–692CrossRef Horiuchi A, Hosoi K, Kajiyama M et al (2015) Prospective, randomized comparison of 2 methods of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 82:686–692CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Oka S, Tanaka S, Kanao H et al (2010) Current status in the occurrence of postoperative bleeding, perforation and residual/local recurrence during colonoscopic treatment in Japan. Dig Endosc 22:376–380CrossRef Oka S, Tanaka S, Kanao H et al (2010) Current status in the occurrence of postoperative bleeding, perforation and residual/local recurrence during colonoscopic treatment in Japan. Dig Endosc 22:376–380CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuura N, Takeuchi Y, Yamashina T et al (2017) Incomplete resection rate of cold snare polypectomy: a prospective single-arm observational study. Endoscopy 49:251–257CrossRef Matsuura N, Takeuchi Y, Yamashina T et al (2017) Incomplete resection rate of cold snare polypectomy: a prospective single-arm observational study. Endoscopy 49:251–257CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Burgess NG, Pellise M, Nanda KS et al (2016) Clinical and endoscopic predictors of cytological dysplasia or cancer in a prospective multicentre study of large sessile serrated adenomas/polyps. Gut 65:437–446CrossRef Burgess NG, Pellise M, Nanda KS et al (2016) Clinical and endoscopic predictors of cytological dysplasia or cancer in a prospective multicentre study of large sessile serrated adenomas/polyps. Gut 65:437–446CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Local recurrence and its risk factors after cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyps
verfasst von
Takaaki Murakami
Naohisa Yoshida
Ritsu Yasuda
Ryohei Hirose
Ken Inoue
Osamu Dohi
Kazuhiro Kamada
Kazuhiko Uchiyama
Hideyuki Konishi
Yuji Naito
Yukiko Morinaga
Mitsuo Kishimoto
Eiichi Konishi
Kiyoshi Ogiso
Yutaka Inada
Yoshito Itoh
Publikationsdatum
03.09.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07072-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.